Impact of Various Parameters on Convergence Performance of CMFD Acceleration for MOC in Multigroup Heterogeneous Geometry

References

• E. E. LEWIS and W. F. MILLER Jr., Computational Methods of Neutron Transport, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1984).
   Google Scholar
• C. R. CEFUS and E. W. LARSEN, “Stability Analysis of Coarse-Mesh Rebalance,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 105, 31 (1990); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE88-117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. S. SMITH, “Nodal Method Storage Reduction by Non-Linear Iteration,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 44, 265 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• K. S. SMITH and J. D. RHODES Ⅲ, “Full-Core, 2-D, LWR Core Calculations with CASMO-4E,” Proc. PHYSOR 2002, Seoul, Korea, October 7–10, 2002, p. 13A–04 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• H. G. JOO et al., “Methods and Performance of a Three-Dimensional Whole-Core Transport Code DeCART,” Proc. PHYSOR 2004, Chicago, Illinois, April 25–29, American Nuclear Society (2004).
   Google Scholar
• B. KOCHUNAS et al., “Overview of Development and Design of MPACT: Michigan Parallel Characteristics Transport Code,” Proc. Int. Conf. Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C 2013), Sun Valley, Idaho, May 5–9, 2013, American Nuclear Society (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Y. S. JUNG et al., “Practical Numerical Reactor Employing Direct Whole Core Neutron Transport and Subchannel Thermal/Hydraulic Solvers,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 62, 357 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.06.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. CHEN et al., “A New High-Fidelity Neutronics Code NECP-X,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 116, 417 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.02.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Z. CHO, G. S. LEE, and C. J. PARK, “Partial Current-Based CMFD Acceleration of the 2D/1D Fusion Method for 3D Whole-Core Transport Calculations,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 88, 594 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• A. YAMAMOTO, “Generalized Coarse-Mesh Rebalance Method for Acceleration of Neutron Transport Calculations,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 151, 274 (2005); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE151-274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. JARRETT et al., “Analysis of Stabilization Techniques for CMFD Acceleration of Neutron Transport Problems,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 184, 208 (2016); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE16-51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. LARSEN, “Infinite Medium Solutions to the Transport Equation, Discretization Schemes, and the Diffusion Approximation,” Proc. Int. Topl. Mtg. Mathematical Methods for Nuclear Applications, Salt Lake City, Utah, September 9–13, 2001, American Nuclear Society (2001).
   Google Scholar
• A. ZHU et al., “An Optimally Diffusive Coarse Mesh Finite Difference Method to Accelerate Neutron Transport Calculations,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 95, 116 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. YAMAMOTO, T. ENDO, and A. GIHO, “Transport Consistent Diffusion Coefficient for CMFD Acceleration and Comparison of Convergence Properties,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 56, 716 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2019.1618405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. WANG and S. XIAO, “A Linear Prolongation Approach to Stabilizing CMFD,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 190, 45 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2017.1417347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. WANG et al., “Stabilizing CMFD with Linear Prolongation,” Proc. PHYSOR 2018, Cancun, Mexico, April 22–26, 2018; https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-14085
   Google Scholar
• L. LI, K. SMITH, and B. FORGET, “Techniques for Stabilizing Coarse-Mesh Finite Difference (CMFD) in Methods of Characteristics (MOC),” Proc. Mathematics & Computation (M&C+SNA+MC 2015), Nashville, Tennessee, April 19–23, 2015, American Nuclear Society (2015).
   Google Scholar
• D. LEE, T. J. DOWNAR, and Y. KIM, “Convergence Analysis of the Nonlinear Coarse-Mesh Finite Difference Method for One-Dimensional Fixed-Source Neutron Diffusion Problem,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 147, 127 (2004); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE03-64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Z. CHO and C. J. PARK, “A Comparison of Coarse Mesh Rebalance (CMR) and Coarse Mesh Finite Difference (CMFD) Acceleration Methods for the Neutron Transport Calculations,” NURAPT-2002-2, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nuclear Reactor Analysis and Particle Transport Laboratory (2003).
   Google Scholar
• H. T. KIM and Y. KIM, “Convergence Studies on Nonlinear Coarse-Mesh Finite Difference Accelerations for Neutron Transport Analysis,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 191, 136 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2018.1463747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. CHAN and S. XIAO, “Convergence Study of CMFD and lpCMFD Acceleration Schemes for k-Eigenvalue Neutron Transport Problems in 2-D Cartesian Geometry with Fourier Analysis,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 133, 327 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.05.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. ZHU et al., “Theoretical Convergence Rate Lower Bounds for Variants of Coarse Mesh Finite Difference to Accelerate Neutron Transport Calculations,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 186, 224 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2017.1293408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. KOCHUNAS, “Theoretical Convergence Rate Analysis of a Unified CMFD Formulation with Various Diffusion Coefficients,” Proc. Int. Conf. Mathematics Computational Methods and Reactor Physics (M&C 2019), Portland, Oregon, August 25–29, 2019, American Nuclear Society (2019).
   Google Scholar
• T. BYAMBAAKHUU and D. WANG, “Comparison of lpCMFD with Other CMFD Based Acceleration Schemes,” Proc. 2019 ANS Student Conference, Richmond, Virginia, April 4–6, 2019, American Nuclear Society (2019).
   Google Scholar
• N. Z. CHO, “Benchmark Problems in Reactor and Particle Transport Physics,” Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (2000).
   Google Scholar
• A. YAMAMOTO et al., “GENESIS: A Three-Dimensional Heterogeneous Transport Solver Based on the Legendre Polynomial Expansion of Angular Flux Method,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 186, 1 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2016.1273002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. YAMAMOTO, A. GIHO, and T. ENDO, “Recent Developments in the GENESIS Code Based on the Legendre Polynomial Expansion of Angular Flux Method,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 49, 1143 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. YAMAMOTO et al., “Derivation of Optimum Polar Angle Quadrature Set for the Method of Characteristics Based on Approximation Error for the Bickley Function,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 44, 129 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2007.9711266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar