Toward Improved Correlations for Mixed Convection in the Downcomer of Molten Salt Reactors

References

• G. LOCATELLI, M. MANCINI, and N. TODESCHINI, “Generation IV Nuclear Reactors: Current Status and Future Prospects,” Energy Policy, 61, 1503 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. MOIR and E. TELLER, “Thorium-Fueled Underground Power Plant Based on Molten Salt Technology,” Nucl. Technol., 151, 3, 334 (2005); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT05-A3655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. N. C. Z. BAHRIA et al., “Characteristic of Molten Fluoride Salt System LiF-BeF2 (FLiBe) and LiF-NaF-KF (Flinak) as Coolant and Fuel Carrier in Molten Salt Reactor (MSR),” AIP Conf. Proc., 1799, 040008 (2017).
   Google Scholar
• P. N. HAUBENREICH and J. R. ENGEL, “Experience with the Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment,” Nucl. Appl. Technol., 8, 2, 118 (1970); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT8-2-118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. SHAVER et al., “Initial Industry Collaborations of the Center of Excellence,” ANL/NSE-19/15, Argonne National Laboratory (2019).
   Google Scholar
• M. A. COTTON and J. D. JACKSON, “Vertical Tube Air Flows in the Turbulent Mixed Convection Regime Calculated Using a Low-Reynolds-Number k-ϵ Model,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 33, 2, 273 (1990); https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(90)90098-F.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. D. JACKSON, M. A. COTTON, and B. P. AXCELL, “Studies of Mixed Convection in Vertical Tubes,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 10, 1, 2 (Mar. 1989); https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-727X(89)90049-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. GNIELINSKI, “Ein neues Berechnungsverfahren fur die Wfirme bertragung im ubergangsbereich zwischen laminarer und turbulenter Rohrstromung,” Eng. Res., 61, 240 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• T. AICHER and H. MARTIN, “New Correlations for Mixed Turbulent Natural and Forced Convection Heat Transfer in Vertical Tubes,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 40, 15, 3617 (1997); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(97)00026-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. K. MACGREGOR and A. F. EMERY, “Free Convection Through Vertical Plane Layers—Moderate and High Prandtl Number Fluids,” J. Heat Transfer, 91, 3, 391 (Aug. 1969); https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3580194.
   Google Scholar
• M. E. NEWELL and F. W. SCHMIDT, “Heat Transfer by Laminar Natural Convection within Rectangular Enclosures,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 92, 159 (1970); https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3449616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. M. BERKOVSKY and V. K. POLEVIKOV, “Numerical Study of Problems on High Intensive Free Convection,” Heat Transfer Turbulent Buoyant Convection, Hemisphere, Washington, 2, 443 (1977).
   Google Scholar
• H. KAWAMURA et al., “DNS of Turbulent Heat Transfer in Channel Flow with Low to Medium-High Prandtl Number Fluid,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 19, 482 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-727X(98)10026-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. ALCÁNTARA-ÁVILA and S. HOYAS, “Direct Numerical Simulation of Thermal Channel Flow for Medium–High Prandtl Numbers Up to Reτ=2000,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 176, 121412 (Sep. 2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. FISCHER et al., “NekRS, a GPU-Accelerated Spectral Element Navier Stokes Solver,” Parallel Comput., 114, 102982 (Dec. 2022).
   Google Scholar
• P. FISCHER et al., “Nek5000 User Documentation,” ANL/MCS-TM-351, Argonne National Laboratory (2016).
   Google Scholar
• E. MERZARI, W. D. POINTER, and P. FISCHER, “Numerical Simulation and Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in a Counter-Flow T-Junction,” J. Fluids Eng., 135, 091304 (Sep. 2013); https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. NGUYEN and E. MERZARI, “On the Impact of Aspect Ratio and Other Geometric Effects on the Stability of Rectangular Thermosiphons,” ASME. J. Heat Transfer, 143, 7, 072601 (July 2021); https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. YILDIZ et al., “Direct Numerical Simulation of the Flow Through a Randomly Packed Pebble Bed,” J. Fluids Eng., 142, 4, 041405 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4045439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. KASAGI, “DNS Database of Turbulence and Heat Transfer”; http://thtlab.jp/DNS/dns_database.html.
   Google Scholar
• N. KASAGI, Y. TOMITA, and A. KURODA, “Direct Numerical Simulation of Passive Scalar Field in a Turbulent Channel Flow,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 114, 598 (1992); https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2911323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. KASAGI and O. LIDA, “Progress in Direct Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Heat Transfer,” presented at the 5th ASME/JSME Joint Thermal Engineering Conf., San Diego, California (1999).
   Google Scholar
• J. YOU, J. Y. YOO, and H. CHOI, “Direct Numerical Simulation of Heated Vertical Air Flows in Fully Developed Turbulent Mixed Convection,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 46, 1613 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(02)00442-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. NGUYEN et al., “Direct Numerical Simulation of High Prandtl Number Fluid Flow in the Downcomer of an Advanced Reactor,” presented at the ATH 2022, American Nuclear Society Annual Mtg., Anaheim, California, June 12–16, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• C. TAI et al., “Direct Numerical Simulation of Low and Unitary Prandtl Number Fluids in Downcomer of Advanced Reactor Using Spectral Element Method,” presented at the ATH 2022, American Nuclear Society Annual Mtg., Anaheim, California, June 12–16, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• “IRP-NEAMS-1.1—Challenge Problem 1 Report: Preliminary Calculations—Direct Numerical Simulation of Canonical Flows,” Argonne National Laboratory (2021).
   Google Scholar
• J. P. EASBY, “The Effect of Buoyancy on Flow and Heat Transfer for a Gas Passing Down a Vertical Pipe at Low Turbulent Reynolds Numbers,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 21, 791 (1978); https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(78)90041-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. RUBIO et al., “Scaled Validation Test for High Prandtl Number Fluid Mixed Convection between Parallel Plates,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 399, 112006 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.112006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. B. DZODZO, “Scaling and Connection with Computational Fluid Dynamics,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 401, 112086 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.112086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. T. PATERA, “A Spectral Element Method for Fluid Dynamics: Laminar Flow in a Channel Expansion,” J. Comput. Phys., 54, 3, 468 (1984); https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(84)90128-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. MERZARI et al., “Toward Exascale: Overview of Large Eddy Simulations and Direct Numerical Simulations of Nuclear Reactor Flows with the Spectral Element Method in Nek5000,” Nucl. Technol., 206, 9, 1308 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1748557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. NGUYEN, E. MERZARI, and H. YUAN, “Direct Numerical Simulation of Supercritical CO2 Flow: Development of a Plugin for the REFPROP/PROPATH Properties Database in the Spectral Element Code NekRS,” presented at the American Nuclear Society Annual Winter Mtg. and Technology Expo, Washington, District of Columbia, November 30–December 3, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• A. KRAUS et al., “Large Eddy Simulation of a 5 × 5 Rod Bundle: Impacts of a Central Control Rod Thimble Tube,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 381, 111337 (Sep. 2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. REGER et al., “Pressure Drop Correlation Improvement for the Near-Wall Region of Pebble-Bed Reactors,” Nucl. Technol., 209, 90 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2022.2108688.
   Google Scholar
• C. GEUZAINE and J.-F. REMACLE, “Gmsh: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Mesh Generator with Built-in Pre- and Post-Processing Facilities,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 79, 11, 1309 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. S. KIM, S. HE, and J. D. JACKSON, “Assessment by Comparison with DNS Data of Turbulence,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 51, 1293 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. D. CARR, M. A. CONNOR, and H. O. BUHR, “Velocity, Temperature and Turbulence Measurements in Air for Pipe Flow with Combined Free and Forced Convection,” J. Heat Transfer, 95, 1, 445 (1973); https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3450087.
   Google Scholar
• A. STEINER, “On the Reverse Transition of a Turbulent Flow Under the Action of Buoyancy Forces,” J. Fluid Mech., 41, 503 (1971); https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112071001198.
   Google Scholar
• J. E. BYRNE and E. EJIOGU, “Combined Free and Forced Convection Heat Transfer in a Vertical Pipe,” presented at the Mechanical Engineering Symp. on Heat and Mass Transfer by Combined Forced and Natural Convection, Manchester, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• J. D. JACKSON, B. P. AXCELL, and A. WALTON, “Mixed-Convection Heat Transfer to Sodium in a Vertical Pipe,” Exp. Heat Transfer, 7, 71 (1994); https://doi.org/10.1080/08916159408946473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. D. JACKSON, “Turbulent Mixed Convection Heat Transfer to Liquid Sodium,” Int. J. Heat & Fluid Flow, 4, 2, 107 (1983); https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-727X(83)90011-5.
   Google Scholar
• N. M. ROUAI, Influences of Buoyancy and Imposed Flow Transients on Turbulent Convective Heat Transfer in a Tube, University of Manchester (1987).
   Google Scholar
• “Curve Fitting Toolbox User’s Guide,” MathWorks (2022).
   Google Scholar
• T. NGUYEN and E. MERZARI, “Direct Numerical Simulation of High Prandtl Number Fluid Flow in the Downcomer of an Advanced Reactor,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 197, 2634 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2186200.
   Google Scholar