Group Work Management in the Classroom

References

• American Psychological Association (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct, Retrieved August 2, 2008, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html
   Google Scholar
• Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Chowne, A. (2007). Improving the effectiveness of collaborative group work in primary schools: Effects on science attainment. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 663–680. doi: 10.1080/01411920701582231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Kutnick, P. (2003). Changes in grouping practices over primary and secondary school. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 9–34. doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00071-5
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, M. (2007). Practical and ethical issues in planning research. In G. BreakwellS. M. HammondC. Fife-Schaw & J. A. Smith (Ed.), Research methods in psychology, (pp. 24–48). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Campbell, B. (2004). A systematic review of the use of small-group discussions in science teaching with students age 11–18, and their effects on students' understanding in science or attitude to science: Review summary, York, UK: University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method, Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• British Psychology Society (BPS) (2004). Code of conduct, ethical principles and guidelines, Retrieved August 2, 2008, from http://don.bps.org.uk/document-download-area/document-download$.cfm?file_uuid=6D0645CC-7E96-C67F-D75E2648E5580115&ext=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charon, J. M. (2006). Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration (9th ed.). London: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–35. doi: 10.3102/00346543064001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekholm, M. (1996). School climate and educational change: Stability and change in nine Swedish schools, EERA Bulletin, 2
   Google Scholar
• Galton, M., Hargreaves, L., Comber, C., Wall, D., & Pell, T. (1999). Changes in patterns of teacher interactions in primary classrooms: 1976–1996. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 23–37. doi: 10.1080/0141192990250103
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M. (2003). Structuring cooperative group work in classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 35–49. doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00072-7
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M. (2008). Teachers' and students' verbal behaviours during cooperative learning. In R. M. GilliesA. Ashman & J. Terwel (Ed.), The teacher's role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom, (pp. 238–257). Brisbane: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M., Ashman, A., & Terwel, J. (2008). Concluding remarks. In R. M. GilliesA. Ashman & J. Terwel (Ed.), The teacher's role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom, (pp. 258–262). Brisbane: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers' reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 933–940. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory, Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Granström, K. (1998). Classroom management in Sweden: Swedish classroom rhetoric and practice. In N. Shimahara (Ed.), Politics of classroom life: Classroom management in international perspective, (pp. 136–162). New York: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Granström, K. (2006). Group phenomena and classroom management in Sweden. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Ed.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice and contemporary issues, (pp. 1141–1160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Granström, K. (2007). Ledarskap i klassrummet [Leadership in the classroom]. In K. Granström (Ed.), Forskning om lärares arbete i klassrummet [Research into teachers' work in the classroom], (pp. 13–32). Stockholm: Myndigheten för skolutveckling.
   Google Scholar
• Hammar Chiriac, E. (2010). Research on group work in education. NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hammar Chiriac, E. & Forslund Frykedal, K. (2011). Management of group work as classroom activity. World Journal of Education, 1, 3–16. doi:10.5430/wje.v1n2p3
   Google Scholar
• Hammar Chiriac, E. & Granström, K. (2009). Prerequisites for meaningful group work—Students' experiences of co-operation. In S. Jern & J. Näslund (Eds.), Dynamics within and outside the lab: Proceedings from the 6th Nordic Conference on Group and Social Psychology, Lund University, May, 2008 (pp. 94–110). Linköping: Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Hammar Chiriac, E. & Granström, K. (2012). Teachers' leadership and students' experience of group work. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18, 345–363.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (2003). Joining together: Group theory and group skills, Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2004). Assessing students in groups: Promoting group responsibility and individual accountability, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, S. (2005). Om kvalité i kvalitativ forskning [On quality in qualitative reserach]. Nordisk pedagogik, 25, 16–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lotan, R. A. (2006). Managing group work in the heterogeneous classroom. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Ed.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice and contemporary issues, (pp. 525–540). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lotan, R. A. (2008). Developing language and mastering content in heterogeneous classrooms. In R. M. GilliesA. Ashman & J. Terwel (Ed.), The teacher's role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom, (pp. 184–200). Brisbane: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lumpe, A. T., & Haney, J. J. (1998). Science teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the use of cooperative learning. School Science and Mathematics, 98, 123–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17405.x
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. W., & Sadler, T. (2008). Interactive patterns and conceptual convergence during student collaborations in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 634–658. doi: 10.1002/tea.20211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, J. P., & Evertson, C. M. (1982). Time use and activities in junior high classes. Journal of Educational Research, 63, 143–147.
   Google Scholar
• Schmuck, R. A., & Schmuck, P. (1992). Group processes in the classroom, Dubuque: William C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21–51. doi: 10.3102/00346543069001021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Säljö, R., Jakobsson, A., Lilja, P., Mäkitalo, Å., & Åberg, M. (2011). Att förädla information till kunskap. Lärande och klassrumsarbete i mediesamhället. [Refining information into knowledge: Learning and classroom work in the media society], Stockholm: Nordstedts.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, J. J., Beretvas, S. N., Svinicki, M. D., & Gorin, J. S. (2005). Evaluating collaborative learning and community. Journal of Experimental Education, 73, 165–188. doi: 10.3200/JEXE.73.3.165-188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education (2009). Vad påverkar resultaten i svensk grundskola? Kunskapsöversikt om betydelsen av olika faktorer. Sammanfattande analys. [What affects the results of the compulsory school? Knowledge review about the role of various factors: Summary analysis], Stockholm: The Swedish National Agency for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (2008). Teacher practices and small-group dynamics in cooperative learning classrooms. In R. M. GilliesA. Ashman & J. Terwel (Ed.), The teacher's role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom, (pp. 201–221). Brisbane: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003). Promoting effective helping behavior in peer-directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 73–97. doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00074-0
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Ing, M. (2006). Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behavior in peer-directed groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 63–119. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1501_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P., & Sheridan, S. (2010). Conditions for collaborative learning and constructive competition in school. Educational Research, 52, 335–350. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2010.524748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar