Seeding the gender revolution: Women’s education and cohort fertility among the baby boom generations

References

• Aldcroft, D. H. 1998. Education and development: The experience of rich and poor nations, History of Education 27(3): 235–254. doi: 10.1080/0046760980270304
   Google Scholar
• Alter, G. 1991. New perspectives on European marriage in the nineteenth century, Journal of Family History 16(1): 1–5. doi: 10.1177/036319909101600101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axinn, W. G. 1993. The effects of children’s schooling on fertility limitation, Population Studies 47(3): 481–493. doi: 10.1080/0032472031000147256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axinn, W. G. and J. S. Barber. 2001. Mass education and fertility transition, American Sociological Review 66(4): 481–505. doi: 10.2307/3088919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, F. D. 1983. The baby boom and its explanations, The Sociological Quarterly 24(3): 353–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1983.tb00706.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, F. D. and G. Swicegood. 1979. Intergenerational occupational mobility and fertility: a reassessment, American Sociological Review 44(4): 608–619. doi: 10.2307/2094590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berend, I. T. 2005. What is Central and Eastern Europe? European Journal of Social Theory 8(4): 401–416. doi: 10.1177/1368431005056420
   Google Scholar
• Blake, J. 1966. Ideal family size among white Americans: a quarter of a century’s evidence, Demography 3(1): 154–173. doi: 10.2307/2060069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, J. and P. Das Gupta. 1975. Reproductive motivation versus contraceptive technology: is recent American experience an exception? Population and Development Review 1(2): 229–249. doi: 10.2307/1972222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blossfeld, H.-P. and J. Huinink. 1991. Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation, American Journal of Sociology 97(1): 143–168. doi: 10.1086/229743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boli, J., F. O. Ramirez, and J. W. Meyer. 1985. Explaining the origins and expansion of mass education, Comparative Education Review 29(2): 145–170. doi: 10.1086/446504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonvalet, C., C. Clément, and J. Ogg. 2014. Renewing the Family: A History of the Baby Boomers. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, J. C. 1982. Theory of Fertility Decline. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• CFE. 2017. Cohort Fertility and Education Database. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography. Available: http://www.cfe-database.org.
   Google Scholar
• Cherlin, A. 1983. Changing family and household: contemporary lessons from historical research, Annual Review of Sociology 9: 51–66. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.000411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coale, A. J. and R. Treadway. 1986. A summary of the changing distribution of overall fertility, marital fertility, and the proportion married in the provinces of Europe, in A. J. Coale and S. C. Watkins (eds), The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 31–181.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. E. 2008. Make secondary education universal, Nature 456(7222): 572–573. doi: 10.1038/456572a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coontz, S. 2005. Marriage, a History: From Obedience to Intimacy, or How Love Conquered Marriage. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Creighton, C. 1999. The rise and decline of the ‘Male breadwinner family’ in Britain, Cambridge Journal of Economics 23(5): 519–541. doi: 10.1093/cje/23.5.519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterlin, R. A. 1987. Birth and Fortune. The Impact of Numbers on Personal Welfare, second edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emeka, A. S. 2006. Birth, fortune, and discrepant fertility in twentieth-century America, Social Science History 30(3): 327–357. doi: 10.1017/S0145553200013493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 2009. The Incomplete Revolution. Adapting to Women’s New Roles. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. and F. C. Billari. 2015. Re-theorizing family demographics, Population and Development Review 41(1): 1–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidelis, M. 2010. Women, Communism, and Industrialization in Postwar Poland. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frejka, T. 2008. Overview chapter 5: determinants of family formation and childbearing during the societal transition in central and Eastern Europe, Demographic Research 19(7): 139–170. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frejka, T., J.-P. Sardon, K. Katus, and W. Kingkade. 2004. Baltic region, in T. Frejka and J.-P. Sardon (eds), Childbearing Trends and Prospects in low-Fertility Countries. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 253–270.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin, C. 1990. Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin, C. 2006. The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family, American Economic Review 96(2): 1–21. doi: 10.1257/000282806777212350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldscheider, F., E. Bernhardt, and T. Lappegård. 2015. The gender revolution: a framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review 41(2): 207–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajnal, J. 1953. The marriage boom, Population Index19(2): 80–101. doi: 10.2307/2730761
   Google Scholar
• Hajnal, J. 1965. European marriage patterns in perspective, in D. V. Glass and D. E. C. Eversley (eds), Population and History. Essays in Historical Demography. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 101–143.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A. 1992. The trade-off between child quantity and quality, Journal of Political Economy 100(1): 84–117. doi: 10.1086/261808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, K. S., V. Skirbekk, and J. Van Bavel. 2012. Education and the global fertility transition – introduction, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 10: 1–8. doi: 10.1553/populationyearbook2012s1
   Google Scholar
• Janssens, A. 1997. The rise and decline of the male breadwinner family? An overview of the debate, International Review of Social History 42(Supplement): 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0020859000114774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kravdal, O. and R. R. Rindfuss. 2008. Changing relationships between education and fertility: a study of women and men born 1940 to 1964, American Sociological Review 73(5): 854–873. doi: 10.1177/000312240807300508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappegård, T. and M. Rønsen. 2005. The multifaceted impact of education on entry into motherhood, European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 21(1): 31–49. doi: 10.1007/s10680-004-6756-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesthaeghe, R. 2010. The unfolding story of the second demographic transition, Population and Development Review 36(2): 211–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macunovich, D. J. 2002. Birth Quake: The Baby Boom and Its Aftershocks. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• May, E. T. 1988. Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., F. O. Ramirez, and Y. N. Soysal. 1992. World expansion of mass education, 1870–1980, Sociology of Education 65(2): 128–149. doi: 10.2307/2112679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, R. T. 1975. Education and fertility, in F. Thomas Juster (ed.), Education, Income, and Human Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill for Carnegie Foundation and National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 339–364.
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Population Center. 2017. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, International: Version 6.5. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. Available: https://international.ipums.org
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. P. 1991. Late nineteenth-and early twentieth-century childlessness, American Journal of Sociology 97(3): 779–807. doi: 10.1086/229820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. 2002. Breadwinning: accounts of work and family life in the 1950s, Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work 12(3): 59–75. doi: 10.1080/10301763.2002.10722024
   Google Scholar
• Pott-Buter, H. A. 1993. Facts and Fairy Tales About Female Labor, Family and Fertility: A Seven Country Comparison, 1850–1990. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puur, A. and M. Klesment. 2014. The absence of the post-war baby boom in Estonia: societal shock or early consolidation of the two-child norm? Paper presented at the European Population Conference, Budapest, June 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Reher, D. S. 2011. Economic and social implications of the demographic transition, in R. D. Lee and D. S. Reher (eds), Demographic Transition and Its Consequences (Population and Development Review, Supplement to Volume 37). New York: Population Council, pp. 11–33.
   Google Scholar
• Reher, D. and M. Requena. 2015. The mid-twentieth century fertility boom from a global perspective, The History of the Family 20(3): 420–445. doi: 10.1080/1081602X.2014.944553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reher, D., M. Requena, and A. Sanz. 2014. Fertility and contraceptives: the experience of Spanish women born in the first half of the twentieth century. Paper presented at the European Population Conference, Budapest, June 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Requena, M. and L. Salazar. 2014. Education, marriage, and fertility: the Spanish case, Journal of Family History 39(3): 283–302. doi: 10.1177/0363199014527592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, A. S. 1984. Gender and parenthood, American Sociological Review 49(1): 1–19. doi: 10.2307/2095554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, D. T. 2007. Historical trends in childlessness, Journal of Family Issues 28(10): 1311–1337. doi: 10.1177/0192513X07303823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder, N. 1978. A model of fertility by planning status, Demography 15(4): 433–458. doi: 10.2307/2061198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder, N. 1980. Components of temporal variations in American fertility, in R. W. Hiorns (ed.), Demographic Patterns in Developed Societies. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 15–54.
   Google Scholar
• Sandström, G. 2014. The mid-twentieth century baby boom in Sweden – changes in the educational gradient of fertility for women born 1915–1950, The History of the Family 19(1): 120–140. doi: 10.1080/1081602X.2013.871317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandström, G. 2017. A reversal of the socioeconomic gradient of nuptiality during the Swedish mid-20th-century baby boom, Demographic Research 37(50): 1625–1658. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. L. 2010. Nominal comparability is not enough: (in-)equivalence of construct validity of cross-national measures of educational attainment in the European social survey, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 28(3): 343–357. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofer, E. and J. W. Meyer. 2005. The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century, American Sociological Review 70(6): 898–920. doi: 10.1177/000312240507000602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobotka, T. and E. Beaujouan. 2014. Two is best? The persistence of a two-child family ideal in Europe, Population and Development Review 40(3): 391–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00691.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soysal, Y. N. and D. Strang. 1989. Construction of the first mass education systems in nineteenth-century Europe, Sociology of Education 62(4): 277–288. doi: 10.2307/2112831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stloukal, L. 1999. Understanding the ‘abortion culture’ in central and Eastern Europe, in H. P. David and J. Skilogianis (eds), From Abortion to Contraception: a Resource to Public Policies and Reproductive Behavior in Central and Eastern Europe From 1917 to the Present, Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, pp. 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Teitelbaum, M. S. and J. Winter. 1985. The Fear of Population Decline. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Testa, M. R., L. Cavalli, and A. Rosina. 2014. The effect of couple disagreement about child-timing intentions: a parity-specific approach, Population and Development Review 40(1): 31–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00649.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2003. International Standard Classification of Education, ISCED 1997, in J. H. P. Hoffmeyer-Slotnik and C. Wolf (eds), Advances in Cross-National Comparison. A European Working Book for Demographic and Socio-Economic Variables. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, pp. 195–220.
   Google Scholar
• Van Bavel, J. 2010. Subreplacement fertility in the west before the baby boom: past and current perspectives, Population Studies 64(1): 1–18. doi: 10.1080/00324720903362806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bavel, J. 2014. The mid-twentieth century baby boom and the changing educational gradient in Belgian cohort fertility, Demographic Research 30(33): 925–962. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bavel, J. and D. Reher. 2013. The baby boom and its causes: what we know and what we need to know, Population and Development Review 39(2): 257–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00591.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Kaa, D. J. 1987. Europe’s second demographic transition, Population Bulletin 42(1): 3–57.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, S. C. 1986. Regional patterns of nuptiality in Western Europe, 1870–1960, in A. J. Coale and S. C. Watkins (eds), The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 314–36.
   Google Scholar