References
- American Constitutional Rights Union (ACRU) website. 2021, August 29. https://www.theacru.org/category/acru_amicus/.
- Avery, M., and D. McLaughlin. 2013. The Federalist Society: How Conservatives Took the Law Back from Liberals. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/.
- Aydın-Çakır, A. 2014. “Judicialization of Politics by Elected Politicians: The Theory of Strategic Litigation.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (3): 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912914533997.
- Barker, L. J. 1967. “Third Parties in Litigation: A Systemic View of the Judicial Function.” The Journal of Politics 29 (1): 41–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/2127811.
- Baumgartner, F. R., & B. L. Leech. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Blackwell, J. K. 2015. “America’s Two First Freedoms: A Biblical Christian Perspective on How the Second Amendment Secures First Amendment Rights.” Liberty University Law Review 9 (2): 215–264.
- Burgess, S. 2016. The Founding Fathers, Pop Culture, and Constitutional Law: Who’s Your Daddy?. London: Routledge.
- Caldeira, G. A., and J. R. Wright. 1990. “Amici Curiae Before the Supreme Court: Who Participates, When, and How Much?” The Journal of Politics 52 (3): 782–806. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131827.
- Carstensen, M. B. 2011. “Paradigm Man Vs. the Bricoleur: Bricolage As an Alternative Vision of Agency in Ideational Change.” European Political Science Review 3 (1): 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773910000342.
- Cato Policy Report. 2008, November/December 14.
- Cato Policy Report September. 2018, October 16.
- Chemerinsky, E. 2022. Worse Than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism. Great Britain: Yale University Press.
- Collins, P. M. 2008. Friends of the Supreme Court: Interest Groups and Judicial Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Collins, P. M. 2017. Interest Groups and the Judiciary. (Vol. 1, edited by L. Epstein & S. A. Lindquist). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199579891.013.21.
- Conservatism. 2019. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Accessed August , 2021. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/conservatism/.
- Cornell, S. 2008. “Originalism on Trial: The Use and Abuse of History in District of Columbia V.” Ohio State Law Journal’s Heller 69 (4): 625.
- Cornell, S. 2009. “New Orginalism, and Law Office History: Meet the New Boss, Same As the Old Boss.” UCLA Law Review 56 (5): 1095.
- Cramer, K. J. 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. London: University of Chicago Press.
- Crow, D. A., and J. Berggren. 2014. “Using the Narrative Policy Framework to Understand Stakeholder Strategy and Effectiveness: A Multi-Case Analysis.” In The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework in Public Policy Analysis, edited by M. D. Jones, E. A. Shanahan, and M. K. McBeth, 131–156. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Dabirimehr, A., and M. T. Fatmi. 2014. “LACLAU and Mouffe’s Theory of Discourse.” Journal of Novel Applied Sciences 3 (11): 1283–1287.
- Deckman, M. 2016. Tea Party Women: Mama Grizzlies, Grassroots Leaders, and the Changing Face of the American Right. New York: New York University Press.
- Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) 1 U.S.C §7. 1996. Accessed May 17, 2023. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/defense_of_marriage_act_(doma).
- Derrida, J., A. Ronell, and W. J. T. Mitchell. 1981. “On Narrative.”
- Dionne, E. J. 2004. Why Americans Hate Politics. New York: Simon and Schuster.
- District of Columbia v. Heller § 554 U.S. 570. 2008. Accessed May 17, 2023. https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/dc-v-heller/.
- Dudas, J. R. 2016. “All the Rage: Clarence Thomas, Paternal Authority, and Conservative Desire.” Law, Culture and the Humanities 12 (1): 70–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872112453811.
- Duigan, B. 2023. “District of Columbia V. Heller (2008).” Accessed December 5, 2023. https://www.britannica.com/event/District-of-Columbia-v-Heller.
- Elbaz-Luwisch, F. 1997. “Narrative Research: Political Issues and Implications.” Teaching and Teacher Education 13 (1): 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00042-X.
- Ennis, B. J. 1983. “Effective Amicus Briefs.” Catholic University Law Review 33 (3): 603.
- Epstein, L., and S. A. Lindquist, Eds. 2017. The Oxford Handbook of US Judicial Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Even more so in Parsons and latterly in Discourse Institutonalism. 2008. Schmidt.
- Fairclough, N.1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. London, Longman.
- Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse, Vol. 270. London: Routledge.
- Fairclough, N., and R. Wodak In T.A. van Dijk, ed. 1997. Critical Discourse Analysis, 256–84.
- Feindt, P. H., and A. Oels. 2005. “Does Discourse Matter? Discourse Analysis in Environmental Policy Making.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7 (3): 161–173.
- Fisher, S.1984. “Institutional Authority and the Structure of Discourse.” Discourse processes 7 (2): 201–224.
- Flick, U., Ed. 2013. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage.
- Fowler, J. H., T. R. Johnson, J. F. Spriggs, S. Jeon, and P. J. Wahlbeck. 2007. “Network Analysis and the Law: Measuring the Legal Importance of Precedents at the U.S. Supreme Court.” Political Analysis 15 (3): 324–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpm011.
- Frazer, E., and K. Hutchings. 2007. “Argument and Rhetoric in the Justification of Political Violence.” European Journal of Political Theory 6 (2): 180–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885107074349.
- Fulbrook, M., and T. Skocpol. 1984. “Destined Pathways: The Historical Sociology of Perry Anderson.” In Vision and Method in Historical Sociology, edited by T. Skocpol, 170–210, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Goss, K. A. 2006. Disarmed: The Missing Movement for Gun Control in America. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
- Goss, K. A. 2019. “Do Courts Change Politics? Heller and the Limits of Policy Feedback Effects.” Emory Law Journal 103 (69): 881.
- Greene, J. 2009. “Heller High Water: The Future of Originalism.” Harvard Law & Policy Review 3 (2): 325–346.
- Hajer, M. A. 1993a. “Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Britain.” In The Argumentative Turn, edited by F. Fischer and J. Forester, 43–76. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Hajer, M. A. 1993b. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296. https://doi.org/10.2307/422246.
- Hajer, M. A. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hajer, M. A. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44 (5): 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x.
- Hajer, M. A. 2006. “Doing Discourse Analysis: Coalitions, Practices, Meaning.” Netherlands Geographical Studies 344 : 65–74. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.289572.
- Hall, P. A.1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain.” Comparative Politics: 275–296.
- Hall, P. A., and R. C., Taylor. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political studies 44 (5): 936–957.
- Halman, L. 2009. “Political Values.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Behaviour, edited by Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199270125-e-016.
- Hanegraaff, M., and A. Pritoni. 2019. “United in Fear: Interest Group Coalition Formation as a Weapon of the Weak?” European Union Politics 20 (2): 198–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116518824022.
- Hansford, T. G. 2004a. “Information Provision, Organizational Constraints, and the Decision to Submit an Amicus Curiae Brief in a US Supreme Court Case.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (2): 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290405700204.
- Hansford, T. G. 2004b. “Lobbying Strategies, Venue Selection, and Organized Interest Involvement at the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Politics Research 32 (2): 170–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X03259192.
- Hansford, T. G. 2008. “Interests and Institutions: The Causes and a Consequence of Organized Interest Activity at the U.S. Supreme Court.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.
- Hansford, T. G. 2010. “The Legal Advocacy Network.” Paper presented that annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
- Hardin, R. 1982. Collective Action. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Heinz, J. P., A. Paik, and A. Southwark. 2003. “Lawyers for Conservative Causes: Clients, Ideology, and Social Distance.” Law & Society Review 37 (1): 5–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3701001.
- Heracleous, L. Th. 2004. “The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Discourse.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Discourse, 175–192. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608122.
- Hodgson, G. 1996. The World Turned Right Side Up: A History of the Conservative Ascendancy in America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
- Hollis-Brusky, A. 2015. “Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution.” Studies in Postwar American.
- Hollis-Brusky, A., and J. C. Wilson. 2017. “Playing for the Rules: How and Why New Christian Right Public Interest Law Firms Invest in Secular Litigation.” Law & Policy 39 (2): 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12075.
- Honderich, T. 1991. Conservatism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Horwitz, J., and C. Anderson. 2009. Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Howarth, D. 2005. “Applying discourse theory: The method of articulation.” In Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance, 316–349. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
- Inglehart, R., and H. D. Klingemann. 1979. “Ideological Conceptualization and Value Priorities.” Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies 203–213. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Inglehart%2C+R.%2C+and+H.+D.+Klingemann.+1979.+“Ideological+Conceptualization+and+Value+Priorities.”+Political+Action%3A+Mass+Participation+in+Five+Western+Democracies+203–213.&btnG=.
- Jackson, M. O. 2008. Social and Economic Networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Jacobs, T. 2018. “The Dislocated Universe of Laclau and Mouffe: An Introduction to Post-Structuralist Discourse Theory.” Critical Review 30 (3–4): 294–315.
- Jenkins-Smith, H. C., and P. A. Sabatier. 1994. “Evaluating the Advocacy Coalition Framework.” Journal of Public Policy 14 (2): 175–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00007431.
- Jenkins-Smith, H. C., and P. A. Sabatier. 2018. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Overview of the Research Program.” Theories of the Policy Process 4:135–171. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429494284-5/advocacy-coalition-framework-overview-research-program-hank-jenkins-smith-daniel-nohrstedt-christopher-weible-karin-ingold.
- Jones, M. D., and M. K. McBeth. 2010. “A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong?” Policy Studies Journal 38 (2): 329–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00364.x.
- Jones, M. D., and M. K. McBeth. 2014. “Introducing the Narrative Policy Framework.” In The Science of Stories, edited by Michael D. Jones, Elizabeth A. Shanahan, Mark K. McBeth, 1–25 . New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9781137485861.
- Jones, M. D., and M. K. McBeth. 2015. “The Narrative Policy Framework: Child or Monster?” Critical Policy Studies 9 (3): 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1053959.
- Kaplan, A. 1943. “Content Analysis and the Theory of Signs.” Philosophy of Science 10 (4): 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1086/286814.
- Kaplan, T. J. 1993. “Reading Policy Narratives: Beginnings, Middles and Ends.” In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, edited by F. Fischer and J. Forester, 167–185. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Kobylka, J. F. 1991. The Politics of Obscenity: Group Litigation in a Time of Legal Change No. 64. New York: Praeger Pub Text.
- Krippendorf, K. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 13. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Lacombe, M. J. 2019. “The Political Weaponization of Gun Owners: The National Rifle Association’s Cultivation, Dissemination, and Use of a Group Social Identity.” The Journal of Politics 81 (4): 1342–1356. https://doi.org/10.1086/704329.
- Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law. 2002, June. Second Amendment. Accessed November 5, 2023. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment#:~:text=The%20Second%20Amendment%20of%20the,regarding%20the%20Amendment’s%20intended%20scope.
- Lejano, R., M. Ingram, and H. Ingram. 2013. The Power of Narratives in Environmental Networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Levy, J. S. 2008. “Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 25 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388940701860318.
- Levy, Robert. 2023, August 1. Cato Institute. https://www.cato.org/people/robert-levy.
- Lund, N. 2009. “The Second Amendment, Heller, and Originalist Jurisprudence.” UCLA Law Review 56 (5): 1343–1376.
- Mahoney, P. P., K. Remmer, T. Skocpol, S. Steinmo, and K. Thelen. 2019. “Historical Institutionalism: Origins and Developments.” The Handbook of Political, Social, and Economic Transformation 95. https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=dOCGDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA95&dq=Mahoney,+P.+P.,+K.+Remmer,+T.+Skocpol,+S.+Steinmo,+and+K.+Thelen.+2019.+“Historical+Institutionalism:+Origins+and+Developments.”+The+Handbook+of+Political,+Social,+and+Economic+Transformation+95.&ots=huo-x8Vwel&sig=-7RT06QCGpQwM1yR83j3fAu6ov8&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false.
- McBeth, M., M. D. Jones, and E. Shanahan. 2007. “The Intersection of Narrative Policy Analysis and Policy Change Theory.” Policy Studies Journal 35 (1): 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00208.x.
- McBeth, M., M. D. Jones, and E. Shanahan. 2014. “The Narrative Policy Framework.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by C. Weible and P. Sabatier, 225–266. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- McGann, James G. 2008. Global Go to Think Tanks Index Report. Accessed May 17, 2023. https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=think_tanks.
- McGirr, L. 2001. Suburban Warriors: The Origins of the New American Right. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
- Medvetz, T. M. 2007. Think Tanks and the Production of Policy-Knowledge in America. Berkeley, California: University of California.
- Medvetz, T. M. 2012. “Murky Power: “Think Tanks” As Boundary Organizations.” In Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Vol. 34, edited by D. Courpasson, D. Golsorkhi, and J. J. Sallaz, 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2012)0000034007.
- Melzer, S. 2009. “Frontier Masculinity, America’s “Gun Culture”, and the NRA.” In Gun Crusaders, 25–43. The NRAs Culture War. NYU Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qgfdd.6.
- Merry, M. K. 2016. “Constructing Policy Narratives in 140 Characters or Less: The Case of Gun Policy Organizations.” Policy Studies Journal 44 (4): 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12142.
- Merry, M. K. 2018. “Narrative Strategies in the Gun Policy Debate: Exploring Proximity and Social Construction.” Policy Studies Journal 46 (4): 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12255.
- Merry, M. K. 2020. Warped Narratives: Distortion in the Framing of Gun Policy. United States of America: University of Michigan Press.
- Merry, M. K. 2022. “Trump’s Tweets as Policy Narratives: Constructing the Immigration Issue via Social Media.” Politics & Policy 50 (4): 752–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12487.
- Miller, H. T. 2012. Governing Narratives: Symbolic Politics and Policy Change. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
- Mirowski, P., and D. Plehwe, eds. 2015. The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. London: Harvard University Press.
- Nash, G. H. 1976. The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945. New York: Basic Books.
- Neily, C. 2007. “District of Columbia V. Heller: The Second Amendment Is Back, Baby.” Cato Supreme Court Review, 127–160. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/catoscrev7&div=11&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals.
- Neily, C. 2010. “The Right to Keep and Bear Arms in the States: Ambiguity, False Modesty, and (Maybe) Another Win for Originalism.” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 33 (1): 185–202.
- Neily, Clark 2023a, August 1. Cato Institute. https://www.cato.org/people/clark-neily.
- Neily, Clark. 2023b, August 1. Federalist Society. https://fedsoc.org/contributors/clark-neily.
- Ney, S. 2014. “The Governance of Social Innovation: Connecting Meso and Macro Levels of Analysis.” In The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework in Public Policy Analysis, edited by M. D. Jones, E. A. Shanahan, and M. K. McBeth, 207–234. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Obergefell v. Hodges. 2015. Accessed May 17, 2023. https://www.britannica.com/event/Obergefell-v-Hodges.
- O’Bryan, T., C. A. Dunlop, and C. M. Radaelli. 2014. “Narrating the ‘Arab Spring’: Where Narrative Meets Heuristics in Legislative Hearings.” In The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework in Public Policy Analysis, edited by M. D. Jones, E. A. Shanahan, and M. K. McBeth, 107–130. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Olsen, J. P. 2001. “Garbage Cans, New Institutionalism, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 95 (1): 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401000120.
- O’Shea, M. 2009. “The Right to Defensive Arms After District of Columbia V. Heller.” West Virginia Law Review 111(2):349–394. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/wvb111&div=17&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals.
- Ospina, S. M., and J. Dodge. 2008. “Narrative Inquiry.” In Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, 1285–1288. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor and Francis.
- Parrilla, R., N. Almiron, and J. Xifra. 2016. “Crisis and Interest: The Political Economy of Think Tanks During the Great Recession.” American Behavioral Scientist 60 (3): 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215613404.
- Parsons, C. 2003. A Certain Idea of Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- Parsons, C. 2007. How to Map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Pautz, H. 2011. “Revisiting the Think-Tank Phenomenon.” Public Policy and Administration 26 (4): 419–435.
- Pew Research. 2021, April 20. Amid a Series of Mass Shootings in the U.S. Gun Policy Remains Deeply Divisive. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/04/20/amid-a-series-of-mass-shootings-in-the-u-s-gun-policy-remains-deeply-divisive/.
- Phillips-Fein, K. 2011. “Conservatism: A State of the Field.” The Journal of American History 98 (3): 723–743. https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jar430.
- Pierce, J. J., H. L. Peterson, M. D. Jones, S. P. Garrard, and T. Vu. 2017. “There and Back Again: A Tale of the Advocacy Coalition Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 45 (S1): S13–S46. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12197.
- Pierson, P., and T. Skocpol. 2002. “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science.” Political Science: The State of the Discipline 3 (1): 1–32.
- Plehwe, D. 2011. “Transnational Discourse Coalitions and Monetary Policy: Argentina and the Limited Powers of the ‘Washington Consensus.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (2): 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2011.576521.
- Plehwe, D. 2014. “Think Tank Networks and the Knowledge–Interest Nexus: The Case of Climate Change.” Critical Policy Studies 8 (1): 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2014.883859.
- Plummer, K. 2019. Narrative Power: The Struggle for Human Value. Cambridge: Polity.
- Radaelli, C. M. 1999. “Harmful Tax Competition in the EU: Policy Narratives and Advocacy Coalitions.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 37 (4): 661–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00201.
- Rochefort, D. A., and K. P. Donnelly. 2013. “Agenda Setting and Political Discourse: Major Analytical Frameworks and Their Applications.” In Routledge Handbook of Public Policy, edited by E. Araral, S. Fritzen, and M. Howlett, 189–203. New York: Routledge.
- Roe, E. 1994. Narrative Policy Analysis: Theory and Practice. Durham, CT: Duke University Press.
- Sabatier, P. A. 1988. “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein.” Policy Sciences 21 (2–3): 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406.
- Sabatier, P. A. 1998. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance for Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 5 (1): 98–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501768880000051.
- Sager, R. 2006. The Elephant in the Room: Evangelicals, Libertarians, and the Battle to Control the Republican Party. Wiley. https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=eI3uEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1932&dq=Sager,+R.+2006.+The+Elephant+in+the+Room:+Evangelicals,+Libertarians,+and+the+Battle+to+Control+the+Republican+Party.+Wiley.&ots=pdFzH3htNh&sig=cjbIbGLDgmWxnkzRpfYawMbW1ho&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false.
- Scalia, A. 2008. “Opinion of the Court, D.C. V Heller (No. 07–290. 554 U.S. October Term 2007).” Decided June 26.
- Scheppele, K. L., and J. L. Walker Jr. 1991. “The Litigation Strategies of Interest Groups.” In Mobilizing Interest Groups in America, edited by J.L. Walker Jr. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Scheppele%2C+K.+L.%2C+and+J.+L.+Walker+Jr.+1991.+“The+Litigation+Strategies+of+Interest+Groups.”+In+Mobilizing+Interest+Groups+in+America%2C+edited+by+J.L.+Walker+Jr.+Ann+Arbor%3A+University+of+Michigan+Press.&btnG=.
- Schmidt, V. A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.
- Scruton, R. 2017. Conservatism: Ideas in Profile. London: Profile Books.
- Seawright, J. 2016. Multi-Method Social Science: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Tools. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Shanahan, E. A., M. D. Jones, and M. K. McBeth. 2011. “Policy Narratives and Policy Processes.” Policy Studies Journal 39 (3): 535–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00420.x.
- Shanahan, E. A., M. D. Jones, and M. K. McBeth. 2014. “Denouement?” In The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework in Public Policy Analysis, edited by M. D. Jones, E. A. Shanahan, and M. K. McBeth, 247–260. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Shanahan, E. A., M. D. Jones, M. K. McBeth, and R. R. Lane. 2013. “An Angel on the Wind: How Heroic Policy Narratives Shape Policy Realities.” Policy Studies Journal 41 (3): 453–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12025.
- Shapiro, I. 2008. “Friends of the Second Amendment.” Journal on Firearms & Public Policy 20:15–41. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jfpp20&div=6&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals.
- Siegel, R. B. 2008a. Dead or Alive: Originalism As Popular Constitutionalism in Heller.
- Siegel, R. B. 2008b. “Heller & (And) Originalism’s Dead Hand-In Theory and Practice.” SSRN Electronic Journal 56:1399. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1356073.
- Siegel, R. B. 2014. “Analyzing American Political Development As it Happens.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Political Development, edited by R. Valelly, S. Mettler, and R. Lieberman, Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697915.013.22.
- Skocpol, T. 2014. “Bringing the state back in.” In Policy Process, 126–138. Routledge.
- Smith, T. 2007. “Why Originalism won’t Die-Common Mistakes in Competing Theories of Judicial Interpretation.” Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy 2:159. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/dukpup2&div=5&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals.
- Solowiej, L. A., and P. M. Collins Jr. 2009. “Counteractive Lobbying in the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Politics Research 37 (4): 670–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X08328674.
- Songer, D. R., and R. S. Sheehan. 1993. “Interest Group Success in the Courts: Amicus Participation in the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (2): 339–354.
- Spitzer, R. J. 2015. Politics of Gun Control. New York: Routledge.
- Spitzer, R. J. 2022. The Gun Dilemma: How History Is Against Expanded Gun Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Spivey, M. 2016. Culture Warriors Go to Court: The Supreme Court and the Battle for the“Soul” of America ( Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland.
- Spriggs, J. F., and P. J. Wahlbeck. 1997. “Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 50 (2): 365–386.
- Stone, D. A. 2012. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. Vol. 3. New York: WW Norton & company.
- Teles, S. M. 2008. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law. Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7sqcp.
- ‘The Right to Keep and Bear Arms: 10 Years after Heller’, Cato Policy Report. 2018, September/October. Accessed May 4, 2023. https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/policy-report/2018/10/cpr-v40n5-9.pdf.
- U.S. v. Miller, § 307 U.S. 174. 1939. Accessed May 17, 2023. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/307/174/.
- U.S. v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744. 2013. Accessed May 17, 2023. https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/windsor-v-united-states-2/.
- van Deth, J. W. 1984. Politieke waarden. Amsterdam: CT Press.
- van Deth, J. W. 1995. “Introduction.” In The Impact of Values, edited by J. W. van Deth and E. Scarbrough, 1–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Walker, A. 2008. “From Ballots to Bullets: District of Columbia V. Heller and the New Civil Rights.” Louisiana Law Review 69 (3): 509. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/louilr69&div=24&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals.
- Weber, R. P. 1990. Basic Content Analysis. Sage: Newbury Park.
- Weible, C. M., and P. A. Sabatier. 2006. “A Guide to the Advocacy Coalition Framework.” In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis, edited by Fischer, F., and GJ Miller, G, 123–136.
- Weible, C. M., P. A. Sabatier, and K. McQueen. 2009. “Themes and Variations: Taking Stock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 37 (1): 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x.
- Wesley, J. J. 2010. “Qualitative Document Analysis in Political Science.” In T2PP Workshop, 9–10 . Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Wesley%2C+J.+J.+2010.+“Qualitative+Document+Analysis+in+Political+Science&btnG=.
- Wilkinson, J. H., III. 2009. “Of Guns, Abortions, and the Unraveling Rule of Law.” Virginia Law Review 95(2): 253–323. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25478705.
- Young, N. J. 2016. We Gather Together: The Religious Right and the Problem of Interfaith Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Zelizer, J. E. 2010. “Rethinking the History of American Conservatism.” Reviews in American History 38 (2): 367–392.