Spatiality, Maps, and Mathematics in Critical Human Geography: Toward a Repetition with Difference

Literature Cited

• Abler, R. F., J. S. Adams, and P. Gould. 1971. Spatial organization: The geographer's view of the world. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. J. 2009. “Not only … but also”: Quantitative and critical geography. The Professional Geographer 61 (3): 292–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. J., N. Heynen, A. Merrifield, and A. Mountz. 2011. A classic in human geography: William Bunge's (1971). Fitzgerald: Geography of a revolution. Progress in Human Geography 35 (5): 712–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. J., and E. Sheppard. 2009. “Nothing includes everything”: Towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography 34 (2): 193–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benach, N., ed. 2017. Expediciones urbanas: Tras las huellas de William Bunge [William W. Bunge. Urban geographic expeditions]. Barcelona: Icaria Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, L. 2016. Toward speculative data: “Geographic information” for situated knowledges, vibrant matter, and relational spaces. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space 34 (6): 971–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, L., and D. O'Sullivan. Forthcoming. Reimagining GIScience for relational spaces. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, L., E. S. Sheppard, and P. S. Plummer. 2009. Capitalism beyond harmonious equilibrium: Mathematics as if human agency mattered. Environment and Planning A 41 (2): 265–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K. 2002. Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 458 (2026): 2465–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandes, U., G. Robins, A. McCranie, and S. Wasserman. 2013. What is network science? Network Science 1 (1): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bunge, W. W. 1966. Theoretical geography. 2nd ed. Lund, Sweden: C. W. K. Gleerup.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1971. Fitzgerald: Geography of a revolution. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1973. The geography of human survival. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 63 (3): 275–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1988. Nuclear war atlas. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bunge, W. W., and R. Bordessa. 1975. The Canadian alternative: Survival, expeditions and urban change. Toronto: York University.
   Google Scholar
• Buttimer, A. 1976. Grasping the dynamism of lifeworld. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 66 (2): 277–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caquard, S. 2015. Cartography III: A post-representational perspective on cognitive cartography. Progress in Human Geography 39 (2): 225–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caquard, S., and D. Naud. 2014. A spatial typology of cinematographic narratives. In Developments in the theory and practice of cybercartography: Applications and indigenous mapping. 2nd ed., ed. D. R. Fraser Taylor and T. Lauriault, 161–74. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cauvin, C., F. Escobar, and A. Serradj. 2010. Thematic cartography. London: ISTE-Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, M., and S. Elwood, eds. 2009. Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, D. 2001. Apollo's eye: A cartographic genealogy of the Earth in the Western imagination. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couclelis, H. 1999. Space, time, geography. In Geographical information systems: Principles, techniques, management, and applications, ed. P. Longley, M. F. Goodchild, D. Maguire, and D. W. Rhind, 29–38. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Couclelis, H., R. G. Golledge, N. Gale, and W. R. Tobler. 1987. Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology 7 (2): 99–122.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, K. R., W. Macmillan, and W. W. Bunge. 2001. Classics in human geography revisited: Bunge, W. Theoretical geography. Progress in Human Geography 25 (1): 71–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. W. 2001. Maps as social constructions: Power, communication and visualization. Progress in Human Geography 25 (2): 235–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2009. Cartography: Maps 2.0. Progress in Human Geography 33 (1): 91–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, M. 1998. Digital places: Living with geographic information technologies. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cutter, S. L. 1990. Review: Bunge, Nuclear war atlas, 1988. Progress in Human Geography 14 (3): 450–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, C., L. Taylor, and J. Thatcher. 2016. Critical data studies: A dialog on data and space. Big Data & Society 3 (1): 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, C., and J. Thatcher. 2014. What does a critical data studies look like, and why do we care? Seven points for a critical approach to “big data.” http://societyandspace.org/2014/05/12/what-does-a-critical-data-studies-look-like-and-why-do-we-care-craig-dalton-and-jim-thatcher/ (last accessed 10 January 2017).
   Google Scholar
• The Detroit Geographical Expedition and Institute (DGEI). 1971. Field notes 1. http://freeuniversitynyc.org/files/2012/09/Detroit-Geographical-Expedition-and-Institute-1971.pdf (last accessed 15 May 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Dorling, D. 1991. The visualization of spatial structure. PhD thesis, Department of Geography, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Dorling, D., M. Newman, and A. Barford. 2010. The atlas of the real world: Mapping the way we live. (Rev. and exp. ed.) London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. 2008. Dialectics and the measure of the world. Environment and Planning A 40:2641–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2013. Secure the volume: Vertical geopolitics and the depth of power. Political Geography 34 (1): 35–51.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., M. F. Goodchild, and D. Z. Sui. 2012. Researching volunteered geographic information: Spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (3): 571–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forer, P. 1978. A place for plastic space? Progress in Human Geography 2 (2): 230–67.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrys, J. 2016. Program Earth: Environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gatrell, A. C. 1983. Distance and space: A geographical perspective. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Golledge, R. G., and R. J. Stimson. 1997. Spatial behavior: A geographic perspective. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. 2008. Theoretical geography (1962), William Bunge. In Key texts in human geography, ed. P. Hubbard, R. Kitchin, and G. Valentine, 9–16. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gottdiener, M. 1987. Space as a force of production: Contribution to the debate on realism, capitalism and space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 11 (3): 405–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, P. 1981. Letting the data speak for themselves. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 71 (2): 166–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1997. The structure of space(s). Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 79 (3): 127–40.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. 2016. Vertical: The city from satellites to bunkers. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, D. 1994. Geographical imaginations. Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, D., and J. Urry, eds. 1985. Social relations and spatial structures. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Haggett, P. 1965. Locational analysis in human geography. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Haggett, P., and R. J. Chorley. 1969. Network analysis in geography. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., A. Singleton, and C. Parker. 2008. Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the GeoWeb. Geography Compass 2 (6): 2011–39.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1973. Social justice and the city. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1996. Justice, nature, and the geography of difference. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D., and D. Haraway. 1995. Nature, politics, and possibilities: A debate and discussion with David Harvey and Donna Haraway. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13 (5): 507–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heynen, N. 2013. Marginalia of a revolution: Naming popular ethnography through William W. Bunge's Fitzgerald. Social & Cultural Geography 14 (7): 744–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heynen, N., and T. Barnes. 2011. Foreword to the 2011 edition: Fitzgerald then and now. In Geography of a revolution, ed. W. Bunge Fitzgerald. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 1991. Postmodernism, or, The cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janelle, D. G. 1969. Spatial reorganization: A model and concept. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 59 (2): 348–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. 2009. Phase space: Geography, relational thinking, and beyond. Progress in Human Geography 33 (4): 487–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsbury, P., and J. P. Jones. 2009. Walter Benjamin's Dionysian adventures on Google Earth. Geoforum 40 (4): 502–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., and M. Dodge. 2007. Rethinking maps. Progress in Human Geography 31 (3): 331–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J. B. 1978. Multidimensional scaling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P. 2002. Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92 (4): 645–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2008. From oral histories to visual narratives: Re-presenting the post–September 11 experiences of the Muslim women in the USA. Social & Cultural Geography 9 (6): 653–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P., and T. Schwanen. 2009. Quantitative revolution 2: The critical (re)turn. The Professional Geographer 61 (3): 283–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, M. 1991. The production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. 2009. Quantitative limits to qualitative engagements: GIS, its critics, and the philosophical divide. The Professional Geographer 61 (3): 350–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1960. The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. 1994. Visualization in modern cartography: Setting the agenda. In Visualization in modern cartography, ed. A. M. MacEachren and D. R. F. Taylor, 1–12. New York: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, S. A., J. P. Jones, and K. Woodward. 2005. Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30 (4): 416–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 1992. Politics and space/time. New Left Review 196:65–84.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1993. Power geometry and a progressive sense of place. In Mapping the futures, ed. J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam, G. Robertson, and L. Tickner, 59–69. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1999. Space–time, “science” and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 24 (3): 261–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2005. For space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McLafferty, S. L. 2002. Mapping women's worlds: Knowledge, power and the bounds of GIS. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 9 (3): 263–69.
   Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R. 1991. The measurement of cognitive distance: Methods and construct validity. Journal of Environmental Psychology 11 (2): 101–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, G. 1969. Inference problems in locational analysis. In Behavioral models in geography: A symposium, ed. K. R. Cox and R. G. Golledge, 14–24. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, D. 2006. Geographical information science: Critical GIS. Progress in Human Geography 30 (6): 783–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, D., and S. M. Manson. 2015. Do physicists have geography envy? And what can geographers learn from it? Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (4): 704–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, D., and G. L. W. Perry. 2013. Spatial simulation: Exploring pattern and process. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlovskaya, M. 2004. Other transitions: Multiple economies of Moscow households in the 1990s. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (2): 329–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2009. Feminist visualization. In International encylopedia of human geography, ed. R. M. Kitchin and N. J. Thrift, 157–64. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlovskaya, M., and K. St. Martin. 2007. Feminism and geographic information systems: From a missing object to a mapping subject. Geography Compass 1 (3): 583–606.
   Google Scholar
• Peluso, N. L. 1995. Whose woods are these? Counter-mapping forest territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Antipode 27 (4): 383–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., and B. Inhelder. 1967. The child's conception of space. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Piatti, B., A.-K. Reuschel, and L. Hurni. 2013. Dreams, longings, memories—Visualising the dimension of projected spaces in fiction. Paper presented at the International Cartographic Conference, Dresden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Poon, J. P. H. 2005. Quantitative methods: Not positively positivist. Progress in Human Geography 29 (6): 766–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, I., J. Webber, and E. Eifrem. 2015. Graph databases: New opportunities for connected data. 2nd ed. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, D. R. 2003. Plotting against Eurocentrism: The 1929 surrealist map of the world. In Colored White: Transcending the racial past, 169–76. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sack, R. D. 1980. Conceptions of space in social thought: A geographic perspective. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, C. O. 1925. The morphology of landscape. University of California Publications in Geography 2 (2): 19–54.
   Google Scholar
• Schuurman, N. 2000. Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s. Progress in Human Geography 24 (4): 569–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2002. Women and technology in geography: A cyborg manifesto for GIS. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 46 (3): 258–65.
   Google Scholar
• Schuurman, N., and G. Pratt. 2002. Care of the subject: Feminism and critiques of GIS. Gender, Place & Culture 9 (3): 291–99.
   Google Scholar
• Schwanen, T., and M.-P. Kwan. 2009. “Doing” critical geographies with numbers. The Professional Geographer 61 (4): 459–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secor, A. 2013. 2012 Urban Geography plenary lecture: Topological city. Urban Geography 34 (4): 430–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E. S. 1974. A conceptual framework for dynamic location–allocation analysis. Environment and Planning 6 (5): 547–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1995. GIS and society: Towards a research agenda. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 22 (1): 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2001. Quantitative geography: Representations, practices, and possibilities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19 (5): 535–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2008. Geographic dialectics? Environment and Planning A 40 (11): 2603–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2014. We have never been positivist. Urban Geography 35 (5): 636–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E. S., and T. Barnes. 1990. The capitalist space economy: Geographical analysis after Ricardo, Marx and Sraffa. London: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, R. 2004. Rewiring for a GIS/2. Cartographica 39 (1): 25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 1984. Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. New York: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Soja, E. 1980. The socio-spatial dialectic. The Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70 (2): 207–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiekermann, K., and M. Wegener. 1994. The shrinking continent: New time–space maps of Europe. Environment and Planning B 21 (6): 653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, M. 2013. Gender and the GeoWeb: Divisions in the production of user-generated cartographic information. GeoJournal 78 (6): 981–96.
   Google Scholar
• Stimson, R. J. 2008. A personal perspective from being a student of the quantitative revolution. Geographical Analysis 40 (3): 222–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper, M., and R. Walker. 1989. The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology and industrial growth. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sui, D. Z. 2004. Tobler's first law of geography: A big idea for a small world? Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (2): 269–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terranova, T. 2000. Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text 18 (2): 33–58.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. W. 1917. On growth and form. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timander, L., and S. L. McLafferty. 1998. Breast cancer in West Islip, NY: A spatial clustering analysis with covariates. Social Science and Medicine 46 (12): 1623–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. R. 1961. Map transformations of geographic space. PhD dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Washington, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1963. Geographic area and map projections. Geographical Review 53 (1): 59–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1979. A transformational view of cartography. The American Cartographer 6 (2): 101–06.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2000. The development of analytical cartography: A personal note. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 27 (3): 189–94.
   Google Scholar
• Toscano, A., and J. Kinkle. 2015. Cartographies of the absolute. Winchester, UK: Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, C. 2014. Transcending the cube: Translating GIScience time and space perspectives in a humanities GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (5): 1149–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, E. 1997. Close to the machine: Technophilia and its discontents. A memoir. San Francisco: City Lights Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vasiliev, I. 1997. Mapping time. Cartographica 34 (2): 1–50.
   Google Scholar
• Warf, B. 2008. Time-space compression: Historical geographies. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Werritty, A. 2010. D'Arcy Thompson's “On growth and form” and the rediscovery of geometry within the geographic tradition. Scottish Geographical Journal 126 (4): 231–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. W. 2015. New lines? Enacting a social history of GIS. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 59 (1): 29–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D. 2010a. Lynch Debord: About two psychogeographies. Cartographica 45 (3): 185–200.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2010b. Rethinking the power of maps. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Wyly, E. 2009. Strategic positivism. The Professional Geographer 61 (3): 310–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2011. Positively radical. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (5): 889–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar