1,415
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Measuring perceptions of the learning environment and approaches to learning: validation of the learn questionnaire

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 526-539 | Received 04 Feb 2015, Accepted 17 Mar 2016, Published online: 23 May 2016

References

  • Abell, N., Springer, D. W., & Kamata, A. (2009). Developing and validating rapid assessment instruments. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Amaral, A., & Rosa, M. J. (2010). Recent trends in quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 16(1), 59–61. doi: 10.1080/13538321003679515
  • Biggs, J. B. (1999). Teaching for quality learning. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
  • Bologna Declaration. (1999). Joint declaration of the European Ministers of Education Vonved in Bologna at the 19th of June 1999. The European Higher Education Area. Retrieved from http://www.eua.be/eua/jsp/en/upload/OFFDOC_BP_bologna_declaration.1068714825768.pdf
  • Bowen, N., & Guo, S. (2012). Structural equation modeling. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Danish Ministry of Education and Science. (2014). Udviklingskontrakter for de videregående uddannelsesinstitutioner i perioden 2015–2017 [Development Contracts for Higher Education Institutions in 2015–2017]. Retrieved from http://ufm.dk/uddannelse-og-institutioner/videregaende-uddannelse/filer/styring-og-ansvar/udviklingskontrakter/brev-om-udviklingskontrakter-2015–2017.pdf
  • Danish Ministry of Education and Science. (2015). Bekendtgørelse om karakterskala og anden bedømmelse ved uddannelser på Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriets område (karakterbekendtgørelsen) [Ministerial Order on University Examinations and Grading (the Examination Order)]. Retrieved from https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id = 167998
  • De Corte, E. (1995). Fostering cognitive growth: A perspective from research on mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 30, 37–46. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3001_4
  • De Corte, E. (2000). Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice. Learning and Instruction, 10, 249–266. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00029-8
  • Entwistle, N. J. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Entwistle, N. J., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual base of study strategies inventories in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 325–345. doi: 10.1007/s10648-004-0003-0
  • Entwistle, N. J., McCune, V., & Hounsell, J. (2003). Investigating ways of enhancing university teaching-learning environments: Measuring students’ approaches to studying and perceptions of teaching. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. J. Entwistle, & J. van Merrienboer (Eds.), Unravelling basic components and dimensions of powerful learning environments (pp. 89–107). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
  • Hailikari, T., & Parpala, A. (2014). What impedes or enhances my studying? The interrelation between approaches to learning, factors influencing study progress, and earned credits. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(7), 812–824. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2014.934348
  • Harvey, L. (2003). Student feedback. Quality in Higher Education, 9(1), 3–20. doi: 10.1080/13538320308164
  • Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Karagiannopoulou, E., & Milienos, F. S. (2014). Testing two path models to explore relationships between students’ experiences of the teaching-learning environment, approaches to learning and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 35(1), 26–52. doi:10.1080/01443410.2014.895800
  • Karagiannopoulou, E., Naka, K., Kamtsios, S., Savvidou, E., & Michalis, L. (2016). Medical students’ approaches to learning before and after the cardiology problem-based learning practice. Journal of Contemporary Medical Education, 2(3), 153–157.
  • Kember, D., Biggs, J., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2004). Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the Learning Process Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 261–279. doi: 10.1348/000709904773839879
  • Kember, D., Jenkins, W., & Ng, K. C. (2004). Adult students’ perceptions of good teaching as a function of their conceptions of learning – Part 2. Implications for the evaluation of teaching. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(1), 81–97. doi:10.1080/158037042000199461
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (2nd ed.). New York: The Guildford Press.
  • Kreber, C. (2003). The relationship between students' course perceptions and their approaches to studying in undergraduate science courses: A Canadian experience. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(1), 57–75. doi: 10.1080/0729436032000058623
  • Kvalitetsudvalget [The Expert Committee on Quality in Higher Education in Denmark] (2014). Høje mål – fremragende undervisning i videregående uddannelser. Analyserapport [High Goals – Excellent Teaching in Higher Education. Report.]. Retrieved from http://ufm.dk/en/education-and-institutions/councils-and-commissions/the-expert-committee-on-quality-in-higher-education-in-denmark
  • Lawless, C., & Richardson, J. (2002). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in distance education. Higher Education, 44, 257–282. doi: 10.1023/A:1016315114558
  • Parpala, A. (2010). Exploring the experiences and conceptions of good teaching in higher education: Development of a questionnaire for assessing students‘ approaches to learning and experiences of the teaching-learning environment (Doctoral dissertation), University of Helsinki, Institute of Behavioural Sciences. Studies in Educational Sciences 230. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
  • Parpala, A. & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2012). Using a research instrument for developing quality at the university. Quality in Higher Education, 18(3), 313–328. doi: 10.1080/13538322.2012.733493
  • Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Komulainen, E., & Entwistle, N. J. (2013). Assessing students’ experiences of the teaching-learning environments and approaches to learning: Validation of a questionnaire used in different countries and varying contexts. Learning Environments Research, 16(2), 201–215. doi: 10.1007/s10984-013-9128-8
  • Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Komulainen, E., Litmanen, T., & Hirsto, L. (2010). Students’ approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching-learning environment in different disciplines. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 269–282. doi: 10.1348/000709909X476946
  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 387–415. doi: 10.1080/02602930500099193
  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2009). What can students’ perceptions of academic quality tell us? Research using the course experience questionnaire. In M. Tight, K. H. Mok, J. Huisman, & C. C. Morphew (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of higher education (pp. 199–209). New York: Routledge.
  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2014). Critical synthesis package: Experiences of teaching and learning questionnaire (ETLQ). Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.
  • Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulleting, 138(2), 353–387. doi:10.1037/a0026838
  • Richardson, J., & Price, L. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in electronically delivered courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 45–56. doi: 10.1111/1467-8535.00303
  • Rytkönen, H., Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Virtanen, V., & Postareff, L. (2012). Factors affecting bioscience students’ academic achievement. Instructional Science, 40, 241–256. doi: 10.1007/s11251-011-9176-3
  • Sadlo, G., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of the academic environment in students following problem-based and subject-based curricula. Higher Education Research and Development, 22, 253–274. doi:10.1080/758482623
  • Sakurai, Y., Parpala, A., Pyhältö, K., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2014). Engagement in learning: A comparison between Asian and European international university students. Compare. doi:10.1080/03057925.2013.866837
  • Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
  • Teaching & Learning Research Programme. (2007). Learning and teaching at university: The influence of subjects and settings. Research Briefing No. 31. Retrieved from http://www.tlrp.org/pub/documents/Hounsell%20RB%2031%20FINAL.pdf
  • Vanthournout, G., Coertjens, L., Gijbels, D., Donche, v., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). Assessing students’ development in learning approaches according to initial learning profiles: A person-oriented perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(1), 33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.08.002
  • Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(2), 149–171. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01281.x
  • Watkins, D. (2001). Correlates of approaches to learning: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. In R. Sternberg & L.-F. Zang (Eds.), Perspective on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 165–196). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.