Challenges in Argumentation and Paraphrasing Among Beginning Students in Educational Sciences

References

• Abasi, A. R., & Graves, B. (2008). Academic literacy and plagiarism: Conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 221–233. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.010
   Google Scholar
• Almond, R. G. (2014). Using automated essay scores as an anchor when equating constructed response writing tests. International Journal of Testing, 14, 73–91. doi: 10.1080/15305058.2013.816309
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. H., & Wulfeck, H. (2014). Performance assessment: Something old, something new. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 303–310). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Angélil-Carter, S. (2000). Stolen language? Plagiarism in writing. London: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift. Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Attali, Y. (2014). A ranking method for evaluating constructed responses. Educational and Psychological Measurement online. doi:10.1177/0013164414527450
   Google Scholar
• Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2007). Evaluating assessment quality in a competence-based education: A qualitative comparison of two frameworks. Educational Research Review, 2, 114–129. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2007.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Björk, L., Bräuer, G., Rienecker, L., & Jörgensen, P. S. (Eds.). (2003). Teaching academic writing in European higher education. Studies in writing. Dorchrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Bok, D. (2006). Our underachieving colleges. A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boscolo, P., Arfé, B., & Quarisa, M. (2007). Improving the quality of students’ academic writing: An intervention study. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 419–438. doi: 10.1080/03075070701476092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, N. A., & Seifert, T. A. (2011). Can college students accurately assess what affects their learning and development? Journal of College Student Development, 52, 270–290. doi: 10.1353/csd.2011.0042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breen, L., & Maassen, M. (2005). Reducing the incidence of plagiarism in an undergraduate course: The role of education. Issues in Educational Research, 15(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, C., Deming, S. P., Notzon, B., Cantor, S. B., Broglio, K. R., & Pagel, W. (2009). Scientific writing training for academic physicians of diverse language background. Academic Medicine, 84(4), 505–510. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819a7e6d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, J., Nairn, K., & Higgins, J. (2009). Demystifying academic writing: Reflections on emotions, know-How and academic identity. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 269–284. doi: 10.1080/03098260902734943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comas-Forgas, R., & Sureda-Negre, J. (2010). Academic plagiarism: Explanatory factors from students' perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 8, 217–232. doi: 10.1007/s10805-010-9121-0
   Google Scholar
• Darab, S. (2006). A preventive approach to plagiarism: An empirical study of a first-year unit for undergraduates. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2, 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O. (2007). How a reform affects writing in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 32(2), 237–252. doi: 10.1080/03075070701267285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, J., Strickland, D., Timmerman, B., Maher, M., & Feldon, D. (2010). Weeds in the flower garden: An exploration of plagiarism in graduate students’ research proposals and its connection to enculturation, ESL and contextual factors. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 6, 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Groarke, L. (2013). Informal logic. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (spring 2013 edition). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/logic-informal/
   Google Scholar
• Gu, Q., & Brooks, J. (2008). Beyond the accusation of plagiarism. System, 36(3), 337–352. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. A. (2010). Exploring university students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 463–481. doi: 10.1080/03075070903096508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyytinen, H., Holma, K., Toom, A., Shavelson, R. J., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2014). The complex relationship between students’ critical thinking and epistemological beliefs in the context of problem solving. Frontline Learning Research, 6, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hyytinen, H., Nissinen, K., Ursin, J., Toom, A., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2015). Problematising the equivalance of the test results of performance-based critical thinking tests for undergraduate students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 44, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurowska, J. E., & Thompson, J. P. (2012). “Opening doors to early academic integrity”: Aiding the transition to and managing expectations of academic practice at university. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 8, 4–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kaposi, D., & Dell, P. (2012). Discourses of plagiarism: Moralist, proceduralist, developmental and inter-textual approaches. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 33(6), 813–830. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2012.686897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keinonen, T., & Kärkkäinen, S. (2010). University students’ argumentation in science and environmental education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 22, 54–63.
   Google Scholar
• King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (2004). Reflective judgment: Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions trough adulthood. Educational Psychologist, 39, 5–18. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3901_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, S., Benjamin, R., Shavelson, R., & Bolus, R. (2007). The collegiate learning assessment. Facts and fantasies. Evaluation Review, 31(5), 415–439. doi: 10.1177/0193841X07303318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, O. (2003). Getting started: Academic writing in the first year of a university education. In L. Björk, G. Bräuer, L. Rienecker & P. S. Jörgensen (Eds.), Teaching academic writing in European higher education. Studies in writing, (pp. 29–40). Dorchrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28, 16–46. doi: 10.3102/0013189X028002016
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 121–144). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 157–172. doi: 10.1080/03075079812331380364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonka, K. (2003). Helping doctoral student to finish their theses. In L. Björk, G. Bräuer, L. Rienecker & P. S. Jörgensen (Eds.), Teaching academic writing in European higher education. Studies in writing, ed. (pp. 113–131). Dorchrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Löfström, E., & Kupila, P. (2013). The instructional challenges of student plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 11(3), 231–242. doi: 10.1007/s10805-013-9181-z
   Google Scholar
• Maclellan, E. (2004). How convincing is alternative assessment for use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 311–321. doi: 10.1080/0260293042000188267
   Google Scholar
• Mateos, M., Cuevas, I., Martin, E., Martin, A., Echeita, G., & Luna, M. (2011). Reading to write an argumentation: The role of epistemological, reading and writing beliefs. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(3), 281–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01437.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateos, M., & Solé, I. (2009). Synthesizing information from various texts: A study of procedures and products at the different educational levels. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24, 435–451. doi: 10.1007/BF03178760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northedge, A. (2003). Enabling participation in academic discourse. Teaching in Higher Education, 8, 169–180. doi: 10.1080/1356251032000052429
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Poliquin, A. (2008). Role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning. International Journal & Science Education, 30, 1977–1999. doi: 10.1080/09500690701545919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. (2003). In other (people's) words: Plagiarism by university students–literature and lessons. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 471–488. doi: 10.1080/02602930301677
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, RT. (2005). How college affects students. Volume 2: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. (2003). Test better, teach better: The instructional role of assessment. Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Rapanta, C., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2013). What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 483–520. doi: 10.3102/0034654313487606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, M. C. (2003). Construct equivalence of multiple-choice and constructed-response items: A random effects synthesis of correlations. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 163–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2003.tb01102.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A. (2009). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 5–51. doi: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1201_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J. (2010). Measuring college learning responsibly: Accountability in a new era. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, E. J., Mattern, K. D., & Patterson, B. (2011). Discrepant SAT critical reading and writing scores: Implications for college performance. Educational Assessment, 16, 145–163. doi: 10.1080/10627197.2011.604241
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, H., & Biro, J. (1997). Epistemic normativity, argumentation, and fallacies. Argumentation, 11, 277–292. doi: 10.1023/A:1007799325361
   Google Scholar
• Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 235–260. doi: 10.1080/09500690500336957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. (2012). Adult education of educational institutions in 2011. Retrieved from https://www.tilastokeskus.fi/til/oaiop/2011/oaiop_2011_2012-12-14_tie_001_en.html
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. (2004). Academic literacies and the “new orders”: Implications for research and practice in student writing in higher education. Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences, 1(1), 9–20. doi: 10.1386/ltss.1.1.9/0
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland-Smith, W. (2005). Pandora's box: Academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 83–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.007
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univeristy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tynjälä, P., Mason, L., & Lonka, K. (Eds.). (2001). Writing as a learning tool. Integrating theory and practice. Studies in writing. Dorchrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, K. (2006). Plagiarism as literacy practice: Recognizing and rethinking ethical binaries. College Composition and Communication, 58(1), 89–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: Researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41–59. doi: 10.1080/03075070902912994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. (1995). A pragmatic theory of fallacy. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ylijoki, O-H. (2000). Disciplinary cultures and the moral order of studying: A case-study of four Finnish university departments. Higher Education, 39, 339–362. doi: 10.1023/A:1003920230873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylijoki, O-H. (2001). Master's thesis writing from a narrative approach. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 21–34. doi: 10.1080/03075070020030698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar