Teachers’ Implicit Meaning Systems and Their Implications for Pedagogical Thinking and Practice: A Case Study from Finland

References

• Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finker, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655–701. doi:10.1037/a0029531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R. (2000). Making judgements about ability: The role of implicit theories of ability in moderating inferences from temporal and social comparison information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 965–978. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.78.5.965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 19–30. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greewald, A. G. (2011). Math-gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child Development, 82, 766–779. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01529.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 674–685. doi:10.1037/h0077149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. New York, London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindsets and math/science achievement. Report for the Carnegie Corporation of New York-Institute for Advanced Study Commission on Mathematics and Science Education. Retrieved February 11, 2015 from http://www.nationalnumeracy.org.uk/resources/114/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets and human nature: Promoting change in the Middle East, the schoolyard, the racial divide, and willpower. American Psychologist, 67, 614–622. doi:10.1037/a0029783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgements and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 265–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, C.E., & Wright, B.L. (2015). Failing our brightest kids: The global challenge of educating high-ability students. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, J. (1953). The critical incident method. Pittsburgh, PA: American Institute for Research and University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gutshall, C. A. (2013). Teachers’ mindsets for students with and without disabilities. Psychology In The Schools, 50, 1073–1083. doi:10.1002/pits.21725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutshall, C. A. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ mindset beliefs about student ability. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 12, 785–802. doi:10.14204/ejrep.34.14030
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U.H. & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness, Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanhimäki, E., & Tirri, K. (2009). Education for ethically sensitive teaching in critical incidents at school. Journal of Education for Teaching, 35, 107–121. doi:10.1080/02607470902770880
   Google Scholar
• Henderlong, J., & Lepper, M. R. (2002). The effects of praise on children’s intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 774–795. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.5.774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A.-C., & Beach, D. (2012). Predicting the use of praise among pre-service teachers: The influence of implicit theories of intelligence, social comparison and stereotype acceptance. Education Inquiry, 3, 259–281. Retrieved from http://www.education-inquiry.net/index.php/edui/article/view/22033
   Google Scholar
• Kansanen, P., Tirri, K., Meri, M., Klokfors, L., Husu, J., & Jyrhämä, R. 2000. Teachers’ pedagogical thinking. theoretical landscapes, practical challenges. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kärkkäinen, R., & Räty, H. (2010). Parents’ and teachers’ views of the child’s academic potential, Educational Studies, 36, 229–232. doi:10.1080/03055690903162424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, S., Kuusisto, E., & Tirri, K. (2016). Finnish teachers’ conceptions of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39(2), 151–167. doi:10.1177/0162353216640936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, S., & Tirri, K. (2015). How Finnish elementary school teachers meet the needs of gifted students. High Ability Studies, 1–17. doi:10.1080/13598139.2015.1108185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavy, V., & Sand, E. (2015). On the origins of gender human capital gaps: Short- and long-term consequences of teachers’ stereotypical biases. NBER Working paper series, Working paper 20909. Cambridge, MA: National bureau of economic research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w209099.2.2015
   Google Scholar
• Levy, S., Stroessner, S., & Dweck, C.S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421–1436. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohman, D. F. (2005). An aptitude perspective on talent: Implications for identification of academically gifted minority students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 333–360. doi:10.4219/jeg-2005-341
   Google Scholar
• Molden, D. C., Plaks, J. E. & Dweck, C. S. (2006). “Meaningful” social inferences: Effects of implicit theories on inferential processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 738–752. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61, 192–203. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33–52. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunesku, D. (2013). Scaled-up social psychology: Intervening wisely and broadly in education. (Doctoral Dissertation; Stanford University). Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/~paunesku/paunesku_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Plaks, J. E., Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2005). Violations of implicit theories and the sense of prediction and control: Implications for motivated person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 245–262. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaks, J. E., Levy, S. R., & Dweck, C. S. (2009). Lay theories of personality: Cornerstones of meaning in social cognition. Social and Personal Psychology Compass, 3(6), 1069–1081. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00222.x
   Google Scholar
• Plaks, J., & Stecher, K. (2007). Unexpected improvement, decline, and stasis: A prediction confidence perspective on achievement success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 667–684. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaks, J. E., Stroessner, S. J., Dweck, C. S., & Sherman, J. W. (2001). Person theories and attention allocation: Preferences for stereotypic versus counterstereotypic information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 876–893. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, Y., Pomerantz, E. & Deng, C. (2016). Mothers’ goals for adolescents in the United States and China: Content and transmission. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26(1), 126–141. doi:10.1111/jora.12176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It’s ok – Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 731–737. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012
   Google Scholar
• Rydell, R. J., Hugenberg, K., Ray, D., & Mackie, D. M. (2007). Implicit theories about groups and stereotyping: The role of group entitativity. Personality and Social Psychnology Bulletin, 33, 549–558. doi:10.1177/0146167206296956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Räty, H., & Snellman, L. (1998). Social representations of educability. Social Psychology of Education, 1, 359–373. doi:10.1007/BF02335554
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmit, J. A., Shumov, L., & Kackar-Cam, H. (2015). Exploring teacher effects for mindset intervention outcomes in seventh-grade science classes. Middle Grades Research Journal, 10, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80–83. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, S. S., Cho, Y., & Cassady, J. (2013). Goal structures: The role of teachers’ achievement goals and theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Education, 81, 84–104. doi:10.1080/00220973.2011.635168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stornes, T., Bru, E., & Idsoe, T. (2008). Classroom social structure and motivational climates: On the influence of teachers’ involvement, teachers’ autonomy support and regulation in relation to motivational climates in school classrooms. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 315–329. doi:10.1080/00313830802025124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedemann, J. (2002). Teachers’ gender stereotypes as determinants of teacher perceptions in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50, 49–62. doi:10.1023/A:1020518104346
   Google Scholar
• Tirri, K. (2014). The last 40 years in Finnish teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40, 1–10. doi:10.1080/02607476.2014.956545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirri, K. & Nokelainen, P. (2011) The influence of self-perception of abilities and attribution styles on academic choices: Implications for gifted education. Roper Review, 33, 1–7. doi:10.1080/02783193.2011.530204
   Google Scholar
• Tirri, K. (2010). Teachers’ values underlying their professional ethics. In T. Lovat, R. Toomey, N. Clement, R. Pring, & N. Noddings (Eds.), International Handbook on values education and student wellbeing (pp. 153–163). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tirri, K., & Kuusisto, E. (2013). How Finland serves gifted and talented pupils. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(1), 84–96. doi:10.1177/0162353212468066
   Google Scholar
• Tochon, F. V. (2009). From video cases to video pedagogy: A framework for video feedback and reflection in pedagogical research praxis. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 53–65). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Trade Union of Education in Finland. (2010). Code of ethics for Finnish teachers. Helsinki: Trade Union of Education in Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Uljens, M., & Nyman, C. (2013). Educational leadership in Finland or building a nation with bildung. In L. Moos (Ed.), Transnational influence on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership: Is there a Nordic model? (pp. 31–48), Studies in Educational Leadership 19. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: when students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47, 302–314. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.722805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: they’re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81, 267–301. doi:10.3102/0034654311405999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar