Rheological characterisation of water atomised tool steel powders developed for laser powder bed fusion by supervised and unsupervised machine learning

References

• Baesso I, Karl D, Spitzer A, et al. Characterization of powder flow behavior for additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2021;47, p. 102250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wischeropp TM, Emmelmann C, Brandt M, et al. Measurement of actual powder layer height and packing density in a single layer in selective laser melting. Addit Manuf. 2019;28:176–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeges S, Zwiren A, Schade C. Additive manufacturing using water atomized steel powders. Met Powder Rep. 2017;72(2):111–117.
   Google Scholar
• Fayazfar H, Salarian M, Rogalsky A, et al. A critical review of powder-based additive manufacturing of ferrous alloys: process parameters, microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Des. 2018;144:98–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson IE, White EMH, Dehoff R. Feedstock powder processing research needs for additive manufacturing development. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2018;22(1):8–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Habibnejad-korayem M, Liu Z, et al. A computer vision approach to evaluate powder flowability for metal additive manufacturing. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. 2021;10(3):429–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn R, Anderson I, Prost T, et al. Instance segmentation for direct measurements of satellites in metal powders and automated microstructural characterization from image data. Jom. 2021;73(7):2159–2172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm EA, Cohn R, Gao N, et al. Overview: computer vision and machine learning for microstructural characterization and analysis. Metall Mater Trans A. 2020;51(12):5985–5999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutel D, Blais C. Towards the development of water-atomized tool steel powders for utilization in direct energy deposition (DED) and laser powder bed (LPB). 2021 International Conference on Powder Metallurgy and Particulate Materials, PowderMet 2021, 2021, p. 36–51: Metal Powder Industries Federation.
   Google Scholar
• Standard test methods for flow rate of metal powders using the hall flowmeter funnel, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Standard test method for measuring volume of apparent density cup used in test methods B212, B329, and B417, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lumay G, Boschini F, Traina K, et al. Measuring the flowing properties of powders and grains. Powder Technol. 2012;224:19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He K, Gkioxari G, Dollár P, et al. Mask r-cnn. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2017, pp. 2961–2969.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Walt S, Schönberger JL, Nunez-Iglesias J, et al. scikit-image: image processing in python. PeerJ. 2014;2:e453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley NA. Projection sphericity. J Sediment Res. 1941;11(2):94–95.
   Google Scholar
• Nouri A, Sola A. Metal particle shape: a practical perspective. Met Powder Rep. 2018;73(5):276–282.
   Google Scholar
• Berrezueta E, Cuervas-Mons J, Rodríguez-Rey Á, et al. Representativity of 2D shape parameters for mineral particles in quantitative petrography. Minerals. 2019;9(12):768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slotwinski JA, Garboczi EJ, Stutzman PE, et al. Characterization of metal powders used for additive manufacturing (in eng). J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2014;119:460–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chollet F. others.(2015). Keras. GitHub. Available from: https://github.com/fchollet/keras, ed, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Vasco M. Permutation tests to estimate significances on principal components analysis. Comput Ecol Soft. 2012;2(2):103.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wu H. A clustering method based on K-means algorithm. Phys Procedia. 2012;25:1104–1109.
   Google Scholar
• Kodinariya TM, Makwana PR. Review on determining number of cluster in K-means clustering. Int J. 2013;1(6):90–95.
   Google Scholar
• Tomas J, Kleinschmidt S. Improvement of flowability of fine cohesive powders by flow additives. Chem Eng Technol. 2009;32(10):1470–1483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergquist B. New insights into influencing variables of water atomisation of iron. Powder Metall. 1999;42(4):331–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASM International Handbook Committee. Atomization. In: Powder metal technologies and applications, vol. 7. ASM International; 1998. p. 89–110.
   Google Scholar
• Nichiporenko O. Shaping of powder particles during the atomization of a melt with water. Sov Powder Metall Met Ceram. 1976;15(9):665–669.
   Google Scholar
• Hirai M. Estimation of viscosities of liquid alloys. ISIJ Int. 1993;33(2):251–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüddecke A, Pannitz O, Zetzener H, et al. Powder properties and flowability measurements of tailored nanocomposites for powder bed fusion applications. Mater Des. 2021;202:109536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner G, Balasubramanian M. Investigations of the contributions to the tensile strength of weak particulate masses. Powder Technol. 1974;10(3):121–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, LaMarche CQ, Kellogg KM, et al. Cohesive grains: bridging microlevel measurements to macrolevel flow behavior via surface roughness. AIChE J. 2016;62(10):3529–3537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar