Legislative representation and gender (bias)

References

• Bertrand, M., and E. Duflo. 2017. “Field Experiments on Discrimination.” In Handbook of Field Experiments, Volume 1, edited by E. Duflo and A. V. Banerjee, 309–393. Amsterdam: North Holland (Elsevier).
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Silva, E., and T. A. Forman. 2000. “‘I Am Not a Racist but … ’: Mapping White College Students’ Racial Ideology in the USA.” Discourse & Society 11 (1): 50–85. doi:10.1177/0957926500011001003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brians, C. L. 2005. “Women for Women? Gender and Party Bias in Voting for Female Candidates.” American Politics Research 33 (3): 357–375. doi:10.1177/1532673X04269415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D. M. 2014. Representing the Advantaged: How Politicians Reinforce Inequality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. M., and D. E. Broockman. 2011. “Do Politicians Racially Discriminate against Constituents?” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 463–477. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00515.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carton, A. 2001. “The General Elections in Belgium in June 1999: A Real Breakthrough for Women Politicians?” European Journal of Women’s Studies 8: 127–135. doi:10.1177/135050680100800107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, W. R., M. Golder, and S. N. Golder. 2017. Principles of Comparative Politics. 3rd ed. Washington DC: Sage/CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, C., and V. Chykina. 2018. “Last Name Selection in Audit Studies.” Sociological Science 5: 21–28. doi:10.15195/v5.a2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, M. 2017. “How Responsive are Political Elites? A Meta-Analysis of Experiments on Public Officials.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 4 (3): 241–254. doi:10.1017/XPS.2017.14.
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, J. 2003. “Women and Proportional Representation in Australia and New Zealand.” Policy and Society 22 (1): 48–68. doi:10.1016/S1449-4035(03)70013-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhima, K. 2018. “Elite Gender Discrimination? Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Working paper, Texas A&M University.
   Google Scholar
• Drage, J. 2017. “Women and the 2016 Elections.” Women Talking Politics: the Research Magazine of the New Zealand Political Studies Association (NZPSA) 18 (1): 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, M. M. 2006. “Angela Merkel: What Does It Mean to Run as a Woman?” German Politics & Society 24 (1): 93–107. doi:10.3167/104503006780935315.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R. L., and J. L. Lawless. 2010. “If Only They’d Ask: Gender, Recruitment, and Political Ambition.” Journal of Politics 72 (2): 310–326. doi:10.1017/S0022381609990752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton, S. 2014. “When Gender Matters: Macro-Dynamics and Micro-Mechanisms.” Political Behavior 36 (3): 605–630. doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9245-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton, S. A., C. D. Maestas, L. S. Maisel, and W. J. Stone. 2006. “The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2): 235–248. doi:10.1177/106591290605900206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaddis, S. M. 2018. “An Introduction to Audit Studies in the Social Sciences.” In Audit Studies: Behind the Scenes with Theory, Method, and Nuance, edited by S. M. Gaddis, 3–44. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, M., and B. Ferland. 2018. “Electoral Systems and Citizen-Elite Ideological Congruence.” In The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems, edited by E. Herron, R. Pekkanen, and M. Shugart (pp. 213–245). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, S. N., L. Stephenson, K. Van der Straeten, A. Blais, D. Bol, P. Harfst, and J.-F. Laslier. 2017. “Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates.” Politics & Gender 13 (1): 107–131. doi:10.1017/S1743923X16000684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, D., and J. L. Lawless. 2016. Women on the Run: Gender, Media, and Political Campaigns in a Polarized Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, J. 2018 November 8. “Native American Rep.-Elect Deb Haaland Makes History With Congressional Win.” On ‘Here & Now’ from radio station WBUR Boston 90.9. (http://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2018/11/08/deb-haaland-native-american-congresswomen)
   Google Scholar
• Horiuchi, Y., Z. Markovich, and T. Yamamoto. 2018. “Does Conjoint Analysis Mitigate Social Desirability Bias?” Working paper, Dartmouth College.
   Google Scholar
• Htun, M. 2016. Inclusion without Representation: Gender Quotas and Ethnic Reservations in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. D., M. Gell-Redman, C. Crabtree, N. Krishnaswami, D. Rodenberger, and G. Monge. 2018. “Persistent Bias Among Local Election Officials.” Conditionally Accepted at the Journal of Experimental Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Judkins, D. R., and K. E. Porter. 2016. “Robustness of Ordinary Least Squares in Randomized Clinical Trials.” Statistics in Medicine 35 (11): 1763–1773. doi:10.1002/sim.6839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalla, J., F. Rosenbluth, and D. L. Teele. 2018. “Are You My Mentor? A Field Experiment on Gender, Ethnicity, and Political Self-Starters.” Journal of Politics 80 (1): 337–341. doi:10.1086/693984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanthak, K., and J. Woon. 2015. “Women Don’t Run? Election Aversion and Candidate Entry.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 595–612. doi:10.1111/ajps.12158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, M., and T. Verge. 2013. “Decentralization, Political Parties, and Women’s Representation: Evidence from Spain and Britain.” Publius: the Journal of Federalism 43 (1): 109–128. doi:10.1093/publius/pjs023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittilson, M. C., and L. A. Schwindt-Bayer. 2012. The Gendered Effects of Electoral Institutions: Political Engagement and Participation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krook, M. L., and P. Norris. 2014. “Beyond Quotas: Strategies to Promote Gender Equality in Elected Office.” Political Studies 62 (1): 2–20. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, J. L., and R. L. Fox. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, J. L., and R. L. Fox. 2012. Men Rule: The Continued Under-Representation of Women in U.S. Politics. Washington, DC: Women & Politics Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, J. L., and K. Pearson. 2008. “The Primary Reasons for Women’s Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” The Journal of Politics 70 (1): 67–82. doi:10.1017/S002238160708005X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, W. 2013. “Agnostic Notes on Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data: Reexamining Freedman’s Critique.” The Annals of Applied Statistics 7 (1): 295–318. doi:10.1214/12-AOAS583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhiste, M. 2015. “Party Gatekeepers’ Support for Viable Female Candidacy in PR List Systems.” Politics & Gender 11 (1): 89–116. doi:10.1017/S1743923X14000580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’.” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–657. doi:10.2307/2647821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J. M., B. Nyhan, and M. Torres. 2018. “How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do about It.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (3): 760–775. doi:10.1111/ajps.12357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R. T., and K. E. Schnakenberg. 2012. “blockTools: Blocking, Assignment, and Diagnosing Interference in Randomized Experiments.”. Available at the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/blockTools/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Murray, R., M. L. Krook, and K. A. R. Opello. 2012. “Why are Gender Quotas Adopted? Party Pragmatism and Parity in France.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (3): 529–543. doi:10.1177/1065912911414590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, S., W. Hunt, and A. Coppock. 2018. “What Have We Learned about Gender from Candidate Choice Experiments? A Meta-Analysis of 30 Factorial Survey Experiments”. Working paper, Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, M., and M. A. Bodet. 2013. “Sacrificial Lambs, Women Candidates, and District Competitiveness in Canada.” Electoral Studies 32 (1): 153–166. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wängnerud, L. 2009. “Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 51–69. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.123839.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, S., and D. T. Studlar. 1988. “The Effects of Candidate Gender on Voting for Local Office in England.” British Journal of Political Science 18 (2): 273–281. doi:10.1017/S0007123400005093.
   Google Scholar
• Zizzo, D. J. 2010. “Experimenter Demand Effects in Economic Experiments.” Experimental Economics 13 (1): 75–98. doi:10.1007/s10683-009-9230-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar