A Mapping of the Twentieth-Century Urban Geography in North America Using Written Narratives and Network Analysis

Literature Cited

• Abler, R., J. S. Adams, and P. Gould. 1971. Spatial organization: The geographer's view of the world. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Anacker, K. B. 2007. Urban geography in America, 1950–2000: Paradigms and personalities. Journal of the American Planning Association 73 (2):254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabási, A.-L. 2009. Scale-free networks: A decade and beyond. Science 325 (5939):412–13. doi: 10.1126/science.1173299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. J. 2001a. “In the beginning was economic geography”—A science studies approach to disciplinary history. Progress in Human Geography 25 (4):521–44. doi: 10.1191/030913201682688922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. J. 2001b. Lives lived and lives told: Biographies of geography’s quantitative revolution. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19 (4):409–29. doi: 10.1068/d304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. J. 2005. The 1990s show: Culture leaves the farm and hits the streets. In Urban geography in America, 1950–2000: Paradigms and personalities, ed. B. J. L. Berry and J. O. Wheeler, 311–26. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. J. 2016. The odd couple: Richard Hartshorne and William Bunge. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien 60 (4):458–65. doi: 10.1111/cag.12321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. J. 2018. A marginal man and his central contributions: The creative spaces of William (“Wild Bill”) Bunge and American geography. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50 (8):1697–715. doi: 10.1177/0308518X17707524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D. 2009. Writing the world: Disciplinary history and beyond. International Affairs 85 (1):3–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2009.00777.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, L., and R. Morrill. 2018. William Wheeler Bunge: Radical geographer (1928–2013). Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (1):291–300. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1366153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, B. J. L. 2005. Geography’s quantitative revolution: Initial conditions, 1954–1960. A personal memoir. In Urban geography in America, 1950–2000: Paradigms and personalities, ed. B. J. L. Berry and J. O. Wheeler, 63–72. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, B. J. L., and J. O. Wheeler, eds. 2005. Urban geography in America, 1950–2000: Paradigms and personalities. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bodman, A. R. 1991. Weavers of influence: The structure of contemporary geographic research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 16 (1):21–37. doi: 10.2307/622904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacich, P. 2007. Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Social Networks 29 (4):555–64. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunn, S. D. 2018. Citation impacts of AAG presidential addresses. The Professional Geographer 70 (2):209–18. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2017.1347796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunge, W. 1961. The structure of contemporary American geographic research. The Professional Geographer 13 (3):19–23. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1961.133_19.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, C. A. 2019. Oral history interviews: Geography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Libraries. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/49967.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, K. R., J. Wolch, and J. Wolpert. 2009. Wolpert, J. 1970: Departures from the usual environment in locational analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 50, 220–29. Progress in Human Geography 33 (3):419–23. doi: 10.1177/0309132508095075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csardi, G., and T. Nepusz. 2006. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Systems 1695 (5):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• DeVivo, M. S. 2015. Leadership in American academic geography: The twentieth century. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dorling, D. 1996. Area cartograms: Their use and creation. Norwich, UK: School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, M. W. 2018. Geographers on film. Washington, DC: American Association of Geographers.
   Google Scholar
• Efrat, A., Y. Hu, S. G. Kobourov, and S. Pupyrev. 2014. MapSets: Visualizing embedded and clustered graphs. In Graph drawing GD14, lecture notes in computer science, ed. C. Duncan and A. Symvonis, 452–63. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunato, S. 2010. Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports 486 (3–5):75–174. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, R. S., V. Houlden, C. Robinson, D. Arribas-Bel, E. C. Delmelle, U. Demšar, H. J. Miller, and D. O’Sullivan. 2021. Who counts? Gender, gatekeeping, and quantitative human geography. The Professional Geographer 73 (1):48–61. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2020.1828944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fruchterman, T. M., and E. M. Reingold. 1991. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience 21 (11):1129–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gansner, E. R., Y. Hu, and S. Kobourov. 2010. GMap: Visualizing graphs and clusters as maps. Paper presented at IEEE Pacific Visualisation Symposium 2010, Taipei, Taiwan, March 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Gober, P. 2005. The comparative metropolitan analysis project. In Urban geography in America, 1950–2000: Paradigms and personalities, ed. B. J. L. Berry and J. O. Wheeler, 157–70. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, A. R., T. M. Vowles, and S. Tierney. 2009. Bridging the qualitative–quantitative divide in transport geography. The Professional Geographer 61 (3):323–35. doi: 10.1080/00330120902931960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, P. 1985. The geographer at work. London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, P., and F. R. Pitts. 2002. Geographical voices: Fourteen autobiographical essays. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6):1360–80. doi: 10.1086/225469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, T., and H. Barrett. 2018. Urban geography. 5th ed. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, S. 2005. The weight of tradition, the springboard of tradition: Let’s move beyond the 1990s. In Urban geography in America, 1950–2000: Paradigms and personalities, ed. B. J. L. Berry and J. O. Wheeler, 293–310. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C. D. 1979. Geography at Chicago in the 1930s and 1940s. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 69 (1):21–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1979.tb01224.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R., T. Nicholas, C. Souch, A. Singleton, S. Orford, C. Keylock, C. Jarvis, and C. Brunsdon. 2014. Geographers count: A report on quantitative methods in geography. Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences 6 (2):43–58. doi: 10.11120/elss.2014.00035.
   Google Scholar
• Haussmann, N. S., T. McIntyre, A. J. Bumby, and M. J. Loubser. 2013. Referencing practices in physical geography. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment 37 (4):543–49. doi: 10.1177/0309133313482135.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, J. C. 1979. A diamond anniversary. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 69 (1):1–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1979.tb01220.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. 2007. A labor of love: The mathematics genealogy project. Notices of the AMS 54 (8):1002–3.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J. 2000. On disciplinary history and textbooks: Or where has spatial analysis gone? Australian Geographical Studies 38 (2):125–37. doi: 10.1111/1467-8470.00107.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J. 2006. Urban geography in America, 1950–2000: Paradigms and personalities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96 (2):444–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00490.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J., R. J. Harris, K. Jones, D. J. Manley, W. W. Wang, and L. Wolf. 2019. Quantitative methods I: The world we have lost—or where we started from. Progress in Human Geography 43 (6):1133–42. doi: 10.1177/0309132518774967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J., and K. Jones. 2020. A classic that wasn’t: Statistical geography and paths only later taken. Progress in Human Geography 44 (2):357–73. doi: 10.1177/0309132519826684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J., and J. D. Sidaway. 2016. Geography and geographers: Anglo-American human geography since 1945. 7th ed. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. H., and J. E. Mapes. 2016. Where are the women? Accounting for discrepancies in female doctorates in U.S. geography. The Professional Geographer 68 (3):427–35. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2015.1102030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, J., and L. Lees. 2004. Guest editorial—Changing urban geographies: Perspectives on Anglo-American urban research. Urban Geography 25 (8):693–96. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.25.8.693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, L. J. 2008. North American explorations: Ten memoirs of geographers from down under. Victoria, BC: Trafford.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P., and T. Schwanen. 2009. Quantitative revolution 2: The critical (re)turn. The Professional Geographer 61 (3):283–91. doi: 10.1080/00330120902931903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, L. 2002. Rematerializing geography: The “new” urban geography. Progress in Human Geography 26 (1):101–12. doi: 10.1191/0309132502ph358pr.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leskovec, J., K. J. Lang, and M. Mahoney. 2010. Empirical comparison of algorithms for network community detection. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, 631–40. Raleigh, NC: Association for Computing Machinery. doi: 10.1145/1772690.1772755.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, D. N. 1993. The geographical tradition: Episodes in the history of a contested enterprise. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G. J. 2013. Maynard Weston Dow (1929–2011) and “Geographers on Film.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (1):1–4. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2012.732480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, G. J. 2015. American geography and geographers: Toward geographical science. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, H. M. 1979. Urban geography and Chicago in retrospect. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 69 (1):114–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1979.tb01237.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarty, H. H. 1979. Geography at Iowa. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 69 (1):121–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1979.tb01239.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michigan State University. 2020. Department of Geography records 1957–1988. Michigan State University Archives and Historical Collections, East Lansing. https://archive.lib.msu.edu/uahc/FindingAids/ua16-52.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mikesell, M. W. 2016. Leadership in American academic geography: The twentieth century. The AAG Review of Books 4 (4):193–95. doi: 10.1080/2325548X.2016.1222817.
   Google Scholar
• Mott, C., and D. Cockayne. 2017. Citation matters: Mobilizing the politics of citation toward a practice of “conscientious engagement.” Gender, Place & Culture 24 (7):954–73. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2017.1339022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. C., R. F. Brummel, N. Jordan, and S. Manson. 2014. Social networks in complex human and natural systems: The case of rotational grazing, weak ties, and Eastern U.S. dairy landscapes. Agriculture and Human Values 31 (2):245–59. doi: 10.1007/s10460-013-9462-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. A. 2012. Trends in spatial statistics. The Professional Geographer 64 (1):83–94. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2011.578540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. 2006. Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. Physical Review E 74 (3):036104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.036104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opsahl, T., F. Agneessens, and J. Skvoretz. 2010. Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks 32 (3):245–51. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswin, N. 2020. An other geography. Dialogues in Human Geography 10 (1):9–18. doi: 10.1177/2043820619890433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacione, M. 2009. Urban geography: A global perspective. 3rd ed. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Palm, R. 2005. A personal history. In Urban geography in America, 1950–2000: Paradigms and personalities, ed. B. J. L. Berry and J. O. Wheeler, 139–44. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pickles, J. 1997. Tool or science? GIS, technoscience, and the theoretical turn. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87 (2):363–72. doi: 10.1111/0004-5608.00058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitsma, F. 2013. Revisiting the “is GIScience a science?” debate (or quite possibly scientific gerrymandering). International Journal of Geographical Information Science 27 (2):211–21. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2012.674529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Geographical Society. 2020. Collections at RGS. Accessed February 21, 2020. https://www.rgs.org/about/our-collections/.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, S. E. 2007. Graph clustering. Computer Science Review 1 (1):27–64. doi: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2007.05.001.
   Google Scholar
• Schurr, C., M. Müller, and N. Imhof. 2020. Who makes geographical knowledge? The gender of geography’s gatekeepers. The Professional Geographer 72 (3):317–31. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2020.1744169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartzberg, J. E. 2020. Joe Schwartzberg (a personal account in lieu of a memoir). Accessed February 18, 2020. http://www.aag.org/cs/membership/tributes_memorials/sz/schwartzberg_joseph_e_.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 1988. Social network analysis. Sociology 22 (1):109–27. doi: 10.1177/0038038588022001007.
   Google Scholar
• Skupin, A., and S. I. Fabrikant. 2003. Spatialization methods: A cartographic research agenda for non-geographic information visualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 30 (2):99–119. doi: 10.1559/152304003100011081.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 1987. “Academic war over the field of geography”: The elimination of geography at Harvard, 1947–1951. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77 (2):155–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00151.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South Dakota State University. 2020. Department of Geography records 1976–2006. South Dakota State University Archives and Special Collections, Hilton M. Briggs Library, Brookings. https://www.sdstate.edu/sdsu-archives-and-special-collections/geography-records.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, S. 2013a. A fast free-form rubber-sheet algorithm for contiguous area cartograms. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 27 (3):567–93. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2012.709247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, S. 2013b. An optimized rubber-sheet algorithm for continuous area cartograms. The Professional Geographer 65 (1):16–30. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2011.639613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 1993. An urban impasse? Theory, Culture & Society 10 (2):229–38. doi: 10.1177/026327693010002012.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B. L. 2002. Contested identities: Human–environment geography and disciplinary implications in a restructuring academy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92 (1):52–74. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B. L., and W. B. Meyer II. 1985. The use of citation indices in comparing geography programs: An exploratory study. The Professional Geographer 37 (3):271–78. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1985.00271.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Chicago. 2020. Department of Geography records 1902–1975. Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library, Chicago, IL. https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/scrc/findingaids/view.php?eadid=ICU.SPCL.GEOGRAPHY#idp148181640.
   Google Scholar
• University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee. 2020. Archives of the American Geographical Society 2011. Accessed February 21, 2020. https://uwm.edu/lib-collections/agsny/.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, K., T. J. Cooke, R. Shearmur, E. Wyly, S. Hanson, R. Lake, and J. S. Adams. 2020. 40 Years of the journal Urban Geography. Urban Geography 41 (3):355–67. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2020.1723368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, J. O. 2001. Assessing the role of spatial analysis in urban geography in the 1960s. Urban Geography 22 (6):549–58. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.22.6.549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withers, C. W. J. 2002. Constructing “the geographical archive.” Area 34 (3):303–11. doi: 10.1111/1475-4762.00084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withers, C. W. J., and R. J. Mayhew. 2002. Rethinking “disciplinary” history: Geography in British universities, c. 1580–1887. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 27 (1):11–29. doi: 10.1111/1475-5661.00039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. J., M. F. Goodchild, and J. D. Proctor. 1997. Demystifying the persistent ambiguity of GIS as “tool” versus “science.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87 (2):346–62. doi: 10.1111/0004-5608.872057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar