MOOSE Reactor Module: An Open-Source Capability for Meshing Nuclear Reactor Geometries

References

• C. PERMANN et al., “MOOSE: Enabling Massively Parallel Multiphysics Simulation,” SoftwareX, 11, 2352–7110, 100430 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. STANEK, “Overview of DOE-NE NEAMS Program,” LA-UR-19-22247, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2019).
   Google Scholar
• C. LEE et al., “Griffin Software Development Plan,” INL/EXT-21-63185 and ANL/NSE-21/23, Idaho National Laboratory and Argonne National Laboratory Technical Report (2021).
   Google Scholar
• R. WILLIAMSON et al., “BISON: A Flexible Code for Advanced Simulation of the Performance of Multiple Nuclear Fuel Forms,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 7, 954 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1836940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “The CUBIT Geometry and Meshing Toolkit,” Cubit (2021); https://cubit.sandia.gov/.
   Google Scholar
• “Ansys Mechanical Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Software for Structural Engineering,” Ansys (2022); https://www.ansys.com/products/structures/ansys-mechanical.
   Google Scholar
• T. TAUTGES and R. JAIN, “Creating Geometry and Mesh Models for Nuclear Reactor Core Geometries Using a Lattice Hierarchy-Based Approach,” Eng. Comput., 28, 4, 319 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-011-0236-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. SMITH and E. SHEMON, “User Manual for the PROTEUS Mesh Tools,” ANL/NE-15/17 Rev. 1.0, Argonne National Laboratory (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Y. JUNG, C. LEE, and M. SMITH, “PROTEUS-MOC User Manual,” ANL/NSE-18/10, Argonne National Laboratory (2018).
   Google Scholar
• “ Reactor Module,” MOOSE Framework Website (2022); https://mooseframework.inl.gov/modules/reactor/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• E. SHEMON et al., “MOOSE Framework Meshing Enhancements to Support Reactor Physics Analysis,” ANL/NSE-21/43, Argonne National Laboratory (2021).
   Google Scholar
• E. SHEMON et al., “MOOSE Framework Enhancements for Meshing Reactor Geometries,” presented at PHYSOR 2022, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 15, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• S. KUMAR et al., “Physics Demonstration and Verification of MOOSE Framework Reactor Module Meshing Capabilities,” presented at PHYSOR 2022, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 15, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• J. N. HASSE, “Poly2Tri Github Site,” Github (2021); https://github.com/jhasse/poly2tri.
   Google Scholar
• B. S. KIRK et al., “libMesh: A C++ Library for Parallel Adaptive Mesh Refinement/Coarsening Simulations,” Eng. Comput., 22, 3–4, 237 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-006-0049-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. R. GASTON, “Parallel, Asynchronous Ray-Tracing for Scalable, 3D, Full-Core Method of Characteristics Neutron Transport on Unstructured Mesh,” PhD Dissertation, Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2020).
   Google Scholar
• V. LABOURE, “Private Communication,” Idaho National Laboratory (May 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Y. FUJIWARA et al., “Design of High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor (HTTR),” JSME Series in Thermal and Nuclear Power Generation, High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors, Vol. 5, p, 17 (2021).
   Google Scholar
• A. LINDSAY et al., “Usability and Optimization Improvements in MOOSE,” INL/RPT-22-69413, Idaho National Laboratory (September 2022).
   Google Scholar
• J. HANSEL et al., “Sockeye: A One-Dimensional, Two-Phase, Compressible Flow Heat Pipe Application,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 7, 1096 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1861879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. GRASSO et al., “A MOX-Fuel Core Configuration for the Westinghouse Lead Fast Reactor,” presented at the Int. Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP), France, May 12–15, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• C. H. LEE and W. S. YANG, “MC2-3: Multigroup Cross Section Generation Code for Fast Reactor Analysis,” ANL/NE-11-41 Rev. 1, Argonne National Laboratory (2012).
   Google Scholar
• R. HU et al., “SAM Theory Manual,” ANL/NE-17/4 Rev. 1, Argonne National Laboratory (2021).
   Google Scholar
• N. STAUFF et al., “Detailed Analyses of a TRISO-Fueled Microreactor: Modeling of a Micro-Reactor System Using NEAMS Tools,” ANL/NEAMS-21/3, Argonne National Laboratory (2021).
   Google Scholar
• “Verification and Validation of LMFBR Static Core Mechanics Codes Part I,” IWGFR/75, International Atomic Energy Agency (1990).
   Google Scholar
• A. ABDELHAMEED et al., “High-Fidelity Multiphysics Modeling of Load Following for 3-D Gas-Cooled Microreactor Assembly Using NEAMS Codes,” Proceedings of the American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting, Phoenix, AZ, Nov 13–17 (2022).
   Google Scholar
• N. E. STAUFF et al., “Applications of NEAMS Codes for Multiphysics Modeling of Several Microreactors Problems,” Proceedings of the American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting, Phoenix, AZ, Nov 13–17 (2022).
   Google Scholar
• D. I. POSTON et al., “KRUSTY Reactor Design,” Nucl. Technol., 206, sup1, S13 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1725382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. WILKERSON et al., “Thermo-Mechanical-Neutronic Considerations for DireWolf Modeling of the KRUSTY Criticality Experiment,” LA-UR-21-30496, Los Alamos National Laboratory (Oct. 21, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• P. N. HAUBENREICH and J. R. ENGEL, “Experience with the Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment,” J. Nucl. App. Technol., V8, 2, 118 (1970); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT8-2-118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. FEI et al., “Validation of NEAMS Tools Using MSRE Data,” ANL/NSE-22/48, Argonne National Laboratory (Aug. 2022).
   Google Scholar
• M. FRATONI et al., “Molten Salt Reactor Experiment Benchmark Evaluation,” DOE-UCB-8542, University of California-Berkeley and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2020).
   Google Scholar