References
- Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950
- Campbell, D. T. (1986). Relabeling internal and external validity for applied social scientists. In W. M. K. Trochim (Ed.), Advances in quasi-experimental design and analysis (pp. 67–77). Jossey-Bass.
- Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand-McNally.
- Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for fields settings. Houghton Mifflin Company.
- Cronbach, L. J. (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. Jossey-Bass.
- Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1982). Effective evaluation. Jossey-Bass.
- Harlow, H. F. (1958). The nature of love. American Psychologist, 13(12), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047884
- Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage.
- Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Estimating the effects of social interventions. Cambridge University Press.
- Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and causality. Wiley.
- Kruglanski, A. W., & Kroy, M. (1976). Outcome validity in experimental research: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Representative Research in Social Psychology, 7, 168–178.
- Lund, T. (2005). A metamodel of central inferences in empirical research. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(4), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500202918
- Lund, T. (2010). Causal inferences in the Campbellian validity system. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(3), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831003764495
- Lund, T. (2013). Kinds of generalizations in educational and psychological research. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(4), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.657924
- Mark, M. M. (1986). Validity typologies and the logic and practice of quasi-experimentation. In W. M. K. Trochim (Ed.), Advances in quasi-experimental design and analysis (pp. 47–66). Jossey-Bass.
- Mook, D. G. (1983). In defence of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38(4), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.38.4.379
- Reichardt, C. S. (2002). Review of Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin. Social Science Review, 76, 510–514.
- Reichardt, C. S. (2006). The principle of parallelism in the design of studies to estimate treatment effects. Psychological Methods, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.1
- Reichardt, C. S. (2008, November). An alternative to the Campbellian conceptualization of validity [Paper presentation]. Evaluation 2008 Conference, Denver, CO, United States.
- Shadish, W. R. (2010). Campbell and Rubin: A primer and comparison of their approaches to causal inference in field settings. Psychological Methods, 15(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015916
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Leviton, L. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Sage.
- Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 32(9), 752–760. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.9.752