Evaluation of Neutron Cross-Section Data Using Gaussian Mixture Model and Digital Filter

References

• D. KENNEDY, “New Nuclear Power Generation in the UK: Cost Benefit Analysis,” Energy Policy, 35, 7, 3701 (2007); https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v35y2007i7p3701-3716.html.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. ABU-KHADER, “Recent Advances in Nuclear Power: A Review,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 51, 2, 225 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2008.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. S. KORMAZEVA et al., “141Pr(α,x): New Cross-Section Data with Special Reference to 140Nd Production for Medicine,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 197, 7, 1293 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2022.2162303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. GODDARD, A. SOLODOV, and V. FEDCHENKO, “IAEA Significant Quantity Values: Time for a Closer Look?” Nonproliferation Rev., 23, 5–6, 677 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2017.1339934.
   Google Scholar
• G. SCHNABEL et al., “Conception and Software Implementation of a Nuclear Data Evaluation Pipeline,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 173, 239 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2021.04.007; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009037522100017X.
   Google Scholar
• D. L. SMITH, “A Least-Squares Computational ‘Tool Kit,’” Nuclear Data and Measurements Series, UNT Digital Library (1993).
   Google Scholar
• N. SOPPERA, M. BOSSANT, and E. DUPONT, “JANIS 4: An Improved Version of the NEA Java-Based Nuclear Data Information System,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 120, 294 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.071; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090375214005237.
   Google Scholar
• R. CAPOTE, D. L. SMITH, and A. TRKOV, “Nuclear Data Evaluation Methodology Including Estimates of Covariances,” EPJ Web Conf., 8, 4001 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20100804001.
   Google Scholar
• M. HERMAN et al., “New Paradigm for Nuclear Data Evaluation,” EPJ Web Conf., 239, 11001 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023911001.
   Google Scholar
• P. VICENTE-VALDEZ, L. BERNSTEIN, and M. FRATONI, “Nuclear Data Evaluation Augmented by Machine Learning,” Ann. Nucl. Energy (Oxford), 163 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. IWAMOTO, “Generation of Nuclear Data Using Gaussian Process Regression,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 57, 8, 1 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2020.1736202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. B. HAMID et al., “Generation of Proton- and Alpha-Induced Nuclear Cross-Section Data via Random Forest Algorithm: Production of Radionuclide 111In,” Appl. Sci., 11, 15 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156969; https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/15/6969.
   Google Scholar
• S. P. RAM et al., “Application of Kalman Filtering Technique for Evaluation of Neutron Cross Section Data of 100Mo (n, 2n)99Mo Reaction,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A, 1020, 165850 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2021.165850; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900221008354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. NEUDECKER et al., “Enhancing Nuclear Data Validation Analysis by Using Machine Learning,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 167, 36 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2020.07.002; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090375220300247.
   Google Scholar
• M. ALRWASHDEH, “239Pu Evaluation Comparison Study,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 118, 313 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.04.034; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454918302196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. ALRWASHDEH et al., “Nuclear Data Statistical Treatment,” Proc. 21st Int. Conf. Nuclear Engineering, Chengdu, China, July 29–August 2, 2013; https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE21-16790.
   Google Scholar
• M. ALRWASHDEH and W. KAN, “U233 Data Evaluation for Criticality Study,” J. Nucl. Eng. Radiat. Sci., 2, 3, 34501 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. SOBES, L. C. LEAL, and G. ARBANAS, “Nuclear Data Adjustment with SAMMY Based on Integral Experiments;” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 111, 843 (2014); https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1185530.
   Google Scholar
• “Sammy,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory; https://www.ornl.gov/onramp/sammy.
   Google Scholar
• M. ALRWASHDEH and W. KAN, “Development of a Code FITWR for Nuclear Cross Section Statistical Analysis,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 70, 130 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.03.008.
   Google Scholar
• D. MUIR et al., “The Global Assessment of Nuclear Data, GANDR,” Proc. Int. Conf. Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, Nice, France, April 22–27, 2007, p. 717, EDP Sciences (2007).
   Google Scholar
• P. G. YOUNG, E. D. ARTHUR, and M. B. CHADWICK, “Comprehensive Nuclear Model Calculations: Introduction to the Theory and Use of the GNASH Code, ” Los Alamos National Laboratory; https://www.osti.gov/biblio/7183361.
   Google Scholar
• C. DE SAINT JEAN et al., “CONRAD—A Code for Nuclear Data Modeling and Evaluation,” EPJ Nucl. Sci. Technol., 7, 10 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2021011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. HELGESSON and H. SJSTRAND, “Fitting a Defect Non-Linear Model with or Without Prior, Distinguishing Nuclear Reaction Products as an Example,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 88, 11 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4993697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data,”International Atomic Energy Agency; http://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor.
   Google Scholar
• A. KONING and D. ROCHMAN, “Modern Nuclear Data Evaluation with the TALYS Code System,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 113, 12, 2841 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2012.11.002; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090375212000889.
   Google Scholar
• M. KARKERA et al., “Detailed Data Sets Related to the MAHE-Manipal Evaluation of Nuclear Data of 232-Th(n, 2n)231-Th Reaction Cross Section with Inclusion of a Comprehensive Covariance Analysis, ” Manipal Academy of Higher Education (2023); https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33016.11524/1.
   Google Scholar
• A. FILATENKOV, “Neutron Activation Cross Sections Measured at KRI in Neutron Energy Region 13.4–14.9 MeV,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Data Services (Dec. 2016).
   Google Scholar
• H. NAIK et al., “Neutron Induced Reaction Cross-Section of 232Th and 238U at the Neutron Energies of 2.45 and 14.8 MeV,” J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 303, 3, 2497 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3812-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. M. PRAJAPATI et al., “Measurement of the Neutron Capture Cross-Sections of 232Th at 5.9 MeV and 15.5 MeV,” Eur. Phys. J. A, 48, 3, 35 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2012-12035-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. CRASTA et al., “Measurement of the 232Th(n,γ)233Th and 232Th(n,2n)231Th Reaction Cross-Sections at Neutron Energies of 8.04 ± 0.30 and 11.90 ± 0.35MeV,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 47, 160 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2012.02.010; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454912000448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. MUKERJI et al., “Measurement of 232Th(n,γ) and 232Th(n, 2n) Cross-Sections at Neutron Energies of 13.5, 15.5 and 17.28 MeV Using Neutron Activation Techniques,” Pramana, 79, 2, 249 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-012-0299-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. A. REYHANCAN, “Measurements and Model Calculations of Activation Cross Sections for 232Th(n,2n)231Th Reaction Between 13.57 and 14.83MeV Neutrons,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 38, 11, 2359 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2011.07.032; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030645491100315X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. NAIK et al., “Measurement of the Neutron Capture Cross-Section of 232Th Using the Neutron Activation Technique,” Eur. Phys. J. A., 47, 4, 51 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2011-11051–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. KARAMANIS et al., “Neutron Cross-Section Measurements in the Th-U Cycle by the Activation Method,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A, 505, 1, 381 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01102-1; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900203011021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. CHATANI and I. KIMURA, “Measurement of the 232Th(n,2n)231Th Reaction Cross Section with 14.5 MeV Neutrons,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 19, 8, 425 (1992); https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4549(92)90065-J; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/030645499290065J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. RAICS et al., “Measurement of the Cross Sections for the 232Th(n,2n)231Th Reaction in the 6.745 to 10.450 MeV Energy Range,” Phys. Rev. C, 32, 87 (1985); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.32.87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. KARIUS, A. ACKERMANN, and W. SCOBEL, “The Pre-Equilibrium Contribution to the (n,2n) Reactions of 232Th and 238U,” J. Phys. G, 5, 715 (1979); https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4616/5/5/011.
   Google Scholar
• R. J. PRESTWOOD and B. P. BAYHURST, “(n,2n) Excitation Functions of Several Nuclei from 12.0 to 19.8 Mev,” Phys. Rev., 121, 1438 (1961); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.121.1438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. P. BUTLER and D. C. SANTRY, “Th232(n,2n)Th231 Cross Section from Threshold to 20.4 MEV,” Can. J. Chem., 39, 3, 689 (1961); https://doi.org/10.1139/v61-083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. PERKIN and R. COLEMAN, “Cross-Sections for the (n,2n) Reactions of 232Th, 238U and 237Np with 14 MeV Neutrons,” J. Nucl. Energy A/B, 14, 1, 69 (1961); https://doi.org/10.1016/0368-3230(61)90094-5; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0368323061900945.
   Google Scholar
• M. KARKERA et al., “Detailed Data Sets Related to the MAHE-Manipal Evaluation of Nuclear Data of 232-Th(n, 2n)231-Th Reaction Cross Section with Inclusion of a Comprehensive Covariance Analysis, ” Manipal Academy of Higher Education (2023); https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33016.11524/1.
   Google Scholar
• M. KARKERA et al., “Measurement and Covariance Analysis of 232Th(n,2n)231Th Reaction Cross Section,” J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 322, 2, 817 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06722-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. KARKERA et al., “Measurement and Covariance Analysis of 232Th(n, 2n)231Th Reaction Cross Sections at the Effective Neutron Energies of 8.97 and 16.52 MeV,” J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 318, 3, 1893 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-6199-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. KALAMARA et al., “Investigation of the 241Am(n,2n)240Am Cross Section,” Phys. Rev. C, 93, 14610 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.014610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. SAGE et al., “High Resolution Measurements of the 241Am(n,2n) Reaction Cross Section,” Phys. Rev. C, 81, 64604 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.064604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. P. TONCHEV et al., “Measurement of the 241Am(n,2n) Reaction Cross Section from 7.6 MeV to 14.5 MeV,” Phys. Rev. C, 77, 54610 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.77.054610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. LOUGHEED et al., “239Pu and 241Am (n,2n) Cross-Section Measurements near En = 14 MeV,” Radiochim. Acta, 90, 12, 833 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2002.90.12_2002.833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. BADWAR et al., “Measurement of Formation Cross-Section of 99Mo from the 98Mo(n,γ) and 100Mo(n,2n) Reactions,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., 129, 117 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.08.019; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969804317300908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. SEMKOVA and R. NOLTE, “Measurement of Neutron Activation Cross Sections on Mo Isotopes in the Energy Range from 7 MeV to 15 MeV,” EPJ Web Conf., 66, 3077 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20146603077.
   Google Scholar
• P. REIMER et al., “Reaction Mechanisms of Fast Neutrons on Stable Mo Isotopes Below 21 MeV,” Phys. Rev. C, 71, 4, 44617 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.044617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. D. THIEP et al., “Nuclear Reactions with 14 MeV Neutrons and Bremsstrahlungs in Giant Dipole Resonance (GDR) Region Using Small Accelerators,” Nucl. Phys. A, 722, C568 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(03)01429-5; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947403014295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. T. OSMAN and F. I. HABBANI, “Measurement and Study of (n,p) Reaction Cross-Sections for Cr, Ti, Ni, Co, Zr and Mo Isotopes Using 14.7 MeV Neutrons,” International Atomic Energy Agency (1996); http://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:28026846; iNDC(SUD)-001.
   Google Scholar
• X. KONG et al., “The Cross Section Measurements for 100Mo(n,2n)99Mo, 96Mo(n,p)96Nb and 92Mo(n,α)89m+gZr Reactions,” Physica Energiae Fortis et Physica Nuclearis, 15, 6, 549 (1991); http://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:23033064.
   Google Scholar
• Y. IKEDA et al., “Activation Cross Section Measurements for Fusion Reactor Structural Materials at Neutron Energy from 13.3 to 15.0 MeV Using FNS Facility,” JAERI 1312, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (1988); https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/19/086/19086046.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• M. ZHOU, Y. ZHANG, and C. WANG, “Shell Effect from the Cross Section of the (n,2n) Reaction Produced by 14.6 MeV Neutron,” Chin. J. Nucl. Phys., 9, 1, 34 (1987); http://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:19054111.
   Google Scholar
• A. MARCINKOWSKI et al., “Cross Sections of Fast Neutron Induced Reactions on Molybdenum Isotopes,” Z. Phys. A, 323, 1, 91 (1986); https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01294558.
   Google Scholar
• N. MOLLA et al., “Activation Cross Sections for Some Isotopes of Mg, Ti, V, Ni, Zr and Mo at 14 MeV Neutrons,” International Atomic Energy Agency (1986).
   Google Scholar
• M. RAHMAN and S. QAIM, “Excitation Functions of Some Neutron Threshold Reactions on Isotopes of Molybdenum,” Nucl. Phys. A, 435, 1, 43 (1985); https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(85)90301-X; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037594748590301X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. ATSUMI et al., “Measurement of Neutron Activation Cross-Sections of Fusion Reactor Materials at 14.6 MeV,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Data Services (1984).
   Google Scholar
• S. AMEMIYA, K-I. ISHIBASHI, and T. KATOH, “Neutron Activation Cross Section of Molybdenum Isotopes at 14.8 MeV,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 19, 10, 781 (1982); https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.1982.9734218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. H. Y. FUJINO and I. KUMABE, “Measurement of Neutron Activation Cross-Sections of Fusion Reactor Materials at 14.6 MeV,” No. 51, Nuclear Energy Agency Nuclear Data Committee (1977).
   Google Scholar
• G. N. MASLOV, F. NASYROV, and N. PASHKIN, “Experimental Cross-Sections for Nuclear Reactions Involving Neutrons with Energies of About 14 MeV,” INDC(CCP)-42, International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Data Services (1974).
   Google Scholar
• J. ARAMINOWICZ and J. DRESLER, “Investigation of the (n, 2n) Reaction with 14.6-MeV Neutrons,” Brookhaven National Laboratory, National Nuclear Data Center (1973).
   Google Scholar
• S. QAIM, “Activation Cross Sections, Isomeric Cross-Section Ratios and Systematics of (n, 2n) Reactions at 1415 MeV,” Nucl. Phys. A, 185, 2, 614 (1972); https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(72)90036-X; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037594747290036X.
   Google Scholar
• W.-D. LU, N. RANAKUMAR, and R. W. FINK, “Activation Cross Sections for (n,2n) Reactions at 14.4 MeV in the Region Z = 40–60: Precision Measurements and Systematics,” Phys. Rev. C, 1, 350 (1970); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.1.350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. CUZZOCREA, E. PERILLO, and S. NOTARRIGO, “Activation Cross Sections of Mo Isotopes for 14.1 MeV Neutrons,” Nucl. Phys. A, 103, 3, 616 (1967); https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(67)90927-X.
   Google Scholar
• J. CSIKAI and G. PETÖ, “Influence of Direct Inelastic Scattering on (n, 2n) Cross Sections,” Acta Phys. Acad. Scientiarum Hungaricae, 23, 1, 87 (1967); https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03157358.
   Google Scholar
• P. STROHAL, N. CINDRO, and B. EMAN, “Reaction Mechanism and Shell Effects from the Interaction of 14.6 MeV Neutrons with Nuclei,” Nucl. Phys., 30, 49 (1962); https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(62)90031-7; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0029558262900317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. KHURANA and H. HANS, “Cross-Sections for (n, 2n) Reactions at 14.8 MeV,” Nucl. Phys., 28, 1, 560 (1961); https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(61)91077-X.
   Google Scholar
• E. B. PAUL and R. L. CLARKE, “Cross-Section Measurements of Reactions Induced by Neutrons of 14.5Mev. Energy,” Can. J. Phys., 31, 2, 267 (1953); https://doi.org/10.1139/p53-028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. LUO and L. JIANG, “Cross-Sections for (n,2n), (n,α), (n,p), (n,d), and (n,t) Reactions on Molybdenum Isotopes in the Neutron Energy Range of 13 to 15 MeV,” Chin. Phys. C, 44, 11, 114002 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/abaded.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. P. RAM et al., “Measurement and Covariance Analysis of 100Mo(n,2n)99Mo and 96Mo(n,p)96Nb Reaction Cross Sections at the Incident Neutron Energy of 14.54 MeV,” J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 325, 3, 831 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07213-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. M. ZSOLNAY et al., “Summary Description of the New International Reactor Dosimetry and Fusion File (IRDFF Release 1.0),” INDC (NDS)-0616, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Nuclear Data Committee (2012).
   Google Scholar
• “Nuclear Wallet Cards,” International Atomic Energy Agency; https://www.iaea.org/resources/databases/nuclear-wallet-cards.
   Google Scholar
• T. S. PHATAK et al., “Regression Analysis of Experimental Reaction Cross-Section Data of 241Am(n, 2n)240Am,” EPJ Web Conf., 284, 14016 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202328414016.
   Google Scholar
• S. P. RAM et al., “Error Propagation Using Extended Unscented Transformation Technique in Micro-Correlation Method for Covariance Analysis of Efficiency of a HPGe Detector,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A, 953, 163057 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2019.163057; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900219314081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. M. BISHOP, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer, New York (2016).
   Google Scholar
• F. PEDREGOSA et al., “Scikit-Learn: Machine Learning in Python,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. R. DRAPER and H. SMITH, Applied Regression Analysis, Springer, New York (1998).
   Google Scholar
• A. KONING et al., “TALYS-1.96/2.0,” International Atomic Energy Agency; https://www-nds.iaea.org/talys/tutorials/talys_v1.96.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• G. SCHNABEL, “Large Scale Bayesian Nuclear Data Evaluation with Consistent Model Defects,” PhD Thesis,Technischen Universität Wien (2015).
   Google Scholar
• D. SIMON, Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H Infinity, and Nonlinear Approaches, John Wiley & Sons (2006).
   Google Scholar
• W. H. PRESS et al., Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press (2007).
   Google Scholar
• D. BROWN et al., “ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8th Major Release of the Nuclear Reaction Data Library with CIELO-Project Cross Sections, New Standards and Thermal Scattering Data,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 148, 1 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090375218300206.
   Google Scholar
• A. J. M. PLOMPEN et al., “The Joint Evaluated Fission and Fusion Nuclear Data Library, JEFF-3.3,” Eur. Phys. J. A, 56, 7, 181 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00141-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. SHIBATA et al., “Activation Cross-Section File for Decommissioning of LWRs,” Proc. 2015 Symp. Nuclear Data, Tokai, Ibaraki, Japan, November 19–20, 2015, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (2016); http://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:48045187.
   Google Scholar
• E. MENDOZA, and D. CANO-OTT, “Update of the Evaluated Neutron Cross Section Libraries for the Geant4 Code.” INDC International Nuclear Data Committee (2018).
   Google Scholar
• Y. ZHUANG et al., “CENDL-3 Chinese Evaluated Nuclear Data Library, Version 3,” Atomic Energy Society of Japan (2002); http://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:51063143.
   Google Scholar
• “TENDL-2021,” TALYS-Based Evaluated Nuclear Data Library; https://tendl.web.psi.ch/tendl_2021/tendl2021.html.
   Google Scholar