Fabrication of tailored Ti6Al4V-based materials by conventional powder metallurgy for bone implant applications

References

• Chen H, Han Q, Wang C, et al. Porous scaffold design for additive manufacturing in orthopedics: a review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:609–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Contreras A, Punset M, Calero JA, et al. Powder metallurgy with space holder for porous titanium implants: a review. J Mater Sci Technol. 2021;76:129–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng F, Liu L, Li Z, et al. 3D printed Ti6Al4 V bone scaffolds with different pore structure effects on bone ingrowth. J Med Biol Eng. 2021;15(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bosshardt DD, Chappuis V, Buser D. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions. Periodontology. 2017;73(1):22–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guglielmotti MB, Olmedo DG, Cabrini RL. Research on implants and osseointegration. Periodontology. 2019;79(1):178–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Han Q, Wang J, et al. Promotion of osseointegration between implant and bone interface by titanium alloy porous scaffolds prepared by 3D printing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6(9):5181–5190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polo-Corrales L, Latorre-Esteves M, Ramirez-Vick JE. Scaffold design for bone regeneration. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2014;14(1):15–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy CM, Haugh MG, O'brien FJ. The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen–glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2010;31(3):461–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao H, Yang J, Jin X, et al. Porous tantalum scaffolds: Fabrication, structure, properties, and orthopedic applications. Mater Des. 2021;210:110095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu AA, Robertson SF, Ke D, et al. Mechanical and biological properties of ZnO, SiO2, and Ag2O doped plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite coating for orthopaedic and dental applications. Acta Biomater. 2019;92:325–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man HC, Zhang S, Cheng FT, et al. In situ formation of a TiN/Ti metal matrix composite gradient coating on NiTi by laser cladding and nitriding. Surf Coat Technol. 2006;200(16-17):4961–4966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farías I, Olmos L, Jiménez O, et al. Wear modes in open porosity titanium matrix composites with TiC addition processed by spark plasma sintering. T Nonferr Metal Soc. 2019;29(8):1653–1664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavez J, Jimenez O, Bravo-Barcenas D, et al. Corrosion and tribocorrosion behavior of Ti6Al4 V/xTiN composites for biomedical applications. T Nonferr Metal Soc. 2022;32(2):540–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avila JD, Stenberg K, Bose S, et al. Hydroxyapatite reinforced Ti6Al4 V composites for load-bearing implants. Acta Biomater. 2021;123:379–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang E, Zhao X, Hu J, et al. Antibacterial metals and alloys for potential biomedical implants. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(8):2569–2612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu S, Zhang Y, Qin G, et al. Antibacterial effect of TiAg alloy motivated by Ag-containing phases. Mater Sci Eng C. 2021;128:112266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang E, Zheng L, Liu J, et al. Influence of Cu content on the cell biocompatibility of Ti–Cu sintered alloys. Mater Sci Eng C. 2015;46:148–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei Z, Zhang H, Zhang E, et al. Antibacterial activities and biocompatibilities of Ti-Ag alloys prepared by spark plasma sintering and acid etching. Mater Sci Eng C. 2018;92:121–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina VG, Amigó V, Muñoz AI. Microstructural, electrochemical and tribo-electrochemical characterisation of titanium-copper biomedical alloys. Corros Sci. 2016;109:115–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li YH, Chen N, Cui HT, et al. Fabrication and characterization of porous Ti–10Cu alloy for biomedical application. J Alloys Compd. 2017;723:967–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos L, Gonzaléz-Pedraza AS, Vergara-Hernández HJ, et al. Ti64/20Ag porous composites fabricated by powder metallurgy for biomedical applications. Materials. 2022;15(17):5956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang BB, Zheng YF, Liu Y. Effect of Ag on the corrosion behavior of Ti–Ag alloys in artificial saliva solutions. Dent Mater. 2009;25(5):672–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Yang L, Zhang L, et al. Effect of nano/micro-Ag compound particles on the bio-corrosion, antibacterial properties and cell biocompatibility of Ti-Ag alloys. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;75:906–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrullo JZ, Borrás AD, Borrás VA, et al. Electrochemical corrosion behavior and mechanical properties of Ti–Ag biomedical alloys obtained by two powder metallurgy processing routes. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;112:104063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Park HJ, Hong SH, et al. Characterization and deformation behavior of Ti hybrid compacts with solid-to-porous gradient structure. Mater Des. 2014;60:66–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi S, Sadrnezhaad SK. A novel method for production of foamy core@ compact shell Ti6Al4 V bone-like composite. J Alloys Compd. 2016;656:416–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueba P, Chicardi E, Rodríguez-Ortiz JA, et al. Development and implementation of a sequential compaction device to obtain radial graded porosity cylinders. J Manuf Process. 2020;50:142–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnica P, Macías R, Chávez J, et al. Fabrication and characterization of highly porous Ti6Al4 V/xTa composites for orthopedic applications. J Mater Sci. 2020;55(34):16419–16431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balla VK, Banerjee S, Bose S, et al. Direct laser processing of a tantalum coating on titanium for bone replacement structures. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(6):2329–2334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Zhang H, Li Q, et al. Biocompatibility and osteogenic properties of porous tantalum. Exp Ther Med. 2015;9(3):780–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos L, Bouvard D, Cabezas-Villa JL, et al. Analysis of compression and permeability behavior of porous Ti6Al4 V by computed microtomography. Met Mater Int. 2019;25(3):669–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials. 2006;27(15):2907–2915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solorio VM, Vergara-Hernández HJ, Olmos L, et al. Effect of the Ag addition on the compressibility, sintering and properties of Ti6Al4 V/xAg composites processed by powder metallurgy. J Alloys Compd. 2022;890:161813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou YL, Niinomi M, Akahori T. Decomposition of martensite α″ during aging treatments and resulting mechanical properties of Ti− Ta alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004;384(1-2):92–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chávez J, Olmos L, Jiménez O, et al. Sintering behaviour and mechanical characterisation of Ti64/x TiN composites and bilayer components. Powder Metall. 2017;60(4):257–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuncer N, Arslan G, Maire E, et al. Investigation of spacer size effect on architecture and mechanical properties of porous titanium. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011;530:633–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamsi Krishna B, Xue W, Bose S, et al. Engineered porous metals for implants. JOM. 2008;60(5):45–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobyn JD. The strength of fixation of porous metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. M.Sc. thesis, McGill University, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, HU C, et al. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Basic Sci Appl Pathol. 1980;150:263–270.
   Google Scholar
• Nauman EA, Fong KE, Keaveny TM. Dependence of intertrabecular permeability on flow direction and anatomic site. Ann Biomed Eng. 1999;27(4):517–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buciumeanu M, Araujo A, Carvalho O, et al. Study of the tribocorrosion behaviour of Ti6Al4V–HA biocomposites. Tribol Int. 2017;107:77–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falodun OE, Obadele BA, Oke SR, et al. Influence of spark plasma sintering on microstructure and wear behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V reinforced with nanosized TiN. T Nonferr Metal Soc. 2018;28(1):47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Xu S, Zhou S, et al. Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: A review. Biomaterials. 2016;83:127–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos L, Mihalcea E, Vergara-Hernández HJ, et al. Design of architectured Ti6Al4V-based materials for biomedical applications fabricated via powder metallurgy. Mater Today Commun. 2021;29:102937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou L, Li L, Zheng Y. Fabrication and characterization of porous sintered Ti–Ag compacts for biomedical application purpose. J Mater Sci Technol. 2013;29(4):330–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Xu DS, Yang R, et al. Theoretical study of the effects of alloying elements on the strength and modulus of β-type bio-titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 1999;260(1-2):269–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou YL, Niinomi M. Ti–25Ta alloy with the best mechanical compatibility in Ti–Ta alloys for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 2009;29(3):1061–1065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar