Coproductive Imaginaries for Climate Change Adaptation: A Case of Adaptation Initiatives in the Gandaki River Basin, Western Nepal

Literature Cited

• Adhikari, S., H. Baral, and C. Nitschke. 2018. Adaptation to climate change in Panchase Mountain ecological regions of Nepal. Environments 5 (3):42. doi: 10.3390/environments5030042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A. 1995. Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change 26 (3):413–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1995.tb00560.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A. 2010. Local institutions and adaptation to climate change. In Social dimensions of climate change: Equity and vulnerability in a warming world, ed. R. Mearns and A. Norton, 173–78. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Amaru, S., and N. B. Chhetri. 2013. Climate adaptation: Institutional response to environmental constraints, and the need for increased flexibility, participation, and integration of approaches. Applied Geography 39:128–39. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnott, J. C., K. J. Mach, and G. Wong-Parodi. 2020. Editorial overview: The science of actionable knowledge. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 42:A1–A5. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryal, J. P., T. B. Sapkota, D. B. Rahut, and M. Jat. 2020. Agricultural sustainability under emerging climatic variability: The role of climate-smart agriculture and relevant policies in India. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development 14 (2):219–45. doi: 10.1504/IJISD.2020.106243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brink, E., T. Aalders, D. Ádám, R. Feller, Y. Henselek, A. Hoffmann, K. Ibe, A. Matthey-Doret, M. Meyer, N. L. Negrut, et al. 2016. Cascades of green: A review of ecosystem-based adaptation in urban areas. Global Environmental Change 36:111–23. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhetri, N. B., and N. Chhetri. 2015. Alternative imaginations. In Indigenous innovation, 11–23. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chhetri, N. B., and W. E. Easterling. 2010. Adapting to climate change: Retrospective analysis of climate technology interaction in the rice-based farming system of Nepal. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (5):1156–76. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2010.518035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhetri, N., M. Stuhlmacher, and A. Ishtiaque. 2019. Nested pathways to adaptation. Environmental Research Communications 1 (1):015001. doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/aaf9f9.
   Google Scholar
• Chhetri, N., M. Subedi, and S. Ghimire. 2013. Niche-based responses in addressing the climatic constraints to farm production: Analogues to climate-change adaptation in Nepal. Climate and Development 5 (2):174–81. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2013.789790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J., P. Gurung, P. S. Chapagain, S. Regmi, J. K. Bhusal, T. Karpouzoglou, F. Mao, and A. Dewulf. 2017. Water as “time-substance”: The hydrosocialities of climate change in Nepal. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (6):1351–69. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1329005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colls, A., N. Ash, and N. Ikkala. 2009. Ecosystem-based adaptation: A natural response to climate change. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P., J. F. Morton, D. Dodman, B. Karapinar, F. Meza, M. G. Rivera-Ferre, A. Toure Sarr, and K. E. Vincent. 2014. Rural areas climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. C. B. Field et al., 613–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Nepal/United Nations Development Program (GON/UNDP). 2016. Ecosystem based adaptation in mountain ecosystems in Nepal Project Completion Report. United Nations Development Program and Department of Forest.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. K., R. Sinha, D. Koradia, R. Patel, M. Parmar, P. Rohit, H. Patel, K. Patel, V. S. Chand, T. J. James, et al. 2003. Mobilizing grassroots technological innovations and traditional knowledge, values and institutions: Articulating social and ethical Capital. Futures 35 (9):975–87. doi: 10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00053-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3):575–99. doi: 10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariyo Ban Program. 2016. Hariyo Ban Nepal Ko Dhan Program, Annual performance report, year 5, July 2015–June 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. 2009. Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huq, S., and M. R. Khan. 2006. Equity in national adaptation programs of action (NAPAs): The case of Bangladesh. In Fairness in adaptation to climate change, ed. W. N. Adger, J. Paavola, S. Huq, and M. J. Mace, 181–200. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2004. States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and S.-H. Kim. 2009. Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47 (2):119–46. doi: 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and S.-H. Kim. 2015. Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, A., and S. Vinthagen. 2016. Dimensions of everyday resistance: An analytical framework. Critical Sociology 42 (3):417–35. doi: 10.1177/0896920514524604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L., and E. Boyd. 2011. Exploring social barriers to adaptation: Insights from Western Nepal. Global Environmental Change 21 (4):1262–74. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatri-Chhetri, A., A. Pant, P. K. Aggarwal, V. V. Vasireddy, and A. Yadav. 2019. Stakeholders prioritization of climate-smart agriculture interventions: Evaluation of a framework. Agricultural Systems 174:23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatri-Chhetri, A., B. Poudel, P. B. Shirsath, and P. Chaudhary. 2017. Assessment of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) options in Nepal. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Klenk, N., A. Fiume, K. Meehan, and C. Gibbes. 2017. Local knowledge in climate adaptation research: Moving knowledge frameworks from extraction to co‐production. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 8 (5):e475. doi: 10.1002/wcc.475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenk, N., and K. Meehan. 2015. Climate change and transdisciplinary science: Problematizing the integration imperative. Environmental Science & Policy 54:160–67. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebel, L. 2013. Local knowledge and adaptation to climate change in natural resource–based societies of the Asia-Pacific. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 18 (7):1057–76. doi: 10.1007/s11027-012-9407-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maharjan, S. K. 2019. Local adaptation plan of action framework and process in the agriculture sector in Nepal. International Journal of Conservation Science 10 (2):351–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milkoreit, M., A. R. Kapuscinski, K. Locke, and A. Iles. 2017. Imaginary politics: Climate change and making the future. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 5:62. doi: 10.1525/elementa.249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T. R. 2020. Imaginaries of sustainability: The techno-politics of smart cities. Science as Culture 29 (3):365–87. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2019.1705273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munang, R., I. Thiaw, K. Alverson, M. Mumba, J. Liu, and M. Rivington. 2013. Climate change and ecosystem-based adaptation: A new pragmatic approach to buffering climate change impacts. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5 (1):67–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A. J. 2015. A socionature approach to adaptation. In Climate change adaptation and development, vol. 219, ed. T. H. Inderberg, S. Eriksen, K. O’Brien, and L. Sygna, 219–34. London and New York: Routledge in association with GSE Research.
   Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A. J. 2016. Adaptive scholarship and situated knowledges? Hybrid methodologies and plural epistemologies in climate change adaptation research. Area 48 (1):41–47. doi: 10.1111/area.12195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A. J. 2017. Power and politics in climate change adaptation efforts: Struggles over authority and recognition in the context of political instability. Geoforum 84:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A. J., S. Eriksen, M. Taylor, T. Forsyth, M. Pelling, A. Newsham, E. Boyd, K. Brown, B. Harvey, L. Jones, et al. 2020. Beyond technical fixes: Climate solutions and the great derangement. Climate and Development 12 (4):343–52. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2019.1624495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojha, H. R., S. Ghimire, A. Pain, A. Nightingale, D. B. Khatri, and H. Dhungana. 2016. Policy without politics: Technocratic control of climate change adaptation policy making in Nepal. Climate Policy 16 (4):415–33. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.1003775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojha, H., L. Persha, and A. Chhatre. 2009. Seeing the forest through the trees: Community forestry in Nepal. In Millions fed: Proven successes in agricultural development, ed. D. J. Spielman and R. Pandya-Lorch, 47–52. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2002. How farmer managed irrigation systems build social capital to outperform agency managed systems that rely primarily on physical capital. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar, ed. P. Pradhn and U. Gautam, 18–19. Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Pachauri, R. K., M. R. Allen, V. R. Barros, J. Broome, W. Cramer, R. Christ, J. A. Church, L. Clarke, Q. Dahe, and P. Dasgupta. 2014. Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy, S. 2017. Grassroots innovation systems for the post-carbon world: Promoting economic democracy, environmental sustainability, and the public interest. Brooklyn Law Review 82:761.
   Google Scholar
• Paudel, B., R. C. Khanal, A. KC, K. Bhatta, and P. Chaudhary. 2017. Climate-smart agriculture in Nepal. Local Initiatives for Biodiversity, Research and Development (LI-BIRD), CGIAR’s Research Programme on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) and Ministry of Agricultural Development, Nepal.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan, P. 1989. Patterns of irrigation organization in Nepal: A comparative study of 21 farmer-managed irrigation systems. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Irrigation Mangement Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, C. M., I. Fazey, M. S. Reed, L. C. Stringer, G. M. Robinson, and A. C. Evely. 2010. Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 91 (8):1766–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reij, C., G. Tappan, and M. Smale. 2009. Agroenvironmental transformation in the Sahel: Another kind of “green revolution.” IFPRI Discussion Paper 00914, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1985. Weapons of the weak. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1989. Everyday forms of resistance. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 4:33. doi: 10.22439/cjas.v4i1.1765.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silwal, P., L. Roberts, H. G. Rennie, and M. J. Lexer. 2019. Adapting to climate change: An assessment of local adaptation planning processes in forest-based communities in Nepal. Climate and Development 11 (10):886–98. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2019.1586634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subedi, R., L. D. Bhatta, E. Udas, N. K. Agrawal, K. D. Joshi, and D. Panday. 2019. Climate-smart practices for improvement of crop yields in mid-hills of Nepal. Cogent Food & Agriculture 5 (1):1631026. doi: 10.1080/23311932.2019.1631026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernooy, R., and C. Bouroncle. 2019. Climate-smart agriculture: In need of a theory of scaling. CCAFS Working Paper no. 256. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). Wageningen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Vignola, R., B. Locatelli, C. Martinez, and P. Imbach. 2009. Ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change: What role for policy-makers, society and scientists? Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 14 (8):691–96. doi: 10.1007/s11027-009-9193-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, K., and R. P. Chhetri. 2011. Minding the money: Governance of climate change adaptation finance in Nepal. Oxfam Policy and Practice: Agriculture, Food and Land 11 (1):67–118.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, J., R. Badola, N. Chettri, R. P. Chaudhary, R. Zomer, B. Pokhrel, S. A. Hussain, S. Pradhan, and R. Pradhan. 2019. Sustaining biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Hindu Kush Himalaya. In The Hindu Kush Himalaya assessment, ed. P. Wester, A. Mishra, A. Mukherji, and A. B. Shrestha, 127–65. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar