Publication Cover
Population Studies
A Journal of Demography
Volume 75, 2021 - Issue 2
8,771
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

When is fertility too low or too high? Population policy preferences of demographers around the world

&
Pages 289-303 | Received 31 Oct 2019, Accepted 16 Jun 2020, Published online: 22 Jul 2020

References

  • Anderson, T., and H. P. Kohler. 2015. Low fertility, socioeconomic development, and gender equity, Population and Development Review 41(3): 381–407. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00065.x
  • Atkinson, A. B. 2014. Optimum population, welfare economics, and inequality, in I. Goldin (ed), Is the Planet Full? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–45. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677771.003.0002
  • Bailey, M. J. 2013. Fifty years of family planning: New evidence on the long-run effects of increasing access to contraception, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2013(1 (Spring)): 341–409. doi: 10.1353/eca.2013.0001
  • Billari, F. C. 2018. A ‘great divergence’ in fertility?, in D. L. Poston, Jr. (ed), Low Fertility Regimes and Demographic and Societal Change. New York: Springer, pp. 15–35. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-64061-7_2
  • Bloom, D. E., D. Canning, G. Fink, and J. E. Finlay. 2010. The cost of low fertility in Europe, European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie 26(2): 141–158. doi: 10.1007/s10680-009-9182-1
  • Bongaarts, J., and G. Feeney. 1998. On the quantum and tempo of fertility, Population and Development Review 24: 271–291. doi: 10.2307/2807974
  • Bongaarts, J., and B. C. O’Neill. 2018. Global warming policy: Is population left out in the cold?, Science 361(6403): 650–652. doi: 10.1126/science.aat8680
  • Bongaarts, J., and S. W. Sinding. 2009. A response to critics of family planning programs, International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 35(1): 39–44. doi: 10.1363/3503909
  • Bose, C. E. 2012. Intersectionality and global gender inequality, Gender & Society 26(1): 67–72. doi: 10.1177/0891243211426722
  • Coleman, D., and R. Rowthorn. 2011. Who’s afraid of population decline? A critical examination of its consequences, Population and Development Review 37: 217–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00385.x
  • Dasgupta, A., and P. Dasgupta. 2017. Socially embedded preferences, environmental externalities, and reproductive rights, Population and Development Review 43(3): 405–441. doi: 10.1111/padr.12090
  • Demeny, P. 2015. Sub-replacement fertility in national populations: Can it be raised?, Population Studies 69(Suppl. 1): S77–S85. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2014.962930
  • De Silva, T., and S. Tenreyro. 2017. Population control policies and fertility convergence, Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(4): 205–228. doi: 10.1257/jep.31.4.205
  • Ehrlich, P. R. 1968. The Population Bomb. New York: Ballantine.
  • Engelman, R. 2011. An end to population growth: Why family planning is key to a sustainable future, Solutions Journal 2(3): 32–41.
  • Espenshade, T. J., J. C. Guzman, and C. F. Westoff. 2003. The surprising global variation in replacement fertility, Population Research and Policy Review 22(5-6): 575–583. doi: 10.1023/B:POPU.0000020882.29684.8e
  • Gietel-Basten, S., and S. Scherbov. 2019. Exploring the ‘true value’ of replacement rate fertility, Population Research and Policy Review: 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s11113-019-09561-y
  • Goldstein, J. R., M. Kreyenfeld, A. Jasilioniene, and D. K. Örsal. 2013. Fertility reactions to the “great recession” in Europe, Demographic Research 29: 85–104. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.4
  • Goldstein, J. R., W. Lutz, and M. R. Testa. 2003. The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideals in Europe, Population Research and Policy Review 22(5-6): 479–496. doi: 10.1023/B:POPU.0000020962.80895.4a
  • Gore, A. 2006. An Inconvenient Truth: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About It. New York: Rodale.
  • Hagewen, K. J., and S. P. Morgan. 2005. Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970–2002, Population and Development Review 31(3): 507–527. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00081.x
  • Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons, Science 162(3859): 1243–1248. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
  • Heckman, J. J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error, Econometrica 47(1): 153–161. doi: 10.2307/1912352
  • Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1984. Choices, values, and frames, American Psychologist 39(4): 341–350. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341
  • Klein, D. B., and C. Stern. 2005. Professors and their politics: The policy views of social scientists, Critical Review 17(3-4): 257–303. doi: 10.1080/08913810508443640
  • Kohler, H. P., F. C. Billari, and J. A. Ortega. 2002. The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s, Population and Development Review 28(4): 641–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00641.x
  • Lam, D. 2011. How the world survived the population bomb: Lessons from 50 years of extraordinary demographic history, Demography 48(4): 1231–1262. doi: 10.1007/s13524-011-0070-z
  • Lee, R. 2016. Macroeconomics, aging, and growth, in J. Piggott & A. Woodland (eds), Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, New York: Elsevier, pp. 59–118. doi: 10.1016/bs.hespa.2016.05.002
  • Lee, R., and A. Mason. 2014. Is low fertility really a problem? Population aging, dependency, and consumption, Science 346(6206): 229–234. doi: 10.1126/science.1250542
  • Lutz, W. 2014. A population policy rationale for the twenty-first century, Population and Development Review 40(3): 527–544. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00696.x
  • Lutz, W., A. Goujon, M. Stonawski, and N. Stilianakis. 2018. Demographic and Human Capital Scenarios for the 21st Century: 2018 Assessment for 201 Countries. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Lutz, W., V. Skirbekk, and M. R. Testa. 2006. The low-fertility trap hypothesis: Forces that may lead to further postponement and fewer births in Europe, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research: 167–192. doi: 10.1553/populationyearbook2006s167
  • May, J. F. 2017. The politics of family planning policies and programs in sub-Saharan Africa, Population and Development Review 43: 308–329. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2016.00165.x
  • McDonald, P. 2013. Societal foundations for explaining fertility: Gender equity, Demographic Research 28: 981–994. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.34
  • Meadows, D. H., D. L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. W. Behrens. 1972. The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books.
  • Morgan, S. P. 2003. Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis?, Demography 40(4): 589–603. doi: 10.1353/dem.2003.0037
  • Myrskylä, M., J. R. Goldstein, and Y. H. A. Cheng. 2013. New cohort fertility forecasts for the developed world: Rises, falls, and reversals, Population and Development Review 39(1): 31–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00572.x
  • Reher, D. S. 2007. Towards long-term population decline: A discussion of relevant issues, European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie 23(2): 189–207. doi: 10.1007/s10680-007-9120-z
  • Robinson, R. S. 2015. Population policy in sub-Saharan Africa: A case of both normative and coercive ties to the world polity, Population Research and Policy Review 34(2): 201–221. doi: 10.1007/s11113-014-9338-5
  • Robinson, W. C., and J. A. Ross. 2007. The Global Family Planning Revolution: Three Decades of Population Policies and Programs. Washington, DC: The World Bank. doi: 10.1596/978-0-8213-6951-7
  • Sandler, T. 2004. Global Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511617119
  • Schneider, D. 2015. The great recession, fertility, and uncertainty: Evidence from the United States, Journal of Marriage and Family 77(5): 1144–1156. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12212
  • Schoen, R. 2004. Timing effects and the interpretation of period fertility, Demography 41(4): 801–819. doi: 10.1353/dem.2004.0036
  • Seltzer, N. 2019. Beyond the great recession: Labor market polarization and ongoing fertility decline in the United States, Demography 56(4): 1463–1493. doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00790-6
  • Sen, A. 1997. Population policy: Authoritarianism versus cooperation, Journal of Population Economics 10(1): 3–22. doi: 10.1007/s001480050029
  • Sigle, W. 2016. Why demography needs (new) theories, in D. Mortelmans, K. Matthijs, E. Alofs, & B. Segaert (eds), Changing Family Dynamics and Demographic Evolution. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 271–233.
  • Sobotka, T. 2004. Is lowest-low fertility in Europe explained by the postponement of childbearing?, Population and Development Review 30(2): 195–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.010_1.x
  • Stark, L., and H. P. Kohler. 2002. The debate over low fertility in the popular press: A cross-national comparison, 1998–1999, Population Research and Policy Review 21(6): 535–574. doi: 10.1023/A:1022990205200
  • Stern, N., and N. H. Stern. 2007. The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511817434
  • Striessnig, E., and W. Lutz. 2013. Can below-replacement fertility be desirable?, Empirica 40(3): 409–425. doi: 10.1007/s10663-013-9213-3
  • Teitelbaum, M. S. 2015. Political demography: Powerful trends under-attended by demographic science, Population Studies 69(Suppl. 1): S87–S95. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2014.977638
  • Teitelbaum, M. S., and J. Winter. 1985. The Fear of Population Decline. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Teitelbaum, M. S., and J. Winter. 1998. A Question of Numbers: High Migration, Low Fertility, and the Politics of National Identity. New York: Hill and Wang.
  • Tversky, A., and I. Simonson. 1993. Context-dependent preferences, Management Science 39(10): 1179–1189. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1179
  • UN. 2017. World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision. New York: United Nations.
  • UNFPA. 1994. Programme of action of the international conference on population and development, Cairo, 5–13 September 1994, New York: United Nations.
  • Van Dalen, H. P. 2008. Designing global collective action in population and HIV/AIDS programs, 1983–2002: Has anything changed?, World Development 36(3): 362–382. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.03.007
  • Van Dalen, H. P. 2019. Values of economists matter in the art and science of economics, Kyklos 72(3): 472–499. doi: 10.1111/kykl.12208
  • Van Dalen, H. P., and K. Henkens. 2011. Who fears and who welcomes population decline?, Demographic Research 25: 437–464. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2011.25.13
  • Van Dalen, H. P., and K. Henkens. 2012. What is on a demographer’s mind? A worldwide survey, Demographic Research 26: 363–408. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2012.26.16
  • Van Dalen, H. P., and M. M. Scharf. 2014. Reproductive health aid: A delicate balancing act, in A. Kulczycki (ed), Critical Issues in Reproductive Health, New York: Springer, pp. 195–213. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6722-5_10
  • Weiner, M. 1971. Political demography: An inquiry into the political consequences of population change, in National Academy of Sciences, Office of the Foreign Secretary (ed), Rapid Population Growth: Consequences and Policy Implications. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 567–617.