References
- “Perspectives on Canada’s SMR Opportunity: Summary Report: Request for Expression of Interest—CNL’s Small Modular Reactor Strategy,” Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (2017); http://www.cnl.ca/site/media/Parent/CNL_SmModularReactor_Report.pdf (current as of Jan. 10, 2019).
- “2016–2026: 10-Year Integrated Plan Summary,” Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (2017); http://www.cnl.ca/site/media/Parent/Long_Term_Strategy_2017April18.pdf (current as of Jan. 10, 2019).
- “Pre-Licensing Vendor Design Review,” Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission; http://nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/reactors/power-plants/pre-licensing-vendor-design-review/index.cfm (current as of Jan. 10, 2019).
- “SMR Roadmap,” Canadian Small Modular Reactor Roadmap Steering Committee (2018); https://smrroadmap.ca/ (current as of Jan. 10, 2019).
- D. LEBLANC, “Integral Molten Salt Reactor,” Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Generation IV and Small Reactors, Ottawa, Ontario, November 6–8, 2018, Canadian Nuclear Society (2018).
- D. LEBLANC, “An Overview of the Integral Molten Salt Reactor,” Proc. Molten Salt Reactor Workshop 2016: Moving MSRs Forward—The Next Steps, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, October 4–5, 2016, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2016).
- A. CIONCOLINI et al., “Preliminary CFD Analysis of Natural Convection Fuel Tubes in Molten Salt Nuclear Reactors,” Proc. 14th UK Heat Transfer Conf., Edinburgh, United Kingdom, September 7–8, 2015.
- S. LEEFE et al., “Computation Fluid Dynamic Modelling of Natural Convection Heat Flow in Unpumped Molten Salt Fuel Tubes,” Proc. Int. Thorium Energy Conf.: Gateway to Thorium Energy, Mumbai, India, October 12–15, 2015.
- “Advances in Small Reactor Technology Developments: A Supplement to IAEA Advanced Reactors Information System,” International Atomic Energy Agency (Aug. 2016); https://aris.iaea.org/Publications/SMR-Book_2018.pdf (current as of Jan. 10, 2019).
- “Seaborg External Multiphysics Architecture for Licensing and Ip Development of Nuclear Reactors,” Seaborg Technologies (2018); https://www.eurostars-eureka.eu/project/id/11837 (current as of Jan. 10, 2019).
- “STAR-CCM+ CFD Software,” Siemens (2018); https://mdx.plm.automation.siemens.com/star-ccm-plus (current as of Jan. 10, 2019).
- “NEK-5000 CFD Software,” Argonne National Laboratory (2017); https://nek5000.mcs.anl.gov/ (current as of Jan. 10, 2019).
- “Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear,” Idaho National Laboratory (2018); https://gain.inl.gov/SitePages/Home.aspx (current as of Jan. 10, 2019).
- Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors website, U.S. Department of Energy (2018); https://www.casl.gov/ (current as of Jan. 10, 2019).
- L. B. CARASIK et al., “Steady RANS Methodology for Calculating Pressure Drop in an In-Line Molten Salt Compact Crossflow Heat Exchanger,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 101, 209 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.07.017.
- X. SUN et al., “Natural Circulation Salt Heat Transfer,” Proc. Molten Salt Reactor Workshop 2017: Key Technology and Safety Issues for MSRs, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, October 3–4, 2017, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2017).
- M. S. SOHAL et al., “Engineering Database of Liquid Salt Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties,” INL/EXT-10-18297, Idaho National Laboratory (Mar. 2010).
- “Challenges Related to the Use of Liquid Metal and Molten Salt Coolants in Advanced Reactors,” IAEA-TECDOC-1696, International Atomic Energy Agency (May 2013).
- G. L. YODER et al., “Liquid Fluoride Salt Experiment Using a Small Natural Circulation Cell,” ORNL/TM-2014/56, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Apr. 2014).
- J. BAO, “Development of the Model for the Multi-Physics Analysis of Molten Salt Reactors Using Gen-Foam Code,” MS Thesis, Paul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory for Reactor Physics and System Behavior (Aug. 2016).
- “Open Source CFD Software,” ESI OpenFOAM (2017); http://www.openfoam.com/ (current as of Jan. 10, 2019).
- “RELAP5-3D Code Manuals Revision,” Idaho National Laboratory (2017).
- B. N. HANNA, “CATHENA: A Thermalhydraulic Code for CANDU Analysis,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 180, 113 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00294-X.
- D. P. GUILLEN, “Computational Flow Predictions for the Lower Plenum of a High Temperature, Gas Cooled Reactor,” INL/EXT-06-11780, Idaho National Laboratory (Nov. 2006).
- “ANSYS CFD (Fluent and CFX) Software,” ANSYS (2017); http://www.ansys.com/products/fluids (current as of Jan. 10, 2019).
- D. P. GUILLEN and P. SABHARWALL, Computational Fluid Dynamics Technologies and Applications, Chap. 3, Intech Open Science, Rijeka, Croatia (2011).
- “NRC Non-Light Water Reactor (Non-LWR) Vision and Strategy Staff Report: Near-Term Implementation Action Plans, Volume 2—Detailed Information,” ML16270A217, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Nov. 2016).
- J. LEPPÄNEN et al., “The Serpent Monte Carlo Code: Status, Development and Applications in 2013,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 82, 142 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.024.
- X. HE, “Validation of the TRACE Code for the System Dynamic Simulations of the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment and the Preliminary Study on the Dual Fluid Molten Salt Reactor,” PhD Thesis, University of Munich, Mechanical Engineering (June 2016).
- Y. WANG et al., “Hybrid PN-SN with Lagrange Multiplier and Upwinding for the Multiscale Transport Capability in Rattlesnake,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 101, 381 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.03.020.
- R. J. KEDL, “Fluid Dynamic Studies of the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) Core,” ORNL-TM-3229, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Nov. 1970).
- R. C. ROBERTSON, “MSRE Design and Operations Report,” ORNL-TM-0728, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Jan. 1965).
- J. R. ENGEL and P. N. HAUBENREICH, “Temperature in the MSRE Core During Steady-State Power Operation,” ORNL-TM-378, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Nov. 1962).
- B. YAMAJI et al., “Analysis of Molten Salt Thermal-Hydraulics Using Computational Fluid Dynamics,” Proc. 13th Symp. Atomic Energy Research, Dresden, Germany, September 22–26, 2003, p. 755, Kiadja and KFKI Atomenergia Kutatointezet (2003).
- S. C. TADEPALLI, A. GUPTA, and K. UMASANKARI, “Neutronic Analysis of MSRE and Its Study for Validation of ARCH Code,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 320, 1 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.05.005.
- D. SHEN et al., “Zero Power Criticality Power Benchmark Evaluation on the Benchmark Experiment,” Proc. PHYSOR 2018: Reactor Physics Paving the Way Towards More Efficient Systems, Cancun, Mexico, April 22–26, 2018, Mexican Nuclear Society (2018).
- “Solidworks 3D CAD Software,” Dassault Systèmes (2018); https://www.solidworks.com/; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.03.020.
- “ANSYS DesignModeler,” ANSYS (2018); https://www.ansys.com/services/training-center/platform/introduction-to-ansys-designmodeler (current as of Jan. 10, 2019).
- S. CANTOR et al., “Physical Properties of Molten-Salt Reactor Fuel, Coolant, and Flush Salts,” ORNL-TM-2316, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Aug. 1968).
- L. LUZZI et al., Hydrodynamics—Theory and Model: Thermo-Hydrodynamics of Internally Heated Molten Salts for Innovative Nuclear Reactors, Intech Open Science, Rijeka, Croatia (2012).