Formative assessment of writing in English as a foreign language

References

• Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning. Putting it into practice. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., Swann, J., & Wiliam, D. (2006). School pupils’ beliefs about learning. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 151–170. doi: 10.1080/02671520600615661
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Borgen, F., & Lund, R. E. (2013). Skriving i engelsk fellesfag, Vg1 [Writing in the foundation course, Vg1]. In A. Norunn & B. Aamotsbakken (Eds.), Syn for skriving. Læringsressurser og skriving i skolens tekstkulturer [Looking into writing. Learning resources and writing in the school's text cultures] (pp. 151–170). Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professionl development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), 301–318. doi: 10.1080/0969594042000304609
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., & Hirschfeld, G. H. F. (2008). Students’ conceptions of assessment: Links to outcomes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(1), 3–17. doi: 10.1080/09695940701876003
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, B. (2005). Pupil commentary on assessment for learning. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 137–151. doi: 10.1080/09585170500135921
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five traditions (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2013). Student perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(2), 150–169. doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2012.749212
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, J. (Ed.). (2012). Assessment and learning. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Guénette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1), 40–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Wiltshire: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(1), 21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Hertzberg, F. (2009). Skolen og grunnleggende ferdigheter [Basic skills in schools]. In J. Møller, T. S. Prøitz, & P. Aasen (Eds.), Kunnskapsløftet – tung bør å bære? Underveisanalyse av styringsreformen i skjæringspunktet mellom politikk, administrasjon og profesjon [The knowledge promotion – Heavy burden to bear? An analysis of the governance reform at the intersection of politics, administration and profession] (pp. 137–146). Oslo: NIFU STEP.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzberg, F. (2010). Arbeid med grunnleggende ferdigheter [Working with the basic skills]. In E. Ottesen & J. Møller (Eds.), Underveis, men i svært ulikt tempo. Et blikk inn i ti skoler etter tre år med Kunnskapsløftet [Progress in a very different pace. A glance into ten schools after three years with the knowledge promotion] (pp. 77–89). Oslo: NIFU STEP.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgen, J., & Marshall, B. (2005). Assessment for learning in English and mathematics: A comparison. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 153–176. doi: 10.1080/09585170500135954
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 255–286. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90017-0
   Google Scholar
• KD, Kunnskapsdepartementet [Ministry of Education and Research]. (2006/2013). Læreplaner for gjennomgående fag i grunnskolen og videregående opplæring [National curriculum for knowledge promotion in primary and secondary education and training]. Oslo: Utdanningsdirektoratet [The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training].
   Google Scholar
• KD, Kunnskapsdepartementet [Ministry of Education and Research]. (2009). Forskrift om endring i forskrift til opplæringslova [Regulation about change in the regulation of the education act]. Retrieved April 14, 2015, from from https://lovdata.no/dokument/LTI/forskrift/2009-07-01-964
   Google Scholar
• KD, Kunnskapsdepartementet [Ministry of Education and Research]. (2011). St.meld. nr. 22 (2010-2011) Motivasjon – Mestring – Muligheter. Ungdomstrinnet [White Paper no. 22: Motivation – Mastering – Possibilities. Middle school]. Oslo: Forfatteren [The author].
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju [Interview: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing] (2nd ed.). Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, R. (2013). The relationship between assessment types and text revision. ELT Journal, 67(4), 446–458. doi: 10.1093/elt/cct034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. (2007). Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning? Assessing Writing, 12(3), 180–198. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I. (2011). Formative assessment in EFL writing: An exploratory case study. Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education, 18(1), 99–111. doi: 10.1080/1358684X.2011.543516
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I. & Coniam, D. (2013). Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination-driven system in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(1), 34–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, B., & Drummond, M. J. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 133–149. doi: 10.1080/02671520600615638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Rambøll Management. (2008). Kartlegging av vurderingsopplegg hos norske skoleeiere [Survey of assessment practices in Norwegian schools]. Oslo: Rambøll Management. Retrieved July 21, 2015, from http://www.udir.no/globalassets/upload/vurdering/5/rapport_kartlegging_av_vurderingsopplegg_hos_norske_skoleeiere.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ringdal, K. (2007). Enhet og mangfold. Enhet og mangfold. Samfunnsvitenskapelig forskning og kvantitativ metode [Unity and diversity. Social science research and quantitative method] (2nd ed.). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandvik, L. V. (2012). Skrivekompetanse i fremmedspråk – hva innebærer det? [Writing competence in a foreign language – what does it imply?]. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 96(2), 154–165.
   Google Scholar
• Sandvik, L. V., & Buland, T. (Eds.). (2013). Vurdering i skolen. Operasjonaliseringer og praksiser. Delrapport 2 fra prosjektet Forskning på individuell vurdering i skolen (FIVIS) [Assessment in schools. Operationalisations and practices. Report 2 from the project Research on individual assessment in schools]. Trondheim: Program for lærerutdanning, NTNU.
   Google Scholar
• Sandvik, L. V., & Buland, T. (Eds.). (2014). Vurdering i skolen. Utvikling av kompetanse og fellesskap. Sluttrapport fra prosjektet Forskning på individuell vurdering i skolen (FIVIS) [Assessment in schools. Development of competence and communities. Final report from the project Research on individual assessment in schools]. Trondheim: Program for lærerutdanning, NTNU.
   Google Scholar
• Sandvik, L. V., Engvik, G., Fjørtoft, H., Langseth, I. D., Aaslid, B. E., Mordal, S., & Buland, T. (2012). Vurdering i skolen. Intensjoner og forståelser. Delrapport 1 fra prosjektet Forskning på individuell vurdering i skolen (FIVIS) [Assessment in schools. Intentions and understandings. Report 1 from the project research on individual assessment in schools]. Trondheim: Program for lærerutdanning, NTNU.
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. doi: 10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E., & Gorard, S. (2005). “They don't give us our marks”: The role of formative feedback in student progress. Assessment in Edcuation: Principles, Policy & Practice, 12(1), 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. (2011). Professional development of teachers – A prerequisite for AfL to be successfully implemented in the classroom. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.005
   Google Scholar
• Udir, Utdanningsdirektoratet [The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training]. (2010a). Nasjonal satsing på vurdering for læring [National initiative for assessment for learning]. Retrieved April 14, 2015, from http://www.udir.no/Vurdering-for-laring/Nasjonal-satsing1/Nasjonal-satsing-pa-Vurdering-for-laring/
   Google Scholar
• Udir, Utdanningsdirektoratet [The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training]. (2010b). Elevundersøkelsen [The student survey].Kristiansand: Oxford Research. Retrieved July 21, 2015 from http://www.udir.no/globalassets/upload/forskning/2010/5/elevundersokelsen_2010_analyse.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 79–102. doi: 10.2307/3586773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar