Individual Adjustment of Independent Cross-Section Set Based on Bayesian Theory

References

• G. CECCHINI et al., “Analysis of Integral Data for Few-Group Parameter Evaluation of Fast Reactors,” Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Peaceful Uses Atomic Energy, Geneva, Switzerland, August 31–September 9, 1964, p. 388 (1964).
   Google Scholar
• M. HUMI, J. J. WAGSCHAL, and Y. YEIVIN, “Multi-Group Constants from Integral Data,” Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Peaceful Uses Atomic Energy, Geneva, Switzerland, August 31– September 9, 1964, p. 398 (1964).
   Google Scholar
• J. B. DRAGT, “Statistical Considerations on Techniques for Adjustment of Differential Cross Sections with Measured Integral Parameters,” in “STEK, The Fast-Thermal Coupled Facility of RCN at Petten,” RCN-122, p. 85, Reactor Centrum Nederland (1970).
   Google Scholar
• H. MITANI and H. KUROI, “Adjustment of Group Cross Sections by Means of Integral Data, (I) Theoretical Study,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 9, 7, 383 (1972); https://doi.org/10.3327/jnst.9.383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. MITANI and H. KUROI, “Adjustment of Group Cross Sections by Means of Integral Data, (II) Numerical Study,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 9, 11, 642 (1972); https://doi.org/10.3327/jnst.9.642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. GANDINI, M. PETILLI, and M. SALVATORES, “Nuclear Data and Integral Measurement Correlation for Fast Reactors. Statistical Formulation and Analysis of Methods. The Consistent Approach,” Proc. Int. Symp. Physics of Fast Reactors, Tokyo, Japan, October 16–19, 1973, Vol. 2, p. 612, Committee for the International Symposium on Physics of Fast Reactors (1973).
   Google Scholar
• J. B. DRAGT et al., “Methods of Adjustment and Error Evaluation of Neutron Capture Cross Sections; Application to Fission Product Nuclides,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 62, 1, 117 (1977); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE77-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. TAKEDA, A. YOSHIMURA, and T. KAMEI, “Prediction Uncertainty Evaluation Methods of Core Performance Parameters in Large Liquid-Metal Fast Breeder Reactors,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 103, 2, 157 (1989); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE89-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. DE SAINT-JEAN et al., “Assessment of Existing Nuclear Data Adjustment Methodologies,” NEA/NSC/WPEC/DOC(2010)429, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency (2011).
   Google Scholar
• M. SALVATORES et al., “Methods and Issues for the Combined Use of Integral Experiments and Covariance Data,” NEA/NSC/WPEC/DOC(2013)445, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency (2013).
   Google Scholar
• G. PALMIOTTI et al., “Combined Use of Integral Experiments and Covariance Data,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 118, 596 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.145.
   Google Scholar
• K. YOKOYAMA, M. ISHIKAWA, and T. KUGO, “Extended Cross-Section Adjustment Method to Improve the Prediction Accuracy of Core Parameters,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 49, 12, 1165 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2012.739020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. YOKOYAMA and A. YAMAMOTO, “Cross-Section Adjustment Methods Based on Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimation,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 53, 10, 1622 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2016.1146637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. YOKOYAMA, A. YAMAMOTO, and T. KITADA, “Dimension-Reduced Cross-Section Adjustment Methods Based on Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimation,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 55, 3, 319 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1397563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. YOKOYAMA and T. KITADA, “Generalized Formulation of Extended Cross-Section Adjustment Method Based on Minimum Variance Unbiased Linear Estimation,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 56, 1, 87 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2018.1531078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. PALMIOTTI et al., “New Approaches to Provide Feedback from Nuclear and Covariance Data Adjustment for Effective Improvement of Evaluated Nuclear Data Files,” Proc. Int. Conf. Nuclear Data for Science and Technology (ND2016), Bruges, Belgium, September 11–September 16, 2016, Vol. 146, EPJ Web Conf. (2017); https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201714606003.
   Google Scholar
• G. PALMIOTTI and M. SALVATORES, “PIA and REWIND: Two New Methodologies for Cross Section Adjustment,” Proc. M&C2017, Jeju, Korea, April 16–20, 2017, Korean Nuclear Society (2017).
   Google Scholar
• G. PALMIOTTI, M. SALVATORES, and G. ALIBERTI, “A-Priori and A-Posteriori Covariance Data in Nuclear Cross Section Adjustments: Issues and Challenges,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 123, 41 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.12.008.
   Google Scholar
• “International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments,” NEA/NSC/DOC(95)03, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency (2016).
   Google Scholar
• B. T. READEN and M. A. JESSEE, “SCALE Code System,” ORNL/TM-2005/39, Version 6.2, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; available from Radiation Safety Information Computational Center as CCC-834 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• M. B. CHADWICK et al., “ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 112, 12, 2887 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• B. T. REARDEN, “SAMS: A Sensitivity Analysis Module for Criticality Safety Analysis Using Monte Carlo Techniques,” Proc. PHYSOR 2000, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 7–12, 2000, American Nuclear Society (2000).
   Google Scholar