629
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Front and Back Stages of Swedish School Inspection: Opening the Black Box of Judgment

References

  • Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
  • Baxter, J. (in press). Professional inspector or inspecting professional? Teachers as inspectors in a new regulatory regime for education in England. British Educational Research Journal.
  • Baxter, J., & Clarke, J. (in press). Farewell to the tick box inspector? Ofsted and the changing regime of school inspection. Oxford Review of Education.
  • Boyne, G. A. (2006). Public service performance: Perspectives on measurement and management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Campbell, J., & Husbands, C. (2000). On the reliability of OFSTED inspection of initial teacher training: A case study. British Educational Research Journal, 26(1), 39–48. doi: 10.1080/014119200109507
  • Clarke, J. (2008). Performance paradoxes: The politics of evaluation in public services. In H. Davis & S. Martin (Eds.), Public services inspection in the UK. Research highlights in social work (50) (pp. 120–144). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Clarke, J., & Ozga, J. (2011, July 4–6). Governing by inspection? Comparing school inspection in Scotland and England. Paper presented at the Social Policy Association Conference, University of Lincoln.
  • Eisner, E. W. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  • Ek, E. (2012). De granskade. Om hur offentliga verksmheter görs granskningsbara [The auditees. On how public organisations are made auditable]. Göteborg: Förvaltningshögskolan.
  • Fidler, B., Early, P., Ouston, J., & Davies, J. (1998). Teacher gradings and OfSTED inspections: Help or hindrance as a management tool? School Leadership & Management, 18(2), 257–270. doi: 10.1080/13632439869682
  • Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gilroy, P., & Wilcox, B. (1997). Ofsted, criteria and the nature of social understanding: A Wittgensteinian critique of the practice of educational judgement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 45(1), 22–38.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
  • Hammersley, M. (2012). Troubling theory in case study research. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(3), 393–405. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.631517
  • Landsberger, H. A. (1958) Hawthorne revisited: Management and the worker, its critics, and developments in human relations in industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
  • Lefstein, A. (2012). The regulation of teaching as symbolic politics: Rituals of order, blame and redemption. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–17, iFirst article.
  • Lindgren, J., Hult, A., Segerholm, C., & Rönnberg, L. (2012). Mediating school inspection: Key dimensions and keywords in agency text production 2003–2010. Education Inquiry, 3(4), 569–590. doi: 10.3402/edui.v3i4.22055
  • Matthews, P., Holmes, J. R., Vickers, P., & Corporaal, B. (1998). Aspects of the reliability and validity of school inspection judgements of teaching quality. Educational Research and Evaluation, 4(2), 167–188. doi: 10.1076/edre.4.2.167.6959
  • National Agency for Education (NAE). (2011). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the leisure-time centre 2011. http://www.skolverket.se/om-skolverket/publicerat/visa-enskild-publikation?_xurl_=http%3A%2F%2Fwww5.skolverket.se%2Fwtpub%2Fws%2Fskolbok%2Fwpubext%2Ftrycksak%2FRecord%3Fk%3D2575
  • Ozga, J. (2008). Governing knowledge: Research steering and research quality. European Educational Research Journal, 7(3). Retrieved April 2, 2012, from xhttp://www.wwwords.co.uk/pdf/validate.asp?j=eerj&vol=7&issue=3&year=2008&article=1_Ozga_EERJ_7_3_web doi: 10.2304/eerj.2008.7.3.261
  • Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162. doi: 10.1080/02680930902733121
  • Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge.
  • Power, M. (1996). Making things auditable. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(2/3), 289–315.
  • Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Power, M. K. (2003). Auditing and the production of legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 379–394. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00047-2
  • Power, M. (2007). Organized uncertainty: Designing a world of risk management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rönnberg, L. (2012). Reinstating national school inspections in Sweden: The return of the state. Nordic Studies in Education, 32(2), 69–83.
  • Sivesind, K. (2012). Jus + ped = sant? Et felles nasjonalt tilsyn i skolen – om nye styringsformer og bruken av faglig skjønn. In H. Jakhelln & T-E. Welstad (Eds.), Utdanningsrettslige emner [Legal topics in education] (pp. 655–681). Oslo: Cappelen Damm AS.
  • Skolinspektionen. (2009a). Bedömningspunkter förskoleklass och grundskola [Judgement points for pre-school and compulsory school]. Stockholm: Skolinspektionen.
  • Skolinspektionen. (2009b). Bedömning av kunskapsresultat för grundskolans årskurs 5 och 9 [Judgements of knowledge results for compulsory school year 5 and 9]. Unpublished memo.
  • Skolinspektionen. (2010). Stöd för bedömningspunkter – förskoleklass och grundskola [Support for judgement points – Pre-school and compulsory school]. Unpublished memo.
  • Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.