IDPs at Work

References

• Akrich, M. (1992). The De-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technonlogy/building society – Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M., & Latour, B. (1992). A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and Nonhuman assemblies. In W. E. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technonlogy/building society – Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 259–264). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. (2010). Summing up and moving forward. In H. L. Andrade, & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 344–351). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Asp Onsjö, L. (2006). Åtgärdsprogram – dokument eller verktyg? En fallstudie i en kommun [The individual education plan – Document or tool?]. Göteborg: Doktorsavhandling Göteborgs universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Asp Onsjö, L. (2011). Dokumentation, styrning och kontroll i den svenska skolan [Documentation, steering and control in the Swedish school; in Swedish]. Educare 2, 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ds 2001:19 Elevens framgång – skolans ansvar [Student's success – school's responsibility; in Swedish]. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Ds 2013:23 Tid för undervisning - lärares arbete med skriftliga individuella utvecklingsplaner [Time for teching – Teachers’ work with written individual education plans]. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, J. (2000). Paper promises? Making the code work for you. Support for Learning, 15(3), 126–133. doi: 10.1111/1467-9604.00161
   Google Scholar
• Habib, L., & Wittek, L. (2007). The portfolio as artifact and actor. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(4), 266–282. doi: 10.1080/10749030701623763
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh, Å. (2011). A Tool for Learning? An analysis of targets and strategies in Swedish Individual education Plans. Nordic Studies in Education 31(3), 14–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh, Å. (2012). The Individual Education Plan: a gendered assessment practice? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(4), 469–485.
   Google Scholar
• Holton, R. (2003). Max weber and the interpretative tradition. In G. Delanty, & E. F. Isin (Eds.), Handbook of historical sociology (p. 27–39) [electronic resource]. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1997). Den kvalitativa forskningintervjun [The qualitative research interview]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Langseth, A. (2012). Björklund: Jag är självkritisk [Björklund: I am self-critical; in Swedish]. SvD Nyheter, 9 May 2012. Retrieved May 15, 2012, from http://www.svd.se/nyheter/inrikes/bjorklund-jag-ar-sjalvkritisk_7184627.svd
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D., Morton, M., & Hornby, G. (2010). Review of the Literature on Individual Education Plans. Report to the new Zealand Ministry of Education. Retrieved November 7, 2012, from www.edcationcounts.govt.nz
   Google Scholar
• Office of Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Orrell, J. (1996). Assessment in higher education: An examination of academics’ thinking-in-assessment, beliefs-about-assessment and a comparison of assessment behaviours and beliefs (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis). Flinders University, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Pawley, H., & Tennant, G. (2008). Student perceptions of their IEP targets. Support for Learning, 23(4), 183–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9604.2008.00392.x
   Google Scholar
• Prunty, A. (2011). Implementation of children's rights: What is in ’the best interest of the child in relation to the Individual Education Plan (IEP) process for pupils with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD)? Irish Educational Studies, 30(1), 23–44. doi: 10.1080/03323315.2011.535974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RESPECT. (2004). The RESPECT Code of Practice. Retrieved February 15, 2012, from http://www.respectproject.org/ethics/guidelines.php
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. (2000). Lärande i praktiken [Learning in practice; in Swedish]. Stockholm: Prisma.
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. (2005). Lärande & kulturella redskap [Learning & cultural tools; in Swedish]. Falun: Norstedt Akademiska Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• SFS, Grundskoleförordningen, 1994:1194 [Compulsory school ordinance; in Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A. (2005). Formative assessment: Caveat emptor. Paper presented at the ETS Invitational Conference 2005, New York. Retrieved August 15, 2012, from http://www.cpre.org/ccii/images/stories/ccii_pdfs/shepard%20formative%20assessment%20caveat%20emptor.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J., & Popham, W. J. (2007). Assessing students’ affect related to assessment for learning. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State Scool Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2007). Hur används individuella utvecklingsplaner? En studie efter införandet av nya bestämmelser [How are Individual education plans used? A study after the introduction of new rules; in Swedish]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2008). Allmänna råd för den individuella utvecklingsplanen med skriftliga omdömen [Advices for the Individual Education Plan with written assessments; in Swedish]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2009). Parent/teacher meeting: How is your child doing at school?. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2010). Individuella utvecklingsplaner med skriftliga omdömen i grundskolan – en uppföljning och utvärdering av skolornas arbete [Individual Education Plans with written assessments – following up and evaluating schools’ work; in Swedish]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2012). Utvecklingssamtalet och den skriftliga individuella utvecklingsplanen [The parent-pupil-teacher meeting and the written individual education plan; in Swedish]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Television (SVT). (2012). Regeringen ser över kraven på dokumentation i skolan [The government reviews the requriements for documentation in schools; in Swedish]. SvTPlay, 30 April, 2012. Retrieved May 10, 2012, from http://svtplay.se/v/2789221/regeringen_ser_over_kraven_ pa_dokumentation_i_skolan
   Google Scholar
• Tennant, G. (2007). IEPs in mainstream secondary schools: An agenda for research. Support for Learning, 22(4), 204–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9604.2007.00472.x
   Google Scholar
• Vallberg Roth, A. (2010). Lärare i förtätad bedömnings- och dokumentationspraktik. En professionell paradox? [Teachers in a condensed assessment and documentation practice. A professional paradox?; in Swedish]. Malmö Högskola.
   Google Scholar
• Wartofsky, M. (1979). Models. Representation and the scientific understanding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Riedel.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2010). An integrative summary of the research literature and implications for a new theory of formative assessment. In H. L. Andrade, & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 18–40). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar