Assessment in practice: achieving joint decisions in oral examination grading conversations

References

• Adie, L. (2013). The development of teacher assessment identity through participation in online moderation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.650150
   Google Scholar
• Allal, L. (2013). Teachers’ professional judgement in assessment: A cognitive act and socially situated practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.736364
   Google Scholar
• Berge, K. L. (2002). Hidden norms in assessment of students’ exam essays in Norwegian upper secondary schools. Written Communication, 19(4), 458–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/074108802238011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berge, K. L., Skar, G. B., Matre, S., Solheim, R., Evensen, L. S., Otnes, H., & Thygesen, R. (2017). Introducing teachers to new semiotic tools for writing instruction and writing assessment: consequences for students’ writing proficiency. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1330251
   Google Scholar
• Bergen, C., & Stivers, T. (2013). Patient disclosure of medical misdeeds. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 54(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146513487379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P. (2013). Formative and summative aspects of assessment: Theoretical and research foundations in the context of pedagogy. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 167–178). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Byman Frisén, L., Sundqvist, P., & Sandlund, E. (2021). Policy in practice: Teachers’ conceptualizations of L2 English oral proficiency as operationalized in high-stakes test assessment. Languages, 6(204), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6040204
   Google Scholar
• Bøhn, H. (2016). What is to be assessed? Teachers’ understanding of constructs in an oral English examination in Norway. University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, B. A., & Roberts, F. (2001). Medical recommendations as joint social practice. Health Communication, 13(3), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327027HC1303_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjørtoft, H., & Morud, E. B. (2021). Assessment decision making in vocational education and training. Studia Paedagogica, 26(4), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2021-4-6
   Google Scholar
• Forskrift til opplæringslova [Regulations of the Education Act]. (2006). https://lovdata.no/dokument/LTI/forskrift/2009-07-01-964.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2011). Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Watson, D. R. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 123–162).
   Google Scholar
• Hudak, P. L., Clark, S. J., & Raymond, G. (2011). How surgeons design treatment recommendations in orthopaedic surgery. Social Science and Medicine, 7(73), 1028–1036.
   Google Scholar
• Isager, J. (2021a). At knække lærerkoden’ – en elevperspektivistisk analyse af adressater ved mundtlig eksamen [‘Cracking the Teacher’s Code’ – Students’ Perceived Addressees Before Oral Exams]. Nordic Studies in Education, 41(4), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.23865/nse.v41.2692
   Google Scholar
• Isager, J. (2021b). Mundtlig eksamen er en kunst’ – Danske gymnasieelever til mundtlig eksamen i fagene historie og engelsk [‘Oral Exams Are an Art Form’ – Danish Upper Secondary Students Attending Oral Exams]. Nordidactica, 11(2), 87–112.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldahl, A. (2019). Assessing Oracy: Chasing the teachers’ unspoken oracy construct across disciplines in the landscape between policy and freedom. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 19(3), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, C. J. (2011). Patient resistance as agency in treatment decisions. Social Science & Medicine, 72(7), 1105–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landmark, A. M. D., Gulbrandsen, P., & Svennevig, J. (2015). Whose decision? Negotiating epistemic and deontic rights in medical treatment decisions. Journal of Pragmatics, 78, 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2006). On the human ‘interactional engine’. In N. J. Enfield, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Cognition, culture, and interaction (pp. 39–69). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maugesten, M. (2011). Muntlig eksamen. En analyse av åtte studenters forståelse på muntlig eksamen i matematikk. Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift, 95(4), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-2987-2011-04-03
   Google Scholar
• Mazeland, H., & Berenst, J. (2008). Sorting pupils in a report-card meeting: Categorization in a situated activity system. Text & Talk, 28(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research. (2013). Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet [The Curriculum for Knowledge Promotion in Primary and Secondary Education and Training].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research. (2019). Kunnskapsgrunnlag for evaluering av eksamensordningen [The foundation of knowledge for evaluating the exam system in Norway]. https://www.udir.no/tall-og-forskning/finn-forskning/rapporter/Kunnskapsgrunnlag-for-evaluering-av-eksamensordningen/.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsberth, M., & Sandlund, E. (2021). On the interactional challenges of revealing summative assessments: Collaborative scoring talk among teachers and students in Swedish national tests. Linguistics and Education, 61, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2020). Regler for muntlig eksamen [Guidelines for oral examinations]. https://www.udir.no/eksamen-og-prover/eksamen/muntlig-eksamen/.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shaped. In J. M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 57–101). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, D. M. (2020). Experimental evidence on teachers’ racial bias in student evaluation: The role of grading scales. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(3), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720932188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandlund, E., & Sundqvist, P. (2019). Doing versus assessing interactional competence. In M. R. Salaberry, & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence (pp. 357–396). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (2012). The handbook of conversation analysis. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sikveland, R. O., Solem, M. S., & Skovholt, K. (2021). How teachers use prosody to guide students towards an adequate answer. Linguistics and Education, 61, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skovholt, K. (2018). Anatomy of a teacher–student feedback encounter. Teaching and teacher education, 69, 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skovholt, K., Solem, M. S., Vonen, M. N., Sikveland, R. O., & Stokoe, E. (2021). Asking more than one question in one turn in oral examinations and its impact on examination quality. Journal of Pragmatics, 181, 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solheim, R., & Matre, S. (2014). Forventninger om skrivekompetanse. Perspektiver på skriving, skriveopplæring og vurdering i ‘Normprosjektet’ [Expectations About Writing Competence. Perspectives on Writing, Writing Education and Assessment in the Norm-Project]. Viden om Læsning, 15, 76–89.
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M. (2012). Establishing joint decisions in a dyad. Discourse Studies, 14(6), 779–803. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612456654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M. (2013). Constructing a proposal as a thought: A way to manage problems in the initiation of joint decision-making in Finnish workplace interaction. Pragmatics, 23(3), 519–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A. (2012). Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose, and decide. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(3), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2006). Treatment decisions: Negotiations between doctors and parents in acute care encounters. In J. Heritage, & D. W. Maynard (Eds.), Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 279–312). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, P., Sandlund, E., Skar, G., & Tengberg, M. (2020). Effects of rater training on the assessment of L2 English oral proficiency. Nordic Journal of Modern Language Methodology, 8(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.46364/njmlm.v8i1.605
   Google Scholar
• Vanlommel, K., Van Gasse, R., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2017). Teachers’ decision-making: Data based or intuition driven? International Journal of Educational Research, 83, 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonen, M. N., Solem, M. S., & Skovholt, K. (2022). Managing students’ insufficient answers in oral examinations, Classroom Discourse. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2022.2079694.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar