The Role of Beliefs and Motivational Variables in Enhancing Word Problem Solving

References

• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J., & Karabenick, S. A. (2011). Motivation and students’ use of learning strategies: Evidence of unidirectional effects in mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 416–428. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modeling, applications, and links to other subjects – state, trends, and issues in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 37–68. doi: 10.1007/BF00302716
   Google Scholar
• Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M., & Lindenberger, U. (2012). Daily variability in working memory is coupled with negative affect: The role of attention and motivation. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 12(3), 605–617. doi: 10.1037/a0024436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, F. B., & Satorra, A. (2012). Principles and practice of scaled difference chi square testing. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19, 372–398. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2012.687671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhardt, H. (1994). Mathematical applications in school curriculum. In T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 3621–3624). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, R., Lester, F., & O’Daffer, P. (1987). How to evaluate progress in problem solving. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, M., & Xihua, Z. (2008). Family and motivation effects on mathematics achievement: Analyses of students in 41 countries. Learning and Instruction, 18(4), 321–336. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). The Jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27, 291–315. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2703_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Corte, E., Mason, L., Depaepe, F., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Self-regulation of mathematical knowledge and skills. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 155–172). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Corte, E., Op ‘t Eynde, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2002). Knowing what to believe: The relevance of students’ mathematical beliefs for mathematics education. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 297–320). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Depaepe, F., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Analysis of the realistic nature of word problems in current elementary mathematics education. In L. Verschaffel et al. (Eds.), Word and worlds: Modelling verbal descriptions of situations (pp. 245–263). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Depaepe, F., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Teachers’ approaches towards word problem solving: Elaborating or restricting the problem context. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 26, 152–160. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depaepe, F., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2015). Students’ non-realistic mathematical modeling as a drawback of teachers’ beliefs about and approaches to word problem solving. In B. Pepin & B. Roesken-Winter (Eds.), From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education. Exploring a mosaic of relationships and interactions (pp. 137–159). Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3, pp. 1017–1095). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Garofalo, J. (1989). Beliefs and their influence on mathematical performance. Mathematics Teacher, 82, 502–505. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27966379
   Google Scholar
• Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. J. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 163–176. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/748391
   Google Scholar
• Greer, B. (1993). The modelling perspective on wor(l)d problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 12, 239–250. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1994-19459-001
   Google Scholar
• Greer, B. (1997). Modelling reality in mathematics classrooms: The case of word problems. Learning and Instruction, 7, 293–307. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00006-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, B. A., DeBacker, T. K., Ravindran, B., & Krows, A. J. (1999). Goals, values and beliefs as predictors of achievement and effort in high school mathematics classrooms. Sex Roles, 40, 421–458. doi: 10.1023/A:1018871610174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hannula, M. S., Kaasila, R., Pehkonen, E., & Laine, A. (2007). Elementary education students’ advancement during mathematics education course and their memories of mathematics in family context. In K. Hoskonen & M. S. Hannula (Eds.), Current state of research on mathematical beliefs XII: Proceedings of the MAVI-7 Workshop, May 25–28, 2006, pp. 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, L. (1989). Describing the affective domain: Saying what we mean. In D. Mc Leod & V. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving (pp. 37–45). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, K. M. (1997). The effect of year-long instruction in mathematical problem solving on middle-school students’ attitudes, beliefs, and abilities. The Journal of Experimental Education, 66, 5–28. doi: 10.1080/00220979709601392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, B., Norqvist, M., Liljekvist, Y., & Lithner, J. (2014). Learning mathematics through algorithmic and creative reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 36(1), 20–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Kajamies, A., Vauras, M., & Kinnunen, R. (2010). Instructing low-achievers in mathematical word problem solving. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54, 335–355. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2010.493341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallick, B., & Brewer, R. (1997). How to assess problem-solving skills in math. New York, NY: Scholastic.
   Google Scholar
• Kloosterman, P. (1996). Students’ beliefs about knowing and learning mathematics: Implications for motivation. In M. Carr (Ed.), Motivation in mathematics (pp. 131–156). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kloosterman, P. (2002). Beliefs about mathematics and mathematics learning in the secondary school: Measurement and implications for motivation. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 247–270). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kloosterman, P., Raymond, A. M., & Emenaker, C. (1996). Students’ beliefs about mathematics: A three-year study. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 39–56. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1001791?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder, G. C., & Forgasz, H. J. (2002). Measuring mathematical beliefs and their impact on the learning of mathematics. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 95–114). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276. doi: 10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2
   Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maaß, J., & Schlöglmann, W. (2009). Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education: New research results. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, G. (1984). Mind and body: Psychology and emotion and stress. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2001). Modelling modeling: Where is the centre of gravity of-for-when teaching modeling? In J. F. Mators, W. Blum, S. K. Houston, & S. P. Carreira (Eds.), Modelling and mathematics education. ICTMA 9: Applications in science and technology (pp. 39–61). Chichester: Horwood.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L., & Scrivani, L. (2004). Enhancing students’ mathematical beliefs: An intervention study. Learning and Instruction, 14, 153–176. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. B. (1989). The role of affect in mathematical problem solving. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 20–36). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. B. (1991). Research on learning and instruction in arithmetic: The role of affect. In E. Fennema, T. P. Carpenter, & S. J. Lamon (Eds.), Integrating research on teaching learning mathematics (pp. 55–82). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575–596). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, D.B., & Adams, V.M. (1989). Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. (2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1–33). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 882–891. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02070.x/pdf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nagin, D.S. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2010). Why is teaching with problem solving important to student learning? Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Niss, M. (2015). Prescriptive modelling – challenges and opportunities. In G. A. Stillman, W. Blum, & M. Salett Biembengut (Eds.), Mathematical modelling in education research and practice, international perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 67–79). Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Op ‘t Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2002). Framing students’ mathematics-related beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 13–37). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Pehkonen, E. (1995). Pupils’ view of mathematics: Initial report for an international comparison project. University of Helsinki, Department of Teacher Education. Research Report 152. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/ERIC_ED419712
   Google Scholar
• Pehkonen, E. (1998). Teachers’ conceptions on mathematics teaching. In M. S. Hannula (Eds.), Current state of research on mathematical beliefs V: Proceedings of the MAVI-5 workshop, pp. 58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Pehkonen, E., & Törner, G. (1996). Mathematical beliefs and different aspects of their meaning. International Review on Mathematical Education (ZDM), 28, 101–108.
   Google Scholar
• Pepin, B., & Roesken-Winter, B. (2015). From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education. Exploring a mosaic of relationships and interactions. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pongsakdi, N., Brezovszky, B., Hannula-Sormunen, M. M., & Lehtinen, E. (2013). An analysis of word problem solving tasks: A development of framework. Poster presented at the15th conference of the Junior Researchers of EARLI, 26-27 August, Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Pongsakdi, N., Laine, T., Veermans, K., Hannula-Sormunen M., & Lehtinen, E. (2016). Improving word problem performance in elementary school students by enriching word problems used in mathematics teaching. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 23–44. Retrieved from http://ncm.gu.se/pdf/nomad/21_2_023044_pongsakdi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reusser, K., & Stebler, R. (1997). Every word problem has a solution: The social rationality of mathematical modeling in schools. Learning and Instruction, 7, 309–327. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00014-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research - Online, 8(2), 23–74. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2003-08119-003
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). Episodes and executive decisions in mathematical problem-solving skills. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 345–395). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985a). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985b). Students’ beliefs about mathematics and their effects on mathematical performance: A questionnaire analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American educational research association, 31 March - 4 April, Chicago, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Explorations of students’ mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 338–355. doi: 10.2307/749440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1991). On mathematics as sense-making: An informal attack on the unfortunate divorce of formal and informal mathematics. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 311–343). Hillsdale, MI: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Eds.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York, NY: McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schommer-Aikins, M., Duell, O. K., & Hutter, R. (2005). Epistemological beliefs, mathematical problem-solving beliefs, and academic performance of middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 105(3), 289–304. doi: 10.1086/428745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207–231. Retrieved from https://wss.apan.org/jko/mls/Learning20Content/schunk20academic20self20efficacy.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seegers, G., & Boekaerts, M. (1993). Task motivation and mathematics achievement in actual task situations. Learning and Instruction, 3, 133–150. doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(93)90012-O
   Google Scholar
• Shores, M. L., & Shannon, D. M. (2007). The effects of self-regulation, motivation, anxiety, and attributions on mathematics achievement for fifth and sixth grade students. School Science and Mathematics, 107(6), 225–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2007.tb18284.x
   Google Scholar
• Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332. doi: 10.1080/00220670209596607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenmark, J. (1991). Mathematics assessment: Myths, models, good questions, and practical suggestions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Verschaffel, L., & De Corte, E. (1997). Teaching realistic mathematical modeling in the elementary school: A teaching experiment with fifth graders. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 577–601. doi: 10.2307/749692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., & Lasure, S. (1994). Realistic considerations in mathematical modelling of school arithmetic word problems. Learning and Instruction, 4, 273–294. doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90002-7
   Google Scholar
• Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., Lasure, S., Van Vaerenbergh, G., Bogaerts, H., & Ratinckx, E. (1999). Learning to solve mathematical application problems: A design experiment with fifth graders. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 195–229. doi: 10.1207/s15327833mtl0103_2
   Google Scholar
• Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91–120). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar