Global and local correlations of Hajnal’s household formation markers in historical Europe: A cautionary tale

References

• Alter, G. 2013. Generation to generation: Life course, family, and community, Social Science History 37(1): 1–26. doi:10.1017/S0145553200010555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. 1976. Marriage patterns in Victorian Britain: An analysis based on registration district data for England and Wales 1861, Journal of Family History 1: 55–78. doi:10.1177/036319907600100105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. 1990. What is special about spatial data? Alternative perspectives on spatial data analysis, in D. A. Griffith (ed), Spatial Statistics, Past, Present and Future. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute of Mathematical Geography, pp. 63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. and S. Rey. 2010. Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barbagli, M. 1991. Three household formation systems in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Italy, in D. I. Kertzer & R. P. Saller (eds), The Family in Italy from Antiquity to the Present. New Haven- London: Yale University Press, pp. 255–269.
   Google Scholar
• Benigno, F. 1989. The Southern Italian family in the early modern period: A discussion of co-residential patterns, Continuity and Change 4: 165–194. doi:10.1017/S0268416000003623
   Google Scholar
• Berkner, L. K. 1972. The stem family and the developmental cycle of the peasant household: An eighteenth-century Austrian example, The American Historical Review 77(2): 398–418. doi:10.2307/1868698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidanset, P. E. and J. R. Lombard. 2017. Optimal kernel and bandwidth specifications for geographically weighted regression: An evaluation using automated valuation models (AVMs) for mass real estate appraisal, in J. Lombard, E. Stern, & G. Clarke (eds), Applied Spatial Modelling and Planning. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 107–120.
   Google Scholar
• Billari, F. C. 2015. Integrating macro- and micro-level approaches in the explanation of population change, Population Studies 69: S11–S20. doi:10.1080/00324728.2015.1009712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsdon, C., S. Fotheringham, and M. E. Charlton. 1996. Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial nonstationarity, Geographical Analysis 28: 281–298. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1996.tb00936.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch, T. K. 2018. Model-based Demography: Essays on Integrating Data, Technique and Theory. Cham: Springer Open.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael, S. G., A. De Pleijt, J. L. Van Zanden, and T. De Moor. 2016. The European marriage pattern and its measurement, The Journal of Economic History 76(1): 196–204. doi:10.1017/S0022050716000474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coale, A. J. and S. C. Watkins (eds). 1986. The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Da Molin, G. 1990. Family forms and domestic service in southern Italy from the seventeenth to the nineteenth centuries, Journal of Family History 15(4): 503–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, R. J. 2020. Urbanization and mortality in Britain, c. 1800–50, The Economic History Review 73: 455–485. doi:10.1111/ehr.12964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennison, T. K. and S. Ogilvie. 2014. Does the European marriage pattern explain economic growth?, The Journal of Economic History 74: 651–693. doi:10.1017/S0022050714000564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilli, S. D. 2017. The Deep Causes of Economic Development. Family systems and female agency, in J. L. Van Zanden, A. Rijpma, & J. Kok (eds), Agency, Gender, and Economic Development in the World Economy 1850-2000: Testing the Sen hypothesis. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 138–161.
   Google Scholar
• Dribe, M., M. Manfredini, and M. Oris. 2014. The roads to reproduction: Comparing life course trajectories in preindustrial Eurasia, in C. Lund & S. Kurosu (eds), Similarity in Difference. Marriage in Europe and Asia, 1700–1900. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 89–120.
   Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., A. Rodriguez-Pose, and R. Sandall. 2009. Family types and the persistence of regional disparities in Europe, Economic Geography 85(1): 23–47.
   Google Scholar
• Engelen, T. and J. Kok. 2003. Permanent celibacy and late marriage in the Netherlands, 1890–1960, Population (English Edition) 58(1): 67–95. doi:10.3917/pope.301.0067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelen, T. and A. P. Wolf. 2005. Introduction, in T. Engelen & A. P. Wolf (eds), Marriage and the Family in Eurasia: Perspectives on the Hajnal Hypothesis. Amsterdam: Aksant, pp. 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Farago, T. 1998. Different household formation systems in Hungary at the end of the 18th century: Variations on John Hajnal’s thesis, Historical Social Research 1–2: 83–111. doi:10.12759/hsr.23.1998.1/2.83-111
   Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, A. S. 1997. Trends in quantitative methods I: Stressing the local, Progress in Human Geography 21: 88–96. doi:10.1191/030913297676693207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, A. S., C. Brunsdon, and M. Charlton. 2002. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gollini, I., B. Lu, M. Charlton, C. Brunsdon, and P. Harris. 2015. GWmodel: An R package for exploring spatial heterogeneity using geographically weighted models, Journal of Statistical Software 63(17). doi:10.18637/jss.v063.i17
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. and D. G. Janelle. 2004. Thinking spatially in the social sciences, in M. F. Goodchild & D. G. Janelle (eds), Spatially Integrated Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Greif, A. 2006. Family Structure, Institutions, and Growth: The Origins and Implications of Western Corporations, The American Economic Review 96(2): 308–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, S. and M. Szołtysek. 2016. The patriarchy index: A comparative study of power relations across historical Europe, The History of the Family 21: 133–174. doi:10.1080/1081602X.2014.1001769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haining, R. 2009. The special nature of spatial data, in A. S. Fotheringham & P. A. Rogerson (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Spatial Analysis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., pp. 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hajnal, J. 1953. Age at marriage and proportions marrying, Population Studies 7(2): 111–136. doi:10.1080/00324728.1953.10415299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajnal, J. 1965. European marriage patterns in perspective, in D. V. Glass & D. E. C. Eversley (eds), Population in History. Essays in Historical Demography. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 101–143.
   Google Scholar
• Hajnal, J. 1982. Two kinds of preindustrial household formation system, Population and Development Review 8: 449–494. doi:10.2307/1972376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel, E. A. and P. Laslett. 1974. Comparing household structure over time and between cultures, Comparative studies in Society and History 16(1): 73–109. doi:10.1017/S0010417500007362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, M. S. 2004. The Household and the Making of History. A Subversive View of the Western Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgs, E., C. Jones, K. Schürer, and A. Wilkinson. 2013. Integrated Census Microdata (I-CeM) Guide. Available: https://www.nappdata.org/napp/resources/enum_materials_pdf/sample_design_gb1851a.pdf (accessed: 22 June 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Hinde, A. P. R. 1990. Resources and the fertility transition in the countryside of England and Wales, in J. Landers & V. Reynolds (eds), Fertility and Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 76–91.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, F. M., J. R. Porter, and S. A. Matthews (eds). 2016, Recapturing Space: New Middle-Range Theory in Spatial Demography. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Imhof, A. E. 1976. Ländliche Familienstrukturen an einem hessischen Beispiel: Heuchelheim 1690–1900, in W. Conze (ed), Sozialgeschichte der Familie in der Neuzeit Europas. Stuttgart: Klett, pp. 121–135.
   Google Scholar
• Işik, O. and M. M. Pinarcioğlu. 2006. Geographies of a silent transition: A geographically weighted regression approach to regional fertility differences in Turkey, European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie 22: 399–421. doi:10.1007/s10680-006-9111-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janelle, D. G. and M. Goodchild. 2011. Concepts, principles, tools, and challenges in spatially integrated social science, in Timothy L. Nyerges, Helen Couclelis, & Robert McMaster (eds), The SAGE Handbook of GIS and Society. London: SAGE Publications Inc., pp. 27–45.
   Google Scholar
• Jenks, G. F. 1967. The data model concept in statistical mapping, International Yearbook of Cartography 7: 186–190.
   Google Scholar
• Kertzer, D. I. 1991a. Household history and sociological theory, Annual Review of Sociology 17: 155–179. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.001103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertzer, D. I. 1991b. Introduction to part three, in D. I. Kertzer & R. P. Saller (eds), The Family in Italy from Antiquity to the Present. New Haven- London: Yale University Press, pp. 247–249.
   Google Scholar
• Kertzer, D. I. and C. Brettell. 1987. Advances in Italian and Iberian family history, Journal of Family History 12(1–3): 87–120. doi:10.1177/036319908701200106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klep, P. M. M. 2005. An adult life before marriage: Children and the Hajnal hypothesis, in T. Engelen & A. P. Wolf (eds), Marriage and the Family in Eurasia. Perspectives on the Hajnal Hypothesis. Amsterdam: Aksant, pp. 241–270.
   Google Scholar
• Klüsener, S. 2015. Spatial variation in non-marital fertility across Europe in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries: Recent trends, persistence of the past, and potential future pathways, The History of the Family 20(4): 593–628. doi:10.1080/1081602X.2015.1099112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kussmaul, A. 1981. Servants in husbandry in early modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laslett, P. 1977. Characteristics of the Western family considered over time, in P. Laslett (ed), Family Life and Illicit Love in Earlier Generations. Essays in Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 12–49.
   Google Scholar
• Laslett, P. 1983. Family and household as work group and kin group: Areas of traditional Europe compared, in R. Wall & J. Robin (eds), Family Forms in Historic Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 513–563.
   Google Scholar
• Law, C. 1967. The growth of urban population in England and Wales, 1801–1911, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41: 125–143. doi:10.2307/621331
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, C. D. 2019. Local Models for Spatial Analysis (Second Edition). London/New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R. 2012. Making a place for space: Spatial thinking in social science, Annual Review of Sociology 38: 507–524. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, B., P. Harris, M. Charlton, and C. Brunsdon. 2014. The GWmodel R package: Further topics for exploring spatial heterogeneity using geographically weighted models, Geo-spatial Information Science 17(2): 85–101. doi:10.1080/10095020.2014.917453
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, A. 1986. Marriage and Love in England: Modes of Reproduction, 1300–1840. New York: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Manfredini, M. 2016. Family forms in later periods of the mediterranean, in S. R. Huebner & G. Nathan (eds), Mediterranean Families in Antiquity. Oxford: Wiley, pp. 310–323.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, S. A. and D. M. Parker. 2013. Progress in spatial demography, Demographic Research 28: 271–312. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, S. A. and T. C. Yang. 2012. Mapping the results of local statistics: Using geographically weighted regression, Demographic Research 26: 151–166. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2012.26.6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosaic. 2014. https://censusmosaic.demog.berkeley.edu/data/mosaic-data-files (accessed: September 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. 2014. John Hajnal (1924–2008), in R. Johnston (ed.), Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the British Academy. Oxford: Oxford University Press/The British Academy, pp. 251–269.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E. and T. Plümper. 2017. Robustness Tests for Quantitative Research (Methodological Tools in the Social Sciences). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108233590
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, R. 2002. Household and family in the Iberian Peninsula, Portugese Journal of Social Sciences 1(1): 62–75. doi:10.1386/pjss.1.1.62
   Google Scholar
• Ruggles, S. 2012. The future of historical family demography, Annual Review of Sociology 38: 423–441. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggles, S., E. Roberts, S. Sarkar, and M. Sobek. 2011. The North Atlantic population project: Progress and prospects, Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History 44: 1–6. doi:10.1080/01615440.2010.515377
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, R. S. 1985. English marriage patterns revisited, Journal of Family History 10: 2–20. doi:10.1177/036319908501000101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schürer, K., E. M. Garret, J. Hannaliis, and A. Reid. 2018. Household and family structure in England and Wales (1851–1911): Continuities and change, Continuity and Change 33: 365–411. doi:10.1017/S0268416018000243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signorell, A., et al. 2018. DescTools: Tools for descriptive statistics. R package version 0.99.26. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DescTools/DescTools.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, B. W. 1986. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Siordia, C., J. Saenz, and S. E. Tom. 2012. An introduction to macro-level spatial nonstationarity: A geographically weighted regression analysis of diabetes and poverty, Human Geographies – Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography 6(2): 5–13. doi:10.5719/hgeo.2012.62.5
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. M. 1981a. The people of tuscany and their families in the fifteenth century: Medieval or mediterranean?, Journal of Family History 6: 107–128. doi:10.1177/036319908100600111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. M. 1981b. Fertility, economy, and household formation in England over three centuries, Population and Development Review 7(4): 595–622. doi:10.2307/1972800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. M. 1990. Monogamy, landed property and demographic regimes in pre-industrial Europe: Regional contrasts and temporal stabilities, in J. Landers & V. Reynolds (eds), Fertility and Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 164–188.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. S. 1993. American family and demographic patterns and the Northwest European model, Continuity and Change 8(3): 389–415. doi:10.1017/S0268416000002162
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. and R. Bennett. 2017. Urban-rural classification using census data, 1851–1911. doi:10.17863/CAM.15763
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H., R. Bennett, and D. Radicic. 2018. Towns in victorian England and Wales: A new classification, Urban History 45(4): 568–594. doi:10.1017/S0963926818000020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szołtysek, M. 2008. Three kinds of preindustrial household formation system in historical Eastern Europe: A challenge to spatial patterns of the European family, The History of the Family 13(3): 223–257. doi:10.1016/j.hisfam.2008.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szołtysek, M. 2015. Rethinking East-central Europe: Family Systems and Co-residence in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (2 vols). Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Szołtysek, M. 2016. A stem-family society without the stem-family ideology? The case of eighteenth-century Poland, The History of the Family 21(4): 502–530. doi:10.1080/1081602X.2016.1198712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szołtysek, M. and S. Gruber. 2016. Mosaic: Recovering surviving census records and reconstructing the familial history of Europe, The History of the Family 21(1): 38–60. doi:10.1080/1081602X.2015.1006655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szołtysek, M. and B. Ogórek. 2020. How many household formation systems were there in historic Europe? A view across 256 regions using partitioning clustering methods, Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History 53(1): 53–76. doi:10.1080/01615440.2019.1656591
   Google Scholar
• Szołtysek, M. and R. Poniat. 2018. Historical family systems and contemporary developmental outcomes: What is to be gained from the historical census microdata revolution?, The History of the Family 23(3): 466–492. doi:10.1080/1081602X.2018.1477686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szołtysek, M., B. Ogórek, R. Poniat, and S. Gruber. 2019. “One size does not fit all”: Spatial nonstationarity in the determinants of elderly residential isolation in historical Europe, Population, Space and Place 25(6). doi:10.1002/psp.2242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. R. 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region, Economic Geography 46(2): 234–240. doi:10.2307/143141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viazzo, P.P., and D. Albera. 1990. The Peasant Family in Northern Italy, 1750-1930: A Reassessment, Journal of Family History 15(1): 461–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitali, A. and F. C. Billari. 2017. Changing determinants of low fertility and diffusion: A spatial analysis for Italy, Population, Space and Place 23: e1998. doi:10.1002/psp.1998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, P. R., K. J. Curtis White, and R. B. Hammer. 2006. Explorations in Spatial Demography, in W. A. Kandel & D. L. Brown (eds), Population Change and Rural Society. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 407–427.
   Google Scholar
• Wachter, K. W., E. A. Hammel, and P. Laslett. 1978. Statistical Studies of Historical Social Structure. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, R., M. Woollard, and B. Moring. 2004. Census Schedules and Listings, 1801–1831: An Introduction and Guide. Colchester: University of Essex, Department of History. https://www.academia.edu/619532/Census_Schedules_and_Listings_1801-1831_An_Introduction_and_Guide (accessed: 1 August 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, J. R. 2004. The role of spatial analysis in demographic research, in M. F. Goodchild & D. G. Janelle (eds), Spatially Integrated Social Science: Examples in Best Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 381–399.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, D. C. 2019. Geographically weighted regression, in Handbook of Regional Science, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Whittle, J. (ed). 2017. Servants in Rural Europe 1400–1900. Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, R. I. 2004. The Demography of Victorian England and Wales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, R. I. and P. R. A. Hinde. 1985. Nuptiality and age at marriage in nineteenth-century England, Journal of Family History 10(2): 119–144. doi:10.1177/036319908501000201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrigley, E. A. 1981. Marriage, fertility and population growth in eighteenth century England, in R. B. Outhwaite (ed), Marriage and Society: Studies in the Social History of Marriage. London: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 137–185.
   Google Scholar
• Wrigley, E. A. 2014. European marriage patterns and their implications: John Hajnal’s essay and historical demography during the last half-century, in C. D. Briggs, P. Kitson, & S. Thompson (eds.), Population, welfare and economic change in Britain. Woodbridge: Boydell Press, pp. 15–41.
   Google Scholar
• Wrigley, E. A., R. S. Davies, J. E. Oeppen, and R. S. Schofield. 1997. English Population History from Family Reconstitution 1580–1837. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, T. C., C. Shoff, and S. A. Matthews. 2013. Examining the spatially non-stationary associations between the second demographic transition and infant mortality: A Poisson GWR approach, Spatial Demography 1: 17–40. doi:10.1007/BF03354885
   PubMedGoogle Scholar