Publication Cover
Population Studies
A Journal of Demography
Volume 76, 2022 - Issue 3
4,694
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

So happy together … Examining the association between relationship happiness, socio-economic status, and family transitions in the UK

Pages 447-464 | Received 04 Aug 2020, Accepted 07 Jul 2021, Published online: 19 Oct 2021

References

  • Barlow, Anne, and Grace James. 2004. Regulating marriage and cohabitation in 21st century Britain, Modern Law Review 67(2): 143–176. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.00482.x
  • Berrington, Ann, and Ian Diamond. 2000. Marriage or cohabitation: A competing risks analysis of first-partnership formation among the 1958 British birth cohort, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 163(2): 127–151. doi:10.1111/1467-985X.00162
  • Berrington, Ann, Brienna Perelli-Harris, and Paulina Trevena. 2015. Commitment and the changing sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage: Insights from qualitative research in the UK, Demographic Research 33(2015): 327–362. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.12
  • Billari, Francesco C., Nicole Hiekel, and Aart C. Liefbroer. 2019. The social stratification of choice in the transition to adulthood, European Sociological Review 35(5): 599–615. doi:10.1093/esr/jcz025
  • Blom, N. 2019. Partner Relationship Quality Under Pressing Work Conditions: Longitudinal and Cross-National Investigations. Nijmegen: Radboud University.
  • Blom, Niels, and Brienna Perelli-Harris. 2021. Temporal dimensions of unemployment and relationship happiness in the United Kingdom, European Sociological Review 37(2): 253–270. doi:10.1093/esr/jcaa044
  • Brown, Susan L. 2000. Union transitions among cohabitors: The significance of relationship assessments and expectations, Journal of Marriage and Family 62(3): 833–846. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00833.x
  • Brown, Susan L. 2003. Relationship quality dynamics of cohabiting unions, Journal of Family Issues 24: 583–601. doi:10.1177/0192513X03024005001
  • Brown, Susan L. 2004. Moving from cohabitation to marriage: Effects on relationship quality, Social Science Research 33(1): 1–19. doi:10.1016/S0049-089X(03)00036-X
  • Brown, Susan L., Wendy D. Manning, and Krista K. Payne. 2017. Relationship quality among cohabiting versus married couples, Journal of Family Issues 38(12): 1730–1753. doi:10.1177/0192513X15622236
  • Chao, Shih-Yi, Niels Blom, Ann Berrington, and Brienna Perelli-Harris. 2020. How partnerships have changed in the UK over the last 30 years. Centre for Population Change Policy Brief. University of Southampton.
  • Cherlin, Andrew J. 2004. The deinstitutionalization of American marriage, Journal of Marriage and Family 66: 848–861. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x
  • Conger, Rand D., Katherine J. Conger, and Monica J. Martin. 2010. Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development, Journal of Marriage and Family 72(3): 685–704. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00725.x
  • Crawford, Claire, Alissa Goodman, Ellen Greaves, and Rob Joyce. 2012. Cohabitation, marriage and child outcomes: An empirical analysis of the relationship between marital status and child outcomes in the UK using the millennium cohort study, Child & Family Law Quarterly 24: 176. Available: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2245029
  • Duncan, S., and M. Phillips. 2008. New families? Tradition and change in modern relationships, in A Park (eds), British Social Attitudes: The 24th Report. London: Sage, pp. 2–28.
  • Edin, Kathryn, and Maria Kefalas. 2005. Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood Before Marriage. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
  • Fincham, Frank D., and Ron Rogge. 2010. Understanding relationship quality: Theoretical challenges and new tools for assessment, Journal of Family Theory & Review 2(4): 227–242. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00059.x
  • Finkel, Eli J., Jeffry A. Simpson, and Paul W. Eastwick. 2017. The psychology of close relationships: Fourteen core principles, Annual Review of Psychology 68: 383–411. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044038
  • Garriga, Anna, and Brienna Perelli-Harris. 2019. The “Pattern of Disadvantage” revisited across Europe: Education, employment precarity, and fathers’ partnership status. Population Association of America. Austin, TX.
  • Gibson-Davis, Christina, Anna Gassman-Pines, and Rebecca Lehrman. 2018. “His” and “Hers”: Meeting the economic bar to marriage, Demography 55(6): 2321–2343. doi:10.1007/s13524-018-0726-z
  • Graham, James M., Yenling J. Liu, and Jennifer L. Jeziorski. 2006. The dyadic adjustment scale: A reliability generalization meta-analysis, Journal of Marriage and Family 68(3): 701–717. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00284.x
  • Hardie, Jessica Halliday, and Amy Lucas. 2010. Economic factors and relationship quality among young couples: Comparing cohabitation and marriage, Journal of Marriage and Family 72(5): 1141–1154. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00755.x
  • Heuveline, Patrick, and Jeffrey M. Timberlake. 2004. The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective, Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5): 1214–1230. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00088.x
  • Hiekel, Nicole, Aart C. Liefbroer, and Anne-Rigt Poortman. 2014. Understanding diversity in the meaning of cohabitation across Europe, European Journal of Population 30(4): 391–410. doi:10.1007/s10680-014-9321-1
  • Hiekel, Nicole, Aart C. Liefbroer, and Anne-Rigt Poortman. 2015. Marriage and separation risks among German cohabiters: Differences between types of cohabiter, Population Studies 69(2): 237–251. doi:10.1080/00324728.2015.1037334
  • Ishizuka, Patrick. 2018. The economic foundations of cohabiting couples’ union transitions, Demography 55(2): 535–557. doi:10.1007/s13524-018-0651-1
  • James, Spencer L. 2015. Variation in trajectories of women’s marital quality, Social Science Research 49: 16–30. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.07.010
  • Kalmijn, Matthijs. 2013. The educational gradient in marriage: A comparison of 25 European countries, Demography 50(4): 1499–1520. doi:10.1007/s13524-013-0229-x
  • Karney, Benjamin R., and Thomas N. Bradbury. 2020. Research on marital satisfaction and stability in the 2010s: Challenging conventional wisdom, Journal of Marriage and Family 82(1): 100–116. doi:10.1111/jomf.12635
  • Kennedy, Sheela, and Larry Bumpass. 2008. Cohabitation and children's living arrangements: New estimates from the United States, Demographic Research 19: 1663. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.47
  • Lavner, Justin A., and Thomas N. Bradbury. 2010. Patterns of change in marital satisfaction over the newlywed years, Journal of Marriage and Family 72(5): 1171–1187. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00757.x
  • Le, Benjamin, Natalie L. Dove, Christopher R. Agnew, Miriam S. Korn, and Amelia A. Mutso. 2010. Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis, Personal Relationships 17(3): 377–390. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01285.x
  • McLanahan, Sara. 2004. Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the Second Demographic Transition, Demography 41(4): 607–627. doi:10.1353/dem.2004.0033
  • McLanahan, Sara, and Christine Percheski. 2008. Family structure and the reproduction of inequalities, Annual Review of Sociology 34: 257–276. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134549
  • Mikolai, Julia, Brienna Perelli-Harris, and Ann Berrington. 2018. The role of education in the intersection of partnership transitions and motherhood in Europe and the United States, Demographic Research 39: 753–794. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2018.39.27
  • Moors, Guy, and Eva Bernhardt. 2009. Splitting up or getting married? Competing risk analysis of transitions among cohabiting couples in Sweden, Acta Sociologica 52(3): 227–247. doi:10.1177/0001699309339800
  • Musick, Kelly, and Katherine Michelmore. 2018. Cross-national comparisons of union stability in cohabiting and married families with children, Demography 55(4): 1389–1421. doi:10.1007/s13524-018-0683-6
  • Office for National Statistics. 2018. Families and households in the UK. Available: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/families/bulletins/familiesandhouseholds/2018.
  • Perelli-Harris, Brienna, and Laura Bernardi. 2015. Exploring social norms around cohabitation: The life course, individualization, and culture: Introduction to special collection: “Focus on partnerships: Discourses on cohabitation and marriage throughout Europe and Australia”, Demographic Research 33: 701–732. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.25
  • Perelli-Harris, Brienna, and Nora Sánchez Gassen. 2012. How similar are cohabitation and marriage? Legal approaches to cohabitation across Western Europe, Population and Development Review 38(3): 435–467. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00511.x
  • Perelli-Harris, Brienna, and Mark Lyons-Amos. 2016. Partnership patterns in the United States and across Europe: The role of education and country context, Social Forces 95(1): 251–281. doi:10.1093/sf/sow054
  • Perelli-Harris, Brienna, Wendy Sigle-Rushton, Trude Lappegård, Renske Keizer, Caroline Berghammer, and Michaela Kreyenfeld. 2010. The educational gradient of nonmarital childbearing in Europe, Population and Development Review 36(4): 775–801. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00357.x
  • Perelli-Harris, Brienna, Michaela Kreyenfeld, Wendy Sigle-Rushton, Renske Keizer, Trude Lappegård, Aiva Jasilioniene, Caroline Berghammer, and Paola Di Giulio. 2012. Changes in union status during the transition to parenthood in eleven European countries, 1970s to early 2000s, Population Studies 66(2): 167–182. doi:10.1080/00324728.2012.673004
  • Perelli-Harris, Brienna, Ann Berrington, Caroline Berghammer, Renske Keizer, Trude Lappegård, Monika Mynarska, Ann Evans, et al. 2014. Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia, Demographic Research 31(34): 1043–1078. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.34
  • Perelli-Harris, Brienna, Stefanie Hoherz, Trude Lappegård, and Ann Evans. 2019. Mind the “happiness” gap: The relationship between cohabitation, marriage, and subjective well-being in the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, and Norway, Demography 56(4): 1219–1246. doi:10.1007/s13524-019-00792-4
  • Rijken, Arieke J., and Aart C. Liefbroer. 2009. The influence of partner relationship quality on fertility, European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 25(1): 27–44. doi:10.1007/s10680-008-9156-8
  • Rijken, Arieke J., and Elizabeth Thomson. 2011. Partners’ relationship quality and childbearing, Social Science Research 40(2): 485–497. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.10.001
  • Robles, Theodore F., Richard B. Slatcher, Joseph M. Trombello, and Meghan M. McGinn. 2014. Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review, Psychological Bulletin 140(1): 140. doi:10.1037/a0031859
  • Sassler, Sharon, and Daniel T. Lichter. 2020. Cohabitation and marriage: Complexity and diversity in union-formation patterns, Journal of Marriage and Family 82(1): 35–61. doi:10.1111/jomf.12617
  • Sassler, Sharon, and Amanda Miller. 2017. Cohabitation Nation: Gender, Class, and the Remaking of Relationships. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
  • Schneider, Daniel, Kristen Harknett, and Matthew Stimpson. 2019. Job quality and the educational gradient in entry into marriage and cohabitation, Demography 56(2): 451–476. doi:10.1007/s13524-018-0749-5
  • Smock, Pamela J., Wendy D. Manning, and Meredith Porter. 2005. “Everything’s there except money”: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors, Journal of Marriage and Family 67(3): 680–696. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00162.x
  • Spanier, Graham B. 1976. Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads, Journal of Marriage and the Family 38: 15–28. doi:10.2307/350547
  • Stanley, Scott M., Galena Kline Rhoades, and Howard J. Markman. 2006. Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect, Family Relations 55(4): 499–509. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00418.x
  • Thomson, Elizabeth. 2014. Family complexity in Europe, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 654(1): 245–258. doi:10.1177/0002716214531384
  • Umberson, Debra, and Jennifer Karas Montez. 2010. Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy, Journal of Health and Social Behavior 51(1_suppl): S54–S66. doi:10.1177/0022146510383501
  • University of Essex. 2020. Understanding society: Marital and cohabitation histories, 1991–2015. Available: www.understandingsociety.ac.uk.
  • University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research, NatCen Social Research, and Kantar Public. 2019. Understanding Society: Waves 1-9, 2009-2018 and Harmonised BHPS: Waves 1-18, 1991-2009 (12th edn.: UK Data Service).
  • Waller, Maureen R., and Sara S. McLanahan. 2005. “His” and “Her” marriage expectations: Determinants and consequences, Journal of Marriage and Family 67(1): 53–67. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00005.x
  • Wellings, Kaye, Kyle G. Jones, Catherine H. Mercer, Clare Tanton, Soazig Clifton, Jessica Datta, Andrew J. Copas, et al. 2013. The prevalence of unplanned pregnancy and associated factors in Britain: Findings from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3), The Lancet 382(9907): 1807–1816. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62071-1
  • Wiik, Kenneth Aarskaug, Eva Bernhardt, and Turid Noack. 2009. A study of commitment and relationship quality in Sweden and Norway, Journal of Marriage and Family 71(3): 465–477. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00613.x
  • Wiik, Kenneth Aarskaug, Renske Keizer, and Trude Lappegård. 2012. Relationship quality in marital and cohabiting unions across Europe, Journal of Marriage and Family 74(3): 389–398. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00967.x