Numerical analysis of droplet breakup, cooling, and solidification during gas atomisation

References

• Antipas GS. Review of gas atomisation and spray forming phenomenology. Powder Metall. 2013;56(4):317–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attar H, Prashanth KG, Chaubey AK, et al. Comparison of wear properties of commercially pure titanium prepared by selective laser melting and casting processes. Mater Lett. 2015;142:38–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabard A, de Villiers Lovelock HL, Hussain T. Microstructural evolution in solution heat treatment of gas-atomized Al alloy (7075) powder for cold spray. J Therm Spray Technol. 2018;27(1):145–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gökce B, Barcikowski S, Fritsching U, et al. Prozessadaptierte materialien für die photonik. Photonik. 2015;1:24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang H, Chen X, Yu W, et al. Progress and prospect on the gas atomization. Fenmo Yejin Jishu (Powder Metall Technol) (China). 2007;25(1):53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Song C, Li K, Xie K, et al. The effect of the nucleation ability on solidified microstructures of gas-atomized Fe–6.5 wt.% Si alloy powder. Powder Technol. 2014;263:31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong M, Browne DJ. Direct numerical simulation of melt–gas hydrodynamic interactions during the early stage of atomisation of liquid intermetallic. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;202(1–3):419–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo K-K, Chen J, Shang S, et al. Numerical simulation of atomization process of nickel-based alloy powders prepared by vacuum induction melting gas atomization. Vibroeng Proc. 2020;32:185–189.
   Google Scholar
• Tong M, Browne DJ.eds. Modelling melt–gas dynamic interaction during initial stage gas atomisation of liquid intermetallic using a front tracking formulation, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Tong M, Browne DJ. Direct numerical simulation of melt–gas hydrodynamic interactions during the early stage of atomisation of liquid intermetallic. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;202:419–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeoli N, Tabbara H, Gu S. CFD modeling of primary breakup during metal powder atomization. Chem Eng Sci. 2011;66(24):6498–6504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeoli N, Tabbara H, Gu S. Three-dimensional simulation of primary break-up in a close-coupled atomizer. Appl Phys A. 2012;108(4):783–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Cao F, Ning Z, et al. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) investigation of the flow field and the primary atomization of the close coupled atomizer. Comput Chem Eng. 2012;40:58–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mates SP, Settles GS. A study of liquid metal atomization using close-coupled nozzles, part 1: gas dynamic behavior. At Sprays. 2005;15(1):19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Li J, Liu H-S, et al. Process modeling gas atomization of close-coupled ring-hole nozzle for 316L stainless steel powder production. Chin Phys B. 2021;30(5):57502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firmansyah DA, Kaiser R, Zahaf R, et al. Numerical simulations of supersonic gas atomization of liquid metal droplets. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2014;53(5S3):05HA09.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson JS, Hassan O, Rolland SA, et al. The identification of an accurate simulation approach to predict the effect of operational parameters on the particle size distribution (PSD) of powders produced by an industrial close-coupled gas atomiser. Powder Technol. 2016;291:75–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L, Zhou X, Li J, et al. Numerical simulations of molten breakup behaviors of a de laval-type nozzle, and the effects of atomization parameters on particle size distribution. Processes. 2020;8(9):1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Du J, Wang L, et al. Effects of different nozzle materials on atomization results via CFD simulation. Chin J Chem Eng. 2020;28(2):362–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann D, Fritsching U, Bauckhage K. A mathematical model for cooling and rapid solidification of molten metal droplets. Int J Therm Sci. 2000;39(1):53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattel JH, Pryds NH, Thorborg J, et al. A quasi-stationary numerical model of atomized metal droplets. I: model formulation. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng. 1999;7(3):413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson SB, Delplanque J-P, Lin Y, et al. Numerical simulation and experimental characterization of a binary aluminum alloy spray-application to the spray rolling process. Idaho Falls (ID): Idaho National Lab.(INL).
   Google Scholar
• Lena C, Djambazov G, Pericleous KA. Modelling metal powder production by the gas atomisation process, 08733971, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Li B, Liang X, Earthman JC, et al. Two dimensional modeling of momentum and thermal behavior during spray atomization of γ-TiAl. Acta Mater. 1996;44(6):2409–2420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahesh NS, Mendonca J, Muralidhara MK, et al. Modeling of droplet dynamic and thermal behaviour during spray deposition. Bull Mater Sci. 2003;26(3):355–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryds NH, Hattel JH, Thorborg J. A quasi-stationary numerical model of atomized metal droplets. II: prediction and assessment. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng. 1999;7(3):431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla P, Mandal RK, Ojha SN. Non-equilibrium solidification of undercooled droplets during atomization process. Bull Mater Sci. 2001;24(5):547–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Zhang Z. Numerical simulation study on cooling of metal droplet in atomizing gas. Mater Today Commun. 2020;25:101423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencia JJ, Quested PN. Thermophysical properties, 08717071, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Mills KC, Youssef YM, Li Z, et al. Calculation of thermophysical properties of Ni-based superalloys. ISIJ Int. 2006;46(5):623–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andon RJ, Chapman L, Day A, et al. Viscosities of liquid metals and commercial alloys, 1361–4061, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hosaeus H, Seifter A, Kaschnitz E, et al. Thermophysical properties of solid and liquid inconel 718 alloy. High Temp High Press(UK). 2001;33(4):405–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamnis S, Gu S, Zeoli N. Mathematical modelling of inconel 718 particles in HVOF thermal spraying. Surf Coat Technol. 2008;202(12):2715–2724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poinsot T, Veynante D. Theoretical and numerical combustion. Philadelphia: RT Edwards, Inc; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo KK, Acharya R. Fundamentals of turbulent and multiphase combustion. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hirt CW, Nichols BD. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys. 1981;39(1):201–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang SS, Liu Z, Reitz RD. Breakup mechanisms and drag coefficients of high-speed vaporizing liquid drops. At Sprays. 1996;6(3):353–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beale JC, Reitz RD. Modeling spray atomization with the Kelvin-Helmholtz/Rayleigh-Taylor hybrid model. At Sprays. 1999;9(6):623–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson IE, Figliola RS, Morton H. Flow mechanisms in high pressure gas atomization. Mater Sci Eng A. 1991;148(1):101–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ting J, Anderson IE, Terpstra R, et al. Design and testing of an improved convergent-divergent discrete-jet high pressure gas atomization nozzle. Metal Pow Indus Fed, Adv Pow Metall Particul Mater. 1998;3:10.
   Google Scholar
• Ting J, Terpstra R, Anderson IE, et al. A novel high pressure gas atomizing nozzle for liquid metal atomization. Adv Powder Metall Part Mater. 1996;1:1.
   Google Scholar
• Ünal A. Effect of processing variables on particle size in gas atomization of rapidly solidified aluminium powders. Mater Sci Technol. 1987;3(12):1029–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeoli N, Gu S. Numerical modelling of droplet break-up for gas atomisation. Comput Mater Sci. 2006;38(2):282–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeoli N, Gu S. Computational validation of an isentropic plug nozzle design for gas atomisation. Comput Mater Sci. 2008;42(2):245–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus S, Fritsching U, Bauckhage K. Jet break up of liquid metal in twin fluid atomisation. Mater Sci Eng A. 2002;326(1):122–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou H, Xiao Z. Pre-breakup mechanism of free-fall nozzle in electrode induction melting gas atomization. Mater Today Commun. 2021;29:102778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urionabarrenetxea E, Martín JM, Rivas A, et al. Experimental study and simulation of the gas flow in the atomisation chamber during close-coupled gas atomisation. Proceedings of the international powder metallurgy congress and exhibition, Euro PM; 2013; pp. 257–262.
   Google Scholar
• Ünal A. Effect of processing variables on particle size in gas atomization of rapidly solidified aluminium powders. Mater Sci Technol. 1987;3(12):1029–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mates SP, Ridder SD, Biancaniello FS. Comparison of the supersonic length and dynamic pressure characteristics of discrete-jet and annular close-coupled nozzles used to produce fine metal powders, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Achelis L, Uhlenwinkel V, Lagutkin S, et al. Atomization using a pressure-gas-atomizer. Mater Sci Forum. 2007;534-536:13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Achelis L, Uhlenwinkel V. Characterisation of metal powders generated by a pressure-gas-atomiser. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;477(1):15–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng B, Lin Y, Zhou Y, et al. Gas atomization of amorphous aluminum: part I. thermal behavior calculations. Metall Mater Trans B. 2009;40(5):768–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar