Using a Random Forest Model to Choose Optimized Group Structures

References

• S. KIRKPATRICK, C. D. GELATT JR., and M. P. VECCHI, “Optimization by Simulated Annealing,” Science, 220, 4598 (1983); https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.671.
   Google Scholar
• R. CARR, “Simulated Annealing,” from MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource created by Eric W. Weisstein; https://mathworld.wolfram.com/SimulatedAnnealing.html (accessed Oct. 6, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• F. LIANG, “Optimization Techniques—Simulated Annealing,” Towards Data Science; https://towardsdatascience.com/optimization-techniques-simulated-annealing-d6a4785a1de7 (accessed Oct. 6, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• C. M. MARTINEZ and D. CAO, “iHorizon-Enabled Energy Management for Electrified Vehicles,” Elsevier Science & Technology, San Diego, California (2018).
   Google Scholar
• M. C. WHITE, “The 618-, 250-, 133-, 70-Group LANL Neutron Energy-Group Structures,” LANL Internal Memorandum, X-5:MCW-05-94(U), Los Alamos National Laboratory (Sep. 2005).
   Google Scholar
• L. BREIMAN, “Random Forests,” Mach. Learn., 45, 5 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. AKBARI et al., “An Investigation for an Optimized Neutron Energy-Group Structure in Thermal Lattices Using Particle Swarm Optimization,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 47, 53 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2012.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. AKBARI et al., “A Novel Approach to Find Optimized Neutron Energy Group Structure in MOX Thermal Lattices Using Swarm Intelligence,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 47, 951 (2013); https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.01.2012.005.
   Google Scholar
• C. YI and G. SJODEN, “Energy Group Structure Determination Using Particle Swarm Optimization,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 56, 53 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2012.12.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. YI, G. SJODEN, and C. EDGAR, “Heuristic Optimization of Group Structures Using Physics-Based Fitness Approximation,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 96, 389 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.06.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. MASSONE, F. GABRIELLI, and A. RINEISKI, “SIMMER Extension for Multigroup Energy Structure Search Using Genetic Algorithm with Different Fitness Functions,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 49, 1250 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. TILL, N. GIBSON, and T. SALLER, “Optimizing Group Structures Using Hierarchical Division,” Proc. PHYSOR 2022, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 15–19, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• V. NAIR et al., “Group Structure Selection with Random Forests,” Proc. PHYSOR 2022, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 15–19, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• T. SALLER, “Simulated Annealing for Group Structure Optimization,” Proc. M&C 2021, Raleigh, North Carolina, October 3–7, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• M. GOMEZ-FERNANDEZA et al., “Status of Research and Development of Learning-Based Approaches in Nuclear Science and Engineering: A Review,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 359, 110479 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. TANO and J. RAGUSA, “Acceleration of Radiation Transport Solves Using Artificial Neural Networks,” CoRR abs/1906.04017, arXiv:1906.04017 (2019).
   Google Scholar
• M. POZULP, “1D Transport Using Neural Nets, SN, and MC,” Proc. M&C 2019, Portland, Oregon, August 25–29, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• C. CAO et al., “An Adaptive Deviation-Resistant Neutron Spectrum Unfolding Method Based on Transfer Learning,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 52, 2452 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.04.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. GRECHANUK, M. E. RISING, and T. S. PALMER, “Using Machine Learning Methods to Predict Bias in Nuclear Criticality Safety,” J. Comput. Theor Transport., 47, 552 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1080/23324309.2019.1585877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. MICHAEL HUANG, “Neutronic Analysis and Optimization of the Advanced High Temperature Reactor Fuel Design Using Machine Learning,” PhD Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Nuclear and Radiological Engineering Program in the School of Mechanical Engineering (Aug. 2017).
   Google Scholar
• W. R. D. BOYD III, “Reactor Agnostic Multi-Group Cross Section Generation for Fine-Mesh Deterministic Neutron Transport Simulations,” PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering (Feb. 2017).
   Google Scholar
• S. B. KOTSIANTIS, “Decision Trees: A Recent Overview,” Artif. Intell., 39, 261 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-011-9272-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. BIAU, “Analysis of a Random Forests Model,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., 13, 1, 1063 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• W. HAECK et al., “A Comparison of Monte Carlo and Deterministic Solvers—keff and Sensitivity Profiles,” Proc. PHYSOR 2018, Cancun, Mexico, April 22–26, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• C. J. WERNER et al., “MCNP6.2 Release Notes,” Report LA-UR-18-20808, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2018).
   Google Scholar
• R. E. ALCOUFFE et al., “PARTISN: A Time-Dependent, Parallel Neutral Particle Transport Code System,” Report LA-UR-17-29704, Los Alamos National Laboratory (Sep. 2020).
   Google Scholar
• R. E. MACFARLANE et al., “The NJOY Nuclear Data Processing System, Version 2016,” Report LA-UR-17-20093, Los Alamos National Laboratory (Nov. 2019).
   Google Scholar
• M. C. WHITE, “The TD Weight Function Revisited,” LANL Internal Memo, X–5 MCW-05-24(U), Los Alamo National Laboratory (2005).
   Google Scholar
• “ Bagging Regressor,” Scikit-Learn; https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.ensemble.BaggingRegressor.html (accessed Oct. 6, 2020).
   Google Scholar