Critical literacy in the PISA 2018 reading literacy assessment

References

• Anstey, M., & Bull, G. (2006). Teaching and learning multiliteracies: Changing times, changing literacies. International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Arffman, I. (2007). The problem of equivalence in translating texts in international reading literacy studies: A text analytic study of three English and Finnish texts used in the PISA 2000 reading test (Research Reports 21). [Doctoral dissertation], University of Jyväskylä, Institute for Educational Research. JYX Digital Repository. https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/37744/1/T021_verkkoversio.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arffman, I. (2016). Threats to validity when using open-ended items in international achievement studies: Coding responses to the PISA 2012 problem-solving test in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(6), 609–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1066429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In V. W. McGee, C. Emerson, & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (pp. 60–102). University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L. (2018). Validity. Research methods, 142–194. Routledge & Guilford Press. https://bluesyemre.files.wordpress.com/2019/01/lmaguilp1808_research_methods_fb_r3-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D.. (2007). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language (2nd ed.). Blackwell Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Bellanca, J., & Brandt, R. (Eds.). (2010). 21st-century skills: Rethinking how students learn. Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, L. W., & Whitney, E. (2009). Walking in their shoes: Using multiple-perspectives texts as a bridge to critical literacy. The Reading Teacher, 62(6), 530–534. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.62.6.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cornish, F., Gillespie, A., & Zittoun, T. (2014). Collaborative analysis of qualitative data. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 79–93). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Criscuolo, N. P. (1965). A plea for critical reading in the primary grades. Peabody Journal of Education, 43(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619566509537322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelsky, C. (2006). With literacy and justice for all (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019). Key competences for lifelong learning. Publications Office, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. https://doi.org/10.2766/569540
   Google Scholar
• Facione, P. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED315423.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Agency for Education. (2014). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2014 [National core curriculum for basic education 2014]. Finnish National Board of Education. https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/perusopetuksen_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Agency for Education. (2021). National literacy strategy 2030. Finnish National Agency for Education. https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/National_literacy_strategy_2030.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, R. (1996). On critical linguistics. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard, & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Text and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 3–14). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frau-Meigs, D. (2013). Transliteracy: Sense-making mechanisms for establishing e-presence. In U. Carlsson, & S. H. Culver (Eds.), Media and information literacy and intercultural dialogue (pp. 175–189). MILID Yearbook 2013. NORDICOM. http://milunesco.unaoc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Media_and_Information_Literacy_and_Intercultural_Dialogue.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hämäläinen, E. K., Kiili, C., Marttunen, M., Räikkönen, E., González-Ibáñez, R., & Leppänen, P. H. (2020). Promoting sixth graders’ credibility evaluation of web pages: An intervention study. Computers in Human Behaviour, 110, Article 106372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. J., & Sipay, E. R. (1990). How to increase reading ability. A guide to developmental & remedial methods (9th ed.). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. (2020, Oct 19). Evaluating internet research sources. VirtualSalt. www.virtualsalt.com/evaluating-internet-research-sources
   Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Maul, A. (2011). Examining evidence for the validity of PISA learning strategy scales based on student response processes. International Journal of Testing, 11(2), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2010.529977
   Google Scholar
• Janks, H. (2013). Critical literacy in teaching and research. Education Inquiry, 4(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v4i2.22071
   Google Scholar
• Kauppinen, M. (2010). Lukemisen linjaukset – Lukutaito ja sen opetus perusopetuksen äidinkielen ja kirjallisuuden opetussuunnitelmissa [Literacy delineated – Reading literacy and its instruction in the curricula for the mother tongue in basic education] (Jyväskylä Studies in Humanities, 141). [Doctoral dissertation, University of Jyväskylä]. JYX Digital Repository. https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/24964/9789513940119.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Kiili, C., Coiro, J., & Räikkönen, E. (2019). Students’ evaluation of information during online inquiry: Working individually or in pairs. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 42(3), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiili, C., Leu, D. J., Marttunen, M., Hautala, J., & Leppänen, P. H. (2018). Exploring early adolescents’ evaluation of academic and commercial online resources related to health. Reading and Writing, 31(3), 533–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9797-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Ramos, K. A., Chung, H., & Choi, S. (2020). Integrating critical multiliteracies pedagogy in ESL/EFL teaching. Journal of English Learner Education, 11, Article 4.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. L. (1968). Evaluating critical reading. In M. A. Dawson (Ed.), Developing comprehension: Including critical Reading (pp. 206–213). International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality. In B. Cope, & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182–202). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kupiainen, R., Kulju, P., & Mäkinen, M. (2015). Mikä monilukutaito? [What is multiliteracy?]. In T. Kaartinen (Ed.), Monilukutaito kaikki kaikessa [Multiliteracy is the key] (pp. 13–24). The Teacher Training School.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1992). Reading between the lines and beyond the pages: A culturally relevant approach to literacy teaching. Theory Into Practice, 31(4), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543558
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2017). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Education, 197(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741719700202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. L., & Cammack, D. W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. B. Ruddell, & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and process of reading (5th ed, pp. 1570–1613). International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., Enciso, P., & Moje, E. B. (2007). Reframing sociocultural research on literacy: Identity, agency, and power. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (1991). Redefining critical reading for college critical thinking courses. Journal of Reading, 34, 420–423.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, L., Mednick, F. J., De Backer, F., & Lombaerts, K. (2021). Fostering critical thinking across the primary school’s curriculum in the European schools system. Education Sciences, 11(9), 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louloudi, E. (2022). Investigating understandings of critical literacies among Finnish and Canadian teachers. Apples: Journal of Applied Language Studies, 16, 57–76. https://doi.org/10.47862/apples.112308
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (2012). Critical literacy: Foundational notes. Theory Into Practice, 51(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.636324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (2014). Defining critical literacy. In J. Z. Pandya, & J. Ávila (Eds.), Moving critical literacies forward: A new look at praxis across contexts (pp. 20–31). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1999). Further notes on the four resources model. Reading Online, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Jones, M. (2007). Bilingualism, education and the regulation of access to language resources. In M. Heller (Ed.), Bilingualism: A social approach (pp. 161–182). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical background and procedures. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education: Examples of methodology and methods (pp. 365–380). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1988). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed, pp. 13–103). American Council on Education/Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Culture. (2019). Media literacy in Finland: National media education policy. Publications of the Ministry of Education and Culture 2019:39. https://medialukutaitosuomessa.fi/mediaeducationpolicy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (Eds.). (2019). PIRLS 2021 assessment frameworks. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2021/framework/
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 released field trial and main survey new reading items. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/test/PISA2018_Released_REA_Items_12112019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): what students know and can do. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). Are 15-year-olds prepared to deal with fake news and misinformation? PISA in focus 2021/113. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (n.d.). PISA 2018 technical report. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/pisa2018technicalreport
   Google Scholar
• Perry, K. H. (2009). Genres, contexts, and literacy practices: Literacy brokering among Sudanese refugee families. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 256–276. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.3.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, K. H. (2012). What is literacy? A critical overview of sociocultural perspectives. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 8, 50–71.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkänen-Huhta, A., & Holm, L. (2012). Literacy practices in transition: Setting the scene. In A. Pitkänen-Huhta, & L. Holm (Eds.), Literacy practices in transition: Perspectives from the Nordic countries (pp. 1–23). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Rieh, S. Y. (2002). Judgement of information quality and cognitive authority in the web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2013). Cultivating diversity through critical literacy in teacher education. In C. Kosnik, J. Rowsell, P. Williamson, R. Simon, & C. Beck (Eds.), Literacy teacher educators: Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 7–20). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2014). Coaching teachers as they design critical literacy practices. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 30(3), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.909260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankov, L., Lee, J., & von Davier, M. (2018). A note on construct validity of the anchoring method in PISA 2012. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36(7), 709–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282917702270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulkunen, S. (2007). Text authenticity in international reading literacy assessment. Focusing on PISA 2000 (Jyväskylä Studies in Humanities, 76). [Doctoral dissertation], University of Jyväskylä. JYX Digital Repository. https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/13434/9789513929763.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Sulkunen, S., & Malin, A. (2014). Aikuisten lukutaito tiedon käsittelyn ja hallinnan avaintaitona [adults literacy as a key skill for information processing and management]. Kieli, koulutus ja yhteiskunta [Language, Education and Society], 5. https://www.kieliverkosto.fi/fi/journals/kieli-koulutus-ja-yhteiskunta-huhtikuu-2014/aikuisten-lukutaito-tiedon-kasittelyn-ja-hallinnan-avaintaitona
   Google Scholar
• The Matriculation Examination Board. (2022). Äidinkielen ja kirjallisuuden kokeen määräykset [Guidelines for the examination of mother tongue and literature]. https://www.ylioppilastutkinto.fi/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/documents/aidinkieli_ja_kirjallisuus_maaraykset.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, D. (2006). Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werlich, E. (1983). A text grammar of English. Quelle & Meyer.
   Google Scholar