Demographic models of the reproductive process: Past, interlude, and future

References

• Aparicio Diaz, B., T. Fent, A. Prskawetz, and L. Bernardi. 2011. Transition to parenthood: The role of social interaction and endogenous networks, Demography 48(2): 559–579. doi:10.1007/s13524-011-0023-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. C. 1969. A Monte Carlo simulation of human reproduction, Genus 25(1/4): 1–22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29787859
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. C. 1971. Use of a fertility simulation model to refine measurement techniques, Demography 8(4): 481–490. doi:10.2307/2060684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaumont, M. A. 2010. Approximate Bayesian computation in evolution and ecology, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41: 379–406. doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaumont, M. A. 2019. Approximate Bayesian computation, Annual Review of Statistics and its Application 6: 379–403. doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-030718-105212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billari, F. C., T. Fent, A. Prskawetz, and J. Scheffran. 2006. Agent-based Computational Modelling: Applications in Demography, Social, Economic and Environmental Sciences. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Billari, F. C., F. Ongaro, and A. Prskawetz. 2003. Introduction: Agent-based computational demography, in Agent-based Computational Demography. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bongaarts, J. 1977. A dynamic model of the reproductive process, Population Studies 31(1): 59–73. doi:10.1080/00324728.1977.10412747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongaarts, J., and R. E. Potter. 1983. Fertility, Biology, and Behavior: An Analysis of the Proximate Determinants. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, W. 1958. The distribution of births in human populations in rural Taiwan, Population Studies 12(1): 51–72. doi:10.1080/00324728.1958.10404370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch, T. K. 2018. Does demography need differential equations?, Model-Based Demography. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 79–94. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-65433-1_5
   Google Scholar
• Burkimsher, M. 2017. Evolution of the shape of the fertility curve: Why might some countries develop a bimodal curve?, Demographic Research 37: 295–324. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciganda, D. and F. Villavicencio. 2016. Feedback mechanisms in the postponement of fertility in Spain, in André Grow and Jan Van Bavel (eds), Agent-Based Modelling in Population Studies. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 405–435
   Google Scholar
• Coale, A. J., and T. J. Trussell. 1974. Model fertility schedules: Variations in the age structure of childbearing in human populations, Population Index 40: 185–258. doi:10.2307/2733910
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coale, A., and J. Trussell. 1996. The development and use of demographic models, Population Studies 50(3): 469–484. doi:10.1080/0032472031000149576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, B., and G. Masarotto. 2000. Daily fecundability: First results from a new data base, Demographic Research 3. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2000.3.5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Connolly, S. R., S. A. Keith, R. K. Colwell, and C. Rahbek. 2017. Process, mechanism, and modeling in macroecology, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 32(11): 835–844. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2017.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D. R. 1972. Regression models and life-tables, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 34(2): 187–202. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancik, G. M., and K. S. Dorman. 2008. Mlegp: Statistical analysis for computer models of biological systems using R, Bioinformatics 24(17): 1966–1967. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandekar, V. 1955. Certain modified forms of binomial and Poisson distributions, Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics (1933-1960) 15(3): 237–250. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i25048241
   Google Scholar
• Dunson, D. B., B. Colombo, and D. D. Baird. 2002. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle, Human Reproduction 17(5): 1399–1403. doi:10.1093/humrep/17.5.1399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecochard, R. 2006. Heterogeneity in fecundability studies: Issues and modelling, Statistical Methods in Medical Research 15(2): 141–160. doi:10.1191/0962280206sm436oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteve, A., D. Devolder, and A. Domingo. 2016. Childlessness in Spain: Tick Tock, Tick Tock, Tick Tock!, Perspectives Demogràfiques 1: 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Fent, T., B. A. Diaz, and A. Prskawetz. 2013. Family policies in the context of low fertility and social structure, Demographic Research 29: 963–998. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, A. 2019. To move research from quantity to quality, go beyond good intentions, Nature 566(7744): 297. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00613-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, M. 1970. Mathematical games, Scientific American 222(6): 132–136. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0670-132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gini, C. 1924. Premières recherches sur la fécondabilité de la femme [Initial Research on the Fecundability of Women], in North-Holland: (ed), Proceedings of the International Mathematical Congress. (Vol. 2.). Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Grow, A. and J. Van Bavel (eds). 2016. Agent-Based Modelling in Population Studies: Concepts, Methods, and Applications (Vol. 41). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, M. U. and J. Corander. 2016. Bayesian optimization for likelihood-free inference of simulator-based statistical models, The Journal of Machine Learning Research 17(1): 4256–4302.
   Google Scholar
• Hartig, F., J. M. Calabrese, B. Reineking, T. Wiegand, and A. Huth. 2011. Statistical inference for stochastic simulation models - Theory and application, Ecology Letters 14(8): 816–827. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01640.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegselmann, R., Thomas C. Schelling, and James M. Sakoda. 2017. The intellectual, technical, and social history of a model, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 20: 3. doi:10.18564/jasss.3511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, L. 1953. Fondements théoriques des mesures de la fécondité naturelle [Theoretical basis of measures of natural fertility], Revue de l’Institut International de Statistique / Review of the International Statistical Institute 21(3): 135–151. doi:10.2307/1401425
   Google Scholar
• Henry, L. 1972. On the Measurement of Human Fertility: Selected Writings of Louis Henry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hilton, J. and J. Bijak. 2017. Design and analysis of demographic simulations, in André Grow and Jan Van Bavel (eds) Agent-based Modelling in Population Studies. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 211–235.
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertility Database. 2011. Human Fertility Database.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., C. Haerpfer, A. Moreno, C. Welzel, K. Kizilova, J. Diez-Medrano, M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin, and B. Puranen et al. (eds). 2018. World Values Survey: All Rounds - Country-Pooled Datafile. Madrid: JD Systems Institute. Available: https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWVL.jsp
   Google Scholar
• Klabunde, A., S. Zinn, F. Willekens, and M. Leuchter. 2017. Multistate modelling extended by behavioural rules: An application to migration, Population Studies 71(sup1): 51–67. doi:10.1080/00324728.2017.1350281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Bras, H. 1993. Simulation of change to validate demographic analysis, in David Sven, Reher and Roger S. Schofield (eds) Old and New Methods in Historical Demography. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press, pp. 259–280.
   Google Scholar
• Leridon, H. 2004. Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment, Human Reproduction 19(7): 1548–1553. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnesota Population Center. 2018. Integrated public use microdata series, International: Version 7.0.
   Google Scholar
• Mode, C. J. 1985. Stochastic Processes in Demography and Their Computer Implementation (Vol. 14). Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Orcutt, G. H. 1957. A new type of socio-economic system, The Review of Economics and Statistics 39: 116–123. doi:10.2307/1928528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, E. B. and M. C. Sheps. 1964. Human reproduction: A stochastic process, Biometrics: 28–45. doi:10.2307/2527616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, R. G. 1972. Additional births averted when abortion is added to contraception, Studies in Family Planning 3(4): 53–59. doi:10.2307/1965360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, R. G. and J. M. Sakoda. 1966. A computer model of family building based on expected values, Demography 3(2): 450–461. doi:10.2307/2060170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridley, J. C. and M. C. Sheps. 1966. An analytic simulation model of human reproduction with demographic and biological components, Population Studies 19(3): 297–310. doi:10.1080/00324728.1966.10406018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakoda, J. M. 1971. The checkerboard model of social interaction, The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1(1): 119–132. doi:10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989791
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. 1971. Dynamic models of segregation, The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1(2): 143–186. doi:10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheps, M. C., J. A. Menken, and A. P. Radick. 1973. Mathematical Models of Conception and Birth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S. 1963. Probability models for the variation in the number of births per couple, Journal of the American Statistical Association 58(303): 721–727. doi:10.1080/01621459.1963.10500882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., B. Bhattacharya, and R. Yadava. 1974. A parity dependent model for number of births and its applications, Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B 36(1): 93–102. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25051886
   Google Scholar
• Sobotka, T. and E. Beaujouan. 2014. Two is best? The persistence of a two-child family ideal in Europe, Population and Development Review 40(3): 391–419. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00691.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Kaa, D. J. 1987. Europe’s second demographic transition, Population Bulletin 42(1): 1–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatacharya, K. 1971. A Monte Carlo model for the study of human fertility under varying fecundability, Social Biology 18(4): 406–415. doi:10.1080/19485565.1971.9987949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willekens, F. 2009. Continuous-time microsimulation in longitudinal analysis, in Asghar Zaidi, Ann Harding, and Paul Williamson (eds), New Frontiers in Microsimulation Modelling. London: Routledge, pp. 353–376.
   Google Scholar
• Willekens, F. 2014. Multistate Analysis of Life Histories with R. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Y. 2000. Demography: Past, present, and future, Journal of the American Statistical Association 95(450): 670–673. doi:10.1080/01621459.2000.10474248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeigler, B. P., T. G. Kim, and H. Praehofer. 2000. Theory of Modeling and Simulation. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeman, K., Z. Brzozowska, T. Sobotka, E. Beaujouan, and A. Matysiak. 2014. Cohort Fertility and Education database. Methods protocol. Available at www.cfedatabase.org (last accessed on 10.4. 2017). Technical report, Vienna Institute of Demography.
   Google Scholar