3,308
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

How genuine are sub-replacement ideal family sizes in urban China?

& ORCID Icon
Received 15 Apr 2022, Accepted 14 Nov 2022, Published online: 06 Apr 2023

References

  • Ajzen, Icek and Jane Klobas. 2013. Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior, Demographic Research 29(8): 203–232. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2013.29.8
  • Attané, Isabelle. 2016. Second child decisions in China, Population and Development Review 42(3): 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2016.00151.x
  • Banister, Judith. 1987. China’s Changing Population. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Basten, Stuart, Wolfgang Lutz, and Qiang Ren. 2010. Shanghai’s Ultra-Low Fertility: The Future for Other Populations? Paper presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting.
  • Basten, Stuart and Baochang Gu. 2013. Childbearing Preferences, Reform of Family Planning Restrictions and the Low Fertility Trap in China, Oxford Centre for Population Research: Working Paper #61.
  • Basten, Stuart and Quanbao Jiang. 2014. China’s family planning policies: Recent reforms and future prospects, Studies in Family Planning 45(4): 493–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00003.x
  • Basten, Stuart and Quanbao Jiang. 2015. Fertility in China: An uncertain future, Population Studies 69(sup1): S97–S105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2014.982898
  • Basten, Stuart and Georgia Verropoulou. 2015. A re-interpretation of the ‘two-child norm’ in post-transitional demographic systems: Fertility intentions in Taiwan, PLoS ONE 10(8): e0135105. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135105
  • BBC News. 2021. China Allows Three Children in Major Policy Shift. Available: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-57303592 (accessed: 20 October 2022).
  • Blake, Judith. 1966. Ideal family size among white Americans: A quarter of a century’s evidence, Demography 3(1): 154–173. https://doi.org/10.2307/2060069
  • Bongaarts, John. 2001. Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies, Population and Development Review 27: 260–281.
  • Bongaarts, John. 2002. The end of the fertility transition in the developed world, Population and Development Review 28(3): 419–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00419.x
  • Cai, Yong. 2010. China’s below-replacement fertility: Government policy or socioeconomic development?, Population and Development Review 36(3): 419–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00341.x
  • Campbell, Charlie. 2019. China’s Aging Population Is a Major Threat to Its Future. Available: https://time.com/5523805/china-aging-population-working-age/ (accessed: 20 October 2022).
  • Chan, Kam Wing and Will Buckingham. 2008. Is China abolishing the Hukou system?, The China Quarterly 195: 582–606. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741008000787
  • Chesnais, Jean-Claude. 1996. Fertility, family, and social policy in contemporary Western Europe, Population and Development Review 22(4): 729–739. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137807
  • Chesnais, Jean-Claude. 2000. Determinants of Below-Replacement Fertility. Special Issue Nox. 40/41. Population Bulletin of the United Nations. New York: United Nations Population Division.
  • Choe, Minja Kim and Noriko O. Tsuya. 1991. Why do Chinese women practice contraception? The case of rural Jilin province, Studies in Family Planning 22(1): 39–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/1966518
  • Croll, E., Penny Kane, and Delia Davin. 1985. China’s One-Child Family Policy. London: Springer.
  • De Santis, Gustavo and Massimo Livi Bacci. 2001. Reflections on the Economics of the Fertility Decline in Europe. Paper presented at EURESCO Conference: The second demographic transition in Europe.
  • European Commission. 2005. Green Paper ‘Confronting Demographic Change: A New Solidarity between the Generations.’ Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/green-paper-confronting-demographic-change-a-new-solidarity-between-the-generations.html (accessed: 20 October 2022).
  • Feeney, Griffith and Jianhua Yuan. 1994. Below replacement fertility in China? A close look at recent evidence, Population Studies 48(3): 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000147926
  • Gietel-Basten, Stuart. 2018. Fertility preferences in Taiwan, in Stuart Gietel-Basten, John Casterline, and Minja Choe (eds), Family Demography in Asia: A Comparative Analysis of Fertility Preferences. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 109–120.
  • Gietel-Basten, Stuart. 2019. The “Population Problem” in Pacific Asia. International Policy Exchange. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gietel-Basten, Stuart, Xuehui Han, and Yuan Cheng. 2019. Assessing the impact of the “one-child policy” in China: A synthetic control approach, PLoS ONE 14(11): e0220170. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.Pone.0220170
  • Girard, Alain and Louis Roussel. 1982. Ideal family size, fertility, and population policy in Western Europe, Population and Development Review 8(2): 323–345. https://doi.org/10.2307/1972989
  • Global Times. 2022. 17 Chinese Govt Departments Issue Guideline to Boost Population Growth amid Falling Birth Rate. Available: https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202208/1273160.shtml (accessed: 20 October 2022).
  • Goldstein, Joshua, Wolfgang Lutz, and Maria Rita Testa. 2003. The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideals in Europe, Population Research and Policy Review 22(5): 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POPU.0000020962.80895.4a
  • Goodkind, Daniel. 2017. The astonishing population averted by China’s birth restrictions: Estimates, nightmares, and reprogrammed ambitions, Demography 54(4): 1375–1400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-017-0595-x
  • Greenhalgh, Susan. 1986. Shifts in China’s population policy, 1984-86: Views from the central, provincial, and local levels, Population and Development Review 12(3): 491–515. https://doi.org/10.2307/1973220
  • Greenhalgh, Susan. 2008. Just One Child: Science and Policy in Deng’s China. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Greenhalgh, Susan. 2018. Making demography astonishing: Lessons in the politics of population science, Demography 55(2): 721–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0660-0
  • Gu, Baochang, Feng Wang, Zhigang Guo, and Zhang Erli. 2007. China’s local and national fertility policies at the end of the twentieth century, Population and Development Review 33(1): 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00161.x
  • Guo, Zhigang, Stuart Gietel-Basten, and Baochang Gu. 2019. The lowest fertility rates in the world? Evidence from the 2015 Chinese 1% sample census, China Population and Development Studies 2(3): 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42379-018-0012-1
  • Hagewen, Kellie J. and S. Philip Morgan. 2005. Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970–2002, Population and Development Review 31(3): 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00081.x
  • Hayford, Sarah R. 2009. The evolution of fertility expectations over the life course, Demography 46(4): 765–783. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0073
  • Heiland, Frank, Alexia Prskawetz, and Warren C. Sanderson. 2008. Are individuals’ desired family sizes stable? Evidence from West German panel data, European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 24(2): 129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-008-9162-x
  • Hermalin, Albert I. and Xian Liu. 1990. Gauging the validity of responses to questions on family size preferences in China, Population and Development Review 16(2): 337–354. https://doi.org/10.2307/1971594
  • Hou, Jiawei. 2015. Changes in the Chinese population’s fertility intentions: 1980-2011, Social Sciences in China 36(1): 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2015.1001482
  • Iacovou, Maria and Lara Patrício Tavares. 2011. Yearning, learning, and conceding: Reasons men and women change their childbearing intentions, Population and Development Review 37(1): 89–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00391.x
  • Jiang, Quanbao, Ying Li, and Jesús J. Sánchez-Barricarte. 2016. Fertility intention, son preference, and second childbirth: Survey findings from Shaanxi province of China, Social Indicators Research 125(3): 935–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0875-z
  • Li, Hong-tian, Ming Xue, Susan Hellerstein, Yue Cai, Yanqiu Gao, Yali Zhang, Jie Qiao, et al. 2019. Association of China’s universal two child policy with changes in births and birth related health factors: National, descriptive comparative study, BMJ 366: l4680. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4680
  • Liu, Tao and Li Sun. 2015. An apocalyptic vision of ageing in China, Zeitschrift Für Gerontologie Und Geriatrie 48(4): 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-014-0816-5
  • Livi Bacci, Massimo. 2001. Comment: Desired family size and the future course of fertility, Population and Development Review 27(supplement): 282–289.
  • Lutz, Wolfgang, Vegard Skirbekk, and Maria Rita Testa. 2006. The low-fertility trap hypothesis: Forces that may lead to further postponement and fewer births in Europe, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 4: 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2006s167
  • Lutz, Wolfgang. 2007. Adaptation versus mitigation policies on demographic change in Europe, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2007: 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2007s19
  • Master, Farah and Albee Zhang. 2022. China to Discourage Abortions to Boost Low Birth Rate. Available: https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-discourage-abortions-boost-low-birth-rate-2022-08-16/ (accessed: 20 October 2022).
  • McClelland, G. H. 1983. Family-size desires as measures of demand, in Rodolfo A. Bulatao and Ronald D. Lee (eds), Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries, Volume 1, Supply and Demand for Children. New York: Academic Press, pp. 288–343.
  • Merli, M. Giovanna and S. Philip Morgan. 2011. Below replacement fertility preferences in Shanghai, Population (English Edition) 66(3): 519–542. https://doi.org/10.3917/pope.1103.0519
  • Merli, M. Giovanna and Herbert I. Smith. 2002. Has the Chinese family planning policy been successful in changing fertility preferences?, Demography 39(3): 557–572. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2002.0029
  • Miller, Warren B. 2011. Differences between fertility desires and intentions: Implications for theory, research and policy, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011 9: 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2011s75
  • Mistreanu, Simina. 2022. As Chinese Shun Parenthood, Firms Dangle Bonuses, Loans and Leave. Available: https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2022/1/26/as-chinese-shun-parenthood-firms-dangle-bonuses-loans-and-leave (accessed: 20 October 2022).
  • Morgan, S. Philip and Heather Rackin. 2010. The correspondence between fertility intentions and behavior in the United States, Population and Development Review 36(1): 91–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00319.x
  • Morgan, S. Philip, Guo Zhigang, and Sarah R. Hayford. 2009. China’s below-replacement fertility: Recent trends and future prospects, Population and Development Review 35(3): 605–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00298.x
  • Müller, Maximilian W., Joan Hamory, Jennifer Johnson-Hanks, and Edward Miguel. 2022. The illusion of stable fertility preferences, Population Studies 76(2): 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2022.2057577
  • Nie, Yilin and Robert J. Wyman. 2005. The one-child policy in Shanghai: Acceptance and internalization, Population and Development Review 31(2): 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00067.x
  • OECD. 2011. SF2.2: Ideal and Actual Number of Children. OECD Family Database. Available: https://www.oecd.org/els/family/database.htm (accessed: 20 October 2022).
  • People’s Congress. 2021. Outline of the People’s Republic of China 14th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development and Long-Range Objectives for 2035. Xinhua News Agency. https://cset.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/t0284_14th_Five_Year_Plan_EN.pdf
  • Philipov, Dimiter. 2009. Fertility intentions and outcomes: The role of policies to close the gap, European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 25(4): 355–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-009-9202-1.c
  • Philipov, Dimiter, Olivier Thévenon, Jane Klobas, Laura Bernardi, and Aart Liefbroer. 2009. Reproductive Decision-Making in a Macro-Micro Perspective (REPRO): State-of-the-Art. Vienna Institute of Demography, European Demographic Research papers No. 1.
  • Philipov, Dimiter and Laura Bernardi. 2012. Concepts and operationalisation of reproductive decisions implementation in Austria, Germany and Switzerland, Comparative Population Studies 36(2-3). http://www.comparativepopulationstudies.de/index.php/CpoS/article/view/78
  • Quesnel-Vallée, Amélie and S. Philip Morgan. 2003. Missing the target? Correspondence of fertility intentions and behavior in the U.S., Population Research and Policy Review 22(5): 497–525. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POPU.0000021074.33415.c1
  • Ray, Colleen, Sela Harcey, Arthur Greil, Stacy Tiemeyer, and Julia McQuillan. 2018. Stability and change in personal fertility ideals among U.S. women in heterosexual relationships, Demographic Research 39: 459–486. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2018.39.16
  • Reuters Staff. 2021. China’s 2020 Fertility Rate Was 1.3, with 12 Mln Births. Available: https://www.reuters.com/article/china-society-census-fertility-idUSL4N2MY140 (accessed: 20 October 2022).
  • Royston, Patrick and Ian R. White. 2011. Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE): Implementation in Stata, Journal of Statistical Software 45(1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i04
  • Ryder, Norman B. and Charles F. Westoff. 1971. Orientations toward numbers of children, in Reproduction in the U.S., 1965. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400886517-002.
  • Savelieva, Kateryna, Natalie Nitsche, Venla Berg, Anneli Miettinen, Anna Rotkirch, and Markus Jokela. 2021. Birth cohort changes in fertility ideals: Evidence from repeated cross-sectional surveys in Finland, SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/7vtqm
  • Sobotka, Tomáš and Éva Beaujouan. 2014. Two is best? The persistence of a two-child family ideal in Europe, Population and Development Review 40(3): 391–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00691.x
  • Testa, Maria Rita and Leonardo Grilli. 2006. The influence of childbearing regional contexts on ideal family size in Europe, Population (English Edition, 2002-) 61(1/2). Institut National d’Études Démographiques: 109–137. https://doi.org/10.3917/pope.601.0099
  • Thomson, Elizabeth. 2015. Family size preferences, in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier, pp. 805–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.31064-9.
  • Toulemon, Laurent. 1996. Very few couples remain voluntarily childless, Population: An English Selection 8. Institut National d’Études Démographiques: 1–27.
  • Trent, Roger B. 1980. Evidence bearing on the construct validity of ‘ideal family size’, Population and Environment 3(3): 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01255345
  • Trinitapoli, Jenny, and Sara Yeatman. 2018. The flexibility of fertility preferences in a context of uncertainty, Population and Development Review 44(1): 87–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12114
  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2020. World Population Prospects: The 2022 Revision. Available: https://population.un.org/wpp/ (accessed: 20 October 2022).
  • United Nations Population Fund. 2014. Programme of Action Adopted at the International Conference on Population Development Cairo, 5-13 September 2014: 20th Anniversary Edition. Available: https://www.unfpa.org/publications/international-conference-population-and-development-programme-action/ (accessed: 7 March 2023).
  • Van de Kaa, Dirk J. 2001. Postmodern fertility preferences: From changing value orientation to new behavior, Population and Development Review 27: 290–331.
  • Van Peer, Christine. 2002. Desired and achieved fertility, in E. Kijzing and M. Corijin (eds), Dynamics of Fertility and Partnership in Europe. Volume 2. New York: United Nations, pp. 117–141.
  • Waldmeir, Patti. 2009. Shanghai Sidesteps ‘One Child’ Rule. Available: https://www.ft.com/content/925e99f2-787f-11de-bb06-00144feabdc0
  • Wang, J. 1990. Women’s preferences for children in Shifang county, Sichuan, China, Asian and Pacific Population Forum 4(3): 27–28.
  • Wang, Jun. 2015. 生育政策调整对中国出生人口规模的影响 [The influence of fertility policy adjustment to the birth population size in China, 人口学刊 [Population Journal] 37(02): 26–33. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-129X.2015.02.003
  • Wang, Feng, Yong Cai, Shen Ke, and Stuart Gietel-Basten. 2018. Is demography just a numerical exercise? Numbers, politics, and legacies of China’s one-child policy, Demography 55(2): 693–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0658-7
  • Whyte, Martin King and S. Z. Gu. 1987. Popular response to China’s fertility transition, Population and Development Review 13(3): 471–493. https://doi.org/10.2307/1973135
  • Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2001. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Xie, Yu and Ping Lu. 2015. The sampling design of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), Chinese Journal of Sociology 1(4): 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057150X15614535
  • Xin, Liu. 2022. China Vows to Improve Nursing Services to Encourage Childbearing. Available: https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202208/1273218.shtml
  • Yang, Shucai, Quanbao Jiang, and Jesús J. Sánchez-Barricarte. 2022. China’s fertility change: An analysis with multiple measures, Population Health Metrics 20(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-022-00290-7
  • Yeatman, Sara, Christie Sennott, and Steven Culpepper. 2013. Young women’s dynamic family size preferences in the context of transitioning fertility, Demography 50(5): 1715–1737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0214-4
  • Yeatman, Sara, Jenny Trinitapoli, and Sarah Garver. 2020. The enduring case for fertility desires, Demography 57(6): 2047–2056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00921-4
  • Yeung, Jessie. 2021. These Chinese Villages Are Paying Couples to Have More Children. Available: https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/24/china/three-child-cash-incentive-intl-hnk/index.html
  • Zeng, Yi and Therese Hesketh. 2016. The effects of China’s universal two-child policy, The Lancet 388(10054): 1930–1938. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31405-2
  • Zhang, Hong. 2007. From resisting to ‘embracing?’ The one-child rule: Understanding new fertility trends in a Central China village, The China Quarterly 192: 855–875. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741007002068
  • Zhao, Zhongwei. 2015. Closing a sociodemographic chapter of Chinese history, Population and Development Review 41(4): 681–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00090.x
  • Zhao, Zhongwei and Guangyu Zhang. 2018. Socioeconomic factors have been the major driving force of China’s fertility changes since the mid-1990s, Demography 55(2): 733–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0662-y
  • Zheng, Zhenzhen. 2014. 生育意愿的测量与应用 [The measurement and application of fertility intention], 中国人口科学 [Chinese Population Science] 06: 15–25+126.
  • Zheng, Zhenzhen, Baochang Gu, and Stuart Gietel-Basten. 2018. Chapter 7: Fertility preferences in China, in Stuart Gietel-Basten, John Casterline, and Minja Choe (eds), Family Demography in Asia: A Comparative Analysis of Fertility Preferences. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 109–120.
  • Zhenzhen, Zheng, Yong Cai, Wang Feng, and Gu Baochang. 2009. Below-replacement fertility and childbearing intention in Jiangsu province, China, Asian Population Studies 5(3): 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730903351701
  • Zhuang, Ya’er, Yu Jiang, Zhili Wang, Chengfu Li, Jianan Qi, Hui Wang, Hongyan Liu, et al. 2014. 当前我国城乡居民的生育意愿——基于2013年全国生育意愿调查[The current fertility willingness of urban and rural residents in China: Based on the 2013 National Fertility Willingness Survey], 人口研究 [Population Research] 38(03): 3–13.
  • Zhuang, Yaer, Yu Jiang, and Bohua Li. 2020. Fertility intention and related factors in China: Findings from the 2017 National Fertility Survey, China Population and Development Studies 4(1): 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42379-020-00053-7