497
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Exploring Educational Opportunities for Foreign National Prisoners in Europe

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 389-407 | Received 05 Apr 2017, Accepted 02 Dec 2018, Published online: 09 Jan 2019

References

  • Aebi, M. F., Tiago, M. M., & Burkhardt, C. C. (2016). SPACE I—council of Europe annual penal statistics: Prison populations. Survey 2015. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  • Atabay, T. (2009). Handbook on prisoners with special needs. New York: United Nations Publication.
  • Bagnall, A.-M., South, J., Hulme, C., Woodall, J., Vinall-Collier, K., … Wright, N. M. (2015). A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of peer education and peer support in prisons. BMC Public Health, 15(290), doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1584-x
  • Barkan, M., Toprak, E., Kumtepe, A. T., Kumtepe, E. G., Ataizi, M., Pilanci, H., … Kayabas, B. K. (2011). Eliminating language barriers online at European prisons (ELBEP): A case-study. Educational Media International, 48(3), 235–248. doi: 10.1080/09523987.2011.615160
  • Barnoux, M., & Wood, J. (2013). The specific needs of foreign national prisoners and the threat to their mental health from being imprisoned in a foreign country. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(2), 240–246. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.012
  • Behan, C. (2014). Learning to escape: Prison education, rehabilitation and the potential for transformation. Journal of Prison Education and Reentry, 1(1), 20–31. doi: 10.15845/jper.v1i1.594
  • Berglee, R. (2012). World regional geography: People, places and globalization. Morehead: Morehead State University.
  • Bhui, H. S. (2004). The resettlement needs of foreign national offenders. Criminal Justice Matters, 56(1), 36–44. doi: 10.1080/09627250408552947
  • Bhui, H. S. (2009). Foreign national prisoners: Issues and debates. In H. S. Bhui (Ed.), Race and criminal justice (pp. 154–169). London: SAGE.
  • Bonevski, B., Randell, M., Paul, C., Chapman, K., Twyman, L., … Hughes, C. (2014). Researching the hard-to-reach: A systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(42), doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-42
  • Bosworth, M., Hasselberg, I., & Turnbull, S. (2016). Punishment, citizenship and identity: An introduction. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 16(3), 257–266. doi: 10.1177/1748895816635720
  • Brosens, D., Croux, F., & De Donder, L. (2017). Distance education for citizens detained abroad: Evaluation of the FORINER pilot projects. Zelzate: University Press.
  • Brosens, D., De Donder, L., Dury, S., & Verté, D. (2015). Barriers to participation in vocational orientation programmes among prisoners. Journal of Prison Education and Reentry, 2(2), 8–22. doi: 10.15845/jper.v2i2.817
  • CEP. (n.d). Good practice guide. Developing services for European citizens detained abroad. Utrecht: Confederation of European Probation. Retrieved from http://cep-probation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Good-Practice-Guide2.pdf
  • Cooper, R., & Liou, D. D. (2007). The structure and culture of information pathways: Rethinking opportunity to learn in urban high schools during the ninth grade transition. The High School Journal, 91(1), 43–56. doi: 10.1353/hsj.2007.0020
  • Costelloe, A., & Langelid, T. (2011). Prison education and training in Europe—A review and commentary of existing literature, analysis and evaluation. Birmingham: GHK.
  • Costelloe, A., & Warner, K. (2014). Prison education across Europe: Policy, practice, politics. London Review of Education, 12(2), 175–183. doi: 10.18546/LRE.12.2.03
  • Council of Europe. (1989). Recommendation R(89)12 on education in prison. Retrieved from http://pjp-eu.coe.int/documents/3983922/6970334/CMRec+(89)+12+on+education+in+prison.pdf/9939f80e-77ee-491d-82f7-83e62566c872
  • Council of Europe. (2006). European Prison Rules. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dgi/criminallawcoop/Presentation/Documents/European-Prison-Rules_978-92-871-5982-3.pdf
  • Council of Europe. (2012). Recommendation CM/Rec. 12 of the Committee of Ministers to member States concerning foreign prisoners (2012). Retrieved from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:r3ymIY8GtA0J:pjp-eu.coe.int/documents/3983922/6970334/CMRec%2B%282012%29%2B12%2Bconcerning%2Bforeign%2Bprisoners.pdf/a13a6dc6-facd-4aaa-9cc6-3bf875ac8b0f+&cd=1&hl=nl&ct=clnk&gl=be
  • Coyle, A. (2009). A human rights approach to prison management : Handbook for prison staff. London: International Centre for Prison Studies.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angles: SAGE Publications.
  • Croux, F., Brosens, D., Vandevelde, S., & De Donder, L. (2018). Foreign national prisoners in flanders (Belgium): motivations and barriers to participation in prison programmes. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. doi: 10.1007/s10610-018-9372-7
  • Delaere, G., De Caluwé, S., & Clarebout, G. (2013). Prison education and breaking through the walls in flanders: The motivational orientations of long-term prisoners. Journal of Correctional Education, 64(2), 2–21.
  • Easton, S. (2011). Prisoners rights: Principles and practice. London: Routledge.
  • Eikeland, O., Manger, T., & Asbjørnsen, A. (2009). Education in nordic prisons—prisoners’ educational backgrounds, preferences and motivation: Education in nordic prisons. Copenhagen: TemaNord.
  • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. doi: 10.1177/160940690600500107
  • Gaes, G. G. (2008). The impact of prison education programs on post-release outcomes. New York: Reentry Roundtable on Education, John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
  • Gee, J. (2008). A sociocultural perspective on opportunity to learn. In P. Moss, D. Pullin, J. Gee, E. Haertel, & L. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 76–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Giles, M., Paris, L., & Whale, J. (2016). The role of art education in adult prisons: The western Australian experience. International Review of Education, 62(6), 689–709. doi: 10.1007/s11159-016-9604-3
  • Gresalfi, M. S., Barnes, J., & Cross, D. (2012). When does an opportunity become an opportunity? Unpacking classroom practice through the lens of ecological psychology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 249–267. doi: 10.1007/s10649-011-9367-5
  • Haertel, E. H., Moss, P. A., Pullin, D. C., & Gee, J. P. (2008). Introduction. In P. A. Moss, D. C. Pullin, J. P. Gee, E. H. Haertel, & L. J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity and opportunity to learn (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hawley, J., Murphy, I., & Souto-Otero, M. (2013). Prison education and training in Europe. Current state-of-play and challenges. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv56865
  • Hetland, H., Iversen, A. C., Eikeland, O. J., & Manger, T. (2015). Former welfare clients in prison: Education and self-reported learning problems. European Journal of Social Work, 18(2), 198–210. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2014.897219
  • Hollin, C. R. (2013). Psychology and crime: An introduction to criminological psychology. London: Routledge.
  • Kim, R. H., & Clark, D. (2013). The effect of prison-based college education programs on recidivism: Propensity score matching approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(3), 196–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.03.001
  • Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). New Dehli: SAGE Publications.
  • Lemmers, F. (2015). Het onderwijs aan buitenlandse gedetineerden blijft onder de Europese maat. Sancties. Tijdschrift over Straffen En Maatregelen, 3, 152–161. (In Dutch).
  • Liamputtong, P. (2011). Focus group methodology. Principles and practice. London: SAGE.
  • Lloyd, M., Bhui, H. S., Bye, E., Laing-Morton, T., Tysoe, E., Fossi, J., & Trussler, L. (2006). Foreign national prisoners: A thematic review. London: HM Inspectorate of Prisons.
  • Magee, H., & Foster, J. (2011). Peer support in prison health care. An investigation into the listening scheme in one adult male prison. London: University of Greenwich.
  • Mujere, N. (2016). Sampling in research. In M. L. Baran, & J. E. Jones (Eds.), Mixed methods research for improved scientific study (pp. 107–122). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Mulgrew, R. (2016). Foreign prisoners: findings of a study in foreign national only prisons in Norway and the Netherlands. Retrieved 27 May 2016, from http://cep-probation.org/foreign-prisoners-findings-of-a-study-in-foreign-national-only-prisons-in-norway-and-the-netherlands/
  • Muñoz, V. (2009). Promotion and protection of human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development: The right to education to persons in detention. United Nations. Retrieved from https://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/11session/A.HRC.11.8_en.pdf?
  • Perrin, C., & Blagden, N. (2016). Movements towards desistance via peer-support roles in prison. In L. S. Abrams, E. Hughes, M. Inderbitzin, & R. Meek (Eds.), The voluntary sector in prisons. Encouraging personal and institutional change (pp. 115–142). New York: Palgrave Studies.
  • Rosário, P., Núñez, J. C., Pereira, J., Fuentes, S., Gaeta, M., Cunha, J., & Polydoro, S. (2016). Studying while doing time: Understanding inmates’ conceptions of learning. British Educational Research Journal, 42(1), 151–167. doi: 10.1002/berj.3194
  • Roth, B. B., & Manger, T. (2014). The relationship between prisoners’ educational motives and previous incarceration, sentence length, and sentence served. London Review of Education, 12, 209–220. doi: 10.18546/LRE.12.2.06
  • Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research. A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). Amsterdam: Teachers College Press.
  • Smit, D. v. Z., & Snacken, S. (2009). Principles of european prison Law and policy: Penology and human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Social Exclusion Unit. (2002). Reducing re-offending by ex-prisoners. London: Social Exclusion Unit.
  • Stern, K. (2013). Prison education and our will to punish. Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 33, 443–458.
  • Sue, V. M., & Ritter, L. A. (2012). Conducting online surveys (2nd ed.). Los Angles: Sage Publications.
  • Sykes, G. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Ugelvik, T. (2014). The incarceration of foreigners in european prisons. In S. Pickering, & J. Ham (Eds.), The routledge handbook on crime and international migration (pp. 107–120). London: Routledge.
  • Ugelvik, T., & Damsa, D. (2017). The pains of crimmigration imprisonment: Perspectives from a Norwegian all-foreign prison. British Journal of Criminology. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azx067
  • United Nations. (1955). Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners. Retrieved from http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b36e8.html
  • van Kalmthout, A., Hofstee-van der Meulen, F., & Dünkel, F. (2007). Comparative overview, conclusions and recommendations. In A. van Kalmthout, F. Hofstee-van der Meulen, & F. Dünkel (Eds.), Foreigners in European prisons (pp. 7–88). Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.
  • Warr, J. (2016). The deprivation of certitude, legitimacy and hope: Foreign national prisoners and the pains of imprisonment. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 16(3), 301–318. doi: 10.1177/1748895815603775
  • Westrheim, K., & Manger, T. (2013). Educational background, preferences and needs. A qualitative study of prisoners from Iraq, Poland, Russia, Serbia and Somalia. Hordaland: County Governor of Hordaland.
  • Westrheim, K., & Manger, T. (2014). Iraqi prisoners in Norway: Educational background, participation, preferences and barriers to education. Journal of Prison Education and Reentry, 1(1), 6–19. doi: 10.15845/jper.v1i1.593
  • Yildiz, C., & Bartlett, A. (2011). Language, foreign nationality and ethnicity in an English prison: Implications for the quality of health and social research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(10), 637–640. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040931

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.