Changes in Children’s Agency Beliefs and Control Expectancy in Classes With and Without a Special Emphasis in Finland from Grade Four to Grade Six

References

• Ball, S. J., & Vincent, C. (1998). “I heard It on the grapevine”:’hot’ knowledge and school choice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(3), 377–400. doi: 10.1080/0142569980190307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belfi, B., Goos, M., De Fraine, B., & Van Damme, J. (2012). The effect of class composition by gender and ability on secondary school students’ school well-being and academic self-concept: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 7(1), 62–74. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2011.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berisha, A. K., & Seppänen, P. (2017). Pupil selection segments urban comprehensive schooling in Finland: Composition of school classes in pupils’ school performance, gender, and ethnicity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61, 240–254. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2015.1120235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernelius, V. (2013). Eriytyvät kaupunkikoulut: Helsingin peruskoulujen oppilaspohjan erot, perheiden kouluvalinnat ja oppimistuloksiin liittyvät aluevaikutukset osana kaupungin eriytymiskehitystä. [Differentiation of urban schools. The differences of pool of pupils, parental school choice and learning outcomes in connection with neighbourhood effects as part of the segregation of the city of Helsinki]. Helsingin kaupungin tietokeskus. Tutkimuksia 2013:1. Helsinki: City of Helsinki Urban Facts.
   Google Scholar
• Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40. doi: 10.1023/A:1021302408382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, M. A., & Sass, T. R. (2013). Classroom peer effects and student achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(1), 51–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman, K. G., & Zhang, L. (2012). Classroom peer effects and academic achievement: Evidence from a Chinese middle school. China Economic Review, 23(2), 223–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caro, D. H., McDonald, J. T., & Willms, J. D. (2009). Socio-economic status and academic achievement trajectories from childhood to adolescence. Canadian Journal of Education, 32(3), 558–590.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, J. P. (1990). Context, self and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life span. In D. Cicchetti, & M. Beeghly (Eds.), The self in transition: Infancy to childhood (pp. 66–98). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, G., Reay, D., James, D., Jamieson, F., Beedell, P., Hollingworth, S., & Williams, K. (2008). White middle-class parents, identities, educational choice and the urban comprehensive school: Dilemmas, ambivalence and moral ambiguity. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(3), 261–272. doi: 10.1080/01425690801966295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demetriou, A., & Kazi, S. (2006). Self-awareness in g (with processing efficiency and reasoning). Intelligence, 34(3), 297–317. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2005.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, P., Kuyper, H., van der Werf, G., Buunk, A. P., & van der Zee, Y. G. (2008). Social comparison in the classroom: A review. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 828–879. doi: 10.3102/0034654308321210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å, Meland, E., & Breidablik, D. (2014). Self-beliefs among students: Grade level and gender differences in self-esteem, self-efficacy and implicit theories of intelligence. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbelsteen, S., Levin, J., & Oosterbeek, H. (2002). The causal effect of class size on scholastic achievement: Distinguishing the pure class size effect from the effect of changes in class composition. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64(1), 17–38. doi: 10.1111/1468-0084.00003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duru-Bellat, M., & Mingat, A. (1998). Importance of ability grouping in French “colleges” and its impact upon pupils’ academic achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 4(4), 348–368. doi: 10.1076/edre.4.4.348.6951
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self-and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64(3), 830–847. doi: 10.2307/1131221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. doi: 10.1177/001872675400700202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geldhof, G. J., & Little, T. D. (2011). Influences of children’s and adolescents’ action-control processes on school achievement, peer relationships, and coping with challenging life events. In R. M. Lerner, J. V. Lerner, E. P. Bowers, S. Lewin-Bizan, S. Gestsdottir, & J. B. Urban (Eds.), Thriving in childhood and adolescence: The role of self-regulation processes. New directions for child and adolescent development (Vol. 133, pp. 45–59). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A. (2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. The Economic Journal, 116(510), C63–C76. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01076.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter, S. (1998). The development of self-representations. In W. Damon (ed.) Handbook of child psychology. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 553–617). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, xxiv, 1208 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. (2002). Classroom composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(5), 449–481. doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00015-6
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of 800+ meta-analyses on achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hautamäki. (2010). Minne vaihtelu menee? Oppilaiden luokkien ja koulujen väliset erot oppimistuloksissa. [Where does the variance go? Differences in achievement between pupils, classes and schools]. In M. Rimpelä & V. Bernelius (Eds.) Peruskoulujen oppimistulokset ja oppilaiden hyvinvointi eriytyvällä Helsingin seudulla: Metrop-tutkimus 2010–2013 (pp. 49–54). Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto, Geotieteiden ja maantieteen laitos.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalalahti, M., Silvennoinen, H., & Varjo, J. (2015). Kouluvalinnat kykyjen mukaan?: Erot painotettuun opetukseen valikoitumisessa [School choices according to aptitude? Differences in the selection of classes with a special emphasis]. Kasvatus: Suomen Kasvatustieteellinen Aikakauskirja, 46, 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kosunen, S. (2014). Reputation and parental logics of action in local school choice space in Finland. Journal of Education Policy, 29(4), 443–466. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2013.844859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosunen, S., & Carrasco, A. (2016). Parental preferences in school choice: Comparing reputational hierarchies of schools in Chile and Finland. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46, 172–193. doi: 10.1080/03057925.2013.861700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosunen, S., & Seppänen, P. (2015). The transmission of capital und a feel for the game: Upper-class school choice in Finland. Acta Sociologica, 58(4), 329–342. doi: 10.1177/0001699315607968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Hawley, P. H., Henrich, C. C., & Marsland, K. W. (2002). Three views of the agentic self: A developmental synthesis. In E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 389–404). Rochester, NY: University Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., & Lopez, D. F. (1997). Regularities in the development of children’s causality beliefs about school performance across six sociocultural contexts. Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 165–175. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.33.1.165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Lopez, D. F., Oettingen, G., & Baltes, P. B. (2001). A comparative-longitudinal study of action-control beliefs and school performance: On the role of context. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(3), 237–245. doi: 10.1080/01650250042000258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Stetsenko, A., & Maier, H. (1999). Action-control beliefs and school performance: A longitudinal study of Moscow children and adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23(3), 799–823. doi: 10.1080/016502599383801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg, L. E., Wanner, B., & Little, T. D. (2008). Age and school-type differences in children’s beliefs about school performance. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(6), 531–541. doi: 10.1177/0165025408095558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1984). Big fish little pond effect on academic self-concept. Educational Psychology Review, 2(2), 77–172. doi: 10.1007/BF01322177
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1990). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2(2), 77–172. doi: 10.1007/BF01322177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., O’Mara, A. J., & Craven, R. G. (2008). The big-fish–little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 319–350. doi: 10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millsapp, R., & Cham, H. (2012). Investigating factorial invariance in longitudinal data. In B. Larsen, T. Little, & N. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 109–128). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, J. G. (1978). The development of the concepts of effort and ability, perception of academic attainment, and the understanding that difficult tasks require more ability. Child Development, 49, 800–814. doi: 10.2307/1128250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, J. G., & Miller, A. T. (1983). The differentiation of the concepts of difficulty and ability. Child Development, 54, 951–959. doi: 10.2307/1129899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemivirta, M. (2000). “Ehkä osaisinkin, mutta kun ei huvita” – Motivaatio ja koulumenestys yläasteen päättyessä. [“Maybe I could, but I don’t care to” – Motivation and school achievement at the end of lower secondary education]. In J. Hautamäki, P. Arinen, B. Lindblom, A. Hautamäki, S. Kupiainen, M. Niemivirta & P. Scheinin (Eds.) Oppimaan oppiminen yläasteella. Oppimistulosten arviointi, 7. Helsinki: Opetushallitus
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. Perception, 11, 239–266.
   Google Scholar
• Pallas, A. M., Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., & Stluka, M. F. (1994). Ability-group effects: Instructional, social, or institutional? Sociology of Education, 67, 27–46. doi: 10.2307/2112748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (1996). The role of expectancy and self-efficacy beliefs. In P. Pintrich, & D. Schunk (Eds.), Motivation in education: Theory, research & applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Retrieved from: http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/PS.html
   Google Scholar
• Reay, D. (1998). Cultural reproduction: Mothers’ involvement in children’s primary schooling. In M. Grenfell, & D. James (Eds.), Bourdieu and education policy: Acts of practical theory (pp. 55–71). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richer, S. (1976). Reference-group theory and ability grouping: A convergence of sociological theory and educational research. Sociology of Education, 49, 65–71. doi: 10.2307/2112394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinne, R. (2000). The globalisation of education: Finnish education on the doorstep of the new EU millennium. Educational Review, 52(2), 131–142. doi: 10.1080/713664043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppänen, P. (2003a). Patterns of “public-school markets” in the Finnish comprehensive school from a comparative perspective. Journal of Education Policy, 18(5), 513–531. doi: 10.1080/0268093032000124875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppänen, P. (2003b). Miten ja miksi kouluvalintapolitiikka tuli Suomen peruskouluun 1990-luvulla?: kouluvalinnan lainsäädäntömuutokset sekä perustelut ja kritiikki kansainvälisessä valossa. [How and why school choice policy arrived at the Finnish comprehensive school during the 1990s. The legislation changes and arguments of the school choice in the international perspective]. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka 68, 175–187.
   Google Scholar
• Seppänen, P., Kalalahti, M., Rinne, R., & Simola, H. (2015). Lohkoutuva peruskoulu. Perheiden kouluvalinnat, yhteiskuntaluokat ja koulutuspolitiikka. [Segmenting comprehensive school: Parental school choice, social classes and education policies]. Research in Educational Sciences 68. Jyväskylä: Finnish Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Seppänen, P., Rinne, R., & Riipinen, P. (2012). Yläkouluvalinnat,. koulujen suosio ja perheiden sosiaalinen asema: Lohkoutuuko perusopetus kaupungeissa?. [ School choice, school popularity and families’social status – segmentation of basic education in Finnish cities?] Kasvatus: Suomen Kasvatustieteellinen Aikakauskirja, 43(3), 226–243.
   Google Scholar
• Simola, H., Seppänen, P., Kosunen, S. & Vartiainen, H. (2015). Oppilasvalikoinnin paluu? [return of pupil selection?]. In P. Seppänen, M. Kalalahti, R. Rinne & H. Simola (Eds.). Lohkoutuva peruskoulu. Perheiden kouluvalinnat, yhteiskuntaluokat ja koulutuspolitiikka. [Segmenting comprehensive school: Parental school choice, social classes and education policies] Research in Educational Sciences 68 (pp.87–122). Jyväskylä: Finnish Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., Chapman, M., & Baltes, P. B. (1988). Control, means-ends, and agency beliefs: A new conceptualization and its measurement during childhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 117–133. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: A process model of perceived control and children’s engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 22–32. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Connell, J. P., Eccles, J. S., & Wellborn, J. G. (1998). Individual differences and the development of perceived control. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(2/3), i-231. doi: 10.2307/1166220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M. C., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016). What One hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K–12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of Two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetsenko, A., Little, T. D., Gordeeva, T., Grasshof, M., & Oettingen, G. (2000). Gender effects in children’s beliefs about school performance: A cross-cultural study. Child Development, 71(2), 517–527. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetsenko, A., Little, T. D., Oettingen, G., & Baltes, P. B. (1995). Agency, control, and means-ends beliefs about school performance in Moscow children: How similar are they to beliefs of western children? Developmental Psychology, 31(2), 285–299. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.31.2.285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stipek, D. J., & Gralinski, J. H. (1991). Gender differences in children’s achievement-related beliefs and emotional responses to success and failure in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 361–371. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stipek, D., & Iver, D. M. (1989). Developmental change in children’s assessment of intellectual competence. Child Development, 60, 521–538. doi: 10.2307/1130719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulkunen, S., Välijärvi, J., Arffman, I., Harju-Luukkainen, H., Kupari, P., Nissinen, K., … Reinikainen, P. (2010). PISA 2009 ensituloksia. [First Results of PISA 2009]. Reports of the Ministry of Education and Culture 2010:21. Helsinki: Ministry of Education and Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 788–806. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vainikainen, M-P, Wüstenberg, S., Kupiainen, S., Hotulainen, R., & Hautamäki, J. (2015). Development of learning to learn skills in primary school. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 34(4), 376–392. doi: 10.1080/02601370.2015.1060025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varjo, J., Kalalahti, M. & Silvennoinen, H. (2014). Families, school choice, and democratic iterations on the right to education and freedom of education in Finnish municipalities. Journal of School Choice, 8, 20–48. doi: 10.1080/15582159.2014.875408
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, C., Ball, S. J., & Kemp, S. (2004). The social geography of childcare: Making up a middle-class child. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(2), 229–244. doi: 10.1080/0142569042000205091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widaman, K. F., Ferrer, E., & Conger, R. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives, 4(1), 10–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar