Analyzing Accessibility Using Parcel Data: Is There Still an Access–Space Trade-Off in Long Beach, California?

Literature Cited

• Alonso, W. 1964. Location and land use: Toward a general theory of land rent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ArcGIS. 2014. North America detailed streets. https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=f38b87cc295541fb88513d1ed7cec9fd (last accessed 28 July 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson-Palombo, C. 2010. New housing construction in Phoenix: Evidence of “new suburbanism”? Cities 27 (2): 77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, M. 2005. Cities and complexity: Understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. H. 2015. How real estate developers think. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bullen, P. A., and P. E. D. Love. 2009. Residential regeneration and adaptive reuse: Learning from the experiences of Los Angeles. Structural Survey 27 (5): 351–60.
   Google Scholar
• California Homebuilding Foundation. 2016. California housing units. http://www.mychf.org/ (last accessed 19 July 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., and K. Kockelman. 1997. Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2 (3): 199–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapple, K., and R. Jacobus. 2009. Retail trade as a route to neighborhood revitalization. In Urban and regional policy and its effects, Vol. 1, ed. N. Pindus, H. Wial, and H. Wolman, 19–68. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daisa, J. M., and T. Parker. 2009. Trip generation rates for urban infill land uses in Calfornia. ITE Journal (Institute of Transportation Engineers) 79 (6): 30–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmelle, E., Y. Zhou, and J.-C. Thill. 2014. Densification without growth management? Evidence from local land development and housing trends in Charlotte, North Carolina, USA. Sustainability 6 (6): 3975–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duany, A., J. Speck, and M. Lydon. 2010. The smart growth manual. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, D. T., J. Aldstadt, J. Whalen, and S. J. Melly. 2012. Validation of walk scores and transit scores for estimating neighborhood walkability and transit availability: A small-area analysis. GeoJournal 78 (2): 407–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenhalt, A. 2012. The great inversion and the future of the American city. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). (2016). All-transactions house price index for Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA (MSAD). https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/ATNHPIUS38060Q (last accessed 7 April 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Filion, P. 2001. Suburban mixed-use centres and urban dispersion: What difference do they make? Environment and Planning A 33 (1): 141–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher, R. 2007. Is high-rise housing innovative? Developers' contradictory narratives of high-rise housing in Melbourne. Urban Studies 44 (3): 631–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischel, W. A. 2001. The homevoter hypothesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L. 2011. Trimph of the city. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E., and J. Gottlieb. 2006. Urban resurgence and the consumer city. Urban Studies 43 (8): 1275–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., and J. Gyourko. 2002. The impact of zoning on housing affordability. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 8835. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J., and K. Perrott. 2010. Where is the cafe? The challenge of making retail uses viable in mixed-use suburban developments. Urban Studies 48 (1): 177–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, E. 2007. Divide and sprawl, decline and fall: A comparative critique of Euclidean zoning. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 68 (4): 915–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, S. 1993. Regional versus local accessibility: Implications for nonwork travel. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1400:58–66.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., and C. Hunter. 2004. Sustainable cities. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, T. 2001. Adaptive re-use of offices for residential use—The experiences of London and Toronto. Cities 18 (3): 173–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewko, J., K. E. Smoyer-Tomic, and M. J. Hodgson. 2002. Measuring neighbourhood spatial accessibility to urban amenities: Does aggregation error matter? Environment and Planning A 34 (7): 1185–1206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotelling, H. 1929. Stability in competition. Economic Journal 39 (153): 41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Infogroup. 2015. Reference USA historical business dataset. Papillon, NE: Infogroup.
   Google Scholar
• Intra City. 2016. Special issue. The Daily 49er. http://neighborhoods.d49erspecial.com/ (last accessed 16 May 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, E. G. 2010. New directions for urban economic models of land use change: Incorporating spatial dynamics and heterogeneity. Journal of Regional Science 50 (1): 65–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, E. G., and J. Geoghegan. 2001. Theory, data, methods: Developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 85 (1–3): 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, K., J. P. Connors, and C. S. Galletti. 2014. Beyond fragmentation at the fringe: A path-dependent, high-resolution analysis of urban land cover in Phoenix, Arizona. Applied Geography 52:123–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, K., A. M. York, J. Tuccillo, Y. Ouyang, and L. Gentile. 2014. Residential development during the Great Recession: A shifting focus in Phoenix, Arizona. Urban Geography 35 (4): 486–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, J. T., and J. Zimmerman. 2004. Constructing the “genuine American city”: Neo-traditionalism, New Urbanism and neo-liberalism in the remaking of downtown Milwaukee. Cultural Geographies 11 (1): 74–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knaap, G., and E. Talen. 2005. New Urbanism and smart growth: A few words from the academy. International Regional Science Review 28 (2): 107–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, J. 1998. Rethinking accessibility and jobs–housing balance. Journal of the American Planning Association 64 (2): 133–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——–. 2005. A choice-based rationale for land use and transportation alternatives: Evidence from Boston and Atlanta. Journal of Planning Education and Research 24 (3): 317–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Los Angeles Open Data. 2016. Assessor parcels data: 2006–2015. https://data.lacity.org/ (last accessed 17 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Medzerian, D. 2014. New housing booms in downtown Long Beach. The Orange County Register 31 August. http://www.ocregister.com/articles/building-633163-downtown-units.html (last accessed 26 August 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, R., and S. Capperis. 2016. Neighbourhood differences in retail turnover: Evidence from New York City. Urban Studies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0042098016661268
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meltzer, R., and J. Schuetz. 2011. Bodegas or bagel shops? Neighborhood differences in retail and household services. Economic Development Quarterly 26 (1): 73–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe Sullivan, D., and S. C. Shaw. 2011. Retail gentrification and race: The case of Alberta Street in Portland, Oregon. Urban Affairs Review 47 (3): 413–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, L. 2008. Third-wave gentrification in New Zealand: The case of Auckland. Urban Studies 45 (12): 2521–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phe, H. H., and P. Wakely. 2000. Status, quality and the other trade-off: Towards a new theory of urban residential location. Urban Studies 37 (1): 7–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plane, D. 2013. Deconstructing the age dimension of the “Great Inversion.” Paper presented at the North American Regional Science Association, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 2000. Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly 14 (1): 15–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powe, M., J. Mabry, E. Talen, and D. Mahmoudi. 2016. Jane Jacobs and the value of older, smaller buildings. Journal of the American Planning Association 82 (2): 167–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prang, J. 2015. Office of the Los Angeles County Assessor annual report. Los Angeles: Office of the Assessor of Los Angeles County.
   Google Scholar
• Redfin. 2016. Walk Score. www.walkscore.com (last accessed 2 May 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Schwanke, D., ed. 2003. Mixed-use development handbook. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sevtsuk, A. 2014. Location and agglomeration: The distribution of retail and food businesses in dense urban environments. Journal of Planning Education and Research 34 (4): 374–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southern California Association of Governments. 2015. Profile of the City of Long Beach: Local profiles report. Los Angeles: Southern California Association of Governments.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, A. L., N. Bania, and L. Leete. 2010. Comparative approaches to measuring food access in urban areas: The case of Portland, Oregon. Urban Studies 48 (8): 1715–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrens, P. M. 2006. Simulating sprawl. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96 (2): 248–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau, D., and J. Kaplan. 2015. Is there diversity in the New Urbanism? Analyzing the demographic characteristics of New Urbanist neighborhoods in the United States. Urban Geography 37 (3): 458–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voulgaris, C. T., E. Blumenburg, K. Relph, B. D. Taylor, and A. Brown. 2017. Synergistic neighborhood relationships with travel behavior: An analysis of travel in 30,000 US neighborhoods. Journal of Transportation and Land Use 10 (1): 437–61.
   Google Scholar
• Waldfogel, J. 2008. The median voter and the median consumer: Local private goods and population composition. Journal of Urban Economics 63 (2): 567–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar