934
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Focus: Feminist Research and Knowledge Production in Geography

“Doing Good Work”: Feminist Dilemmas of Volunteering in the Field

Pages 307-313 | Received 01 Apr 2015, Accepted 01 Apr 2016, Published online: 29 Aug 2016

Literature Cited

  • Baillie Smith, M., and N. Laurie. 2011. International volunteering and development: Global citizenship and neoliberal professionalism today. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36 (4): 545–59.
  • Belkin, A. 2012. Bring me men: Military masculinity and the benign façade of American Empire, 1898–2001. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Briggs, D. 2013. Emotions, ethnography and crack cocaine users. Emotion, Space and Society 7 (1): 1–12.
  • Browne, K. 2003. Negotiations and fieldworkings: Friendship and feminist research. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 2 (2): 132–46.
  • Cahill, C., D. Cerecer, and M. Bradley. 2010. “Dreaming of …”: Reflections on participatory action research as a feminist praxis of critical hope. Affilia 25 (4): 406–16.
  • de Leeuw, S., E. Cameron, and M. Greenwood. 2012. Participatory and community based research, indigenous geographies, and the spaces of friendship: A critical engagement. The Canadian Geographer 56 (2): 180–94.
  • DeLyser, D. 2001. “Do you really live here?” Thoughts on insider research. Geographical Review 91 (1–2): 441–53.
  • DeLyser, D., and D. Sui. 2014. Crossing the qualitative–quantitative chasm III: Enduring methods, open geography, participatory research, and the fourth paradigm. Progress in Human Geography 38 (2): 294–307.
  • Dyck, I. 1993. Ethnography: A feminist method? Canadian Geographer 37 (1): 52–57.
  • England, K. 1994. Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer 46 (1): 80–89.
  • Girl Scouts of San Diego. 2015. Volunteer essentials 2015–2016. San Diego, CA: Girl Scouts of San Diego.
  • Girl Scouts of the United States of America. (GSUSA). 2015. Welcome, Girl Scout volunteer! http://www.girlscouts.org/program/basics/for_volunteers/ (last accessed 15 October 2015).
  • ———. n.d. Girl Scout product activity resources 2013. Girl Scout product activity. http://www.girlscouts.org/program/gs_cookies/cookie_activity.asp (last accessed 1 May 2013).
  • Goerisch, D. 2013. Smart cookies: The gendered spaces of labor, citizenship, and nationalism in the Girl Scout cookie sale. Doctoral dissertation, San Diego State University and University of California, Santa Barbara.
  • ———. 2014. Leading the way: Youth-led non-formal learning in the Girl Scouts. In Informal education, childhood, and youth: Geographies, histories, practices, ed. S. Mills and P. Kraftl, 257–69. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Goerisch, D., and K. Swanson. 2015. “It's called Girl Scouts not Woman Scouts!”: Emotional labor and girls' bodies. Children's Geographies 13 (4): 451–66.
  • Herman, T., and D. Mattingly. 1999. Community, justice, and the ethics of research: negotiating reciprocal relations. In Geography and ethics: Journey in a moral terrain, ed. J. D. Proctor and D. M. Smith, 209–22. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Hodge, P., and J. Lester. 2006. Indigenous research: Whose priority? Journeys and possibilities of cross-cultural research in geography. Geographical Research 44 (1): 41–51.
  • Huisman, K. 2008. “Does this mean you're not going to come visit me anymore?”: An inquiry into an ethics of reciprocity and positionality in feminist ethnographic research. Sociological Inquiry 78 (3): 372–96.
  • Katz, C. 1994. Playing the field: Questions of fieldwork in geography. The Professional Geographer 46 (1): 67–72.
  • Kindon, S., R. Pain, and M. Kesby. 2007. Participatory action research: Origins, approaches and methods. In Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation, and place, ed. S. Kindon, R. Pain, and M. Kesby, 9–18. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Kobayashi, A. 1994. Coloring the field: Gender, “race,” and the politics of fieldwork. The Professional Geographer 46 (1): 73–80.
  • ———. 2003. GPC ten years on: Is self-reflexivity enough? Gender, Place and Culture 10 (4): 345–49.
  • ———. 2009. Situated knowledge, reflexivity. In International encyclopedia of human geography, ed. R. Kitchin and N. Thrift, 138–43. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
  • McDowell, L. 1997. Women/gender/feminist: Doing feminist geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 21:381–400.
  • Miller, S. A. 2007. Growing girls: The natural origins of girls' organizations in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Mills, S. 2013. Surprise! Public historical geographies, user engagement and voluntarism. Area 45 (1): 16–22.
  • Miraftab, F. (2004). Can you belly dance? Methodological questions in the era of transnational feminist research. Gender, Place and Culture 11 (4): 595–604.
  • Moss, P. 1993. Focus: Feminism as method. Canadian Geographer 37 (1): 48–49.
  • Mountz, A., I. Miyares, R. Wright, and A. Bailey. 2003. Methodologically becoming: Power, knowledge and team research. Gender, Place and Culture 10 (1): 29–46.
  • Mullings, B. 1999. Insider or outsider, both or neither: Some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum 30 (4): 337–50.
  • Nagar, R. 2002. Footloose researchers, “traveling” theories, and the politics of transnational feminist praxis. Gender, Place and Culture 9 (2): 179–86.
  • Naples, N. A. 1996. A feminist revisiting of the insider/outsider debate: The “outsider phenomenon” in rural Iowa. Qualitative Sociology 19 (1): 83–106.
  • Nast, H. 1998. The body as “place” reflexivity and fieldwork in Kano, Nigeria. In Places through the body, ed. H. Nast and S. Pile, 69–86. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Pain, R., M. Kesby, and K. Askins. 2011. Geographies of impact: Power, participation and potential. Area 43 (2): 183–88.
  • Parr, H. 2000. Interpreting the “hidden social geographies” of mental health: Ethnographies of inclusion and exclusion in semi-institutional places. Health & Place 6 (3): 225–37.
  • ———. 2001. Feeling, reading, and making bodies in space. Geographical Review 91 (1–2): 158–67.
  • Punch, S. 2012. Hidden struggles of fieldwork: Exploring the role and use of field diaries. Emotion, Space and Society 5 (2): 86–93.
  • Rose, G. 1997. Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivity, and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography 21 (3): 305–20.
  • Rosol, M. 2012. Community volunteering as neoliberal strategy? Green space production in Berlin. Antipode 44 (1): 239–57.
  • Routledge, P. 2002. Travelling east as Walter Kurtz: Identity, performance, and collaboration in Goa, India. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20 (4): 477–98.
  • Sultana, F. 2007. Reflexivity, positionality, and participatory ethics: Negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 6 (3): 374–85.
  • Watts, J. 2011. Ethical and practical challenges of participant observation in sensitive health research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 14 (4): 301–12.
  • Weinberg, M. 2002. Biting the hand that feeds you, and other feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In Walking the tightrope: Ethical issues for qualitative researchers, ed. W.C. Van den Hoonaard, 79–94. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • What grown-ups need to know about selling Girl Scout Cookies. 2013. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWk1dMwMEYM&feature=youtube_gdata_player (last accessed 1 May 2013).
  • Wolf, D. L. 1996. Situating feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork, ed. D. L. Wolf, 1–55. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.