GIS-Based Landscape Stability Analysis: A Comparison of Overlay Method and Fuzzy Model for the Case Study in Slovakia

Literature Cited

• Alcantara, C., T. Kuemmerle, A. V. Prishchepov, and V. C. Radeloff. 2012. Mapping abandoned agriculture with multi-temporal MODIS satellite data. Remote Sensing of Environment 124:334–47. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.05.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, J. A. 1980. Remote sensing in land and land use studies. Geography 65 (1):35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez, D. G. 2017. Cartographic scale and minimum mapping unit influence on LULC modelling. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management (GISTAM 2017), Porto, Portugal, April 28.
   Google Scholar
• Amirahmadi, A. M., M. Shiran, M. Z. Asadi, and F. Keramati. 2017. Landslide susceptibility zonation using the fuzzy algebraic operators in GIS, Iran. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science 8 (1):50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Antrop, M. 1997. The concept of traditional landscapes as a base for landscape evaluation and planning. The example of Flanders Region. Landscape and Urban Planning 38 (1–2):105–17. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00027-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antrop, M. 1998. Landscape change: Plan or chaos? Landscape and Urban Planning 41 (3–4):155–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antrop, M. 2005. Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning 70 (1–2):21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArcGIS 10.2.2. Redlands, CA: ESRI.
   Google Scholar
• Arnot, C., and P. Fisher. 2007. Mapping the ecotone with fuzzy sets. In Geographic uncertainty in environmental security. NATO science for peace and security series C: Environmental security, ed. A. Morris and S. Kokhan, 19–32. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Arvor, D., L. Durieux, S. Andrés, and M. A. Laporte. 2013. Advances in geographic object-based image analysis with ontologies: A review of main contributions and limitations from a remote sensing perspective. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 82:125–37. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R. D., J. E. De Steeiguer, D. E. Grwent, and M. J. Newton. 1979. Land use/land cover mapping from aerial photographs. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 45 (5):661–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartková, R., B. Riečan, and A. Tirpáková. 2017. Probability theory for fuzzy quantum spaces with statistical applications. Sharjah, United Arab Emirates: Bentham Science.
   Google Scholar
• Bashir, H., and S. S. Ahmad. 2017. Exploring geospatial techniques for spatiotemporal change detection in land cover dynamics along Soan River, Pakistan. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 189:222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. 1999. Landscape: Pattern, perception and process. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Benz, U. C., P. Hofmann, G. Willhauck, I. Lingenfelder, and M. Heynen. 2004. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 58 (3–4):239–58. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2003.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibby, P. 2009. Land use change in Britain. Land Use Policy 26 (Suppl. 1):2–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke, T. 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 65 (1):2–16. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohnet, I., and P. Pert. 2010. Patterns, drivers and impacts of urban growth—A case study from Cairns, Queensland, Australia from 1952 to 2031. Landscape and Urban Planning 97 (4):239–48. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonham-Carter, G. F. 1994. Geographic information systems for geoscientists: Modeling with GIS. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, J. J. E., R. G. H. Bunce, D. C. Howard, and S. Petit. 2002. General principles of monitoring land cover change based on two case studies in Britain and Denmark. Landscape and Urban Planning 62 (1):37–51. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00095-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brimicombe, A. J. 2010. GIS, environmental modeling and engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Burley, M. 1961. Land use or land utilization? The Professional Geographer 13 (6):18–20. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1961.136_18.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrough, P. A., and R. A. McDonnell. 1998. Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coppin, P., I. Jonckheere, K. Nackaerts, B. Muys, and E. Lambin. 2004. Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: A review. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25 (9):1565–96. doi:10.1080/0143116031000101675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, D., and H. Prade. 1980. Fuzzy sets and systems: Theory and applications. New York: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, G., and K. Lowell. 1996. Modelling uncertainty in photointerpreted boundaries. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 62 (4):337–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESRI. 2014. ArcGIS resources. Accessed January 20, 2018. http://resources.arcgis.com.
   Google Scholar
• Falcucci, A., L. Maiorano, and L. Boitani. 2007. Changes in land-use/land-cover patterns in Italy and their implications for biodiversity conservation. Landscape Ecology 22 (4):617–31. doi:10.1007/s10980-006-9056-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, F., Q. Weng, and Y. Wang. 2007. Land use and land cover change in Guangzhou, China, from 1998 to 2003, based on Landsat TM/ETM + Imagery. Sensors 7 (7):1323–42. doi:10.3390/s7071323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fei, Z. H., and C. V. Johnson. 2017. Assessment of land-cover/land-use change and landscape patterns in the two national nature reserves of Ebinur Lake Watershed, Xinjiang, China. Sustainability 9 (5):724. doi:10.3390/su9050724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, R. T. T., and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape ecology. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, J. M., and Y. H. Sang. 2017. Identification and estimation of landslide-debris flow disaster risk in primary and middle school campuses in a mountainous area of Southwest China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 25:60–71. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Ruiz, J. M., T. Lasanta, P. Ruiz-Flano, L. Ortigosa, S. White, C. González, and C. Martí. 1996. Land-use changes and sustainable development in mountain areas: A case study in the Spanish Pyrenees. Landscape Ecology 11 (5):267–77. doi:10.1007/BF02059854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerard, F., S. Petit, G. Smith, A. Thomson, N. Brown, S. Manchester, R. Wadsworth, et al. 2010. Land cover change in Europe between 1950 and 2000 determined employing aerial photography. Progress in Physical Geography 34 (2):183–205. doi:10.1177/0309133309360141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopal, S., X. J. Tang, N. Phillips, M. Nomack, V. Pasquarella, and J. Pitts. 2016. Characterizing urban landscapes using fuzzy sets. Computers Environment and Urban Systems 57:212–23. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopal, S., and C. E. Woodcock. 1994. Theory and methods for accuracy assessment of thematic maps using fuzzy sets. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 60 (2):181–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haase, D., U. Walz, M. Neubert, and M. Rosenberg. 2007. Changes to Central European landscapes—Analyzing historical maps to approach current environmental issues, examples from Saxony, Central Germany. Land Use Policy 24 (1):248–68. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, G. B., F. Wang, and F. Subaryono. 1992. Comparison of Boolean and fuzzy classification methods in land suitability analysis by using geographical information systems. Environment and Planning A 24 (4):497–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. S. 2003. A fuzzy logic approach to urban land-use mapping. Paper presented at ScanGIS’2003: The 9th Scandinavian Research Conference on Geographical Information Science, Espoo, Finland, June 4.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrychová, M., and M. Kabrna. 2016. An analysis of 200-year-long changes in a landscape affected by large-scale surface coal mining: History, present and future. Applied Geography 74:151–59. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihse, M. 1995. Swedish agricultural landscapes—Patterns and changes during last 50 years, studied by aerial photos. Landscape and Urban Planning 31 (1–3):21–37. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(94)01033-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihse, M., and C. Lindahl. 2000. A holistic model for landscape ecology in practice: The Swedish survey and management of ancient meadows and pastures. Landscape and Urban Planning 50 (1–3):59–84. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00080-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson, L. R. 1988. Land-use change in Illinois, USA: The influence of landscape attribute on current and historic land use. Landscape Ecology 2 (1):45–62. doi:10.1007/BF00138907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatami, R., G. Mountrakis, and S. V. Stehman. 2016. A meta-analysis of remote sensing research on supervised pixel-based land-cover image classification processes: General guidelines for practitioners and future research. Remote Sensing of Environment 177:89–100. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilianová, H., V. Pechanec, J. Lacina, and P. Halas. 2009. Ekotony v současné krajině [Ecotones in current landscape]. Olomouc, Czech Republic: Palacký University Olomouc.
   Google Scholar
• Kilianová, H., V. Pechanec, and Z. Zapletalová. 2008. Změny využití zemědělské krajiny v povodí Trkmanky [Changes in agricultural land use in Trkmanka catchment]. In Ochrana a manažment poľnohospodárskej krajiny, ed. J. Špulerová and T. Hrnčiarová, 199–206. Bratislava, Slovakia: ÚKE SAV.
   Google Scholar
• Kindu, M., T. Schneider, D. Teketay, and T. Knoke. 2013. Land use/land cover change analysis using object-based classification approach in Munessa–Shashemene landscape of the Ethiopian Highlands. Remote Sensing 5 (5):2411–35. doi:10.3390/rs5052411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizos, T., and M. Koulouri. 2006. Agricultural landscape dynamics in the Mediterranean: Lesvos (Greece) case study using evidence from the last three centuries. Environmental Science & Policy 9 (4):330–42. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2006.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuemmerle, T., V. C. Radeloff, K. Perzanowski, and P. Hostert. 2006. Cross-border comparison of land cover and landscape pattern in Eastern Europe using a hybrid classification technique. Remote Sensing of the Environment 103 (4):449–64. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner, A. M., W. T. Langford, S. A. Bekessy, and S. D. Jones. 2012. Are landscape ecologists addressing uncertainty in their remote sensing data? Landscape Ecology 27 (9):1249–61. doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9791-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillesand, T., R. W. Kiefer, and J. Chipman. 2015. Remote sensing and image interpretation. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lipský, Z. 1995. The changing face of the Czech rural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 31 (1–3):39–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipský, Z. 2010. Present changes in European rural landscapes. In Landscape modelling: Geographical space, transformation and future scenarios, ed. J. Anděl, I. Bičík, P. Dostál, Z. Lipský, and S. G. Shahneshin, 13–27. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., L. Wenkai, Z. Hebing, and N. Haipeng. 2016. Comprehensive landscape ecology stability assessment of a coal gangue backfill reclamation area. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 25 (3):1305–14. doi:10.15244/pjoes/61900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, D., P. Mausel, E. Brondízio, and E. Moran. 2004. Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25 (12):2365–2407. doi:10.1080/0143116031000139863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, C. A. S., A. M. K. Beltrame, E. J. Shinohara, M. Gianotti, L. Durieux, T. M. Q. Nóbrega, and J. A. Quintanilha. 2014. Identifying concentrated areas of trip generators from high spatial resolution satellite images using object-based classification techniques. Applied Geography 53:271–83. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMillian, W. D. 1978. An introduction to the theory of fuzzy sets in the context of the construction of representational spatial economic theory. In Towards the dynamic analysis of spatial systems, ed. R. L. Martin, N. J. Thrift, and R. J. Bennett, 36–52. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. 2001. Landscape assessment. In Landscape balance and landscape assessment, ed. R. Krönert, U. Steinhardt, and M. Volk, 201–49. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Miklós, L., E. Kočická, Z. Izakovičová, D. Kočický, A. Špinerová, A. Diviaková, and V. Miklósová. 2019. Landscape as geosystem. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Miklós, L., and A. Špinerová. 2019. Landscape-ecological planning LANDEP. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Munteanu, C., T. Kuemmerle, M. Boltižiar, V. Butsic, U. Gimmi, L. Halada, D. Kaim, et al. 2014. Forest and agricultural land change in the Carpathian region—A meta-analysis of long-term patterns and drivers of change. Land Use Policy 38:685–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohl, W. 2001. Sustainable landscape use and aesthetic perception—Preliminary reflections on future landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning 54 (1–4):223–37. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00138-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oláhová, J., M. Vojtek, and M. Boltižiar. 2013. Application of geoinformation technologies for the assessment of landscape structure using landscape-ecological indexes (case study of the Handlová landslide). Tájökológiai Lapok 11 (2):351–66.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, D., G. Domon, S. Blois, and A. Bouchard. 1999. Temporal (1958–1993) and spatial patterns of land use changes in Haut-Saint-Laurent (Quebec, Canada) and their relation to landscape physical attributes. Landscape Ecology 14 (1):35–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, I., J. Lee, and S. Lee. 2014. Ensemble of ground subsidence hazard maps using fuzzy logic. Central European Journal of Geosciences 6 (2):207–18.
   Google Scholar
• Peterken, G. F. 1976. Long-term changes in woodlands of Rockingham Forest and other areas. Journal of Ecology 64 (1):123–46. doi:10.2307/2258686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit, C. C., and E. F. Lambin. 2002. Impact on data integration technique on historical land-use/land-cover change: Comparing historical maps with remote sensing data in the Belgian Ardennes. Landscape Ecology 17 (2):117–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, C., A. Simms, and R. White. 2001. Hierarchical fuzzy pattern matching for the regional comparison of land use maps. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15 (1):77–100. doi:10.1080/136588100750058715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan, B. 2011. Use of GIS-based fuzzy logic relations and its cross application to produce landslide susceptibility maps in three test areas in Malaysia. Environmental Earth Sciences 63 (2):329–49. doi:10.1007/s12665-010-0705-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh, V., and S. Anbazhagan. 2015. Landslide susceptibility mapping along Kolli hills Ghat road section (India) using frequency ratio, relative effect and fuzzy logic models. Environmental Earth Sciences 73 (12):8009–21. doi:10.1007/s12665-014-3954-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. B. 2003. A perspective on the fundamentals of fuzzy sets and their use in geographical information systems. Transactions in GIS 7 (1):3–30. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00127.
   Google Scholar
• Rogan, J., and D. Chen. 2004. Remote sensing technology for mapping and monitoring land-cover and land-use change. Progress in Planning 61 (4):301–25. doi:10.1016/S0305-9006(03)00066-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabins, F. F. 2007. Remote sensing: Principles and interpretation. Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
   Google Scholar
• Saura, S. 2002. Effects of minimum mapping unit on land cover data spatial configuration and composition. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23 (22):4853–80. doi:10.1080/01431160110114493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A. 1989. Digital change detection techniques using remotely sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 10 (6):989–1003. doi:10.1080/01431168908903939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skanes, H. M., and R. G. H. Bunce. 1997. Directions of landscape change (1741–1993) in Virestad, Sweden—Characterised by multivariate analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning 38 (1–2):61–75. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00019-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stohlgren, T. J., G. W. Chong, M. A. Kalkhan, and L. D. Schell. 1997. Multiscale sampling of plant diversity: Effects of minimum mapping unit size. Ecological Applications 7 (3):1064–74. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangestani, M. H. 2004. Landslide susceptibility mapping using the fuzzy gamma approach in a GIS, Kakan catchment area, southwest Iran. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 51 (3):439–50. doi:10.1111/j.1400-0952.2004.01068.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. G., R. H. Gardner, and R. V. O’Neill. 2001. Landscape ecology in theory and practice: Pattern and process. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Verstraete, J., A. Hallez, and G. De Tré. 2007. Fuzzy regions: Theory and application. In Geographic uncertainty in environmental security. NATO science for peace and security series C: Environmental security, ed. A. Morris and S. Kokhan, 1–17. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vojtek, M., J. Vojteková, and A. Angelovičová. 2017. Land use changes and landscape stability: A case study of Radiša catchment (Western Slovakia). Paper presented at the 4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts, Albena, Bulgaria, August 30.
   Google Scholar
• Vuorela, N., P. Alho, and R. Kalliola. 2002. Systematic assessment of maps as source information in landscape-change research. Landscape Research 27 (2):141–66. doi:10.1080/01426390220128631.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside, T. G., G. S. Boggs, and S. W. Maier. 2011. Comparing object-based and pixel-based classifications for mapping savannas. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 13 (6):884–93. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2011.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wondie, M., W. Schneider, A. M. Melesse, and D. Teketay. 2011. Spatial and temporal land cover changes in the Simen Mountains National Park, a world heritage site in Northwestern Ethiopia. Remote Sensing 3 (4):752–66. doi:10.3390/rs3040752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yafei, L., and L. Gaohuan. 2017. Characterizing spatiotemporal pattern of land use change and its driving force based on GIS and landscape analysis techniques in Tianjin during 2000–2015. Sustainability 9 (6):894. doi:10.3390/su9060894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, W., W. Zhou, Y. Qian, and J. Yan. 2016. A new approach for land cover classification and change analysis: Integrating backdating an object-based method. Remote Sensing of Environment 177:37–47. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information And Control 8 (3):338–53. doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, H. J. 1985. Fuzzy set theory—And its applications. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, H. J. 1998. Fuzzy decision support systems. In Computational intelligence: Soft computing and fuzzy-neuro integration with applications. NATO ASI series (series F: Computer and systems sciences), ed. O. Kaynak, L. A. Zadeh, B. Türkşen, and I. J. Rudas, 198–229. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar