The Losing Battle of Goliath: the Failed Management of an American Alliance and the Asymmetric Intra-Alliance Negotiation under the ANZUS Dispute (1984-1986)

References

• Acharya, A. 1988. “The United States versus the USSR in the Pacific: Trends in the Military Balance.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 9 (4): 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1355/CS9-4C.
   Google Scholar
• Albinski, H. S. 1987. ANZUS, the United States, and Pacific Security. New York, NY: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Beckley, M. 2015. “The Myth of Entangling Alliances: Reassessing the Security Risks of U.S. Defense Pacts.” International Security 39 (4): 7–48. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercovitch, J., Eds. 1988. ANZUS in Crisis: Alliance Management in International Affairs. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. 2020. The Human Factor: Gorbachev, Reagan, and Thatcher, and the End of the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cable, J. 1994. Gunboat Diplomacy, 1919-1991: Political Applications of Limited Naval Force. 3rd ed. New York, NY: ST. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Catalinac, A. 2010. “Why New Zealand Took Itself Out of ANZUS: Observing “Opposition for Autonomy” in Asymmetric Alliances.” Foreign Policy Analysis 6 (4): 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2010.00115.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, K. 1988. Back from the Brink: The Creation of a Nuclear-Free New Zealand. Wellington: Allen & Unwin New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, T. W. 2011. “Preventing Enemy Coalitions: How Wedge Strategies Shape Power Politics.” International Security 35 (4): 155–189. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnini, F. P. 1991. ANZUS in Revision: Changing Defence Features of Australia and New Zealand in the Mid-1980s. Montgomery, AL: Air University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eyley, C. P. 2015. Helen Clark: Inside Story. Kindle version. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, J. D. 1994. “Signaling versus the Balance of Power and Interests: An Empirical Test of a Crisis Bargaining Model.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 38 (2): 236–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002794038002004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, J. D. 1997. “Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1): 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002797041001004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A. L., and A. Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haun, P. 2015. Coercion, Survival and War: Why Weak States Resist the United States. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hensley, G. 2013. Friendly Fire. Nuclear Politics and the Collapse of ANZUS. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, J. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Izumikawa, Y. 2018. “Binding Strategies in Alliance Politics; the Soviet-Japanese-US Diplomatic Tug of War in the Mid-1950s.” International Studies Quarterly 62 (1): 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. C. 2017. “External Threat and Alliance Formation.” International Studies Quarterly 61 (3): 736–745. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqw054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitaoka, S., S. Hatano, Y. Kohno, K. Sakamoto, T. Sasaki, and M. Haruna. 2010. “Report of Expert Committee on ‘Secret Agreement of Nuclear Weapons Deployment within Japan’.” In [Iwayuru ‘Mitsu Yaku’ Mondai,ni Kansuru Yushikisya Iinkai Houkokusyo]. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. M. 2006. The Neither Confirm nor Deny Policy: Nuclear Diplomacy at Work (A Working Paper), Nuclear Information Project.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, D. 1999. Entangling Relations: American Foreign Policy in Its Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, D. R. 1990. Nuclear Free: The New Zealand Way. New York, NY: Penguin USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, D. R. 2005. David Lange: My Life. London: Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, J. S. 2008. “Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 25 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388940701860318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, D. 1995. Background to the ANZUS Pact: Policy-Making, Strategy and Diplomacy 1945-55. Christchurch: University of Canterbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, M. 1999. “Realignment: New Zealand and Its ANZUS Allies.” In New Zealand in World Affairs 1972-1990, edited by B. Brown, 143–176. Wellington: Victorian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, S. 1987. Neither Confirm nor Deny: The Nuclear Ships Dispute Between New Zealand and the United States. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. 1985. Conventional Deterrence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenthau, H. J. 1948. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, J. D. 1991. “Alliances and Asymmetry: An Alternative to the Capability Aggregation Model of Alliances.” American Journal of Political Science 35 (4): 904–933. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, J. D. 2000. “Alliances: Why Write Them Down?” Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1): 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosley, L., Ed. 2013. Interview Research in Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1984. OECD Economic Outlook, Volume 1984 Issue 1. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Organski, A. 1958. World Politics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, M. 1989. The ANZUS Crisis Nuclear Visiting and Deterrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sechser, T. S. 2010. “Goliath’s Curse: Coercive Threats and Asymmetric Power.” International Organization 64 (4): 627–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818310000214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shultz, G. P. 1985. On Alliance Responsibility. Hawaii Honolulu, HI: East-West Center.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, G. 1997. Alliance Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, G., and P. Diesing. 1977. Conflict Among Nations: Bargaining Decision Making and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tamamizu, L. 2020. “Australia and the ANZUS Crisis, 1984-1986: The Third Ally's Perception and Reactions Under the Intra-Alliance Dispute Between the Other Allies.” [Ōstoraria to Anzasu Kiki: Dōmei Gakai Kiki Ni Okeru Meihō[Ōstoraria to Anzasu Kiki: Dōmei Gakai Kiki Ni Okeru Meihō. 199: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.11375/kokusaiseiji.199_1
   Google Scholar
• Tannenwald, N. 2015. “Process Tracing and Security Studies.” Security Studies 24 (2): 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2015.1036614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templeton, M. 2006. Standing Upright Here: New Zealand in the Nuclear Age, 1945-1990. Wellington: Victoria University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walt, S. M. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
   Google Scholar