Charge Distribution Studies in the Epi-Cadmium Neutron-Induced Fission of ²⁴¹Pu

References

• R. VANDENBOSCH and J. R. HUIENGA, Nuclear Fission, Academic, New York (1973).
   Google Scholar
• C. WAGEMANS, The Nuclear Fission Process, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida (1990).
   Google Scholar
• A. N. ANDREYEV, K. NISHIO, and K.-H. SCHMIDT, “Nuclear Fission: A Review of Experimental Advances and Phenomenology,” Rep. Progress Phys., 81, 016301 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa82eb.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• B. D. WILKINS, E. P. STEINBERG, and R. R. CHASMAN, “Scission-Point Model of Nuclear Fission Based on Deformed-Shell Effects,” Phys. Rev. C, 14, 1832 (1976); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.14.1832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. P. BOCQUET and R. BRISSOT, “Mass, Energy and Nuclear Charge Distribution of Fission Fragments,” Nucl. Phys. A, 502, 213 (1989); https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(89)90663-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. DJEBARA et al., “Mass and Nuclear-Charge Yields for 249Cf(nth,f) at Different Fission-Product Kinetic Energies,” Nucl. Phys. A, 496, 346 (1989); https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(89)90179-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. NAIK et al., “Systematics of Charge Distribution Studies in Low-Energy Fission of Actinides,” Nucl. Phys. A, 612, 143 (1997); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(97)80002-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. NAIK, R. J. SINGH, and R. H. IYER, “Charge Distribution Studies in the Fast-Neutron-Induced Fission of 232Th, 238U, 240Pu and 244Cm,” Eur. Phys. J. A, 16, 495 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2002-10122-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. NAIK, R. J. SINGH, and R. H. IYER, “Charge Distribution in Low Energy Fission of Actinides,” J. Phys. G, 30, 107 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/30/2/010.
   Google Scholar
• H. NAIK, S. P. DANGE, and A. V. R. REDDY, “Charge Distribution Studies in the Odd-Z Fissioning Systems,” Nucl. Phys. A, 781, 1 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.10.082.
   Google Scholar
• S. STEINHÄUSER et al., “Odd-Even Effects Observed in the Fission of Nuclei with Unpaired Protons,” Nucl. Phys. A, 634, 89 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00148-1.
   Google Scholar
• K.-H. SCHMIDT et al., “Relativistic Radioactive Beams: A New Access to Nuclear-Fission Studies,” Nucl. Phys. A, 665, 221 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00384-X.
   Google Scholar
• J. BENLLIURE, A. R. JUNGHANS, and K.-H. SCHMIDT, “Shell Effects and Pairing Correlations in Fission Investigated with Radioactive Beams,” Eur. Phys. J. A, 13, 93 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• M. CAAMAÑO, F. REJMUND, and K.-H. SCHMIDT, “Evidence for the Predominant Influence of the Asymmetry Degree of Freedom on the Even–Odd Structure in Fission-Fragment Yields,” J. Phys. G, 38, 35101 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/38/3/035101.
   Google Scholar
• B. JURADO and K.-H. SCHMIDT, “Influence of Complete Energy Sorting on the Characteristics of the Odd–Even Effect in Fission-Fragment Element Distributions,” J. Phys. G, 42, 055101 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/42/5/055101.
   Google Scholar
• S. AMIEL, H. FELDSTEIN, and T. IZAK-BIRAN, “Distributions of Fission Products from Various Low-Energy Fission Reactions and the Systematics of the Odd-Even Fluctuations,” Phys. Rev. C, 15, 2119 (1977); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.15.2119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. IZAK-BIRAN and S. AMIEL, “Independent Yields of Fast-Neutron Fission of 232Th: Observation of Proton Odd-Even Effect and Neutron Shell Effect on the Yields,” Phys. Rev. C, 16, 266 (1977); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.16.266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. SRIVASTAVA and H. O. DENSCHLAG, “Nuclear Charge Distribution in the Reactor Neutron Induced Fission of 232Th: Fractional Cumulative Yields of the Isotopes of Krypton and Xenon,” Radiochim. Acta, 46, 17 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• R. HENTZSCHEL and H. O. DENSCHLAG, “Isomeric Yield Ratios of 134I and 136I and Independent Fractional Yields of Some Halogen Isotopes in the Fission of 232Th with Reactor Neutrons,” Radiochim. Acta, 50, 1 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• J. P. BOCQUET et al., Z. Phys. A., 335, 41 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• M. DJEBARA et al., “Measurement of Charge Distributions for 229Th(nth, f) and 232U(nth, f),” Nucl. Phys., 425, 120 (1984); https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(84)90219-7.
   Google Scholar
• M. HADDAD et al., Radiochim. Acta, 46, 23 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• A. C. WAHL, “Nuclear-Charge Distribution and Delayed-Neutron Yields for Thermal-Neutron-Induced Fission of 235U, 233U, and 239Pu and for Spontaneous Fission of 252Cf,” At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 39, 1 (1988); https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-640X(88)90016-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. QUADE et al., “Nuclide Yields of Light Fission Products from Thermal-Neutron Induced Fission of 233U at Different Kinetic Energies,” Nucl. Phys. A, 487, 1 (1988); https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(88)90127-3.
   Google Scholar
• H. G. CLERC et al., “The Influence of Pairing and Nuclear Structure on the Thermal-Neutron-Induced Fission of 235U,” Z. Phys. A, 274, 203 (1975); https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01437731.
   Google Scholar
• W. LANG et al., “Nuclear Charge and Mass Yields for 235U(nth,f) as a Function of the Kinetic Energy of the Fission Products,” Nucl. Phys. A, 345, 34 (1980); https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(80)90411-X.
   Google Scholar
• M. HADDAD et al., “Post-Neutron Mass Distribution for 238Pu(nth, f),” Nucl. Phys. A, 481, 333 (1988); https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(88)90500-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. SCHMIT et al., Nucl. Phys. A, 430, 21 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• P. SCHILLEBEEKX et al., Nucl. Phys. A, 580, 15 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• H. NAIK, S. P. DANGE, and R. J. SINGH, “Charge Distribution for Light Mass Fission Products in the Thermal Neutron Induced Fission of 229Th, 241Pu, 245Cm and 252Cf(SF),” Radiochim. Acta, 83, 109 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.1998.83.3.109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. ROCHMAN et al., “Isotopic Yields from the Reaction 245Cm(nth,f) at the Lohengrin Mass Separator,” Nucl. Phys. A, 710, 3 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01026-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. MARIOLOPOULOS et al., “Charge Distributions in Low-Energy Nuclear Fission and Their Relevance to Fission Dynamics,” Nucl. Phys. A, 361, 213 (1981); https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(81)90477-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. NAIK et al., “Charge Distribution Studies in the Epi-Cadmium Neutron Induced Fission of 245Cm,” Eur. Phys. J. A, 59, 230 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01136-y.
   Google Scholar
• A. NUTTIN et al., “Potential of Thorium Molten Salt Reactors Detailed Calculations and Concept Evolution with a View to Large Scale Energy Production,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 46, 77 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2004.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. R. ALLEN and D. C. CRAWFORD, “Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor Systems and the Fuels and Materials Challenges,” Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install., Article ID 97486 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/97486.
   Google Scholar
• S. JULIEN-LAFERRIÈRE et al., “Investigation of Neutron Emission Through the Local Odd-Even Effect As a Function of the Fission Product Kinetic Energy,” Phys. Rev. C, 102, 34602 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.034602.
   Google Scholar
• H. NAIK et al., “Post-Neutron Mass Yield Distribution in the Epi-Cadmium Neutron-Induced Fission of 241Pu,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 197, 12, 3110 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2190725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. NAIK et al., “Independent Isomeric Yield Ratios of Fission Products in the Epi-Cadmium Neutron Induced Fission of 241Pu,” Radiochim. Acta, 111, 11, 793 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1515/ract-2023-0177.
   Google Scholar
• “NuDat 2.6,” Brookhaven National Laboratory, National Nuclear Data Center (updated 2011); http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/.
   Google Scholar
• S. Y. F. CHU, L. P. EKSTROM, and R. B. FIRESTONE, “The Lund LBNL, Nuclear Data Search, Version 2.0” (Feb. 1999). Table of Radioactive Isotopes, E. BROWNE, R. B. FIRESTONE, and V. S. SHIRLEY, Eds. Wiley, New York (1986).
   Google Scholar
• J. BLACHOT and C. FICHE, Ann. Phys. (Paris), 6, 3 (1981).
   Google Scholar
• N. SUGARMAN and A. TURKEVICH, Radiochemical Studies: The Fission Product, Vol. 3, p. 1396, C. D. CORYELL and N. SUGARMAN, Eds. McGraw-Hill, New York (1951).
   Google Scholar
• A. C. WAHL et al., “Nuclear-Charge Distribution in Low-Energy Fission,” Phys. Rev., 126, 1112 (1962); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.126.1112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. N. ERTEN and N. K. ARAS, “Charge Distribution in the Spontaneous Fission of 252Cf,” J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 41, 149 (1979); https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1902(79)80502-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. F. RIDER, Compilation of Fission Products Yields, Vallecitos Nuclear Center, NEDO-12154-3B, ENDF-292, General Electric Company (1980).
   Google Scholar
• T. R. ENGLAND and B. F. RIDER, Evaluation and Compilation of Fission Products Yields, LA-UR-94-3106, ENDF-349, ENDF/B-VI, Los Alamos National Laboratory (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Evaluated Nuclear Data Library Descriptions, ENDF/B-VIII.0 and JEFF-3.3, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency; http://www.oecd-nea.org/.
   Google Scholar
• R. BRISSOT et al., “Distributions isotopiques des gaz rares et de leurs précurseurs dans la fission thermique de 239, 241Pu: Etude de l’effet ‘pair-impair,’” Nucl. Phys. A, 282, 109 (1977); https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(77)90174-9.
   Google Scholar
• R. BRISSOT et al., “Distributions isotopiques des gaz rares dans la fission par neutrons thermiques de 235U et 233U,” Nucl. Phys. A, 255, 461 (1975); https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(75)90693-4.
   Google Scholar
• R. M. HARBOUR, D. E. TROUTNER, and K. W. MACMURDO, “Nuclear Charge Distribution in Fission: Fractional Independent Yield of 135Xe from Thermal-Neutron-Induced Fission of 245Cm and 249Cf,” Phys. Rev. C, 10, 769 (1974); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.10.769.
   Google Scholar
• D. E. TROUTNER and R. M. HARBOUR, Phys. Rev. C, 4, 505 (1971).
   Google Scholar
• A. G. C. NAIR et al., “Charge distribution in thermal neutron induced fission of 241Pu: Determination of Fractional Cumulative Yields of 135I and 140Ba,” C, 80WALTAI, 150 (1980).
   Google Scholar
• A. GOSWAMI, PhD Thesis, University of Bombay (1992). A. Goswami et al., “Charge Distribution in the Thermal Neutron Fission of 241Pu: Fractional Cumulative Yield of 105Mo and 105Tc,” BARC-1381, p. 33 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• A. G. C. NAIR et al., “Cumulative Yields of Short-Lived Ruthenium Isotopes in Thermal Neutron-Induced Fission of 241Pu,” J. Radiochim. Acta, 42, 7 (1987); https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.1987.42.1.7.
   Google Scholar
• A. V. R. REDDY, PhD Thesis, Sri Venkateswar University (1986). A.V.R. REDDY et al., “Isotopic Yield Distribution of Iodine in the Thermal Neutron Induced Fission of 241Pu,” BARC-1381, p. 25 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• B. S. TOMAR, PhD Thesis, University of Bombay (1990).
   Google Scholar
• H. NAIK, S. P. DANGE, and T. DATA, “Charge Distribution in the Mass Region 128–134 in Low Energy Fission of Actinides,” Radiochim. Acta, 62, 1 (1993); https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.1993.62.12.1.
   Google Scholar
• H. NAIK et al., “Post-Neutron Mass Yield Distribution in the Thermal Neutron Induced Fission of 241Pu,” Eur. Phys. J. A, 56, 186 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00184-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. J. SWIATECKI, “Common Features and Differences Between Fission and Heavy Ion Physics,” J. Phys. (Paris), 33, C5–45 (1972); https://doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1972505.
   Google Scholar
• H. H. MEIXLER, K. WOLFSBERG, and H. O. DENSCHLAG, “Nuclear Charge Distribution in Fission: Fractional Cumulative Yields of Isotopes of Krypton and Xenon in 249Cf(nth,f) and 250Cf(sp.f),” Can. J. Chem., 61, 665 (1983); https://doi.org/10.1139/v83-123.
   Google Scholar
• H. NIFENECKER et al., “A Combinatorial Analysis of Pair Breaking in Fission,” Z. Phys. A, 308, 39 (1982); https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01415847.
   Google Scholar