Detecting the Variability in Student Learning in Different Disciplines—A Person-Oriented Approach

References

• Asikainen, H., Salmela-Aro, K., Parpala, A., & Katajavuori, N. (2020). Learning profiles and their relation to study-related burnout and academic achievement among university students. Learning and Individual Differences, 78, Article 101781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhaus, K., & Liff, J. P. (2007). Cognitive styles and approaches to studying in management education. Journal of Management Education, 31(4), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562905284674
   Google Scholar
• Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bellhäuser, H., Lösch, T., Winter, C., & Schmitz, B. (2016). Applying a web-based training to foster self-regulated learning—effects of an intervention for large numbers of participants. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (2001). Enhancing learning: A matter of style or approach. In R. J. Sternberg, & L. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives of thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 73–102). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cano, F. (2005). Consonance and dissonance in students’ learning experience. Learning and Instruction, 15(3), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2004). General self-efficacy and self-esteem: Toward theoretical and empirical distinction between correlated self-evaluations. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(3), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, K., Yip, T. L., Wan, C. J., Tsang, H., Zhang, L. W., & Parpala, A. (2020). Differences in study workload stress and its associated factors between transfer students and freshmen entrants in an Asian higher education context. PLoS One, 15(5), e0233022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coertjens, L., Vanthournout, G., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Postareff, L. (2016). Understanding individual differences in approaches to learning across courses: A mixed method approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutinho, S., & Neuman, G. (2008). A model of metacognition, achievement goal orientation, learning style and self-efficacy. Learning Environment Research, 11(2), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-008-9042-7
   Google Scholar
• Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. (2014). Ministry of Higher Education and Science. ISBN (electronic publication): 978-87-93151-35-2.
   Google Scholar
• de Bruin, A. B., Kok, E. M., Lobbestael, J., & de Grip, A. (2017). The impact of an online tool for monitoring and regulating learning at university: Overconfidence, learning strategy, and personality. Metacognition and Learning, 12(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9159-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å. (2003). Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement. European Journal of Personality, 17(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å. (2007a). Approaches to learning, course experience and examination grade among undergraduate psychology students: Testing of mediator effects and construct validity. Studies in Higher Education, 32(3), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701346949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å. (2007b). Students’ evaluation of teaching, approaches to learning, and academic achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830701191654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, A. (2004). Understanding academic performance and progression of first-year accounting and business economics undergraduates: The role of approaches to learning and prior academic achievement. Accounting Education, 13(4), 409–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963928042000306800
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle N. (1988) Motivational factors in students' approaches to learning. In R. R. Schmeck (Eds.), Learning strategies and learning styles. Perspectives on individual differences (pp. 21–51). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2118-5_2
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0003-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Scheja, M. (2006). Student learning in context: Understanding the phenomenon and the person. In L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts, & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends (pp. 131–148). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Walker, P. (2001). Conceptions, styles, approaches within higher education: Analytic abstractions and everyday experience. In R. J. Sternberg, & L.-F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 73–102). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Fenollar, P., Román, S., & Cuestas, P. J. (2007). University students’ academic performance: An integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 873–891. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X189118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer, L. K., & Vermunt, J. D. (2018). Regulating approaches to learning: Testing learning strategy convergences across a year at university. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijbels, D., Van der Watering, G., Dochy, F., & Bossche, V. D. (2005). The relationship between students’ approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(4), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haarala-Muhonen, A., Ruohoniemi, M., Parpala, A., Komulainen, E., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2017). How do the different study profiles of first-year students predict their study success, study progress and the completion of degrees? Higher Education, 74(6), 949–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0087-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailikari, T., Tuononen, T., & Parpala, A. (2018). Students’ experiences of the factors affecting their study progress: Differences in study profiles. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1188898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazel, E., Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2002). Variation in learning orchestration in university biology courses. International Journal of Science Education, 24(7), 737–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, K. J., Bager-Elsborg, A., & McCune, V. (2017). Investigating the relationships between approaches to learning, learner identities and academic achievement in higher education. Higher Education, 74(3), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-9999-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, K. J., Bager-Elsborg, A., & Parpala, A. (2017). Measuring perceptions of the learning environment and approaches to learning: Validation of the learn questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(5), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1172497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagiannopoulou, E., & Christodoulides, P. (2005). The impact of Greek university students’ perceptions of their learning environment on approaches to studying and academic outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(6), 329–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Karagiannopoulou, E., & Milienos, F. S. (2015). Testing two path models to explore relationships between students’ experiences of the teaching–learning environment, approaches to learning and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 35(1), 26–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.895800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagiannopoulou, E., Milienos, F. S., Kamtsios, S., & Rentzios, C. (2019). Do defence styles and approaches to learning “fit together’ in students” profiles? Differences between years of study. Educational Psychology, 40(5), 570–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1600661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagiannopoulou, E., Milienos, F. S., & Rentzios, C. (2020). Grouping learning approaches and emotional factors to predict students’ academic progress. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2020.1832941
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (1996). The intention to both memorise and understand: Another approach to learning? Higher Education, 31(3), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D., Biggs, J., & Leung, D. Y. (2004). Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the learning process questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904773839879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D., Leung, D. Y., & McNaught, C. (2008). A workshop activity to demonstrate that approaches to learning are influenced by the teaching and learning environment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787407086745
   Google Scholar
• Koster, A. S., & Vermunt, J. D. (2020). Longitudinal changes of Deep and surface learning in a constructivist pharmacy curriculum. Pharmacy, 8(4), 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy8040200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, B., & Hoff, E. (2006). Person-centered and variable-centered approaches to longitudinal data. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(3), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2006.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liborius, P., Bellhäuser, H., & Schmitz, B. (2017). What makes a good study day? An intraindividual study on university students’ time investment by means of time-series analyses. Learning and Instruction, 60, 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 486–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lietz, P., & Matthews, B. (2010). The effects of college students’ personal values on changes in learning approaches. Research in Higher Education, 51(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9147-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom-Ylanne, S., & Lonka, K. (1999). Individual ways of interacting with the learning environment—are they related to study success? Learning and Instruction, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2003). Broadening an understanding of the phenomenon of dissonance. Studies in Higher Education, 28(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070309306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Parpala, A., & Postareff, L. (2019). What constitutes the surface approach to learning in the light of new empirical evidence? Studies in Higher Education, 44(12), 2183–2195. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1482267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, W. F. (2003). Dissonance detected by cluster analysis of responses to the approaches and study skills inventory for students. Studies in Higher Education, 28(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070309303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The general self-efficacy scale: Multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masyn, K. E. (2013). Chapter 25: Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods (pp. 551–611). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. (2000). The modelling of “dissonant” study orchestration in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minbashian, A., Huon, G. F., & Bird, K. D. (2004). Approaches to studying and academic performance in short-essay exams. Higher Education, 47(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000016443.43594.d1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Ning, H. K., & Downing, K. (2015). A latent profile analysis of university students’ self-regulated learning strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 40(7), 1328–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.880832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papinczak, T. (2009). Are deep strategic learners better suited to PBL? A preliminary study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9115-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papinczak, T., Young, L., Groves, M., & Haynes, M. (2008). Effects of a metacognitive intervention on students’ approaches to learning and self-efficacy in a first year medical course. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9036-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parpala, A., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2012). Using a research instrument for developing quality at the university. Quality in Higher Education, 18(3), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2012.733493
   Google Scholar
• Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Komulainen, E., Litmanen, T., & Hirsto, L. (2010). Students’ approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching-learning environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X476946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan, H. P. (2007). An examination of reflective thinking, learning approaches, and self-efficacy beliefs at the university of the south pacific: A path analysis approach. Educational Psychology, 27(6), 789–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701349809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postareff, L., Mattsson, M., & Parpala, A. (2018). The effect of perceptions of the teaching-learning environment on the variation in approaches to learning-between-student differences and within-student variation. Learning and Individual Differences, 68, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prat-Sala, M., & Redford, P. (2010). The interplay between motivation, self-efficacy, and approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X480563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., Hazel, E., & Lyons, F. (2000). Students’ experiences of studying physics concepts: The effects of disintegrated perceptions and approaches. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinnell, R., May, E., & Peat, M. (2012). Conceptions of biology and approaches to learning of first year biology students: Introducing a technique for tracking changes in learner profiles over time. International Journal of Science Education, 34(7), 1053–1074. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.582653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (2000). Researching student learning: Approaches to studying in campus-based and distance education. SRHE/Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruohoniemi, M., Forni, M., Mikkonen, J., & Parpala, A. (2017). Enhancing quality with a research-based student feedback instrument: A comparison of veterinary students’ learning experiences in two culturally different European universities. Quality in Higher Education, 23(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2017.1407401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rytkönen, H., Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Virtanen, V., & Postareff, L. (2012). Factors affecting bioscience students’ academic achievement. Instructional Science, 40(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9176-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, B., & Wiese, B. S. (2006). New perspectives for the evaluation of the training sessions in self-regulated learning: Time-series analysis of diary data. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(1), 64–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, U., Doña, B. G., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 242. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.18.3.242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 16–32). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scully, G., & Kerr, R. (2014). Student workload and assessment: Strategies to manage expectations and inform curriculum development. Accounting Education, 23(5), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2014.947094
   Google Scholar
• Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, Article 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D. (2005). Relations between student learning patterns and personal and contextual factors and academic performance. Higher Education, 49(3), 205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6664-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Green, S. B. (2011). Coefficient alpha: A reliability coefficient for the 21st century? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeegers, P. (2001). Approaches to learning in science: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar