Tertiary-Level Students’ English Writing Performance and Metacognitive Awareness: A Group Metacognitive Support Perspective

References

• Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate student’s learning with Hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523–535. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beals, K. A. (2016). Thinking through writing: Guidelines for planning learner-centered instruction. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281. doi: 10.3102/00346543065003245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 161–237). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Conner, L. N. (2007). Cueing metacognition to improve researching and essay writing in a final year high school biology class. Research in Science Education, 37, 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s11165-004-3952-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlin, D. (1999). Ways of coming to understand: Metacognitive awareness among first-year university students. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43(2), 191–208. doi: 10.1080/0031383990430205
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, C., & Brunstein, J. C. (2007). Improving fourth-grade students’ composition skills: Effects of strategy instruction and self-regulation procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 297–310. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Gillespie, A., & Mckeown, D. (2013). Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Reading and Writing, 26, 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, D. J., Keener, M. C., & Kircher, J. C. (2009). Writing is applied metacognition. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 154–172). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzog, C., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). Metacognitive approaches can promote transfer of training: Comment on McDaniel and Bugg. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 61–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jason, R. (2009). Learning nonfiction in an ESL class: The interaction of situated practice and teacher scaffolding in a genre study. Reading Teacher, 62(7), 580–589. doi: 10.1598/RT.62.7.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knospe, Y. (2018). Metacognitive knowledge about writing in a foreign language: A case study. In Å Haukås, C. Bjørke, & M. Dypedahl (Eds.), Metacognition in language learning and teaching (pp. 121–138). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B., & Dudai, V. (2009). Group-metacognitive support for online inquiry in a mathematics with differential self-questioning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(4), 377–404. doi: 10.2190/EC.40.4.a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (1982). Learning to write. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science, 32, 99–113. doi: 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021811.66966.1d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natri, T. (2007). Active learnership in continuous self- and peer-evaluation. In A. Barfield & S. H. Brown (Eds.), Reconstructing autonomy in language education: Inquiry and innovation (pp. 108–120). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Negretti, R. (2012). Metacognition in student academic writing: A longitudinal study of metacognitive awareness and its relation to task perception, self-regulation, and evaluation of performance. Written Communication, 29(2), 142–179. doi: 10.1177/0741088312438529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negretti, R. (2015). Calibrating genre: Metacognitive judgments and rhetorical effectiveness in academic writing by L2 graduate students. Applied Linguistics, 36, 1–29. doi: 10.1093/applin/amt018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, L. T. C., & Gu, Y. Q. (2013). Strategy-based instruction: A learner-focused approach to developing learner autonomy. Language Teaching Research, 17, 9–30. doi: 10.1177/1362168812457528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, S., & Jonassen, D. H. (2007). Scaffolding online argumentation during problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 95–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00206.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12, 529–556. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00030-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139. doi: 10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvén, M. (1992). The role of metacognition in reading instruction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 36(3), 211–221. doi: 10.1080/0031383920360304
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, K. D. (2012). Promoting student metacognition. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11, 113–120. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, F. (2016). Immediate and delayed effects of embedded metacognitive instruction on Chinese EFL students’ English writing and regulation of cognition. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 289–302. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2016.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, F. (2017). The effects of task-induced involvement load on word learning and confidence judgments mediated by knowledge and regulation of cognition. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(3), 791–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, F. (2018). A learner-based approach of applying online reading to improve learner autonomy and lexical knowledge. Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31(1), 104–134.
   Google Scholar
• Teng, F. (2019). The benefits of metacognitive reading strategy awareness instruction for young learners of English as a second language. Literacy. doi: 10.1111/lit.12181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, F., & Huang, J. (2018). Predictive effects of writing strategies for self-regulated learning on secondary school learners’ EFL writing proficiency. TESOL Quarterly. doi: 10.1002/tesq.462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afferbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14. doi: 10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21–39. doi: 10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H. Y. (2006). An empirical study on metacognitive experiences in EFL writing. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 3, 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Yarrow, F., & Topping, K. J. (2001). Collaborative writing: The effects of metacognitive prompting and structured peer interaction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 261–282. doi: 10.1348/000709901158514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinchuk, J. E. (2015). Tracing pedagogical memory: The role of teaching metacognition and learning concepts in student writing development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Washington.
   Google Scholar