Linked to Landscape: Assessing Urbanization in Germany through Landscape and Economic Factors

Literature Cited

• An, L., D. Brown, J. Nassauer, and B. Low. 2011. Variations in development of exurban residential landscapes: Timing, location and driving forces. Journal of Land Use Science 6 (1): 13–32.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. 2003. Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers, and spatial econometrics. International Regional Science Review 26 (2): 153–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., and D. Arribas-Bel. 2011. Spatial fixed effects and spatial dependence. Tempe: GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation, Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Aslaksen, I., S. Glomsrød, and A. Ingeborg-Myhr. 2012. “Late lessons from early warnings”—Uncertainty and precaution in policy approaches to Arctic climate change impacts. Polar Geography 35 (2): 135–53.
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, J., and J. Hilty. 2010. Connecting wildlife populations in fractured landscapes. In Safe passages: Highways, wildlife, and habitat connectivity, ed. J. Beckman, A. Clevenger, M. Huijser, and J. Hilty, 3–16. Washington, DC: Island.
   Google Scholar
• Berechman, J. 2013. Public transit economics and deregulation policy. New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Brueckner, J. 2005. Transport subsidies, system choice and urban sprawl. Regional Science and Urban Economics 35 (6): 715–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium für Raumordnung, Bauwesen und Städtebau, ed. 1993. Leitbild fuer die reumliche Entwicklung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Reports for the sustained growth of the Federal Republic of Germany]. Raumordungspolitischer Orientierungsrahmen.
   Google Scholar
• Capozza, D. R., and R. W. Helsley. 1989. The fundamentals of land price and urban growth. Journal of Urban Economics 26:295–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castle, E., J. Wu, and B. Weber. 2011. Place orientation and rural–urban interdependence. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 33 (2): 179–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. 2002a. Built environments and mode choice: Toward a normative framework. Transportation and Research Part D: Transportation and Environment 7 (4): 265–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2002b. Induced travel demand: Research design, empirical evidence, and normative policies. Journal of Planning Literature 17 (1): 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2003. Road expansion, urban growth, and induced travel: A path analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (2): 145–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J., R. McChesney, D. Munroe, and E. Irwin. 2009. Spatial characteristics of exurban settlement pattern in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 90 (3): 178–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compas, E. 2007. Measuring exurban change in the American West: A case study in Gallatin County, Montana, 1973–2004. Landscape and Urban Planning 82:56–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cote, M., and A. Nightingale. 2012. Resilience thinking meets social theory: Situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Progress in Human Geography 36 (4): 475–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cressie, N. A. C., and C. Wikle. 2011. Statistics for spatio-temporal data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• DeFries, R., A. Hansen, B. L. Turner, R. Reid, and J. Liu. 2007. Land use change around protected areas: Management to balance human needs and ecological function. Ecological Applications 17:1031–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, H. 2013. Concentration or dispersion? Location choice of commercial developers in the Portland Metropolitan area 2000–2007. Urban Geography 34 (7): 989–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunham, I. M., and A. Foster. 2015. Proximate landscapes of economic inclusion in southeastern Pennsylvania. The Professional Geographer 67 (1): 132–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, E., J. Kaplan, D. Fuller, S. Vavrus, K. Goldewijk, and P. Verburg. 2013. Used planet: A global history. PNAS 110 (20): 7978–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Environmental Agency (EEA). 2006. Integration of environmental indicators—IRENA indicator-based assessment report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: 2/2006.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2011a. Landscape fragmentation in Europe. Joint EEA-FOEN Report. Brussels: European Environmental Agency. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/landscape-fragmentation-in-europe (last accessed 15 May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2011b. Laying the foundations for greener transport. Brussels: European Environmental Agency. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/foundations-for-greener-transport (last accessed 20 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2012. Environmental indicator report 2012. Brussels: European Environmental Agency. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental-indicator-report-2012 (last accessed 10 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• European Pollutant Emission Register (EPER). 2004. European Environmental Agency data files: FCBAC302-D63A-4F01-9A57-C4DC53A6B1FA (permalink).
   Google Scholar
• Fahrig, L., and W. Nuttle. 2005. Population ecology in spatially heterogenous environments. In Ecosystem function in heterogenous landscapes, ed. G. Lovett, M. Turner, C. Jones, and K. Weathers, 95–118. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, J., D. Lindenmayer, and A. Manning. 2006. Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: Ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4 (2): 80–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galler, C., C. von Haaren, and C. Albert. 2013. Planning multifunctional measures for efficient landscape management: Quantifying and comparing the added value of integrated and segregated management concepts. In Landscape ecology for sustainable environment and culture, ed. C. Galler, C. von Haaren, and C. Albert, 249–84. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Geoghegan, J. 2002. The value of open spaces in residential land use. Land Use Policy 19:91–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, P. 2003. Nonoptimal levels of suburbanization. Environment and Planning A 35:191–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2012. Linking regional science and urban economics: Long-run interactions among preferences for amenities and public goods. Modern Economy 3:253–62.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, E., R. Hammer, V. Radeloff, and R. Potts. 2005. The relationship between environmental amenities and changing human settlement patterns between 1980 and 2000 in the midwestern USA. Landscape Ecology 20:773–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, S., and G. Giuliano, eds. 2004. The geography of urban transportation. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Iovanna, R., and C. Vance. 2012. Land conversion and market equilibrium: Insights from a simulated landscape. SFB Discussion Papers, 828, Technical University, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, E., and N. Bockstael. 2007. The evolution of urban sprawl: Evidence of spatial heterogeneity and increasing land fragmentation. PNAS 104 (52): 20672–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, J. 2000. Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: New measures of landscape fragmentation. Landscape Ecology 15:115–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, J., H. Esswein, and H. G. Schwarz-von Raumer. 2006. Measuring landscape fragmentation with the effective mesh size. Presentation given at Nature and Landscape Protection Center Zurich (ETH-Zentrum). http://www.nls.env.ethz.ch/staff/jaeger.html (last accessed 14 February 2014).
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2008. Landschaftszerschneidung in Baden-Württemberg: Neuberechnung des Landschaftszerschneidungsgrades, Verbindungsräume geringer Zerschneidung [Fragmentation in Baden-Württemberg: New fragmentation metrics]. Stuttgart, Germany: University of Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, R., and C. Vance. 2013. Landscape pattern and car use: Linking household data with satellite imagery. Journal of Transport Geography 33:250–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klar, N., M. Herrmann, M. Henning-Hahn, B. Pott-Dörfer, H. Hofer, and S. Kramer-Schadt. 2012. Between ecological theory and planning practice: (Re-) connecting forest patches for the wildcat in Lower Saxony, Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning 105:376–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, R. 2003. Dilemmas of environmental planning in post-urban New Jersey. Social Science Quarterly 84 (4): 1002–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2005. Urban crisis redux. Urban Geography 26 (3): 266–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambin, E., and H. Geist. 2006. Land-use and land-cover change: Local processes and global impacts. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• LeSage, J., and K. Pace. 2009. Spatial econometric models. In Handbook of applied spatial analysis, ed. M. Fischer and A. Getis, 355–76. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lindenmayer, D., and S. Cunningham. 2012. Six principles for managing forests as ecologically sustainable ecosystems. Landscape Ecology 28:1099–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, B., C. Biermann, K. McSweeney, J. Law, C. Gallemore, L. Horner, and D. K. Munroe. 2015. Environmental politics after nature: Conflicting socioecological futures. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (2): 284–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarigal, K., and W. McComb. 1995. Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon coast range. Ecological Monographs 65:235–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. 2004. Making sense of counterurbanization. Journal of Rural Studies 20:15–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2013. Creative destruction or creative enhancement? Understanding the transformation of rural spaces. Journal of Rural Studies 32:375–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musacchio, L. R. 2009. The scientific basis for the design of landscape sustainability: A conceptual framework for translational landscape research and practice of designed landscapes and the six Es of landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecology 24 (8): 993–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. R., M. J. Stabler, P. J. Jones, S. R. Mortimer, R. J. Tiffin, and R. B. Tranter. 2009. Evaluating the role of environmental quality in the sustainable rural economic development of England. Environment, Development and Sustainability 11 (4): 735–50.
   Google Scholar
• Radeloff, V., S. Stewart, T. Hawbaker, U. Gimmi, A. Pidegon, C. Flather, R. Hammer, and D. Helmers. 2009. Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value. PNAS 107 (2): 940–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasker, R. 2006. An exploration into the economic impact of industrial development versus conservation on western public lands. Society and Natural Resources 19 (3): 191–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasker, R., P. Gude, and M. Delorey. 2013. The effect of protected federal lands on economic prosperity in the non-metropolitan West. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy 43 (2): 110–22.
   Google Scholar
• Rudel, T., L. Schneider, M. Uriarte, B. L. Turner II, R. DeFries, D. Lawrence, J. Geoghegan, et al. 2009. Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated areas, 1970–2005. PNAS 106 (49): 20675–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudzitis, G. 1996. Wilderness and the changing American West. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Salvati, L. 2014. Exurban development and landscape diversification in a Mediterranean suburban area. Scottish Geographical Journal 130 (1): 22–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvati, L., V. Morelli, K. Rontos, and A. Sabbi. 2013. Latent exurban development: City expansion along the rural-to-urban gradient in growing and declining regions of southern Europe. Urban Geography 34 (3): 376–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, L., and P. Courant. 2006. Sometimes close is good enough: The value of nearby environmental amenities. Journal of Regional Science 46 (5): 931–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S. 2011. Sprawl without growth in eastern Germany. Urban Geography 32 (1): 105–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., and C. Woodcock. 2008. Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information. Urban Studies 45:659–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B. L., E. Lambin, and A. Reenberg. 2007. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. PNAS 104 (20): 666–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visas, A., and J. Carruthers. 2005. Regional development and land use change in the Rocky Mountain West, 1982–1997. Growth and Change 36 (2): 244–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell, P. 2002. UrbanSim: Modeling urban development for land use, transportation and environmental planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 68 (3): 297–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, P., and P. Hurley. 2011. Planning paradise: Politics and visioning of land use in Oregon. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, J. 2007. Implementation of land and ecosystem accounts at the European Environment Agency. Ecological Economics 61 (4): 695–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J. 2010. Urban sustainability: An inevitable goal of landscape research. Landscape Ecology 25 (1): 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., and M. Gopinath. 2008. What causes spatial variations in economic development in the United States? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90 (2): 392–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar