The Shape of Mobility: Measuring the Distance Decay Function of Household Mobility

Literature Cited

• Adams, J. S. 1969. Directional bias in intra-urban migration. Economic Geography 45:302–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. R. 1956. Intermetropolitan migration: A correlation analysis. American Journal of Sociology 61:459–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, M., M. Blake, P. Boyle, O. Duke-Williams, P. Rees, J. Stillwell, and G. Hugo. 2002. Cross-national comparison of internal migration: Issues and measures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 165:435–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biagi, B., A. Faggian, and P. McCann. 2011. Long and short distance migration in Italy: The role of economic, social and environmental characteristics. Spatial Economic Analysis 6:111–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, P. J., and R. Flowerdew. 1997. Improving distance estimates between areal units in migration models. Geographical Analysis 29:93–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L. A., F. E. Horton, and R. I. Wittick. 1970. On place utility and the normative allocation of intra-urban migrants. Demography 7:175–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, L. A., J. Odland, and R. G. Golledge. 1970. Migration, functional distance, and the urban hierarchy. Economic Geography 46:472–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brueckner, J. K., J.-F. Thisse, and Y. Zenou. 1999. Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor?: An amenity-based theory. European Economic Review 43 (1): 91–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, W. A. V. 1976. Migration in Milwaukee. Economic Geography 52:48–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1986. Human migration. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crowder, K. D. 2001. Racial stratification in the actuation of mobility expectations: Microlevel impacts of racially restrictive housing markets. Social Forces 79:1377–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder, K. D., and S. J. South. 2005. Race, class, and changing patterns of migration between poor and nonpoor neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology 110:1715–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deane, G. D. 1990. Mobility and adjustments: Paths to the resolution of residential stress. Demography 27:65–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldridge, J. D., and J. P. Jones. 1991. Warped space: A geography of distance decay. The Professional Geographer 43:500–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feijten, P., and M. Van Ham. 2007. Residential mobility and migration of the divorced and separated. Demographic Research 17:623–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, M. R., and P. S. Kanaroglou. 1995. Utility variability within aggregate spatial units and its relevance to discrete models of destination choice. In New directions in spatial econometrics, ed. L. Anselin and R. J. G. M. Florax, 243–69. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. J., and D. S. Massey. 2004. The ecology of racial discrimination. City and Community 3:221–41.
   Google Scholar
• Galle, O. R., and K. E. Taeuber. 1966. Metropolitan migration and intervening opportunities. American Sociological Review 31:5–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, M. J., P. R. Mueser, D. A. Plane, and A. M. Schlottmann. 1991. New directions in migration research. The Annals of Regional Science 25:237–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, K. E., and A. S. Fotheringham. 1984. Gravity and spatial interaction models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Herting, J. R., D. B. Grusky, and S. E. Van Rompaey. 1997. The social geography of interstate mobility and persistence. American Sociological Review 62:267–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipp, J. R. 2009. Specifying the determinants of neighborhood satisfaction: A robust assessment in 24 metropolitan areas over four time points. Social Forces 88:395–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2010. What is the “neighbourhood” in neighbourhood satisfaction? Comparing the effects of structural characteristics measured at the micro-neighborhood and tract level. Urban Studies 47:2517–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. 2004. Are migrants more skilled than non-migrants? Repeat, return, and same-employer migrants. Canadian Journal of Economics 37:830–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihrke, D. K., and C. S. Faber. 2012. Geographical mobility: 2005 to 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Jun, I. S., and H. S. Chang. 1986. Functional forms and the relevance of contiguous migration in the study of migration and employment growth. The Annals of Regional Science 20:17–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipnis, B. A., and Y. Mansfeld. 1986. Work-place utilities and commuting patterns: Are they class or place differentiated? The Professional Geographer 38:160–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Gory, M., and J. Pipkin. 1981. Urban social space. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B. A., K. E. Campbell, and O. Miller. 1991. Racial differences in urban neighboring. Sociological Forum 6:525–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, L. 1988. Migration and residential mobility in the United States. New York: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Long, L., C. J. Tucker, and W. L. Urton. 1988a. Measuring migration distances: Self-reporting and indirect methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association 83:674–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1988b. Migration distances: An international comparison. Demography 25:633–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, M. 1999. Determinants of residential satisfaction: Ordered logit vs. regression models. Growth and Change 30:264–87.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., and N. A. Denton. 1993. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. F., M. Valenstein, and F. C. Blow. 2007. Residential mobility among patients in the VA health system: Associations with psychiatric morbidity, geographic accessibility, and continuity of care. Adminstration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 34:448–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesch, G. S., and O. Manor. 1998. Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment. Environment and Behavior 30:504–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrill, R. L., and F. R. Pitts. 1967. Marriage, migration, and the mean information field: A study in uniqueness and generality. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 57:401–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedomysl, T., U. Ernstsson, and U. Fransson. 2015. The accuracy of migration distance measures. Population, Space and Place. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/psp.1971
   Google Scholar
• Niedomysl, T., and U. Fransson. 2014. On distance and the spatial dimension in the definition of internal migration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 104:357–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandit, K. 2000. Regional variation in mobility levels and timing in the United States. The Professional Geographer 52:483–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plane, D. A., and J. R. Jurjevich. 2009. Ties that no longer bind? The patterns and repercussions of age-articulated migration. The Professional Geographer 61:4–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plane, D. A., and G. F. Mulligan. 1997. Measuring spatial focusing in a migration system. Demography 34:251–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley, J. M., and D. H. Weinberg. 1977. Intra-urban residential mobility: A review and synthesis. International Regional Science Review 2:41–66.
   Google Scholar
• Ravenstein, E. G. 1885. The laws of migration. Journal of the Statistical Society of London 48:167–235.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, A., J. Raymer, and F. Willekens. 2003. Imposing age and spatial structures on inadequate migration-flow datasets. The Professional Geographer 55:56–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. W. 1968. Changing residence in the city: A review of intraurban mobility. Geographical Review 58:622–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South, S. J., and K. D. Crowder. 1997. Escaping distressed neighborhoods: Individual, community, and metropolitan influences. American Journal of Sociology 102:1040–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1998. Leaving the 'hood: Residential mobility between black, white, and integrated neighborhoods. American Sociological Review 63:17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillwell, J., and M. Thomas. 2015. How far do internal migrants really move? Demonstrating a new method for the estimation of intra-zonal distance. Regional Studies, Regional Science 3:28–47.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, S., and S. M. Manson. 2010. An agent-based model of housing search and intraurban migration in the Twin Cities of Minnesota. Ottawa, Canada: International Environmental Modelling and Software Society.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. J. 1971. Distances within shapes: An introduction to a family of finite frequency distributions. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 53:40–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1975. Distance decay in spatial interactions: Concepts and techniques in modern geography 2. Norwich, UK: Geo Abstracts.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, M., J. Stillwell, and M. Gould. 2015. Modelling multilevel variations in distance moved between origins and destinations in England and Wales. Environment and Planning A 47:996–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viry, G. 2012. Residential mobility and the spatial dispersion of personal networks: Effects on social support. Social Networks 34:59–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. 1987. The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. 1949. Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar