Radiation Protection at Petawatt Laser-Driven Accelerator Facilities: The ELI Beamlines Case

References

• S. BACKUS et al., “High Power Ultrafast Lasers,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 69, 3, 1207 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1148795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “International Committee for Ultra-High Intensity Lasers,”; https://www.icuil.org ( current as of Dec. 12, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• C. DANSON et al., “Petawatt and Exawatt Class Lasers Worldwide,” High Power Laser Sci. Eng., 7, e54 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1017/hpl.2019.36.
   Google Scholar
• G. KORN et al., ELI –Extreme Light Infrastructure WHITEBOOK; Science and Technology with Ultra-Intense Lasers, THOSS Media GmbH, Berlin, Germany, (2011); https://eli-laser.eu/media/1019/eli-whitebook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• W. LU et al., “Generating Multi-GeV Electron Bunches Using Single Stage Laser Wakefield Acceleration in a 3D Nonlinear Regime,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Accel. Beams, 10, 6, 061301 (2007); https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.10.061301.
   Google Scholar
• W. P. LEEMANS et al., “Progress on Laser Plasma Accelerator Development Using Transversely and Longitudinally Shaped Plasmas,” C.R. Phys., 10, 2, 130 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2009.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. ALLEN et al., “Proton Spectra from Ultraintense Laser–Plasma Interaction with Thin Foils: Experiments, Theory, and Simulation,” Phys. Plasmas, 10, 3283 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1592154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. COWAN et al., “Theoretical Understanding of Record Proton Energies from Laser Acceleration with Cone Targets and Future Prospects,” Proc. 2010 Advanced Accelerator Concepts Workshop, Annapolis, Maryland, June 13–19, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• “Council Regulation (EC) No 723/2009 of 25 June 2009 on the Community Legal Framework for a European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC),” OJ L 206, p. 1, The Council of the European Union (Aug. 8, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• S. KÜHN et al., “The ELI-ALPS Facility: The Next Generation of Attosecond Sources,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 50, 132002 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6455/aa6ee8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. GALES et al., “The Extreme Light Infrastructure-Nuclear Physics (ELI-NP) Facility: New Horizons in Physics with 10 PW Ultra-Intense Lasers and 20 MeV Brilliant Gamma Beams,” Rep. Prog. Phys., 80, 094301 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aacfe8.
   Google Scholar
• B. RUS et al., “Outline of the ELI-Beamlines Facility,” Proc. SPIE 8080, Prague, Czech Republic, June 9, 2011; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.890392.
   Google Scholar
• “ ELI, the Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC,” ELI Beamlines Research Programs; https://www.eli-beams.eu/about/projects/completed-projects/eli/research-programs/ ( current as Feb. 23, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• R. ANTIPENKOV et al., “The Construction of Allegra Kilohertz Femtosecond Laser System at ELI-Beamlines,” Proc. SPIE 11034, Prague, Czech Republic, April 26, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2524436.
   Google Scholar
• J. T. GREEN, R. ANTIPENKOV, and P. BAKULE, “L2-DUHA 100 TW High Repetition Rate Laser System at ELI-Beamlines Key Design Considerations,” Reza Kenkyu, 49, 2, 106 (2021).
   Google Scholar
• E. SISTRUNK et al., “All Diode-Pumped, High-Repetition-Rate Advanced Petawatt Laser System (HAPLS),” Proc. Conf. on Lasers and Electro-Optics, p. 1, San Jose, California, May 14–16, 2017 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1364/CLEO_SI.2017.STh1L.2.
   Google Scholar
• F. BATYSTA et al., “Spectral Pulse Shaping of a 5 Hz, Multi-Joule, Broadband Optical Parametric Chirped Pulse Amplification Frontend for a 10 PW Laser System,” Opt. Lett., 43, 16, 3866 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.43.003866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. HORT et al., “High-Flux Source of Coherent XUV Pulses for User Applications,” Opt. Express, 27, 6, 8871 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.008871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. NEJDL et al.,” Progress on Laser-Driven X-ray Sources at ELI Beamlines,” Proc. SPIE 11111, San Diego, California, September 9, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2532702.
   Google Scholar
• U. CHAULAGAIN et al., “ELI Gammatron Beamline: A Dawn of Ultrafast Hard X-ray,” Sci. Photonics, 9, 11, 853 (2022); https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9110853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. MOLODOZHENTSEV et al., “LWFA-Driven Free Electron Laser for ELI-Beamlines,” Proc. 60th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop (FLS’18), p. 62, Shanghai, China, March 5–9, 2018 (2008); https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-FLS2018-TUA2WC02.
   Google Scholar
• G. GRITTANI et al., “ELI-ELBA: Fundamental Science Investigations with High Power Lasers at ELI-Beamlines,” in OSA High-Brightness Sources and Light-Driven Interactions Congress 2020 (EUVXRAY, HILAS, MICS), L. ASSOUFID et al., Eds., paper JM3A.20, OSA Technical Digest Optica Publishing Group (2020); https://doi.org/10.1364/EUVXRAY.2020.JM3A.20.
   Google Scholar
• C. LAZZARINI et al., “50 MeV Electron Beams Accelerated by a Terawatt Scalable kHz Laser,” arXiv:2302.11415 [physics.plasm-ph] (2023); https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.11415.
   Google Scholar
• M. TRYUS et al., “TERESA Target Area at ELI Beamlines,” Quantum Beam Sci., 4, 4, 37 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs4040037.
   Google Scholar
• D. MARGARONE et al., “ELIMAIA: A Laser-Driven Ion Accelerator for Multidisciplinary Applications,” Quantum Beam Sci., 2, 2, 8 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs2020008.
   Google Scholar
• S. WEBER et al., “P3: An Installation for High-Energy Density Plasma Physics and Ultra-High Intensity Laser–Matter Interaction at ELI-Beamlines,” Matter Radiat. Extremes, 2, 4, 149 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mre.2017.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “ Atomic Law,” Státní úřad pro jadernou bezpečnost; https://www.sujb.cz/legislativa/atomove-pravo ( current as of Dec. 13, 2022) (in Czech).
   Google Scholar
• “The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection,” ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37(2-4), International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007).
   Google Scholar
• “Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 Laying Down Basic Safety Standards for Protection Against the Dangers Arising from Exposure to Ionising Radiation, and Repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom,” OJ L 013 17.1.2014, p. 1, European Atomic Energy Community (2013).
   Google Scholar
• “Recommendations of the ICRP,” ICRP Publication 26, Ann. ICRP 1(3): 1, International Commission on Radiological Protection (1977).
   Google Scholar
• “ISO 14644-1:2015. Cleanrooms and Associated Controlled Environments—Part 1: Classification of Air Cleanliness by Particle Concentration,” International Organization for Standardization (2015); https://www.iso.org/standard/53394.html.
   Google Scholar
• C. AHDIDA et al., “Capabilities of the FLUKA Multi-Purpose Code,” Front. Phys., 9, 788253 (2022); https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2021.788253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. BATTISTONI et al., “Overview of the FLUKA Code,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 82, 10, 10 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.11.007.
   Google Scholar
• F. BORNE et al., “Radiation Protection for an Ultra-High Intensity Laser,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 102, 1, 61 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. L. PRITCHETT, “Particle-in-Cell Simulation of Plasmas—A Tutorial,” Space Plasma Simulation. Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 615, J. BÜCHNER, M. SCHOLER, and C. T. DUM, Eds., Springer (2003); https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36530-3_1.
   Google Scholar
• W. BANG et al., “Review of Laser-Plasma Physics Research and Applications in Korea,” J. Korean Phys. Soc., 80, 698 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-021-00391-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. MILOSHEVSKY, “Ultrafast Laser Matter Interactions: Modelling Approaches, Challenges, and Prospects,” Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 30, 083001 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/ac8abc.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. CONSOLI et al., “Laser Produced Electromagnetic Pulses: Generation, Detection and Mitigation,” High Power Laser Sci. Eng., 8, e22, 59 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1017/hpl.2020.13.
   Google Scholar
• K. NELISSEN et al., “Characterisation and Modelling of Ultrashort Laser-Driven Electromagnetic Pulses,” Sci. Rep., 10, 3108 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59882-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. SHURENKOV and V. PERSHENKOV, “Electromagnetic Pulse Effects and Damage Mechanism on the Semiconductor Electronics,” Facta Univ. Ser.: Elec. Energ., 29, 621 (2016); https://doi.org/10.2298/FUEE1604621S.
   Google Scholar
• “ISO/TS 18090-1: 08-2015.Radiological Protection - Characteristics of Reference Pulsed Radiation—Part 1: Photon Radiation,” International Organization for Standardization (2015); https://www.iso.org/standard/61352.html.
   Google Scholar
• T. WERNER et al., “Dose Rate Measurements in Pulsed Radiation Fields by Means of an Organic Scintillator,” Proc. EPJ Web. Conf., 253, 09002 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202125309002.
   Google Scholar
• U. ANKERHOLD et al., “Deficiencies of Active Electronic Radiation Protection Dosemeters in Pulsed Fields,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 135, 3, 149 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncp099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. SCHÜLLER et al., “The European Joint Research Project UHDpulse—Metrology for Advanced Radiotherapy Using Particle Beams with Ultra-High Pulse Dose Rates,” Phys. Med., 80, 134 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.09.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. ZORLONI et al., “Intercomparison of Personal and Ambient Dosimeters in Extremely High-Dose-Rate Pulsed Photon Fields,” Radiat. Phys. Chem., 172, 108764 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. T. WALLMARK and S. M. MARCUS, “Minimum Size and Maximum Packing Density of Nonredundant Semiconductor Devices,” Proc. IRE, 50, 3, 286 (Mar. 1962); https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1962.288321.
   Google Scholar
• I. EFTHYMIOPOULOS et al., “First Year of Physics at CNGS,” Proc. Particle Accelerator Conf. 2009, p. TU6PFP079, Vancouver, Canada, May 4–8, 2009 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• M. BAGATIN and S. GERARDIN, Ionizing Radiation Effects in Electronics: From Memories to Imagers, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group (2018).
   Google Scholar
• R. GARCIA ALIA et al., “Single Event Effects in High-Energy Accelerators,” Semicond. Sci. Technol., 32, 034003 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6641/aa5695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. UZNANSKI et al., “Qualification of Electronics Components for a Radiation Environment: When Standards Do Not Exist,” Proc. RADECS Short Course, Part 4B, p. 1, Geneva, Switzerland, October 2017; https://doi.org/10.23919/MIXDES.2018.8436726.
   Google Scholar
• “RADiation facility Network for the EXploration of effects for indusTry and research,” RADNEXT; https://radnext.web.cern.ch ( current as of Mar. 6, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• FLUKA Manual, “5.1 Particles Codes, ‘List of Particles Transported by FLUKA,’” CERN; https://flukafiles.web.cern.ch/manual/chapters/particle_and_material_codes/particles_codes.html ( current as of Mar. 6, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• V. VLACHOUDIS, “FLAIR: A Powerful but User Friendly Graphical Interface for FLUKA,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Mathematics, Computational Methods & Reactor Physics (M&C 2009), Saratoga Springs, New York (2009).
   Google Scholar
• V. OLŠOVCOVÁ et al., “Bulk Shielding for Laser Research Centre ELI Beamlines,” Prog. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 4, 247, 247 (2014); https://doi.org/10.15669/pnst.4.247.
   Google Scholar
• “Jabroc ‘N’ Densified Wood Laminate,” DEHOMIT; http://www.dehonit.com.cn/english/zuihou.html ( current as of Mar. 3, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• R. BARMAN et al., “Investigation of Radiation Shielding Characteristic Features of Different Wood Species,” Radiat. Phys. Chem., 192, 109927 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. FASSO et al., “An Activation Database for Materials Used at High Intensity Laser Acceleration Facilities,” Proc. Shielding Aspects of Accelerator, Target and Irradiation Facilities (SATIF-13), p. 422, October 10–12, 2016, Dresden, Germany, NEA/NSC/R2(2018), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2018).
   Google Scholar
• “IEC 61580:2010. Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-related Systems,” International Eletrotechnical Commission (2010).
   Google Scholar
• “Welcome,” Rockwell Automation; https://www.rockwellautomation.com ( current as of Dec. 13, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Your Lifecycle Partner Providing Innovative Solutions Across Engineering, Services and Products—Securing Your Performance in Heavily Regulated Environments,” Nuvia; https://www.nuvia.com ( current as of Dec. 13, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Detection and Measurement of Radiation,” VF Nuclear; https://www.vfnuclear.com ( current as of Dec. 13, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Nuclear & Environmental,” Canberra Packard; https://www.cpce.net ( current as of Dec. 13, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• A. KLETT et al., “A Dose Meter for Pulsed Neutron Fields,” Radiat. Meas., 45, 10, 1242 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. LEUSCHNER, “Dose Rate Measurements Around the Electron Extraction at FLASH,” Proc. 8th Int. Workshop on Radiation Safety at Synchrotron Radiation Sources (RadSynch15), Hamburg,DESY, Germany, June 3–5, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• “Process Control, Bioanalytics, Radiation Protection,” Berthold Technologies; https://www.berthold.com ( current as of Dec. 13, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “FHT 192 Ionization Chambers,” ThermoFisher;https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/425354050?SID=srch-srp-425354050 ( current as of Dec. 13, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• M. T. LUCCHINI et al., “Radiation Tolerance of LuAG:Ce and YAG:Ce Crystals Under High Levels of Gamma- and Proton-Irradiation,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 63, 2, 586 (Apr. 2016); https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2015.2493347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “VF Nuclear Gamma Detectors,” VF Nuclear; https://www.nutronic.se/mdg-0x-series-dose-rate-meters ( current as of Mar. 24, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• “Thermofisher Electronic Personal Dosimeter TruDose,” ThermoFisher; https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/EPDTRUDOSE ( current as of Dec. 13, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Český Metrologický Institut,”; https://www.cmi.cz ( current as of December 13, 2022) (in Czech).
   Google Scholar
• E. G. YUKIHARA et al., “Luminescence Dosimetry,” Nat. Rev. Meth. Primers, 2, 26 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00102-0.
   Google Scholar
• E. BULUR and H. Y. GÖKSU, “OSL from BeO Ceramics: New Observations from an Old Material,” Radiat. Meas., 29, 639 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(98)00084-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. G. YUKIHARA, A. B. ANDRADE, and S. ELLER, “BeO Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimetry Using Automated Research Readers,” Radiat. Meas., 94, 27 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2016.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Furnaces and Dryers,” LAC, s.r.o; https://www.lac.cz/en/ ( current as of Dec. 13, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Luminescence Measurement Devices,” Freiberg Instruments; https://www.lexsyg.com/tlosl-reader.html ( current as of Dec. 13, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• “Státní ústav radiační ochrany”; https://www.suro.cz ( current as of Dec. 13, 2022) (in Czech).
   Google Scholar
• “ISO/IEC 17025:2017. General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories,” International Organization for Standardization (2017); https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html.
   Google Scholar
• A. CIMMINO et al., “Characterization of OSL Dosimeters Used at the ELI-Beamlines Laser-Driven Accelerator Facility,” J. Radiol. Prot., 41, N23 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac14d5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar