5,511
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Choice of Track Matters: Academic Self-Concept and Sense of Purpose in Vocational and Academic Tracks

&
Pages 621-636 | Received 21 Apr 2021, Accepted 16 Jan 2022, Published online: 01 Mar 2022

References

  • Abraham, J. (1989). Testing Hargreaves’ and Lacey’s differentiation-polarisation theory in a setted comprehensive. The British Journal of Sociology, 40(1), 46–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/590290
  • Antikainen, A. (2006). In search of the Nordic model in education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600743258
  • Arnesen, A., & Lundahl, L. (2006). Still social and democratic? Inclusive education policies in the Nordic welfare states. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600743316
  • Ball, S. J. (1981). Beachside comprehensive: A case-study of secondary schooling. University Press.
  • Becker, M., Lüdtke, O., & Trautwein, U. (2012). The differential effects of school tracking on psychometric intelligence: Do academic-track schools make students smarter? Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 682–699. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027608
  • Belfi, B., Goos, M., De Fraine, B., & Van Damme, J. (2012). The effect of class composition by gender and ability on secondary school students’ school well-being and academic self-concept: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 7(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.09.002
  • Berends, M. (1995). Educational stratification and students’ social bonding to school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 16(3), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569950160304
  • Betts, J. R. (2011). The economics of tracking in education. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol 3, pp. 341–381). North-Holland.
  • Blondal, K. S., Jonasson, J. T., & Tannhäuser, A.-C. (2011). Dropout in a small society: Is the Icelandic case somehow different? In S. Lamb, E. Markussen, R. Teese, N. Sandberg, & J. Polesel (Eds.), School dropout and completion. International comparative studies in theory and policy (pp. 233–251). Springer.
  • Blondal, K. S., Jónasson, J. T., & Hafthórsson, A. (2019). Student disengagement in inclusive Icelandic education: A question of school effect in Reykjavík. In M. Van Houtte & J. Demanet (Eds.), Resisting education: A cross-national study on systems and school effects (pp. 117–133). Springer.
  • Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302408382
  • Carlgren, I., Klette, K., Mýrdal, S., Schnack, K., & Simola, H. (2006). Changes in Nordic teaching practices: From individualised teaching to the teaching of individuals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 301–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600743357
  • Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3), 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.366
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic.
  • Craven, R. G., & Marsh, H. W. (2008). The centrality of the self-concept construct for psychological wellbeing and unlocking human potential: Implications for child and educational psychologists. Educational and Child Psychology, 25(2), 104–118.
  • Demanet, J., van den Broeck, L., & van Houtte, M. (2018). Social inequality in attitudes and behavior: The implications of the Flemish tracking system for equity. In L. D. Hill & F. J. Levine (Eds.), Global perspectives on education research (pp. 159–181). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351128421-7
  • Dockx, J., De Fraine, B., & Vandecandelaere, M. (2019). Tracks as frames of reference for academic self-concept. Journal of School Psychology, 72, 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.12.006
  • Easton, J. Q., Ponisciak, S., & Luppescu, S. (2008). From high school to the future: The Pathway to 20. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/high-school-future-pathway-20
  • Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 620–146). W. H. Freeman and Company. https://doi.org/10.2307/1422172
  • Eiríksdóttir, E., Ragnarsdóttir, G., & Jónasson, J. T. (2018). Þversagnir og kerfisvillur? Kortlagning á ólíkri stöðu bóknáms- og starfsnámsbrauta á framhaldsskólastigi [Paradoxes and system errors? Mapping of the different status of academic and vocational programs at the upper secondary level]. Netla - Veftímarit Um Uppeldi Og Menntun [Netla - Online Journal on Pedagogy and Education]. https://doi.org/10.24270/serritnetla.2019.7
  • Frímannsson, G. H. (2006). Introduction: Is there a Nordic model in education? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600743233
  • Gerdes, H., & Mallinckrodt, B. (1994). Emotional, social, and academic adjustment of college students: A longitudinal study of retention. Journal of Counseling & Development, 72(3), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1994.tb00935.x
  • Hammersley, M. (1985). From ethnography to theory: A programme and paradigm in the sociology of education. Sociology, 19(2), 244–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038585019002007
  • Hanushek, E. A., & Wößmann, L. (2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. The Economic Journal, 116(510), C63–C76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01076.x
  • Hargreaves, D. H. (1967). Social relations in a secondary school. Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
  • Imsen, G., Blossing, U., & Moos, L. (2016). Reshaping the Nordic education model in an era of efficiency. Changes in the comprehensive school project in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden since the millennium. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(5), 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1172502
  • Kautto, M., Fritzell, J., Hvinden, B., Kvist, J., & Uusitalo, H. (2001). Nordic welfare states in the European context. Routledge.
  • Kember, D., Ho, A., & Hong, C. (2008). The importance of establishing relevance in motivating student learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787408095849
  • Lacey, C. (1970). Hightown grammar: The school as a social system. Manchester University Press.
  • Lamb, S., Jackson, J., & Rumberger, R. (2015). ISCY technical paper: Measuring 21st century skills in ISCY.
  • LaRossa, R., & Reitzes, D. C. (2009). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135–166). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_6
  • Lavrijsen, J., & Nicaise, I. (2017). Systemic obstacles to lifelong learning: The influence of the educational system design on learning attitudes. Studies in Continuing Education, 39(2), 176–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2016.1275540
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. (1984). Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(3), 356–362. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.31.3.356
  • Lerang, M. S., Ertesvåg, S. K., & Havik, T. (2018). Perceived classroom interaction, goal orientation and their association with social and academic learning outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1466358
  • Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308223
  • Liu, W. C., Wang, C. K. J., & Parkins, E. J. (2005). A longitudinal study of students’ academic self-concept in a streamed setting: The Singapore context. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(4), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X42239
  • Marks, G. N. (2005). Cross-national differences and accounting for social class inequalities. International Sociology, 20(4), 483–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580905058328
  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.280
  • Marsh, H. W., Kong, C.-K., & Hau, K.-T. (2000). Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: Counterbalancing contrast and reflected glory effects in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.337
  • Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Parker, P. D., Murayama, K., Guo, J., Dicke, T., & Arens, A. K. (2019). The murky distinction between self-concept and self-efficacy. Beware of lurking jingle-jangle fallacies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000281
  • Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., Omara, A. J., & Craven, R. G. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 319–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6
  • Ministry of Education Science and Culture. (2012). The Icelandic national curriculum guide for upper secondary schools: General section.
  • Moos, L., & Krejsler, J. B. (2021). Nordic school policy approaches to evidence, social technologies and transnational collaboration. In J. B. Krejsler & L. Moos (Eds.), What works in Nordic school policies? Educational governance research (Vol 15, pp. 3–26). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66629-3_1
  • Nairz-Wirth, E., Feldmann, K., & Spiegl, J. (2017). Habitus conflicts and experiences of symbolic violence as obstacles for non-traditional student. European Educational Research Journal, 16(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116673644
  • OECD. (2020). PISA 2018 results (volume V): Effective policies, successful schools. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ca768d40-en
  • Palardy, G. J., & Rumberger, R. W. (2019). The effects 21st century skills on behavioral disengagement in Sacramento high schools. In J. Demanet & M. Van Houtte (Eds.), Resisting education: A cross-national study on systems and school effects (pp. 53–80). Springer. http://gradnation.americaspromise.org/
  • Preckel, F., & Brüll, M. (2010). The benefit of being a big fish in a big pond: Contrast and assimilation effects on academic self-concept. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.12.007
  • Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
  • Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261
  • Rosenbaum, J. E., Bailey, T., Deil, R., Hallinan, M., Ludwig, J., Pallas, A., Miller, S., & Biddle, B. (1998). College-for-all: Do students understand what college demands? Social Psychology of Education, 2(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009653501824
  • Schneider, B. A., Avivi-Reich, M., & Mozuraitis, M. (2015). A cautionary note on the use of the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in classification designs with and without within-subject factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00474
  • Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098
  • Schütz, G., Ursprung, H. W., & Wößmann, L. (2008). Education policy and equality of opportunity. Kyklos, 61(2), 279–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2008.00402.x
  • Shamah, D., & MacTavish, K. A. (2015). Purpose and perceptions of family social location among rural youth. Youth & Society, 50(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X15583655
  • Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407–441. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543046003407
  • Statistics Iceland. (2018). Nýnemum fækkar í starfsnámi á framhaldsskólastigi [Fewer enrol in vocational studies at upper secondary school]. https://hagstofa.is/utgafur/frettasafn/menntun/nynemar-a-framhaldsskolastigi-1997-2016/
  • Statistics Iceland. (2020). Enrolment at upper secondary level by sex, age and domicile 1999-2018. https://statice.is/
  • Stoker, G., Liu, F., & Arellano, B. (2017). Understanding the role of noncognitive skills and school environments in students’ transitions to high school (REL 2018-282). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED578859.pdf
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
  • Telhaug, A. O., Mediås, A., & Aasen, P. (2006). The Nordic model in education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 245–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600743274
  • Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 788–806. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.788
  • Van Houtte, M. (2005). Global self-esteem in technical/vocational versus general secondary school tracks: A matter of gender? Sex Roles, 53(9), 753–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-7739-y
  • Van Houtte, M. (2006). School type and academic culture: Evidence for the differentiation-polarization theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(3), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500363661
  • Van Houtte, M., Demanet, J., & Stevens, P. A. (2012). Self-esteem of academic and vocational students: Does within-school tracking sharpen the difference? Acta Sociologica, 55(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699311431595
  • Van Houtte, M., & Stevens, P. A. J. (2009). Study involvement of academic and vocational students: Does between-school tracking sharpen the difference? American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 943–973. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209348789
  • Westbroek, H. B., Klaassen, K., Bulte, A., & Pilot, A. (2010). Providing students with a sense of purpose by adapting a professional practice. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 603–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902721699
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/CEPS.1999.1015
  • Wolff, F., Lüdtke, O., Helm, F., & Möller, J. (2021, February). Integrating the big-fish-little-pond effect, the basking-in-reflected-glory effect, and the internal/external frame of reference model predicting students’ individual and collective academic self-concepts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65, 101952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101952
  • Wu, H., Guo, Y., Yang, Y., Zhao, L., & Guo, C. (2021). A meta-analysis of the longitudinal relationship between academic self-concept and academic achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1749–1778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09600-1
  • Xerri, M. J., Radford, K., & Shacklock, K. (2018). Student engagement in academic activities: A social support perspective. Higher Education, 75(4), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0162-9
  • Zeiser, K., Scholz, C., & Cirks, V. (2018). Maximizing student agency: Implementing and measuring student-centered learning practices (technical appendix). American Institute for Research.