REFERENCES
- Abarca N., Zimmermann J., Kusber W.-H., Mora D., Van A.T., Skibbe O. & Jahn R. 2020. Defining the core group of the genus Gomphonema Ehrenberg with molecular and morphological methods. Botany Letters 167: 114–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2019.1694980.
- Al-Handal A.Y., Riaux-Gobin C., Abdulla D.S. & Ali M.H. 2014. Cocconeis sawensis sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae) from a saline lake (Sawa Lake), South Iraq: comparison with allied taxa. Phytotaxa 181: 216–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.181.4.2.
- Antoine S.E. & Benson-Evans K. 1984. Teratological variations in the River Wye diatom flora, Wales, UK. In: Proceedings of the 8th international diatom symposium (Ed. by M. Ricard), pp 59–66. Koeltz, Koenigstein, Germany.
- Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L., Cordonier A., Straub F., Iseli J., Esling P. & Pawlowski J. 2017. Taxonomy-free molecular diatom index for high-throughput eDNA biomonitoring. Molecular Ecology Resources 17: 1231–1242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12668.
- Bailet B., Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L., Baričević A., Chonova T., Franc A., Frigerio J.-M., Kelly M., Mora D., Pfannkuchen M., Proft S. et al. 2020. Diatom DNA metabarcoding for ecological assessment: comparison among bioinformatics pipelines used in six European countries reveals the need for standardization. Science of the Total Environment 745: Article 140948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140948.
- Costa L.F., Wetzel C.E., Ector L. & Bicudo D.C. 2020. Freshwater Cocconeis species (Bacillariophyceae) from Southeastern Brazil, and description of C. amerieuglypta sp. nov. Botany Letters 167: 15–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2019.1672103.
- Czarnecki D.B. & Ross M.J. 1988. The Itasca State Park algal culture collection at Loras College. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science 53: 27–32.
- Czarnecki D.B. 1987. The freshwater diatom culture collection at Loras College, Dubuque, Iowa. Notulae Naturae of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 465: 1–16.
- Czarnecki D.B. 1994. The freshwater diatom culture collection at Loras College, Dubuque, Iowa. In: Proceedings of the 11th international diatom symposium (Ed. by J.P. Kociolek), pp 155–173. California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California, USA.
- Edgar R.C. 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26: 2460–2461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461.
- Edlund M.B., Ngô H.M. & Ross M.J. 2007. David B. Czarnecki (1947–2006). Diatom Research 22: 229–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2007.9705708.
- Falasco E., Ector L., Wetzel C.E., Badino G. & Bona F. 2021. Looking back, looking forward: a review of the new literature on diatom teratological forms (2010–2020). Hydrobiologia 848: 1675–1753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04540-x.
- Goujon M., McWilliam H., Li W., Valentin F., Squizzato S., Paern J. & Lopez R. 2010. A new bioinformatics analysis tools framework at EMBL–EBI. Nucleic Acids Research 38: W695–W699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq313.
- Héribaud J. 1893. Les Diatomées d’Auvergne. Pensionnat des Frères des Écoles Chrétiennes, Clermont-Ferrand, Librairie des Sciences Naturelles, Paris. 255 pp.
- Hofmann G., Werum M. & Lange-Bertalot H. 2013. Aufwuchs-Diatomeen im Süßwasser-Benthos von Mitteleuropa. Bestimmungsflora Kieselalgen für die ökologische Praxis. Über 700 der häufigsten Arten und ihre Ökologie. 2. Korrigierte Auflage. A.R.G. Gantner, Ruggell, Germany. 908 pp.
- Holmes R.W., Crawford R.M. & Round F.E. 1982. Variability in the structure of the genus Cocconeis Ehr. (Bacillariophyta) with special reference to the cingulum. Phycologia 21: 370–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-21-3-370.1.
- Jahn R., Abarca N., Gemeinholzer B., Mora D., Skibbe O., Kulikovskiy M., Gusev E., Kusber W.-H. & Zimmermann J. 2017. Planothidium lanceolatum and Planothidium frequentissimum reinvestigated with molecular methods and morphology: four new species and the taxonomic importance of the sinus and cavum. Diatom Research 32: 75–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2017.1312548.
- Jahn R., Abarca N., Kusber W.-H., Skibbe O., Zimmermann J. & Mora D. 2020. Integrative taxonomic description of two new species of the Cocconeis placentula group (Bacillariophyceae) from Korea based on unialgal strains. Algae 35: 303–324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2020.35.8.1.
- Jahn R., Kusber W.-H. & Romero O.E. 2009. Cocconeis pediculus Ehrenberg and C. placentula Ehrenberg var. placentula (Bacillariophyta): typification and taxonomy. Fottea 9: 275–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5507/fot.2009.027.
- Kelly M.G., Juggins S., Mann D.G., Sato S., Glover R., Boonham N., Sapp M., Lewis E., Hany U., Kille P. et al. 2020. Development of a novel metric for evaluating diatom assemblages in rivers using DNA metabarcoding. Ecological Indicators 118: Article 106725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106725.
- Kimmich R. & Bahls L. 2020. Diatoms of North America. Cocconeis grovei. https://diatoms.org/species/cocconeis-grovei; searched on 15 July 2021.
- Kociolek P. 2011. Diatoms of North America. Cocconeis klamathensis. https://diatoms.org/species/cocconeis_klamathensis; searched on 15 July 2021.
- Kumar S., Stecher G., Li M., Knyaz C. & Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35: 1547–1549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096.
- Lai G.G., Ector L., Jüttner I., Padedda B.M. & Wetzel C.E. 2020. Cocconeis intermedia Peragallo & Héribaud (Bacillariophyta): new information on morphology, distribution and ecology of a poorly known diatom species. Nova Hedwigia 111: 245–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2020/0605.
- Mora D., Abarca N., Proft S., Grau J., Enke N., Carmona J., Jahn R. & Zimmermann J. 2019. Morphology and metabarcoding: a test with stream diatoms from Mexico highlights the complementarity of identification methods. Freshwater Science 39: 448–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/704827.
- Müller J., Müller K., Neinhuis C. & Quandt D. 2010. PhyDE: Phylogenetic Data Editor, version 0.9971. http://www.phyde.de
- Nakov T., Beaulieu J.M. & Alverson A.J. 2018. Accelerated diversification is related to life history and locomotion in a hyperdiverse lineage of microbial eukaryotes (Diatoms, Bacillariophyta). New Phytologist 219: 462–473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15137.
- Olenici A., Baciu C., Blanco S. & Morin S. 2020. Naturally and environmentally driven variations in diatom morphology: implications for diatom-based assessment of water quality. In: Modern trends in diatom identification, fundamentals and applications (Ed. by G. Cristóbal, S. Blanco & G. Bueno), pp 39–50. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39212-3_4.
- Patrick R. & Reimer C.W. 1966. The diatoms of the United States exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii, volume 1: Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae, Achnanthaceae, Naviculaceae. The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 688 pp.
- Peres-Weerts F. 2000. Mise en évidence des effets toxiques des metaux lourds sur les diatomées par l’étude des formes teratogenes. Agence de l’Eau Artois Picardie, Douai. 24 pp.
- Potapova M. & Spaulding S. 2013. Diatoms of North America. Cocconeis placentula sensu lato. https://diatoms.org/species/cocconeis_placentula; searched on 26 April 2021.
- Rimet F., Chonova T., Gassiole G., Gusev E., Kahlert M., Keck F., Kelly M., Kulikovskiy M., Maltsev Y., Mann D. et al. 2018. Diat.barcode, an open-access barcode library for diatoms. Portail Data INRAE, V9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15454/TOMBYZ; searched on 13 November 2020.
- Romero O.E. & Jahn R. 2013. Typification of Cocconeis lineata and Cocconeis euglypta (Bacillariophyta). Diatom Research 28: 175–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2013.770801.
- Ruck E.C. & Theriot E.C. 2011. Origin and evolution of the canal raphe system in diatoms. Protist 162: 723–737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2011.02.003.
- Smucker N.J., Pilgrim E.M., Nietch C.T., Darling J.A. & Johnson B.R. 2020. DNA metabarcoding effectively quantifies diatom responses to nutrients in streams. Ecological Applications 30: Article e02205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2205.
- Stancheva R., Busse L., Kociolek J.P. & Sheath R.G. 2015. Standard operating procedures for laboratory processing and identification of stream algae. California State Water Resources Control Board Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) Bioassessment SOP 0003. https://www.waterboards.Ca.gov/water_issues/programs/swamp/bioassessment/docs/sop_algae_lab_101315.pdf; searched on 6 April 2021.
- Stancheva R. 2018. Cocconeis cascadensis, a new monoraphid diatom from mountain streams in northern California, USA. Diatom Research 33: 471–483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2019.1571531.
- Tapolczai K., Selmeczy G.B., Szabó B., Viktória B., Keck F., Bouchez A., Rimet F. & Padisák J. 2021. The potential of exact sequence variants (ESVs) to interpret and assess the impact of agricultural pressure on stream diatom assemblages revealed by DNA metabarcoding. Ecological Indicators 122: Article 107322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107322.
- Theriot E.C., Ashworth M., Ruck E., Nakov T. & Jansen R.K. 2010. A preliminary multigene phylogeny of the diatoms (Bacillariophyta): challenges for future research. Plant Ecology and Evolution 143: 278–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5091/plecevo.2010.418.
- UTEX. 2021. Web page of: utex culture collection of algae at the University of Texas at Austin, living algal strains, UTEX LB FD23 Cocconeis placentula var. lineata. https://utex.org/products/utex-lb-fd-0023?variant=30992165830746; searched on 6 April 2021.
- Visco J.A., Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L., Cordonier A., Esling P., Pillet L. & Pawlowski J. 2015. Environmental monitoring: inferring the diatom index from next-generation sequencing data. Environmental Science & Technology 49: 7597–7605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es506158m.
- Witkowski A., Barka F., Mann D.G., Li C., Weisenborn J.L.F., Ashworth M.P., Kurzydłowski K.J., Zgłobicka I. & Dobosz S. 2014. A description of Biremis panamae sp. nov., a new diatom species from the marine littoral, with an account of the phylogenetic position of Biremis D.G. Mann et E.J. Cox (Bacillariophyceae). PLOS One 9: Article e114508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114508.
- Zimmermann J., Abarca N., Enke N., Skibbe O., Kusber W.-H. & Jahn R. 2014. Taxonomic reference libraries for environmental barcoding: a best practice example from diatom research. PLOS One 9: Article e108793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108793.
- Zimmermann J., Glöckner G., Jahn R., Enke N. & Gemeinholzer B. 2015. Metabarcoding vs. morphological identification to assess diatom diversity in environmental studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 15: 526–542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12336.
- Zimmermann J., Mora D., Tapolczai K., Proft S., Chonova T., Rimet F., Bouchez A., Fidlerová D., Makovinská J. & Weigand A. 2021. Metabarcoding of phytobenthos samples. In: Joint Danube survey 4, scientific report: a shared analysis of the Danube River (Ed. by I. Liška, F. Wagner, M. Sengl, K. Deutsch, J. Slobodník & M. Paunović), pp 145–156. ICPDR – International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River, Vienna, Austria.