Demography’s theory and approach: (How) has the view from the margins changed?

References

• Acker, J. 1992. From sex roles to gendered institutions, Contemporary Sociology 21(5): 565–569. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2075528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. 2017. Policies as gendering practices: Re-viewing categorical distinctions, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 38(1): 20–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2016.1198207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachrach, C. A. 2014. Culture and demography: From reluctant bedfellows to committed partners, Demography 51(1): 3–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0257-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, S. M. 2014. A demographic perspective on family change, Journal of Family Theory and Review 6: 35–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. 2005. For public sociology, American Sociological Review 70(1): 4–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, J. C. 1996. Demography and social science, Population Studies 50(3): 305–333. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000149516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, N. and N. Riley. 2018. Women, biopower and the making of demographic knowledge: India’s Demographic and Health Survey, in Nancy E. Riley, and Jan Brunson (eds), International Handbook on Gender and Demographic Processes. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 37–54.
   Google Scholar
• Ciccia, R. 2016. Qualitative comparative analysis as a tool for concept clarification, typology building, and contextualized comparisons in gender and feminist research, Politics & Gender 12(3): E8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland, J. 1996. Demographic data collection in less developed countries 1946–1996, Population Studies 50(3): 433–450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000149556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clife, J. (presenter) 2014. Varieties of capitalism [audio podcast episode], in Analysis. British Broadcasting Company. https:www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0477nry.
   Google Scholar
• Cherlin, A. J. 2012. Goode’s world revolution and family patterns: A reconsideration at fifty years, Population and Development Review 38(4): 577–607. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00528.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cigno, A. and J. Ermisch. 1989. A microeconomic analysis of the timing of births, European Economic Review 33: 737–760. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(89)90023-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics, University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989(1): Article 8, 139–167. Available: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color, Stanford Law Review 43(6): 1241–1299. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Crimmins, E. M. 1993. Demography: The past 30 years, the present, and the future, Demography 30: 579–591. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2061807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, S. 2000. Maternal education and child health: A feminist dilemma, Feminist Studies 26(2): 425–446. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3178543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, F. M. 2007. Undoing gender, Gender & Society 21(1): 106–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206293577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVault, M. L. 1996. Talking back to sociology: Distinctive contributions of feminist methodology, Annual Review of Sociology 22(1): 29–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmenegger, P., J. Kvist, P. Marx, and K. Petersen. 2015. Three worlds of welfare capitalism: The making of a classic, Journal of European Social Policy 25(1): 3–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928714556966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, M. M. 1990. Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research, Journal of Marriage and the Family 52(4): 866. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/353307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferree, M. M. 2010. Filling the glass: Gender perspectives on families, Journal of Marriage and Family 72: 420–439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00711.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferree, M. M., S. Khan, and S. A. Morimoto. 2007. Assessing the feminist revolution: The presence and absence of gender in theory and practice, in C. Calhoun (ed), Sociology in America: The American Sociological Association Centennial History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 354–384.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, R. H. 1985. Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, R. H. 1988. Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, R. H., T. Gilovich, and D. T. Regan. 1993. Does studying economics inhibit cooperation?, Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(2): 159–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.2.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goisis, A. and W. Sigle-Rushton. 2014. Childbearing postponement and child well-being: A complex and varied relationship?, Demography 51(5): 1821–1841. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0335-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldscheider, F. and G. Kaufman. 1996. Fertility and commitment: Bringing men back in, Population and Development Review 22: 87–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2808006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldscheider, F., E. Bernhardt, and T. Lappegård. 2015. The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior, Population and Development Review 41(2): 207–239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, S. 1996. The social construction of population science: An intellectual, institutional, and political history of twentieth-century demography, Comparative Studies in Society and History 38(1): 26–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500020119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, S. 2012. On the crafting of population knowledge, Population and Development Review 38(1): 121–131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00474.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, S. and J. Li. 1995. Engendering reproductive policy and practice in peasant China: For a feminist demography of reproduction, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 20(3): 601–641. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/495002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajnal, J. 1965. European marriage patterns in perspective, in D. V. Glass and D. E. C. Eversley (eds), Population in History: Essays in Historical Demography. Volume I: General and Great Britain. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction, pp. 101–143.
   Google Scholar
• Hajnal, J. 1982. Two kinds of preindustrial household formation system, Population and Development Review 8: 449–494. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1972376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective, Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. G. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobcraft, J. 1996. Fertility in England and Wales: A fifty-year perspective, Population Studies 50(3): 485–524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000149586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., J. L. Knetsch, and R. H. Thaler. 1991. Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias, Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 193–206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, D. 1996. Demographic transition theory, Population Studies 50(3): 361–387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000149536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (International Encyclopedia of Unified Science; Vol. 2, No. 2). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. 2001. ‘The birth of bio-politics’: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality, Economy and Society 30(2): 190–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140120042271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesthaeghe, R. 2010. The unfolding story of the second demographic transition, Population and Development Review 36(2): 211–251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesthaeghe, R. and C. Vanderhoeft. 2001. Ready, willing and able: A conceptualization of transitions to new behavioural forms, in J. B. Casterline (ed), Diffusion processes and fertility transition. Selected perspectives. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 240–264.
   Google Scholar
• Marczak, J., W. Sigle, and E. Coast. 2018. When the grass is greener: Fertility decisions in a cross-national context, Population Studies 72(2): 201–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2018.1439181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, S. A. 1996. Toward a synthesis of feminist and demographic perspectives on fertility, The Sociological Quarterly 37(1): 83–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1996.tb02332.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. T. 2003. “Under western eyes” revisited: Feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(2): 499–535. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/342914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyer, G. 2011. Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The second “NO”, Demographic Research 24: 225–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orgad, S. 2019. Heading Home: Motherhood, Work, and the Failed Promise of Equality. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orloff, A. S. 2009. Gendering the comparative analysis of welfare states: An unfinished agenda, Sociological Theory 27(3): 317–343. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01350.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pessar, P. R. 1999. Engendering migration studies: The case of new immigrants in the United States, American Behavioral Scientist 42(4): 577–600. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921954372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presser, H. B. 1997. Demography, feminism, and the science–policy nexus, Population and Development Review 23: 295–331. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2137547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, N. E. 1998. Research on gender in demography: Limitations and constraints, Population Research and Policy Review 17(6): 521–538. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006190727571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, N. E. 1999. Challenging demography: Contributions from feminist theory, Sociological Forum 14(3): 369–397. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021443401795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, N. E. and J. Brunson (eds). 2018. International Handbook on Gender and Demographic Processes (Vol. 8). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, N. and J. McCarthy. 2003. Demography in the Age of the Postmodern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risman, B. J. and G. Davis. 2013. From sex roles to gender structure, Current Sociology 61(5–6): 733–755. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113479315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seth, S. 2014. The politics of knowledge: Or, how to stop being eurocentric, History Compass 12(4): 311–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12153
   Google Scholar
• Sigle, W. 2016. Why demography needs (new) theories, in Dimitri Mortelmans, Koenraad Matthijs, Elisabeth Alofs, and Barbara Segaert (eds), Changing Family Dynamics and Demographic Evolution. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 217–233.
   Google Scholar
• Sigle, W. 2021. Plus ça change? The gendered legacies of mid-20th century conceptualisations of the form and function of the family, in Norbert Schneider and Michaela Kreyenfeld (eds), Research Handbook on the Sociology of the Family. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 386–398.
   Google Scholar
• Sigle, W. and Ø. Kravdal. 2021. With age comes … ? An examination of gendered differences in the resource advantages associated with parental age in Norway, Comparative Population Studies 46: 363–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2021-13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigle-Rushton, W. 2014. Essentially quantified? Towards a more feminist modeling strategy, The Sage Handbook of Feminist Theory: 431–445. doi:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473909502.n29
   Google Scholar
• Sigle, W. and A. Goisis. 2019. Mind the gap: The health advantages that accompany parental marriage vary by maternal nativity, Population Studies 73(3): 369–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2019.1654613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigle-Rushton, W. and S. McLanahan. 2002. For richer or poorer? Marriage as an anti-poverty strategy in the United States, Population 57(3): 509–526. doi:https://doi.org/10.3917/pope.203.0509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigle-Rushton, W. and S. McLanahan. 2004. Father absence and child well-being: A critical review, in D. Moynihan, L. Rainwater, and T. Smeeding (eds), The future of the family. New York: Russell Sage, pp. 116–155.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsson, P. and G. Sandström. 2011. Ready, willing, and able to divorce: An economic and cultural history of divorce in twentieth-century Sweden, Journal of Family History 36(2): 210–229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0363199010395853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. 1974. Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology, Sociological Inquiry 44(1): 7–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1974.tb00718.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, J. and B. Thorne. 1985. The missing feminist revolution in sociology, Social Problems 32(4): 301–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/800754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, L. and S. Wise. 1993. Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, F., W. Sigle-Rushton, and Ø. Kravdal. 2009. Consequences of family disruption on children’s educational outcomes in Norway, Demography 46(3): 553–574. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, O., J. Gershuny, and J. P. Robinson. 2018. Stalled or uneven gender revolution? A long-term processual framework for understanding why change is slow, Journal of Family Theory and Review 10(1): 263–279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, A. 2001. The developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family change, Demography 38(4): 449–465. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2001.0039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, A., S. F. Dorius, and J. Swindle. 2015. Developmental idealism: The cultural foundations of world development programs, Sociology of Development 1(2): 277–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/sod.2015.1.2.277
   Google Scholar
• Walby, S. 2004. The European Union and gender equality: Emergent varieties of gender regime, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 11(1): 4–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxh024
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, S. C. 1993. If all we knew about women was what we read in demography, what would we know?, Demography 30(4): 551–577. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2061806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. R. 2010. Doing feminist-demography, International Journal of Social Research Methodology 13(3): 197–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.482250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi, B. and S. P. Morgan. 2017. The second demographic transition theory: A review and appraisal, Annual Review of Sociology 43: 473–492. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarza, J. A. 2018. Representations of feminist theory and gender issues in introductory-level sociology textbooks, Dissertations and Theses. Paper 4358. doi:https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.6251
   Google Scholar