Equity in Transportation Planning: An Analysis of the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization

Literature Cited

• Amekudzi, A.A., M.K. Smith, S.R. Brodie, J.M. Fischer, and C.L. Ross. 2012. Impact of environmental justice on transportation: Applying environmental justice maturation model to benchmark progress. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2320:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, S.B., J. Kincaid, and B.D. McDowell. 1994. MPOs and weighted voting. Intergovernmental Perspective 20 (2): 31–5.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, E.B. 2010. Comments on “Transportation and Civil Rights.” Race & Poverty 19 (4): 10.
   Google Scholar
• Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization. 2011. Memorandum of understanding relating to the comprehensive, continuing and cooperative transportation planning process in the Boston metropolitan area. http://www.ctps.org/Drupal/data/pdf/about/mpo/Boston_Region_MPO_MOU_2011.pdf . (last accessed 25 November 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Ensch, J.L. 2008. Electoral systems and interregional cooperation: Politics and economics in transportation and metropolitan planning organizations. Paper presented at  Democracy and Its Development 2005–2011, Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California Irvine.
   Google Scholar
• Francois, F.B. 1995. State perspective. In Institutional aspects of metropolitan transportation planning , ed. K. F. Turnbull, 8–12.Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1997. Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gage, R.W., and B.D. McDowell. 1995. ISTEA and the role of MPOs in the new transportation environment: A midterm assessment. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 25 (3): 133–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, E.R., and C.C. Gibson. 2009. Balancing regionalism and localism: How institutions and incentives shape American transportation policy. American Journal of Political Science 53:633–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, A.R., P.S. Dempsey, and C. Larson. 2002. Metropolitan planning organizations: Findings and recommendations for improving transportation planning. Publius 32 (1): 87–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney, C. 1991. The fourteenth amendment and symbolic legality: Let them eat due process. Law and Human Behavior 15:183–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iceland, J., D.H. Weinberg, and E. Steinmetz. 2002. Racial and ethnic residential segregation in the United States: 1980–2000. U.S. Census Bureau, Series CENSR-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, P.G. 1998. Regionalism and representation: Measuring and assessing representation in metropolitan planning organizations. Urban Affairs Review 33:839–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, P.G., and M. Sprague. 1997. Federal transportation policy and the role of metropolitan planning organizations in California. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J.R., and B. Stults. 2011. The persistence of segregation in the metropolis: New findings from the 2010 Census. Census Brief prepared for Project US2010. Providence, RI: American Communities Project, Brown University.
   Google Scholar
• MacCoun, R.J. 2005. Voice, control, and belonging: The double-edged sword of procedural fairness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1:171–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallett, W.J. 2010. Metropolitan transportation planning. CRS Report R41068. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A.C., T.W. Sanchez, J.F. Wolf, and M.B. Farquhar. 2004. Metropolitan planning organization voting structure and transit investment bias: Preliminary analysis with social equity implications. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1895:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/ . (last accessed 14 November 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, T.W. 2006. An inherent bias? Geographic and racial-ethnic patterns of metropolitan planning organization boards. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, T.W., and M. Brenman. 2010. Transportation and civil rights. Poverty & Race 19 (4): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, T.W., and J.E. Wolf. 2005. Environmental justice and transportation equity: A review of metropolitan planning organizations. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Shrader-Frechette, K. 2002. Environmental justice: Creating equality, reclaiming democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, K., and M. Xie. 2008. Bootstrap: A statistical method. http://www.stat.rutgers.edu/home/mxie/stat586/handout/Bootstrap1.pdf . (last accessed 19 August 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Solof, M. 1998. History of metropolitan planning organizations. Newark: New Jersey Transportation Planning Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Transportation for Massachusetts. 2011. Maxed out: Massachusetts transportation at a financing crossroad. Boston: Transportation for Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R. 2000. Social justice: Outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology 35: 117–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT). 1997. U.S. Department of Transportation order on environmental justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/environmental_justice/facts/dot_ord.cfm . (last accessed 19 August 2013).
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2012. Department of Transportation environmental justice strategy. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/environmental_justice/ej_at_dot/dot_ej_strategy/ (last accessed 3 July 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Welch, S. 1990. The impact of at-large elections on the representation of Blacks and Hispanics. The Journal of Politics 52:1050–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwillinger, D. 2003. CRC standard mathematical tables and formulae. 31st ed. New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar