148
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Focus: Feminist Research Methods and Intersectionality

Care Praxis in Los Angeles’s Antigentrification Movement: On-the-Ground Womxn of Color Geographies

&
Pages 682-690 | Received 15 Sep 2021, Accepted 10 Apr 2023, Published online: 05 Jul 2023

Literature Cited

  • Anguelovski, I., H. V. Cole, E. O’Neill, F. Baró, P. Kotsila, F. Sekulova, C. Pérez del Pulgar, G. Shokry, M. García-Lamarca, L. Argüelles, et al. 2021. Gentrification pathways and their health impacts on historically marginalized residents in Europe and North America: Global qualitative evidence from 14 cities. Health & Place 72:102698. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102698.
  • Anguelovski, I., J. J. Connolly, M. Garcia-Lamarca, H. Cole, and H. Pearsall. 2019. New scholarly pathways on green gentrification: What does the urban “green turn” mean and where is it going? Progress in Human Geography 43 (6):1064–86. doi: 10.1177/0309132518803799.
  • Atkinson, S., V. Lawson, and J. Wiles. 2011. Care of the body: Spaces of practice. Social & Cultural Geography 12 (6):563–72. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2011.601238.
  • Blackwell, M. 2011. ¡Chicana power! Contested histories of feminism in the Chicano movement. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Cahill, C. 2007. Negotiating grit and glamour: Young women of color and the gentrification of the Lower Eastside. City & Society 19 (2):202–31. doi: 10.1525/city.2007.19.2.202.
  • Cahill, C., D. Cerecer, and M. Bradley. 2010. “Dreaming of …”: Reflections on participatory action research as a feminist praxis of critical hope. Affilia 25 (4):406–16. doi: 10.1177/0886109910384576.
  • Cahuas, M. 2019. Burned, broke, and brilliant: Latinx community workers’ experiences across the greater Toronto area’s non-profit sector. Antipode 51 (1):66–86. doi: 10.1111/anti.12411.
  • Cahuas, M., and C. Levkoe. 2017. Towards a critical service learning in geography education: Exploring challenges and possibilities through testimonio. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 41 (2):246–63. doi: 10.1080/03098265.2017.1293626.
  • Chennault, C. 2021. The path to radical vulnerability: Feminist praxis and community food collaborations. In Feminist geography unbound: Discomfort, bodies, and prefigured futures, ed. B. Gokariksel, M. Hawkins, C. Neubert, and S. Smith, 48–68. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.
  • Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum 1:139–67.
  • Collins, P. H., and S. Bilge. 2016. Intersectionality. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Davis, A. 1981. Women, race, and class. New York: Vintage.
  • Eaves, L. 2019. The imperative of struggle: Feminist and gender geographies in the United States. Gender, Place, and Culture 26 (7–9):1314–21. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2018.1552564.
  • Geobrujas-Comunidad de Geografas and L. Mason-Deese. 2021. Bodies, borders, and resistance: Women conjuring geography through experiences from the other side of the wall. Journal of Latin American Geography 20 (2):168–78.
  • Gilmore, R. 2007. The golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Goeman, M. 2013. Mark my words: Native women mapping our nations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Gokariksel, B., M. Hawkins, C. Neubert, and S. Smith, eds. 2021. Feminist geography unbound: Discomfort, bodies, and prefigured futures. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.
  • Goodling, E. 2021. Urban political ecology from below: Producing a “people’s history” of the Portland harbor. Antipode 53 (3):745–69. doi: 10.1111/anti.12493.
  • Gregory, D., R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. Watts, and S. Whatmore, eds. 1981. The dictionary of human geography. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Harvey, D. 2013. Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London: Verso.
  • Hernandez, I. 2021. The University of Southern California can also be held accountable for gentrification in the South LA community. Accessed July 8, 2022. https://medium.com/writ-150-at-usc-fall-2020/the-university-of-southern-california-can-also-be-held-accountable-for-gentrification-in-the-south-9c577a12eecf.
  • Herrera, J. 2013. Spatializing Chicano power: Cartographic memory and community practices of care. Social Justice 42 (3–4):46–66.
  • Huber, L. 2009. Disrupting apartheid of knowledge: Testimonio as methodology in Latina/o critical race research in education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 22 (6):639–54. doi: 10.1080/09518390903333863.
  • INCITE! 2006. Color of violence: The INCITE! anthology. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
  • Iyanda, A., and Y. Lu. 2021. Perceived impact of gentrification on health and well-being: Exploring social capital and coping strategies in gentrifying neighborhoods. The Professional Geographer 73 (4):713–24. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2021.1924806.
  • Johnson, G. T. 2013. Spaces of conflict, sounds of solidarity: Music, race, and spatial entitlement in Los Angeles. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Kern, L. 2020. Feminist city: Claiming space in a man-made world. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
  • Kim, M. 2012. Moving beyond critique: Creative interventions and reconstructions of community accountability. Social Justice 37 (4):14–35.
  • Lees, L. 2012. The geography of gentrification: Thinking through comparative urbanism. Progress in Human Geography 36 (2):155–71. doi: 10.1177/0309132511412998.
  • Lees, L., T. Slater, and E. Wyly. 2008. Gentrification. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Massey, D. 1994. Space, place, and gender. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Mirabal, N. 2009. Geographies of displacement: Latina/os, oral history, and the politics of gentrification in San Francisco’s Mission District. The Public Historian 3 (2):7–31.
  • Mollett, S., and C. Faria. 2018. The spatialities of intersectional thinking: Fashioning feminist geographic futures. Gender, Place, and Culture 25 (4):565–77. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2018.1454404.
  • Moraga, C., and G. Anzaldua. 1981. This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. Watertown, MA: Persephone Press.
  • Mullings, B. 1999. Insider or outsider, both or neither: Some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum 30 (4):337–50. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00025-1.
  • Muñoz, L., and M. Ybarra. 2019. Latinx geographies. Accessed April 20, 2022. https://www.societyandspace.org/forums/latinx-geographies.
  • Nagar, R. 2019. Hungry translations: The world through radical vulnerability. Antipode 51 (1):3–24. doi: 10.1111/anti.12399.
  • Pardo, M. 1998. Mexican American women activists: Identity and resistance in two Los Angeles communities. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Pulido, L. 2006. Patriarchy and revolution: Gender relations in the third world left. In Black, brown, yellow, and left: Radical activism in Los Angeles, 180–214. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Pulido, L. 2008. FAQs: Frequently asked questions on being a scholar/activist. In Engaging contradictions: Theory, politics, and methods of activist scholarship, ed. C. Hale, 341–66. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Pulido, L. 2015. Landscapes of racial violence in LATitudes: An Angeleno’s atlas, 63–72. Berkeley, CA: Heyday.
  • Raghuram, P. 2019. Race and feminist care ethics: Intersectionality as a method. Gender, Place, and Culture 26 (5):613–37. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2019.1567471.
  • Saracino-Brown, J. 2016. An agenda for the next decade of gentrification scholarship. City & Community 15 (3):220–25.
  • Schwiter, K., and J. Steiner. 2020. Geographies of care work: The commodification of care, digital care futures, and alternative caring visions, 1–16. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Silvey, R. 2005. Borders, embodiment, and mobility: Feminist migration studies in geography. In A companion to feminist geography, ed. L. Nelson and J. Seager, 138–49. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Smith, N. 1996. The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Tran, L. D., T. H. Rice, P. M. Ong, S. Banerjee, J. Liou, and N. A. Ponce. 2020. Impact of gentrification on adult mental health. Health Services Research 55 (3):432–44. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13264.
  • Tuan, Y. 1976. Humanistic geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 66 (2):266–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1976.tb01089.x.
  • USC Neighborhood Data for Social Change. n.d. Accessed May 20, 2019. https://la.myneighborhooddata.org/.
  • Whitson, R. 2017. Painting pictures of ourselves: Researcher subjectivity in the practice of feminist reflexivity. The Professional Geographer 69 (2):299–306. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2016.1208510.
  • Ybarra, M. 2019. On becoming a Latinx geographies killjoy. Society and Space. https://www.societyandspace.org/articles/on-becoming-a-latinx-geographies-killjoy.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.