412
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Identifying Mechanisms of Teaching Practices: A Study in Swedish Comprehensive Schooling

Pages 213-228 | Received 22 Aug 2014, Accepted 01 Jun 2016, Published online: 13 Sep 2016

References

  • Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Anmarkrud, Ø, & Bråten, I. (2012). Naturally-occurring comprehension strategies instruction in 9th-grade language arts classrooms. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(6), 591–623. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2011.621134
  • Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (2011). Sequential analysis and observational methods for the behavioral sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ball, S. J., & Bowe, R. (1992). Subject departments and the ‘implementation’ of National Curriculum policy: An overview of the issues. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(2), 97–115. doi: 10.1080/0022027920240201
  • Ball, S. J., & Lacey, C. (2011). Subject disciplines as the opportunity for group action: A measured critique of subject sub-cultures. In P. Woods (Eds.), Teacher strategies: Explorations in the sociology of the school (pp. 149–177). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Bergem, O. K. (2009). Individuelle versus kollektive arbeidsformer: En drøfting av aktuelle utfordringer i matematikkundervisningen i grunnskolen [Individual versus collective pedagogical work]. Univ. i Oslo, Unipub.
  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Biddle, B. J., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). Small class size and its effects. Educational Leadership, 59(5), 12–23.
  • Bidwell, C. E., Frank, K. A., & Quiroz, P. A. (1997). Teacher types, workplace controls, and the organization of schools. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 285–307. doi: 10.2307/2673268
  • Bidwell, C. E., & Yasumoto, J. Y. (1999). The collegial focus: Teaching fields, collegial relationships, and instructional practice in American high schools. Sociology of Education, 72(4), 234–256. doi: 10.2307/2673155
  • Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Goldstein, H., & Martin, C. (2003). Are class size differences related to pupils’ educational progress and classroom processes? Findings from the institute of education class size study of children aged 5–7 years. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 709–730. doi: 10.1080/0141192032000133668
  • Blatchford, P., Edmonds, S., & Martin, C. (2003). Class size, pupil attentiveness and peer relations. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(1), 15–36. doi: 10.1348/000709903762869897
  • Boli, J., Ramirez, F. O., & Meyer, J. W. (1985). Explaining the origins and expansion of mass education. Comparative Education Review, 29(2), 145–170. doi: 10.1086/446504
  • Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 359–377. doi: 10.1177/136843199002003010
  • Boudon, R. (1993). More on “good reasons”: Reply to critics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 7(1), 87–102. doi: 10.1080/02698599308573455
  • Boudon, R. (2002). Sociology that really matters: European academy of sociology, first annual lecture, 26 October 2001, Swedish cultural center. European Sociological Review, 18(3), 371–378. doi: 10.1093/esr/18.3.371
  • Brint, S., Contreras, M. F., & Matthews, M. T. (2001). Socialization messages in primary schools: An organizational analysis. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 157–180. doi: 10.2307/2673273
  • Bryk, A., Camburn, E., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 751–781. doi: 10.1177/0013161X99355004
  • Cameron, C. E., Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., & Jewkes, A. M. (2008). Effects of classroom organization on letter–word reading in first grade. Journal of School Psychology, 46(2), 173–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.03.002
  • Carlgren, I., Klette, K., Mýrdal, S., Schnack, K., & Simola, H. (2006). Changes in Nordic teaching practices: From individualised teaching to the teaching of individuals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 301–326. doi: 10.1080/00313830600743357
  • Cox, D. R., & Wermuth, N. (2001). Some statistical aspects of causality. European Sociological Review, 17(1), 65–74. doi: 10.1093/esr/17.1.65
  • Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3–13. doi: 10.3102/0013189X019001003
  • Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890–1990. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Cuban, L. (2009). Hugging the middle: How teachers teach in an era of testing and accountability. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
  • Diamond, J. B. (2007). Where the rubber meets the road: Rethinking the connection between high-stakes testing policy and classroom instruction. Sociology of Education, 80(4), 285–313. doi: 10.1177/003804070708000401
  • Diamond, J. B. (2012). Accountability policy, school organization, and classroom practice partial recoupling and educational opportunity. Education and Urban Society, 44(2), 151–182. doi: 10.1177/0013124511431569
  • Diehl, D., & McFarland, D. A. (2012). Classroom ordering and the situational imperatives of routine and ritual. Sociology of Education, 85(4), 326–349. doi: 10.1177/0038040712452093
  • Dreeben, R. (2005). Teaching and the competence of occupations. In L. Hedges, & B. Schneider (Eds.), The social organization of schooling (pp. 51–71). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Emanuelsson, J., & Sahlström, F. (2008). The price of participation: Teacher control versus student participation in classroom interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(2), 205–223. doi: 10.1080/00313830801915853
  • Evetts, J. (2013). Professionalism: Value and ideology. Current Sociology, 61(5-6), 778–796. doi: 10.1177/0011392113479316
  • Gamoran, A., & Dreeben, R. (1986). Coupling and control in educational organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4), 612–632. doi: 10.2307/2392966
  • Gamoran, A., Secada, W. G., & Marrett, C. B. (2006). The organizational context of teaching and learning. In Handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 37–63). New York: Springer.
  • Gerring, J. (2008). The mechanismic worldview: Thinking inside the box. British Journal of Political Science, 38(01), 161–179. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000082
  • Goodson, I. F., & Mangan, J. M. (1995). Subject cultures and the introduction of classroom computers. British Educational Research Journal, 21(5), 613–628. doi: 10.1080/0141192950210505
  • Grossman, P., Loeb, S., Cohen, J., Hammerness, K., Wyckoff, J., Boyd, D., & Lankford, H. (2010). Measure for measure: The relationship between measures of instructional practice in middle school English language arts and teachers’ value-added scores. Retrieved from.
  • Grossman, P. L., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1994). Considerations of content and the circumstances of secondary school teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20, 179–221.
  • Grossman, P. L., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1995). Content as context: The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 5–23. doi: 10.3102/0013189X024008005
  • Hallett, T. (2007). Between deference and distinction: Interaction ritual through symbolic power in an educational institution. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(2), 148–171. doi: 10.1177/019027250707000205
  • Hallett, T. (2010). The Myth incarnate recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an Urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74. doi: 10.1177/0003122409357044
  • Hansson, Å. (2010). Instructional responsibility in mathematics education: Modelling classroom teaching using Swedish data. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 171–189. doi: 10.1007/s10649-010-9249-2
  • Hargreaves, A. (1988). Teaching quality: A sociological analysis 1. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(3), 211–231. doi: 10.1080/0022027880200302
  • Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 6(2), 151–182. doi: 10.1080/713698714
  • Hedström, P., & Ylikoski, P. (2010). Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 49–67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102632
  • Hoetker, J., & AhlbrandJrW. P. (1969). The persistence of the recitation. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 145–167. doi: 10.3102/00028312006002145
  • Ingersoll, R. M. (1996). Teachers’ decision-making power and school conflict. Sociology of Education, 69(2), 159–176. doi: 10.2307/2112804
  • Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033007014
  • Juzwik, M. M., Nystrand, M., Kelly, S., & Sherry, M. B. (2008). Oral narrative genres as dialogic resources for classroom literature study: A contextualized case study of conversational narrative discussion. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1111–1154. doi: 10.3102/0002831208321444
  • Kelly, S. (2007). Classroom discourse and the distribution of student engagement. Social Psychology of Education, 10(3), 331–352. doi: 10.1007/s11218-007-9024-0
  • Kelly, S. (2008a). Race, social class, and student engagement in middle school English classrooms. Social Science Research, 37(2), 434–448. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.08.003
  • Kelly, S. (2008b). What types of students’ effort are rewarded with high marks? Sociology of Education, 81(1), 32–52. doi: 10.1177/003804070808100102
  • Kelly, S. (2010). A crisis of authority in predominantly Black Schools? The Teachers College Record, 112(5), 2–3.
  • Kelly, S., & Turner, J. (2009). Rethinking the effects of classroom activity structure on the engagement of low-achieving students. Teachers College Record, 111(7), 1665–1692.
  • Klette, K. (2003). Lærerens klasseromsarbeid; Interaksjons-og arbeidsformer i norske klasserom etter Reform 97. In K. Klette (Ed.), Klasserommets praksisformer etter Reform 97 (pp. 39–76). Oslo, Norway: UniPub Forlag.
  • Krejsler, J. (2005). Professions and their Identities: How to explore professional development among (semi-) professions. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(4), 335–357. doi: 10.1080/00313830500202850
  • Lindblad, S., & Popkewitz, T. S. (2004). Educational restructuring: International perspectives on traveling policies.
  • Lindblad, S., & Sahlström, F. (1999). Gamla mönster och nya gränser. Om ramfaktorer och klassrumsinteraktion. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 4(1), 73–92.
  • Little, D. (2010). Causal mechanisms. In New Contributions to the Philosophy of History (pp. 97–120). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. The Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536.
  • Little, J. W. (1995). Contested ground: The basis of teacher leadership in two restructuring high schools. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 47–63. doi: 10.1086/461814
  • Lund, T. (2012). Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches: Some arguments for mixed methods research. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(2), 155–165. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2011.568674
  • Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard U.P.
  • Meyer, J. W. (2010). World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1–20. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102506
  • Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181. doi: 10.1086/231174
  • Meyer, J. W., Bromley, P., & Ramirez, F. O. (2010). Human rights in social science textbooks cross-national analyses, 1970–2008. Sociology of Education, 83(2), 111–134. doi: 10.1177/0038040710367936
  • Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ødegaard, M., & Arnesen, N. (2010). Hva skjer i naturfagklasserommet?–resultater fra en videobasert klasseromsstudie; PISA+. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 6(1), 16–32. doi: 10.5617/nordina.271
  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48–63.
  • Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109–119. doi: 10.3102/0013189X09332374
  • Siskin, L. S. (1991). Departments as different worlds: Subject subcultures in secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(2), 134–160. doi: 10.1177/0013161X91027002003
  • Small, M. L. (2011). How to conduct a mixed methods study: Recent trends in a rapidly growing literature. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 57–86. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102657.
  • Spillane, J. P., Hallett, T., & Diamond, J. B. (2003). Forms of capital and the construction of leadership: Instructional leadership in Urban elementary schools. Sociology of Education, 76(1), 1–17. doi: 10.2307/3090258
  • Statistics Sweden. (2012). Children’s experiences from school. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.
  • Stodolsky, S. S. (1988). The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Stodolsky, S. S., & Grossman, P. L. (1995). The impact of subject matter on curricular activity: An analysis of five academic subjects. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 227–249. doi: 10.3102/00028312032002227
  • Stodolsky, S. S., Ferguson, T. L., & Wimpelberg, K. (1981). The recitation persists, but what does it look like? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13(2), 121–130. doi:10.1080/0022027810130206.
  • Swedish Teacher Union, & National Teacher Union. (2001). Lärares Yrkesetik [Teachers Professional Ethics].
  • Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The “grammar” of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–479. doi: 10.3102/00028312031003453
  • Waters, M. (1989). Collegiality, bureaucratization, and professionalization: A Weberian analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 94(5), 945–972. doi: 10.1086/229109
  • Weber, M. (1983). Ekonomi and samhälle. Förståendesociologins grunder 1 [Economy & Society]. Lund: Argos.
  • Woods, P. (2011). Sociology and the school (Vol. 209). London: Routledge.
  • Wößmann, L., & West, M. (2006). Class-size effects in school systems around the world: Evidence from between-grade variation in TIMSS. European Economic Review, 50(3), 695–736. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.11.005
  • Yasumoto, J. Y., Uekawa, K., & Bidwell, C. E. (2001). The collegial focus and high school students’ achievement. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 181–209. doi: 10.2307/2673274
  • Zhao, Y., Lei, J., & Frank, K. A. (2006). The social life of technology: An ecological analysis of technology diffusion in schools. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 1(2), 135–149. doi: 10.1207/s15544818ped0102_5
  • Zimmerman, P. H., Bolhuis, J. E., Willemsen, A., Meyer, E. S., & Noldus, L. P. (2009). The observer XT: A tool for the integration and synchronization of multimodal signals. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 731–735. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.3.731

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.